• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

AMERICA DIVIDES: The Multi-Party US Election of 2016

I wonder if we'll have any districts where all three seats go to the same party. The closest one we've had so far is NY-05, which was only a few points off if I'm doing the math right - I think it would almost have to be somewhere like that with both an extremely high Liberal voteshare and a relatively low Progressive voteshare, so probably some very Black or Hispanic urban district, since I feel like pretty much any right-wing district is going to have strong numbers for at least two of the three parties. But who knows!

My best guess is an African American-majority district in the Deep South? I think it was said that a lot of districts are still effectively gerrymandered, right?
 
My best guess is an African American-majority district in the Deep South? I think it was said that a lot of districts are still effectively gerrymandered, right?
Yeah, I think that's right. I thought the rural districts like AL-07 were closer to 60-40, but I looked it up and Clinton won the district 70-29 that year - even if you shave off 10% of that vote for the Progressives I'm guessing that none of the right-wing parties are winning two-thirds of the right-wing vote. And places like GA-05 are even less competitive, though potentially with a stronger Prog vote.
 
Yeah, I think that's right. I thought the rural districts like AL-07 were closer to 60-40, but I looked it up and Clinton won the district 70-29 that year - even if you shave off 10% of that vote for the Progressives I'm guessing that none of the right-wing parties are winning two-thirds of the right-wing vote. And places like GA-05 are even less competitive, though potentially with a stronger Prog vote.

I think there's quite a few areas where it could happen yeah. The progressive vote in those seats will be very interesting. My hunch is that it might be particularly high in some of the more urban seats as you said, but the vibe of this election seems to be that the liberals do really, really, really well in - to paraphrase our commentators - BAME-majority seats. There's something to be said about that, I do recall the Sanders campaign having a blind spot with Black voters generally but with Southern Black voters specifically, and that might be something that's translating to progressive performance ITTL.
 
I think there's quite a few areas where it could happen yeah. The progressive vote in those seats will be very interesting. My hunch is that it might be particularly high in some of the more urban seats as you said, but the vibe of this election seems to be that the liberals do really, really, really well in - to paraphrase our commentators - BAME-majority seats. There's something to be said about that, I do recall the Sanders campaign having a blind spot with Black voters generally but with Southern Black voters specifically, and that might be something that's translating to progressive performance ITTL.

The results for the progs aren't that bad in the south, it seems like? They're getting cut off from a lot of seats but as relatively close 4th. They're not going to contest the liberal dominance of southern black voters but I think they should always have a niche there. In seats with very low right wing vote it's going to be really hard for them not to get a seat, I think.
 
I think there's quite a few areas where it could happen yeah. The progressive vote in those seats will be very interesting. My hunch is that it might be particularly high in some of the more urban seats as you said, but the vibe of this election seems to be that the liberals do really, really, really well in - to paraphrase our commentators - BAME-majority seats. There's something to be said about that, I do recall the Sanders campaign having a blind spot with Black voters generally but with Southern Black voters specifically, and that might be something that's translating to progressive performance ITTL.

That's my understanding of Dem demographics too - FPTP means this only achieves so many seats but now they're running the election under D'Thande Method
 
Something this format doesn't let us explore (because it would be entirely speculative rather than data driven) is how people would vote once freed from the fear of FPTP.

It's also interesting that the democrats split between left fringe and an establishment weighted to the right rather than left outsider/establishment/blue dogs considering how much we can observe the last ones voting at odds with the establishment trying to get a minimum program going. I guess it was less of a visible thing in the immediate post Obama era. If you ran that on the 2020 primary data it might emerge as a split (though Bloomberg isn't really that good a substitute for the likes of Manchin and Sinema, he's a different kind of right edge of the party I feel, and the fact the primary was kinda truncated would skew data).
 
Something this format doesn't let us explore (because it would be entirely speculative rather than data driven) is how people would vote once freed from the fear of FPTP.

And that would be a massive change after this election: ideologies that Can't Win Here have won, which makes them worth voting for it if you believe it and not worth it as a 'protest vote' because they might actually win.
 
8
"But before we get to Katty's next party rundown, let's turn to some of the questions we've been getting from the viewers at home. Emily Maitlis is now standing beside a giant iPad - other touchscreen tablets are available - aren't you, Emily?"

A slightly ruffled-looking Maitlis nodded. "That's right, Andrew. As always, the viewers at home are seeking to contact us by calling in, sending SMS text messages via the Cellnet, and in one case a carrier pigeon from the Outer Hebrides containing a Ceefax letters page engraved on a single grain of rice. However, we have, of course, ignored all of these, because we all know that the only people we care about are those who post on Twitter. To that end, I have almost four questions here from the viewers at home. First of all, from user TungstenTexan, who writes: 'Every district so far has been split between more than one party - is it possible under hashtag you-ess election sixteen hashtag voting system for all three seats to go to one party?'"

"Well, is it? Jeremy?"

