• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

The Twenty-Sixth HoS List Challenge

The Twenty-Sixth HoS List Challenge: The Military

  • Marching Happily Towards Doom--Yokai Man

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • Peace Hath Her Victories--Walpurgisnacht

    Votes: 8 61.5%
  • The Brutal Decade--Warthog

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • Korea's Kemalism--Time Enough

    Votes: 9 69.2%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .

Walpurgisnacht

It was in the Year of Maximum Danger
Location
Banned from the forum
Pronouns
He/Him
Damn, now I can't alphabetise them any more!

The rules are simple; I give a prompt, and you have until 4:00pm on the 27th (or whenever I remember to post the announcement on that day) to post a list related to the prompt. As for what constitutes a list? If you'd personally post it in Lists of Heads of Government and Heads of State rather than another thread, I think that's a good enough criterion. Writeups are preferred, please don't post a blank list, and I'd also appreciate it if you titled your list for polling purposes. Once the deadline hits, we will open up a multiple choice poll, and whoever receives the most votes after a week gets the entirely immaterial prize.

The name March conjures up many associations--March madness, the March hare, Irish-American Heritage Month--but for many of you reading this, the first thing that comes to mind from the word is military marches. This is doubly appropriate, of course, since March derives from Martius, a Roman month named after Mars, bringer of war. Hence, the theme for this month's list is centred around a group with a tendency to interfere in politics one way or another, The Military. From Alcibiades to Zerbo, ambitious military leaders have always meddled in democratic affairs, and some political theorists have limited the entire purpose of the state to the maintenance of a military, for good or for ill. I'm sure you'll all come up with great lists!

Good luck!
 
Marching Happily Towards Doom


1898-1898 Henri Brisson (Radical-Socialist Group Coalition,Radical Left led War Government)



1898-1907 Start of French Civil War and end of the French Empire


Leaders of the National Revival War Government

1898-1902 Auguste Mercier/Godefroy Cavaignac/Émile Zurlinden


1902-1904 Jean Pendézec


-fragmentation of the National Revival War Government into Bonapartists,Orleanists,Assumptionists and Continuity National Revival War Goverment in Exile (Madagascar)


Leaders of the Republican War Government

1898-1904
Georges Clemenceau/Alexandre Millerand/ Charles Dupuy

1904-1907 Georges Clemenceau/Jean Jaurés/Charles Dupuy



The 20th Century started the way few wanted to,but certainly in a way many deserved for their sins.

In a fitting way it was of accident,not intent,that a quarrel between the two Imperialist masters of Africa in a place called Fashoda that no one before (or afterwards,regrettably) could point on the map ended in bloodshed and started the First Great War that engulfed most of the world. The fighting was initially only reserved in their Colonies,where none of those back home cared for the loss in a real sense.

But then the Admiralty had a dreadful idea,one that destroyed the Third Republic and once more revealed the evil within France as a nation-as well within Britain.

The Dreyfus Affair showed how a nation can lose its mind and the Admiralty felt inspired. They planned,in the case of a war with France,to kidnap Captain Dreyfus and the inmates of the Devil Island,put them on the shore of France with weapons and just watch as France was embroiled into civil war by the mere idea of Captain Dreyfus being "saved" by the perfidious Albion and betraying France. It did not matter that Dreyfus died while the Brits attacked the island (his already poor health due to forced labor had been worsen by the British attack) or that they hastily had a fake Dreyfus put in charge of a disorganized and confused ramble of weak and hungry prisoners. As expected,France lost its mind once more-this time with more grave consequences.

Having being "vindicated",the reactionary forces of the Anti Dreyfusards,especially the military,knew they must strike and save France from its self. The artisans of the Dreyfus Affair orchestrated their violent coup on 4th December 1898,unleashing once more a wave of horrifying violence and hatred against Jewish people,against liberals,against socialists,against all who did not belong in their France. The triumvirate of the bigoted Mercier,the naive Cavaignac and the confused Zurlinden took charge in the ruins of Paris as a National Revival,meant to fight both the enemies of France abroad and inside it,while the Republicans resistance government fought to save their democracy from its greatest enemies yet.

