Walpurgisnacht
It was in the Year of Maximum Danger
- Location
- Banned from the forum
- Pronouns
- He/Him
TBF, he is later mentioned by name as their leader.
This is why I shouldn't read TL updates at 1 in the morning.
TBF, he is later mentioned by name as their leader.
- Alliance - Carson, maybe? Or something to do with third parties?
SC-07
Lib 89,417 30%
Nat 84,053 28.2%
Con 49,836 16.7%
Cst 39,157 13.1%
Prog 27,227 9.1%
All 8,547 2.9%
Fus 0 0%
Total 298,237
MCs elected:
Lib
Nat
Con
FL-06
Nat 115,849 30.5%
Lib 92,163 24.3%
Con 66,580 17.5%
Prog 59,290 15.6%
Cst 33,512 8.8%
All 12,410 3.3%
Fus 0 0%
Total 379,804
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Con
NC-07
Nat 98,334 27.5%
Lib 85,508 23.9%
Cst 63,700 17.8%
Prog 57,301 16%
Con 44,116 12.3%
All 8,949 2.5%
Fus 0 0%
Total 357,908
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Cst
MA-07
Lib 142,830 47.3%
Prog 111,207 36.8%
Fus 19,689 6.5%
Nat 16,329 5.4%
All 11,884 3.9%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 301,939
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Lib
NY-16
Lib 148,841 52.6%
Prog 63,803 22.5%
Nat 36,432 12.9%
Fus 27,158 9.6%
All 6,880 2.4%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 283,114
MCs elected:
Lib
Lib
Prog
CT-04
Lib 123,190 37.5%
Prog 72,304 22%
Nat 63,306 19.3%
Fus 56,670 17.3%
All 12,728 3.9%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 328,198
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Nat
NY-06
Lib 77,907 37.6%
Prog 57,063 27.5%
Nat 44,480 21.5%
Fus 22,007 10.6%
All 5,828 2.8%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 207,285
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Nat
NY-10
Lib 135,640 51.8%
Prog 69,474 26.5%
Fus 27,507 10.5%
Nat 21,672 8.3%
All 7,652 2.9%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 261,945
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Lib
MA-01
Prog 100,945 29.7%
Lib 93,091 27.4%
Nat 64,409 19%
Fus 59,544 17.5%
All 21,337 6.3%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 339,326
MCs elected:
Prog
Lib
Nat
CT-01
Lib 106,860 32.5%
Prog 88,445 26.9%
Nat 68,818 20.9%
Fus 50,577 15.4%
All 14,074 4.3%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 328,774
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Nat
NC-08
Nat 83,643 25.3%
Lib 82,523 24.9%
Cst 66,728 20.1%
Prog 53,709 16.2%
Con 35,502 10.7%
All 9,128 2.8%
Fus 0 0%
Total 331,234
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Cst
Well, the results so far have mostly been from liberal areas, and the House has a non-trivial conservative bias…Judging by the results so far, it’ll all likely end up with a liberal-progressive coalition. Unless, Thande pulls a surprise, and has the West vote Libertarian, and a strong Californian Independence Party.
Yes, but this electoral system partially nullifies it, and even OTL partial change is enough to change the entire outcome. It doesn’t help the right that they’re more divided.Well, the results so far have mostly been from liberal areas, and the House has a non-trivial conservative bias…
To an extent, but if we (for the sake of argument) flatten the parties into their OTL coalitions, there are only four ways things can really go:Yes, but this electoral system partially nullifies it, and even OTL partial change is enough to change the entire outcome. It doesn’t help the right that they’re more divided.
No, go ahead. I should say I forgot something above - the last two statewide seats are winner-take all rather than following the same formula as I implied (er, I mean the BBC researchers made a mistake thus providing a bonus to who comes top across the state.[/LIST]
(@Thande, you don't mind this speculation, do you? I don't want to step on your toes or preempt you or anything, I just think this is a really interesting setup.)
No, go ahead. I should say I forgot something above - the last two statewide seats are winner-take all rather than following the same formula as I implied (er, I mean the BBC researchers made a mistake thus providing a bonus to who comes top across the state.
FL-16
Nat 107,662 27.1%
Lib 107,284 27%
Con 71,166 17.9%
Prog 63,158 15.9%
Cst 34,443 8.7%
All 13,094 3.3%
Fus 0 0%
Total 396,807
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Con
MD-03
Lib 130,126 37.9%
Prog 85,416 24.9%
Nat 55,759 16.2%
Fus 55,012 16%
All 17,096 5%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 343,410
MCs elected:
Lib
Prog
Lib
PA-17
Nat 116,705 38.1%
Lib 72,129 23.5%
Prog 60,571 19.8%
Fus 47,029 15.3%
All 10,210 3.3%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 306,644
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Prog
NJ-05
Nat 144,742 39.7%
Lib 97,422 26.7%
Prog 76,541 21%
Fus 33,316 9.1%
All 12,524 3.4%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 364,545
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Prog
PA-07
Lib 109,497 28.3%
Nat 94,067 24.3%
Fus 87,388 22.6%
Prog 81,102 21%
All 14,285 3.7%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 386,339
MCs elected:
Lib
Nat
Fus
NY-18
Nat 101,361 32.6%
Lib 77,840 25.1%
Prog 68,347 22%
Fus 50,782 16.4%
All 12,144 3.9%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 310,474
MCs elected:
Nat
Lib
Prog
MA-09
Prog 105,180 26.9%
Lib 100,401 25.7%
Nat 93,144 23.8%
Fus 70,499 18%
All 22,065 5.6%
Cst 0 0%
Con 0 0%
Total 391,289
MCs elected:
Prog
Lib
Nat
I was delighted to discover she did actually do a speech at the 2016 Democratic convention so I could use her, because I always like bringing up @Lord Roem 's description of her (from her 2014 senate run) as 'a woman with a gun who has never heard of President Obama' - after an interview she did where she basically refused to even mention his name in response to the interviewer bringing him up.Alison Lundergan Grimes being here feels oddly random. Never really heard of her before.
Never actually seen it so I've never been sure of how true that was.Great stuff,though I’m surprised you didn’t make another The Wire reference and say that O’Malley is guilty of Tommy Carcetti’s crimes,given that David Simon created the character just as a big fuck you to O’Malley and his policies.
"I'm a Liberal because I believe in identity," said a man whose banner read - 'Martin O'Malley? Fmr. Maryland Governor? Maybe?' "America should be a place where everyone can be themselves without prejudice. Specifically, I'm interested in finding out my own identity, as I forgot who I was and no-one will tell me--"