"It is certainly possible, Andrew, but it would require very high support for one party, and the support for the others to be split very granular...ly...is that a word? It is now! Uh, fragmented..."

"Could you explain more?"

"You'd have to go to one of our experts, even though, according to the Leader of the Conservative Party - our Conservative Party, I mean - we have apparently had enough of them. But in the meantime, we have our first result from the state of West Virginia."

Rich (BB code):
	WV-02		
	Nat          	132,448   	52.9%
	Prog          	40,507    	16.2%
	Lib          	32,980    	13.2%
	Fus          	32,226    	12.9%
	All          	12,106    	4.8%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	250,267
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Nat
			Nat

"Well. Speak of the devil - other personifications of evil are available."

"...er, are they?"

"This is the BBC. As I was saying, the question from our metallic tweeter from the Lone Star State has been dramatically answered. Our first result from West Virginia, not merely the western part of Virginia, you understand, but a separate state..."

"Yes, well, from one metal to another, it's time to go over to one of our local native guides for the night, er, is that cute or offensive, anyway, it's Mr Nate Silver, who is speaking to us from his cryogenic capsule beneath Cheyenne Mountain. Mr Silver, can you explain this result?"

"Well, Andrew, the Cubs in the ninth inning scored a touchdown over the Packers, and because Lebron James was still in the sin-bin for smashing Michael Vick's face into the ice, there was a strike at home plate - Christian Pulisic's star play was foiled when he was knocked down by all ten pins--"

"No, I'm sorry, there may be some confusion, I was talking about the election."

"Oh - my apologies, I always get Michael Vick and Mitt Romney mixed up. Well, yes, West Virginia. This is a state that has been in economic decline for some time. Its industry is associated with coal mining, and the unions were powerful here, which tended to help the Democrats. But in recent years, both culture-war issues and views about climate change - which is itself a culture-war issue in some ways - have strongly trended the state towards Republicans. Mr Trump's declarations about talking about rebuilding American industry probably helped him here, whereas the Conservatives' laissez-faire approach, 'vulture capitalism' as it has been dubbed, has not seen much enthusiasm from these blue-coollar workers."

"That's fascinating - imagine if our disaffected coal mining areas started voting for the Tories, can you imagine. But can you explain why the voting system has given all three seats to Mr Trump's Nationals?"

"Well, as you guys from the BBC know, nobody in the world actually understands proportional representation voting systems, but I'll give it my best shot. See, think of it this way. The Nats get the first seat because they have the most votes. The formula then divides their starting number in two, but that's still higher than the second-placed party, the Progs, so the Nats get the second seat. Then it divides it in three, but that's still higher - so the last seat goes to them, too."

"All those numbers, amazing. So, as Jeremy said, it's not just that the, er, Nationals have a lot of support here, but that the opposition is divided?"

"Exactly. We've heard a lot on the campaign trail from President Obama about how this voting system gets away from tactical voting and settling for the lesser of two evils. But we can see here that it's still possible to have 'wasted' votes."

"A consequence of the use of only three-member districts, no doubt..."

Rich (BB code):
	RI-02		
	Prog          	71,964    	30.2%
	Nat          	69,717    	29.2%
	Lib          	49,879    	20.9%
	Fus          	35,316    	14.8%
	All          	11,713    	4.9%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	238,589
			
	MCs elected:		
			Prog
			Nat
			Lib

"We have been interrupted there with a result from Rhode Island, the second and final district..."

"Yes, and a more typical one, with the vote largely split between three parties. If you follow the same method I just outlined, the Progs get seat one, then we divide their votes in two - now the Nats have the most, then we divide theirs in two - and the Libs on 21% or so have more than the 15% or so that the reduced Progs and Nats have."

"I see," Neil said, his face disagreeing with his words.

"And with both results from Rhode Island in, the additional statewide seats are also declared," Vine added.

Rich (BB code):
	Rhode Island at-large		
	Prog          	141,261   	31.1%
	Nat          	116,029   	25.5%
	Lib          	111,264   	24.5%
	Fus          	64,514    	14.2%
	All          	21,637    	4.8%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	454,705
			
	MCs elected:		
			Prog
			Prog

"And as these are simple first-past-the-post, both go to the Progressives, who continue to perform well in Mr Sanders' home region - which we will come to in a minute, Katty."

"What were you saying about three-member districts before, Jeremy?"

"Well, if I understand the maths, it would be much harder for all four seats to go to one party if there were four. And it'd be less likely for a party on, ah, thirty percent to get the same one seat as a party on twenty percent, like we just saw with that second Rhode Island district."

"Ah, right. Nate?"

"Yes, Jeremy is right," Silver agreed, his surprised expression momentarily obscured by the large bubble floating past, one of many slowly moving upwards through his cryogenic pod. "More seats would lead to a more proportional result."

"So why has Mr Obama and his Article V convention gone for three-member districts?" Neil asked.

