• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Alternate Wikibox Thread

1643825411079.png
1643825447226.png



So how did we get here? Well for starters the Democratic Party is declared by Jenkins officially in 1983 as a merger between the SDP and the Liberals. The coalition between the Democrats and the Conservatives is not a pretty sight. After Thatcher resigns a brutal leadership battle between Edward Du Cann and Francis Pym results in a victory for Pym and the One Nation Tories. The 1922 faction is angry but not willing to go and campaign on their own yet. Things start to change as in the 1983 deputy leadership election Ian Gilmour defeated Ian Gow and Airey Neave much to the anger of the 1922 faction. Then the Democrats put a hold on the privatization started by Margaret Thatcher and ended aid to Iran after human rights abuses against homosexuals and women are revealed in 1984. But the final straw was when Jenkins attempted to close several coal pits. Arthur Scargill, the leader of NUM declared a strike that crippled the UK. Jenkins feared looking careless decided to try and negotiate with Scargill. Joseph and the 1922 faction were enraged by this and called it a capitulation to a radical socialist. Pym behind the scenes opposed the negotiations which caused infighting within the coalition. Jenkins tried to negotiate with Scargill but an increasing number of MPs from the conservatives refused to accept any deal with Scargill. This spooked Scargill and he stalled the negotiations until he felt like he could trust Jenkins to follow through with any deal he struck. Plus, Scargill knew he could get a better deal out of a Labor government. Kinnock criticized Jenkins for the failed negotiations and for bowing to the "radical right." Jenkins's popularity collapsed and a no-confidence vote was brought by leftist MP Michael Meacher. Pym refused to vote for the no-confidence vote as he knew it would cost the Conservatives the election. At this point, the 1922 faction was in a full-on revolt due to them perceiving Pym as a coward and extension of the Democrats rather than a conservative. Still, Pym couldn't stop the vote which came back 330-320 against Jenkins. Pym looked like a fool and the 1922 faction was by this point independent of Pym who led the One Nation faction. The split crippled the Conservatives in the election as both factions spent money on defending usually safe seats from each other's factions and split the vote in numerous swing seats. Labor on the other hand was fairly united, minus a split in Scotland by Jim Sillars and Alex Salmond of the Scottish Labor Party (SLP). But this was only two seats and with an unpopular Democratic Party and split Conservative Party Labor was able to dominate the election.

Their platform was more moderate than in 1982 and appealed to both socialist and moderate voters. Kinnock promised to compromise with NUM while not completely bowing down to them. Ordinarily, this would not be a winning position due to it being open to a ruthless counterattack by Conservatives as bowing to the pressure of a radical. In this case, though this was the best option to the public. The miners had voted to go on strike overwhelmingly and pragmatic politicians and miners compared their struggle to the Solidarity strikes in Poland. Scargill would reject his comparison, but it didn't matter. When the UK people saw the miners, they saw workers fighting for their way of life. The populace didn't appreciate the strike but felt like the miners deserved some respect and a compromise would do the trick. Both Pym and Jenkins promised further negotiations that would be "firm but fair" and the 1922 faction promised to wait out the strike. Come election day the result wasn't in doubt, only how large was the Labor majority was going to be is the question on everyone's mind. It turns out it was the largest landslide since 1935 with Labor winning 391 seats and Prime Minister Jenkins losing re-election. Soon after Jenkins resigned as leader of the Democrats due to falling to third place. The conservative factions finally woke up to the fact their civil war was helping no one and allowed a Labor supermajority. Pym resigned as leader and was replaced by the maverick John Gummer. Gummer promised to not run in the leadership election as he felt like he wasn't the one to unite and heal the Conservative Party. The leadership election was won in a landslide by Michael Heseltine, who ran as the compromise candidate and easily won over Ian Gow and Peter Walker. Heseltine had it all. He was young, moderate, and appealed to both factions as well as the electorate. While he never became Prime Minister, he would give Kinnock a run for his money in the 80s and 90s.