Silver ran a cyborg hand through his hair. "Well, the current model is based on just awarding three seats to each of the existing districts," he explained. "In theory, when the new Congress meets, this could be changed so that districts are merged and redrawn. For example, the two Rhode Island districts we've heard about could be merged into one six-member district. But..."

Rich (BB code):
	FL-04		
	Nat          	125,740   	29.8%
	Con          	87,541    	20.8%
	Lib          	85,974    	20.4%
	Prog          	57,701    	13.7%
	Cst          	48,545    	11.5%
	All          	16,116    	3.8%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	421,618
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Con
			Lib

"Sorry to interrupt you there, Nate, that's another district in Florida, from the north-east of the state. Very close result between the Conservatives - again, perhaps Mr Rubio's personal vote? - and the Liberals, but once again the Nationals are out in front."

Rich (BB code):
	NC-02		
	Lib          	100,063   	25.2%
	Cst          	88,809    	22.4%
	Nat          	73,796    	18.6%
	Prog          	73,068    	18.4%
	Con          	48,845    	12.3%
	All          	12,586    	3.2%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	397,167
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Cst
			Nat

"And also another from North Carolina. Another closely divided one, and the Progressives nearly nabbed the third seat. Er, I think this takes in the Raleigh suburbs."

"Rawley," a somewhat irritated Nate Silver corrected him.

"You Americans and your pronunciations..."

"This one is more period accurate than yours! Just ask Sir Walter Raleigh - I mean Rawley!"

"Fine, send a memo to, checks notes, Peter Capaldi and we'll ask him to go and check."

Rich (BB code):
	VA-04		
	Lib          	156,652   	43.2%
	Nat          	56,911    	15.7%
	Prog          	56,025    	15.5%
	Con          	53,490    	14.8%
	Cst          	24,274    	6.7%
	All          	15,179    	4.2%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	362,532
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Lib
			Nat

"And one more from Virginia."

"My apologies, Nate, please continue with what you were saying about multi-member districts."

Slightly mollified, Silver nodded, revealing the glinting circuitboard texture of his neck. "Of course. First, I should say that's an impressive result for the Libs in vee aye oh four, takes in half of Richmond and Petersburg but still--"

"Oh come on, I know your districts are gerrymandered, but you can't possibly have one that stretches all the way from Yorkshire to Russia."

"Be quiet, Jeremy. Nate, about the multi-member districts..."

"Thank you...as I was saying, it would be possible to create districts with more members, or even turn an entire state into a district...but the problem is the smaller states, such as Vermont which we've already seen. Their population only entitles them to a single district, and thus it would be impossible to give them more than three representatives, unless Congress was increased even further in size."

"Can't you just combine states together into one district?"

"Oh come on," said Silver, impatiently blinking one eye and cutting off the red laser beam in the shape of a skull and crossbones emerging from it, "you've got to be realistic."

"Nate Silver, thank you."

Rich (BB code):
	NC-03		
	Nat          	94,063    	28.6%
	Lib          	73,438    	22.4%
	Cst          	66,023    	20.1%
	Prog          	47,657    	14.5%
	Con          	38,778    	11.8%
	All          	8,493     	2.6%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	328,451
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Lib
			Cst

"Another result from North Carolina. This one takes in the coastline of the state. Again, closely divided between several parties there. And that should be enough to update the map..."

Carolinas 15results.png
 
9
Rich (BB code):
	FL-13		
	Lib          	106,909   	29.6%
	Nat          	83,854    	23.2%
	Prog          	71,983    	20%
	Con          	53,198    	14.7%
	Cst          	30,296    	8.4%
	All          	14,520    	4%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	360,760
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Nat
			Prog

"That's another result from Florida. The thirteenth district, on the west coast. Interesting one, this. The old Democrats came very close to taking it in a by-election, what they call a special election here, two years ago. Then they decided not to bother contesting it at all in the general election. That's an interesting split of the vote, possibly caused by former governor Charlie Crist deciding to stand as a candidate for all parties simultaneously."

"Well, regardless of the cause, the Progressives have the third seat, ahead of the Conservatives - despite the alleged home state appeal of co-leader Marco Rubio which we have heard of. Is this a surprise, Katty, tenuous link?"

"Well, Andrew, yes it is. We've already seen in the last few weeks, and then again tonight, repeated, you might say, recalibration of the expectations management for the Progressives by their opponents. When the party was launched, senior Liberals openly claimed that they would be lucky to win one seat in Bernie Sanders' home state of Vermont. As we've seen tonight, the results have been drastically different. Not only have the Progressives done exceptionally well in the wider region of New England, but they have been electing MCs even in the more small-c conservative states such as, here, Florida."

"Perhaps you can tell us a little more about them..."

"I thought you'd never ask."