Another important side effect of the vote splitting was the various independent candidates who became MPs. Whether they were independent conservatives, independent Labor, or Scottish Labor Party (SLP) members, a dozen would enter parliament for the first and last time. The SLP though would find success with them staying in parliament until 1997 when Salmond lost re-election to the Labor candidate.

Kinnock now stood as one of the most powerful men in the world. During his tenure he would face unprecedented trials. The Il Grande Tradimento scandal that brought down the Cianci administration and the Miners Crisis were the most notable events of his first three years in office, but his handling of these events combined with his masterful campaign skills would allow him to stay in office until his defeat by Malcom Riftkind in 1998. His ideology of Kinnockism would continue to influence the Labor Party even as the party swung to the center during the 2000s and 2010s. The soft left ideology cemented him along with Prime Minister Giuliano Vassalli a lasting titian of social democracy in Europe and today he is fondly remembered as the man who was instrumental in both the Northern Ireland peace process and the Athens Accords which ended the Cold War.
 
This is a new series I have just started, called SuperMac's Super Majority. Again not one of my best names...

View attachment 46976
It's done. I present Supermac's Super Majority.

Supermac-Super-Majority-elections.png

1644032548959.png
 
5pG8FUX.png

Wordle is a Touch Generations puzzle video game for the Nintendo DS, released on September 9, 2006 in North America, September 27, 2006 in Europe, and January 11, 2007 in Australia. It was developed and published by Hudson Soft.

The game features 750 unique puzzles, with the ability to download and store up to 1500 additional puzzles, as well as create an additional 750 puzzles and share them with friends over Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection.

Players have, depending on the difficulty selected, either 5, 7, or 9 attempts to guess a five-letter word, with each guess either resulting in a letter being given a grey tile (indicating the letter is not in the word), a yellow tile (indicating the letter is in the word, but not that space), or a green tile (indicating that it is in the correct space).

Wordle was received well both critically and commercially. Critics praised the quick but simple gameplay, noting that its pick up and play mentality lead itself well to breaks at work or at school. Other critics found it repetitive, the art design and graphics to be bland, and the exclusive usage of American spelling to be a detriment to non-US gamers. Wordle sold over a million units, and the title received several sequels including Wordle Double on the DS, Wordle World on the Wii, and Wordle 3D on the Nintendo 3DS. A port to the Sony PlayStation Vita was planned, but cancelled in development.
Fire Emblem: Mystery of the Emblem (SNES)
Chrono Break (PS2)
Metroid 64 (N64)
Metroid Dread (DS)
Gorochu (Pokémon Red and Green, GB)
Super Smash Bros. Tussle (DS)
Kangaschan (Pokémon 2: Gold and Silver, GB)
Super Kid Icarus (SNES)
 
What happened in the 2000s to have the Conservatives go from natural party of government to right-wing populists, and why did no other parties like the SNP or Greens manage to gain seats?
When Lansley lost seats and votes in 2004 and conceded the popular vote the Tories decided to take the entirely wrong lesson, and that's what killed them. If the Tories had elected Theresa May instead in 2004 most say they would have had a strong recovery. Other parties do hold seats and votes but have failed to push through very far, including the SNP.
 
A random thought I had the other day - has anyone ever done the UK with India's political system? Given the combination of familiar Westminster-y like FPTP and by-elections, and the more alien aspects for the UK like the federal states and presidential electoral college, it could make an interesting scenario. One could take either a 'hard' AH approach, where it's recognisable OTL-ish British politics just in this framework, or go for a 'soft' AH full allegory where the BJP equivalent are militant Tory Anglicans or something. Thoughts?
 
A random thought I had the other day - has anyone ever done the UK with India's political system? Given the combination of familiar Westminster-y like FPTP and by-elections, and the more alien aspects for the UK like the federal states and presidential electoral college, it could make an interesting scenario. One could take either a 'hard' AH approach, where it's recognisable OTL-ish British politics just in this framework, or go for a 'soft' AH full allegory where the BJP equivalent are militant Tory Anglicans or something. Thoughts?
@Lord Caedus sort of did it with Canada, and I remember seeing a Wikibox a few years ago on the other place with the Imperial Federation going through, and India just dominating British Empire politics.
 
The India-dominated Imperial Federation thing might've been this wikibox made by me. I think I would have made it very differently now considering what I now know about the white supremacist nature of the Imperial Federation movement (and also my views on Jinnah are far more cynical), but nevertheless:

------​

The Imperial Federation election of 1941 is a hallmark election, embodying the rise of the new Imperial party system. As it turned out, the left-wing agenda of Liberal Party led by the left-wing figure Jawaharlal Nehru, featuring such left-wing proposals such as the formation of an Imperial Health Corporation (IHC), won by a landslide. By this point, Jinnah's government was tired, even though he was quite a popular figure in Africa for enacting Imperial Democracy in several viceroyalties, and this tired nature was enhanced even further by the Bombay Stock Exchange, the centre of the Imperial economy. It is also here that we find the emergence of the "Indian Strategy", in which both major parties attempted to attract Indian voters, who made up an outright majority of the Imperial electorate, to their party by nominating respected Indian figures as their leader. It is also here that we see the emergence of independence parties acting in open resent against the Indian majority of the Federation.

The Liberal Party had long-since been the left-wing party, ever since the time of Joseph Chamberlain. But under Jawaharlal Nehru, this status rose to a new level. Suddenly, the Liberal Party openly proclaimed that a national healthcare system would be established, for everyone throughout the Empire no matter their status, and that education would not just open to everyone, but mandatory for everyone, all for an eventual goal of a 100% education rate, and to crush all "feudal" systems using the full power of the government. It was the radicalism of a man who was born in a poor country, and saw millions remain poor even as it industrialized and democratized. He may have been a member of the elite, but he was a member of the elite who truly cared for the poor. As he was an Indian, he attracted Indian voters who would have otherwise continued to vote for Jinnah their fellow countryman ("viceroyaltyman"), and thus broke Conservative dominance in India (and thus, the empire). Furthermore, Nehru was every bit as good of an orator as Jinnah, and the two had many interesting exchanges during Question Period, to such an extent that they were compared to Disraeli and Gladstone.

The Conservative Party under Jinnah's long premiership adopted a new strategy of trying to attract ex-colonial voters. Jinnah himself acted a long way towards this goal, because as an Indian, he caused the vast majority of Indian voters to vote for "one of their own". But to enhance Conservative support, Jinnah took to breaking the power of the white elites of Africa by enfranchising millions of blacks and abolishing literacy tests. This proved enormously controversial and was the main factor that led to the rise of UKIP. However, this strategy of enfranchising even more people would have probably worked if the Bombay Stock Exchange, the centre of Imperial finance, hadn't crashed. Economic fears spread throughout the empire, and naturally millions were attracted to the radical agenda of Nehru, whose whole platform had the goal of benefiting the common people.

Now, the selection of Nehru as the leader of the Liberal Party angered many who felt that white people were losing their representation. That they clearly were, as India had a larger population than the rest of the empire put together. But such fears were further enhanced as the youth of Britain began to watch Indian movies, speak Hindi words in slang, and adopt Indian dress. It was the national conclusion of the democratization of the empire. Britons, or "Britishers" as Indians called them, were enlightened enough that they would not try to disenfranchise the majority of the empire, but they wanted to rule themselves rather than by the economic capital of Bombay. As such, many British Liberals, led by respected elder figure Winston Churchill, broke away from the party, in order to fight for independence. Rather boringly, they named the party the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), only running candidates in Britain. In this goal, they proved successful, winning a plurality of seats in the United Kingdom. Now, they would fight for an independence referendum.