The screen next to Kay changed again, this time showing various green-tinted greyscale images of Bernie Sanders at different ages, standing behind lecterns, cutting ribbons, waving his fist, etc. There were also newspaper cuttings; prominent among them was a Guardian headline reading "Who Is Barney Saunders?" The word 'Progressive' and a green pine tree symbol in a circle overlaid the collage.

"We've already heard tonight about how the right-wing National Party has cut radically into the old Republican vote, which many expected to transfer wholesale to the Conservatives. Well, there is a parallel to how the left-wing Progressives have done the same to the Democrats, though the situations are somewhat different. Another parallel between the Nationals and Progressives, however, is that both have been accused of being one-man vehicles."

The screen shifted to show one of the more recent green-tinted photos of Sanders, now artificially facing off with an orange-tinted Donald Trump (at least, the photoshop backroom boys had probably had to apply a tint) across a dark void as though they were in an Alas Smith and Jones talking head sketch.

"But Mr Sanders has been swift to deny these accusations, as we can see here at a campaign rally..."

Sanders, elderly but vigorous, proclaimed his message to an excited crowd. "This is not about me! This is about us! And..." his accent momentarily strengthened, "it's about the unmatched taste of REAL! BROOKLYN! PIZZA! When the evils of capitalism attack, my Bernie Bros won't cut 'em no slack--" An aide diplomatically walked up behind him and gently slapped him back to normal. "And a new deal for the American worker..."

"As we just heard there, Mr Sanders was born in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, but he has built his political career in the small New England state of Vermont. Rising from mayor of the town of Burlington to Congressman and then Senator for that state, Mr Sanders historically refused to join the Democratic Party outright. He is one of very few successful US politicians of modern times to openly describe himself as a socialist. For decades that has been a dirty word in American political discourse, more associated with communist dictatorships than the welfare state democracies we tend to think of first. But there are signs of shifts in attitudes, shifts which have alarmed many more mainstream political figures."

"People are waking up," said a woman identified as Kshama Sawant - Seattle Councillor. "They can only label the mildest compromise with rapacious capitalism as 'socialism' for so long before it stops being a bogeyman. Now the workers of America are beginning to educate themselves."

Kay's voice cut back in. "With Mr Sanders' long-held positions becoming more openly considered by American voters, his new political party has drawn perhaps surprising levels of support. Though relatively few senior politicians have endorsed or joined the Progressives, a new generation of activists have been inspired by their message. The Liberals have hit back with accusations which the Progressives describe as mud-slinging. For example, when Mr Sanders walked across the surface of a lake to heal an injured swan, he was accused of breaking zoning regulations. The Liberals also claim the Progressives are dominated by white men in contrast to their own more inclusive membership, a claim which the Progressives deny. We spoke to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, a campaign organiser for Mr Sanders who Mystic Meg told us to pay attention to, as well as investing in companies that make face masks, disinfectants and online soapboxes for conspiracy theorists. This is what Ms Ocasio-Cortez had to say."

"Capitalism needs to be confronted, not appeased," Ocasio-Cortez began. "I knew things had gone too far when nobody could say my name in the coffee place where I worked without activating Jeff Bezos' artificial intelligence. As for these claims we're not diverse enough - I have an asteroid named after me, your argument is invalid."

Back to Kay. "We still don't know what election night will hold for Mr Sanders and the Progressives, but one thing is clear: American politics will never be the same again."

Rich (BB code):
	NY-03		
	Lib          	110,537   	32%
	Nat          	104,980   	30.4%
	Prog          	67,751    	19.6%
	Fus          	51,962    	15%
	All          	10,045    	2.9%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	345,275
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Nat
			Prog

"Thank you Katty, that was very interesting. And we're seeing yet more signs of that success."

"Yes, our latest result there is from New York state - from the northern shore of Long Island. This was an area that's usually pretty reliable for the old Democrats, yet the two parties led by New Yorkers are getting representation as well as the one led by a former New York senator who wasn't born there."

"So good they named it twice."

Rich (BB code):
	NC-05		
	Nat          	81,729    	22.8%
	Cst          	80,291    	22.4%
	Lib          	76,303    	21.3%
	Prog          	66,064    	18.5%
	Con          	43,328    	12.1%
	All          	10,307    	2.9%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	358,023
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Cst
			Lib

"Back to North Carolina, and a very divided district there in the north-western part of the state."

Rich (BB code):
	NH-02		
	Prog          	110,084   	30.6%
	Nat          	77,734    	21.6%
	Lib          	65,098    	18.1%
	Con          	62,631    	17.4%
	Cst          	26,166    	7.3%
	All          	18,581    	5.2%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	360,294
			
	MCs elected:		
			Prog
			Nat
			Lib

"And...yes. You may remember, what seems like quite a while ago, New Hampshire's first district was the first one to report. Evidently they worked all their vote counters to death on the first one, as it's taken this long to get the second. But we have it now, a very similar result to the first, in fact. And as there are only two districts in the so-called Granite State, that means we can now also give the statewide seats."

Rich (BB code):
	New Hampshire at-large		
	Prog          	214,335   	29.3%
	Nat          	166,864   	22.8%
	Lib          	134,191   	18.3%
	Con          	123,896   	16.9%
	Cst          	55,030    	7.5%
	All          	37,951    	5.2%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	732,267
			
	MCs elected:		
			Prog
			Prog

"The Progressives have indeed topped the polls here as they have in so many places in New England. The Liberals are in third behind the Nationals, which must be troubling to them. And we can update the map..."

New England most.png

"Indeed, they've actually topped the polls in every state to finish counting so far. Only Massachusetts and Connecticut remain."

"Admittedly, the Liberals have performed better in those two states. But it will still be an embarrassment, not only for Hillary Clinton, but for the many veteran former Democratic politicians who insisted that Mr Sanders' ideas were too 'extreme' to be electable. Here, in Mr Sanders' backyard, the Progressives seem to be not merely competitive, but dominant!"

"Quite so - we'll be speaking to some more local analysts about this in due time."

Rich (BB code):
	FL-11		
	Nat          	148,766   	36.2%
	Lib          	85,148    	20.7%
	Con          	72,887    	17.7%
	Prog          	48,300    	11.8%
	Cst          	44,603    	10.9%
	All          	11,293    	2.7%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	410,998
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Lib
			Nat

"Florida again, and the rural eleventh district, just to the west of Orlando, the only place we care about in Florida. Again, for all the claims of Mr Rubio's home state advantage, the Conservatives have lost out - with the Nationals even taking two seats out of three..."

Rich (BB code):
	CT-05		
	Nat          	91,766    	28.4%
	Prog          	81,098    	25.1%
	Lib          	80,044    	24.8%
	Fus          	56,135    	17.4%
	All          	13,694    	4.2%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	322,737
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Prog
			Lib

"And back to New England. That's our last result from Connecticut, and the first time the Nationals have topped the polls anywhere in this part of the United States. That will be a shock to many people. But more importantly, it means we can now add the statewide seats for Connecticut. I should've waited to update the map!"

"Yes, you should have."

Rich (BB code):
	Connecticut at-large		
	Lib          	476,408   	29%
	Prog          	421,164   	25.6%
	Nat          	401,528   	24.4%
	Fus          	271,687   	16.5%
	All          	71,517    	4.4%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	1,642,304
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Lib

"The Progressive shut-out for New England we just talked about didn't last long, then - Connecticut, at least, has seen the Liberals come out on top. Massachusetts is still counting for some seats."

Rich (BB code):
	NY-11		
	Nat          	106,944   	43%
	Lib          	56,118    	22.6%
	Prog          	52,689    	21.2%
	Fus          	26,288    	10.6%
	All          	6,418     	2.6%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	248,457
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Lib
			Nat

"New York again, this time the eleventh district, which takes in Staten Island and a chunk of Manhattan. This is the only part of New York City that tended to vote Republican, but even then, it's usually more associated with the more liberal Republicans. This tremendous vote for the Nationals, taking two seats out of three, is quite a shock."

"Indeed, another thing to discuss later as the night unfolds."

Rich (BB code):
	NY-04		
	Lib          	111,997   	33.3%
	Nat          	97,438    	28.9%
	Prog          	67,848    	20.1%
	Fus          	50,031    	14.9%
	All          	9,497     	2.8%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	336,811
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Nat
			Prog

"We're really seeing an avalanche of New York seats now...this is a more urban Long Island district and it's split three ways."

Rich (BB code):
	FL-19		
	Nat          	114,037   	29.9%
	Lib          	92,900    	24.4%
	Con          	73,257    	19.2%
	Prog          	50,101    	13.1%
	Cst          	39,803    	10.4%
	All          	11,060    	2.9%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	381,158
			
	MCs elected:		
			Nat
			Lib
			Con

"And Florida's not far behind. Another from the west coast. Finally another Conservative seat to put a quavering smile on Mr Rubio's little face."

"...have you reverted to Jackanory mode?"

"Er, not at all! Look, a map!"

Florida 12results.png

"At least as far as the leading parties are concerned, Florida looks to be a fight between the Liberals and Nationals - little sign of that Conservative support, except in that they take second or third seats."

Rich (BB code):
	MA-02		
	Prog          	114,639   	32.6%
	Lib          	82,853    	23.6%
	Nat          	65,499    	18.6%
	Fus          	63,938    	18.2%
	All          	24,494    	7%
	Cst          	0         	0%
	Con          	0         	0%
			
		Total	351,423
			
	MCs elected:		
			Prog
			Lib
			Nat

"We just mentioned Massachusetts, and the New England map continues to fill out with this district from the middle part of the state - at least in this part, the Progressives are still beating the Liberals."