As for the Socialist Party, they were never very major. The ground of the left had been taken by the Liberals since the time of Chamberlain. But this time, they were being attacked by the Liberals' new boldly radical stance under Nehru, while the emergence of UKIP took their credentials as a British party. Under Shinwell, they probably wanted to enhance their left-wing stance further, but they held no real chance of being anything significant. Though they won a few more seats than UKIP, these seats were more spread out, and so they made up a majority nowhere, and they could do little but give Nehru a little bit more left-wing support for his radical agenda.

And so Nehru, with a large Liberal majority but a real issue in the form of the British independence movement, was ready to kiss hands with the King-Emperor.

Imperial Federation.png
 
It's May's Way, or the Highway.
View attachment 33157
The aftermath, a swift leadership election...

View attachment 33243
The equivalent of the Bolsover result, Barry Sheerman, MP for 38 years, lost his seat to the Conservatives.
View attachment 33246
View attachment 33244

uk2017.png

Thanks to @Airesien for the beautiful map!

Inspired by CanadianTory's recent look at a landslide for Theresa May in the 2017 election, I've been inspired to remaster It's May's Way or the Highway with new wikiboxes and maps.

May's Way Or the Highway.png
(Sidenote, I really wish I got more consistent bursts of inspiration. I go weeks sometimes without making wikiboxes and today I've made about twelve.)
 
Had all sorts of great ideas for a US/Russia swapped Cold War end analogous wikibox(es), then remembered I don't know how to make them properly.
I made one like 5 years ago, and it turned out so shit, that I’m never attempting making one again.
 
National Space - Wikipedia

The National Space Corporation is an aerospace company legally based in the Marshall Islands, which builds and operates oceanic rocket launch facilities and bases on the surface of the Moon and Mars. Founded in 2037 by Jared Isaacman, the company is notable for its contracting of launch facilities and space facilities to the United States government, NASA, and private launch providers such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Rocket Lab for the purpose of avoiding international space law, a frequent source of controversy.[1][2][3]

nationalspacewikibox.png

The Marshall Islands retain their status as a legally independent state under international law despite having not held above-water territory since 2041,[10] its government today operating from its embassy in Washington, D.C. and the majority of its citizens residing in the United States, which has provided for their dual citizenship since 2035.[11] Due to its status as a non-party to the Outer Space Treaty, combined with its position as an associated state for which the United States holds full defense authority, it has become one of the largest legal havens for space-related companies in the world, hosting 14 separate private launch providers and spacecraft manufacturers.[12][13]

National Space operates two oceanic rocket launch facilities: the Pacific Launch Center, which is located near the former island of Majuro within the Marshall Islands' territorial waters, and the Atlantic Launch Center, which is located in the Eastern Gap, an area near the center of the Gulf of Mexico located in international waters. Both facilities are equipped to furnish up to 5 launches per day, primarily of SpaceX's Starship, Blue Origin's New Armstrong, and Rocket Lab's Neutron launch systems.[14]

National Space operates one surface base on the Moon, Giant Leap One, and two on Mars, For All Humanity One and For All Humanity Two. Giant Leap One is located near the northern edge of Mare Frigoris, hosting a permanent crew of one commander, two flight specialists, six technical personnel, four scientists, and two U.S. Space Force guardians, and primarily conducts helium-3 mining operations and scientific experiments contracted by the United States government and private corporations.[15][16] For All Humanity One, located in Holden Crater, and Giant Leap Two, located in Jezero Crater, are near-identical in design, hosting one commander, three flight specialists, eight technical personnel, six scientists, and four Space Force guardians each at any given time.[17]

In spite of public pressure, the United States continues to recognize National Space's operations as valid under international law, as the company has never formally claimed any area of space as territory of the Marshall Islands or the United States, and recognizes its private claim to space resources such as Lunar helium-3 under the Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015.[18] It also asserts that it maintains the legal right to continue stationing military personnel on National Space-owned surface bases via contract, due to the Compact of Free Association giving the United States full defense responsibility for and military access to the Marshall Islands, as well as the Outer Space Treaty's provision that "the use of military personnel for scientific research or for any other peaceful purposes shall not be prohibited" on the surface of other celestial bodies.[19][20][21]
 
Back
Top