Rich (BB code):
	SC-01		
	Lib          	89,010    	26.7%
	Con          	75,777    	22.8%
	Nat          	64,433    	19.3%
	Prog          	45,675    	13.7%
	Cst          	37,843    	11.4%
	All          	20,283    	6.1%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	333,021
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Con
			Nat

"We haven't seen South Carolina for a while, but this is ironically better news for the Conservatives than Florida. This district has until recently been represented by Mark Sanford, who we'll see later as part of Emily's piece on how this campaign has inspired sex scandal practitioners across America."

Rich (BB code):
	VA-10		
	Lib          	127,127   	31.5%
	Con          	89,549    	22.2%
	Prog          	83,565    	20.7%
	Nat          	52,418    	13%
	Cst          	28,613    	7.1%
	All          	22,549    	5.6%
	Fus          	0         	0%
			
		Total	403,821
			
	MCs elected:		
			Lib
			Con
			Prog

"Another seat for the Conservatives there in Virginia, in the northern part of the state near Washington DC, which has trended towards the old Democrats in recent years. And indeed, though the Liberals topped the polls, the Progressives have won a seat as well."

"Oh, and that means I can update another map!"

"No, you ca-"

Virginias 6results.png
 
Rich (BB code):
    FL-13       
    Lib              106,909       29.6%
    Nat              83,854        23.2%
    Prog              71,983        20%
    Con              53,198        14.7%
    Cst              30,296        8.4%
    All              14,520        4%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    360,760
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Nat
            Prog

"That's another result from Florida. The thirteenth district, on the west coast. Interesting one, this. The old Democrats came very close to taking it in a by-election, what they call a special election here, two years ago. Then they decided not to bother contesting it at all in the general election. That's an interesting split of the vote, possibly caused by former governor Charlie Crist deciding to stand as a candidate for all parties simultaneously."

"Well, regardless of the cause, the Progressives have the third seat, ahead of the Conservatives - despite the alleged home state appeal of co-leader Marco Rubio which we have heard of. Is this a surprise, Katty, tenuous link?"

"Well, Andrew, yes it is. We've already seen in the last few weeks, and then again tonight, repeated, you might say, recalibration of the expectations management for the Progressives by their opponents. When the party was launched, senior Liberals openly claimed that they would be lucky to win one seat in Bernie Sanders' home state of Vermont. As we've seen tonight, the results have been drastically different. Not only have the Progressives done exceptionally well in the wider region of New England, but they have been electing MCs even in the more small-c conservative states such as, here, Florida."

"Perhaps you can tell us a little more about them..."

"I thought you'd never ask."

The screen next to Kay changed again, this time showing various green-tinted greyscale images of Bernie Sanders at different ages, standing behind lecterns, cutting ribbons, waving his fist, etc. There were also newspaper cuttings; prominent among them was a Guardian headline reading "Who Is Barney Saunders?" The word 'Progressive' and a green pine tree symbol in a circle overlaid the collage.

"We've already heard tonight about how the right-wing National Party has cut radically into the old Republican vote, which many expected to transfer wholesale to the Conservatives. Well, there is a parallel to how the left-wing Progressives have done the same to the Democrats, though the situations are somewhat different. Another parallel between the Nationals and Progressives, however, is that both have been accused of being one-man vehicles."

The screen shifted to show one of the more recent green-tinted photos of Sanders, now artificially facing off with an orange-tinted Donald Trump (at least, the photoshop backroom boys had probably had to apply a tint) across a dark void as though they were in an Alas Smith and Jones talking head sketch.

"But Mr Sanders has been swift to deny these accusations, as we can see here at a campaign rally..."

Sanders, elderly but vigorous, proclaimed his message to an excited crowd. "This is not about me! This is about us! And..." his accent momentarily strengthened, "it's about the unmatched taste of REAL! BROOKLYN! PIZZA! When the evils of capitalism attack, my Bernie Bros won't cut 'em no slack--" An aide diplomatically walked up behind him and gently slapped him back to normal. "And a new deal for the American worker..."

"As we just heard there, Mr Sanders was born in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, but he has built his political career in the small New England state of Vermont. Rising from mayor of the town of Burlington to Congressman and then Senator for that state, Mr Sanders historically refused to join the Democratic Party outright. He is one of very few successful US politicians of modern times to openly describe himself as a socialist. For decades that has been a dirty word in American political discourse, more associated with communist dictatorships than the welfare state democracies we tend to think of first. But there are signs of shifts in attitudes, shifts which have alarmed many more mainstream political figures."

"People are waking up," said a woman identified as Kshama Sawant - Seattle Councillor. "They can only label the mildest compromise with rapacious capitalism as 'socialism' for so long before it stops being a bogeyman. Now the workers of America are beginning to educate themselves."

Kay's voice cut back in. "With Mr Sanders' long-held positions becoming more openly considered by American voters, his new political party has drawn perhaps surprising levels of support. Though relatively few senior politicians have endorsed or joined the Progressives, a new generation of activists have been inspired by their message. The Liberals have hit back with accusations which the Progressives describe as mud-slinging. For example, when Mr Sanders walked across the surface of a lake to heal an injured swan, he was accused of breaking zoning regulations. The Liberals also claim the Progressives are dominated by white men in contrast to their own more inclusive membership, a claim which the Progressives deny. We spoke to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, a campaign organiser for Mr Sanders who Mystic Meg told us to pay attention to, as well as investing in companies that make face masks, disinfectants and online soapboxes for conspiracy theorists. This is what Ms Ocasio-Cortez had to say."

"Capitalism needs to be confronted, not appeased," Ocasio-Cortez began. "I knew things had gone too far when nobody could say my name in the coffee place where I worked without activating Jeff Bezos' artificial intelligence. As for these claims we're not diverse enough - I have an asteroid named after me, your argument is invalid."

Back to Kay. "We still don't know what election night will hold for Mr Sanders and the Progressives, but one thing is clear: American politics will never be the same again."

Rich (BB code):
    NY-03       
    Lib              110,537       32%
    Nat              104,980       30.4%
    Prog              67,751        19.6%
    Fus              51,962        15%
    All              10,045        2.9%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    345,275
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Nat
            Prog

"Thank you Katty, that was very interesting. And we're seeing yet more signs of that success."

"Yes, our latest result there is from New York state - from the northern shore of Long Island. This was an area that's usually pretty reliable for the old Democrats, yet the two parties led by New Yorkers are getting representation as well as the one led by a former New York senator who wasn't born there."

"So good they named it twice."

Rich (BB code):
    NC-05       
    Nat              81,729        22.8%
    Cst              80,291        22.4%
    Lib              76,303        21.3%
    Prog              66,064        18.5%
    Con              43,328        12.1%
    All              10,307        2.9%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    358,023
           
    MCs elected:       
            Nat
            Cst
            Lib

"Back to North Carolina, and a very divided district there in the north-western part of the state."

Rich (BB code):
    NH-02       
    Prog              110,084       30.6%
    Nat              77,734        21.6%
    Lib              65,098        18.1%
    Con              62,631        17.4%
    Cst              26,166        7.3%
    All              18,581        5.2%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    360,294
           
    MCs elected:       
            Prog
            Nat
            Lib

"And...yes. You may remember, what seems like quite a while ago, New Hampshire's first district was the first one to report. Evidently they worked all their vote counters to death on the first one, as it's taken this long to get the second. But we have it now, a very similar result to the first, in fact. And as there are only two districts in the so-called Granite State, that means we can now also give the statewide seats."

Rich (BB code):
    New Hampshire at-large       
    Prog              214,335       29.3%
    Nat              166,864       22.8%
    Lib              134,191       18.3%
    Con              123,896       16.9%
    Cst              55,030        7.5%
    All              37,951        5.2%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    732,267
           
    MCs elected:       
            Prog
            Prog

"The Progressives have indeed topped the polls here as they have in so many places in New England. The Liberals are in third behind the Nationals, which must be troubling to them. And we can update the map..."

View attachment 57890

"Indeed, they've actually topped the polls in every state to finish counting so far. Only Massachusetts and Connecticut remain."

"Admittedly, the Liberals have performed better in those two states. But it will still be an embarrassment, not only for Hillary Clinton, but for the many veteran former Democratic politicians who insisted that Mr Sanders' ideas were too 'extreme' to be electable. Here, in Mr Sanders' backyard, the Progressives seem to be not merely competitive, but dominant!"

"Quite so - we'll be speaking to some more local analysts about this in due time."

Rich (BB code):
    FL-11       
    Nat              148,766       36.2%
    Lib              85,148        20.7%
    Con              72,887        17.7%
    Prog              48,300        11.8%
    Cst              44,603        10.9%
    All              11,293        2.7%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    410,998
           
    MCs elected:       
            Nat
            Lib
            Nat

"Florida again, and the rural eleventh district, just to the west of Orlando, the only place we care about in Florida. Again, for all the claims of Mr Rubio's home state advantage, the Conservatives have lost out - with the Nationals even taking two seats out of three..."

Rich (BB code):
    CT-05       
    Nat              91,766        28.4%
    Prog              81,098        25.1%
    Lib              80,044        24.8%
    Fus              56,135        17.4%
    All              13,694        4.2%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    322,737
           
    MCs elected:       
            Nat
            Prog
            Lib

"And back to New England. That's our last result from Connecticut, and the first time the Nationals have topped the polls anywhere in this part of the United States. That will be a shock to many people. But more importantly, it means we can now add the statewide seats for Connecticut. I should've waited to update the map!"

"Yes, you should have."

Rich (BB code):
    Connecticut at-large       
    Lib              476,408       29%
    Prog              421,164       25.6%
    Nat              401,528       24.4%
    Fus              271,687       16.5%
    All              71,517        4.4%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    1,642,304
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Lib

"The Progressive shut-out for New England we just talked about didn't last long, then - Connecticut, at least, has seen the Liberals come out on top. Massachusetts is still counting for some seats."

Rich (BB code):
    NY-11       
    Nat              106,944       43%
    Lib              56,118        22.6%
    Prog              52,689        21.2%
    Fus              26,288        10.6%
    All              6,418         2.6%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    248,457
           
    MCs elected:       
            Nat
            Lib
            Nat

"New York again, this time the eleventh district, which takes in Staten Island and a chunk of Manhattan. This is the only part of New York City that tended to vote Republican, but even then, it's usually more associated with the more liberal Republicans. This tremendous vote for the Nationals, taking two seats out of three, is quite a shock."

"Indeed, another thing to discuss later as the night unfolds."

Rich (BB code):
    NY-04       
    Lib              111,997       33.3%
    Nat              97,438        28.9%
    Prog              67,848        20.1%
    Fus              50,031        14.9%
    All              9,497         2.8%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    336,811
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Nat
            Prog

"We're really seeing an avalanche of New York seats now...this is a more urban Long Island district and it's split three ways."

Rich (BB code):
    FL-19       
    Nat              114,037       29.9%
    Lib              92,900        24.4%
    Con              73,257        19.2%
    Prog              50,101        13.1%
    Cst              39,803        10.4%
    All              11,060        2.9%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    381,158
           
    MCs elected:       
            Nat
            Lib
            Con

"And Florida's not far behind. Another from the west coast. Finally another Conservative seat to put a quavering smile on Mr Rubio's little face."

"...have you reverted to Jackanory mode?"

"Er, not at all! Look, a map!"

View attachment 57891

"At least as far as the leading parties are concerned, Florida looks to be a fight between the Liberals and Nationals - little sign of that Conservative support, except in that they take second or third seats."

Rich (BB code):
    MA-02       
    Prog              114,639       32.6%
    Lib              82,853        23.6%
    Nat              65,499        18.6%
    Fus              63,938        18.2%
    All              24,494        7%
    Cst              0             0%
    Con              0             0%
           
        Total    351,423
           
    MCs elected:       
            Prog
            Lib
            Nat

"We just mentioned Massachusetts, and the New England map continues to fill out with this district from the middle part of the state - at least in this part, the Progressives are still beating the Liberals."

Rich (BB code):
    SC-01       
    Lib              89,010        26.7%
    Con              75,777        22.8%
    Nat              64,433        19.3%
    Prog              45,675        13.7%
    Cst              37,843        11.4%
    All              20,283        6.1%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    333,021
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Con
            Nat

"We haven't seen South Carolina for a while, but this is ironically better news for the Conservatives than Florida. This district has until recently been represented by Mark Sanford, who we'll see later as part of Emily's piece on how this campaign has inspired sex scandal practitioners across America."

Rich (BB code):
    VA-10       
    Lib              127,127       31.5%
    Con              89,549        22.2%
    Prog              83,565        20.7%
    Nat              52,418        13%
    Cst              28,613        7.1%
    All              22,549        5.6%
    Fus              0             0%
           
        Total    403,821
           
    MCs elected:       
            Lib
            Con
            Prog

"Another seat for the Conservatives there in Virginia, in the northern part of the state near Washington DC, which has trended towards the old Democrats in recent years. And indeed, though the Liberals topped the polls, the Progressives have won a seat as well."

"Oh, and that means I can update another map!"

"No, you ca-"

View attachment 57892
Removed my like on this post just so I could like it again.
 
Mark Sanford, who we'll see later as part of Emily's piece on how this campaign has inspired sex scandal practitioners across America.
former governor Charlie Crist deciding to stand as a candidate for all parties simultaneously.

Sort of embarassed I didn't get these gags without looking them up, but very very good work. I can't believe the Appalachian Trail goes through Uganda.
 
No reference to Fivey Fox?
Fivey was 2020, wasn't he?
Hold the phone Raleigh is pronounced Rawley???
...how else would you pronounce it?
And that would be a massive change after this election: ideologies that Can't Win Here have won, which makes them worth voting for it if you believe it and not worth it as a 'protest vote' because they might actually win.
It could go the other way, too - ideologies that failed to win seats might go the other way, with voters going tactically for parties they think could clear the threshold.
"Well. Speak of the devil - other personifications of evil are available."
Lmao excellent timing - and that's really not a very high voteshare to get all three seats! I was expecting one would need at least 60%.

I quite like the color scheme, incidentally - a lot of pleasing orange-and-blue and green-and-purple contrasts.
 
This timeline is immensely satisfying, jokes are great, like better than most AH I’ve read, really glad I spent some time to take a look.

This sounds stupid, but it seems to scratch a kind of itch about American Politics I never knew existed by having it make so much more ‘sense’ to me as someone raised in the UK. I can’t imagine the research and possible either fun or strain that it took to figure out each region and constituencies votes.

Can’t wait to see more.
 
Back
Top