Then that damn fool Wilhelm thought it was a good idea to invade France while it was weak and Russia just reminded it had to defend its ally (especially now when it “officially” became brothers in reactionary thought),which attracted the Habsburgs into the fray and the whole world was thrown in the arms of Mars.

Desperate to hide Esterharzy being a traitor,the Triumvirate assassinated him and his closer circle and tried to burn all incriminating documents,all futile in the face in the German assault. Madmen like Guérin and Dèrouléde’s gang of butchers last act of prominence was settling scores just before Paris became destroyed completely by the Germans. Pendézec,out of desperation,was chosen as the Triumvirate‘s successor after they died in a futile,ill convinced battle in the seize of Paris but he couldn’t keep the Anti Dreyfusards united against it. How could he,after all? The Monarchists wanted to return to the pre 1789 days,the Bonapartists to the glory days of Napoleon and the Assumptionists wanted to destroy all established order. A bland figure like him had no chance.

No one can really say when the First Great War truly ended. Maybe it was when Britain brutally took over almost all of Africa. Maybe when Germany,Austrio-Hungary and Russia were plunged into civil war. Maybe it was during the Washington Conference of 1911. For France though,it never truly ended. Even when the last German soldier was thrown out in bitter guerrilla and the last National Revival commander surrendered by 1907,the reactionaries never truly gave up. The Vendée became almost eternally engulfed into guerrilla warfare against the Republic. Gallieri’s Madagascar remained a shameful thrown in the side and the pathetic last stronghold of the ”true“ France. France’s Jews were never trustful ever again of anyone in the Old World,especially of Britain. A great divide has been forever created between all French and all British.

And for what? A few land in Africa?

Hope it was worth it,your Lordships.
 
Last edited:
Peace Hath Her Victories
Lord Protectors of the United Kingdom:
1653-1658: Oliver Cromwell (Military)
defeated in battle, 1653-4: William Cunningham, 9th Earl of Glencairn (Royalist Uprising)
surpressed revolt of, 1655: John Penruddock (Royalist Uprising)

1658-1661: Henry Cromwell (Military)
defeated in battle, 1658: John Mordaunt, 1st Viscount Mordaunt (Royalist Uprising)
defeated mutinty of, 1659: Edmund Ludlow ("Commonwealthman" Military)

1661-1687: Henry Cromwell (New Model)
defeated mutiny of, 1662: Charles Fleetwood ("Grandee" Military)
surpressed revolt of, 1666: Thomas Venner (Fifth Monarchy Men)
surpressed revolt of, 1668: Hester Biddle (True Levellers/"Diggers")
defeated in battle, 1675-9: Charles II Stuart (Royalist, backed by Kingdom of France)
defeated mutiny of, 1682: John Wildman (Levellers/"Pay-In-Silver Army")

1687-1689: disputed between Thomas Belasyse (New Model), Charles Worsley (Military), John Ayloffe (Levellers)
1689-1691: disputed between Thomas Belasyse (New Model), Ezerel Tonge (Good Old Cause)

When last we left our narrative, the brothers Totney had been thoroughly split up by events. Matthew Totney was in Ireland, putting down revolts and feuding with Anabaptists. Mark Totney was in Jamaica, winning glory for the Protectorate and working with Maroons. Luke Totney was in France, shining the shoes of Royal leaders and bowing to Frenchmen. Only John Totney remained in Britain, lodging in London with his half-crazed father, drawing his meagre pension, and dreaming of a better world to come.

The events that split them up, however, will find a way to force them back together again.

Even if his father had been an ordinary leader of Britain, Henry Cromwell, a sensitive ditherer who spent his administration of Ireland shying away from the burdens of power, would have felt himself ill-suited to succeed him. His father, however, was far beyond ordinary--he was Old Ironsides. The general who won the war for Parliament, who swept away the throne of England and made crowned heads roll. A man who turned the world upside down. Small wonder, then, that that many should attribute to Henry the turn of phrase "what shall men think, when CROMWELL is announced, and none but the Lord of Ireland comes in?". Nearly everyone agreed at the time he was the wrong choice, but Fleetwood refused the post in favour of waiting and seeing, Ireton was long buried, and Henry's own older brother had taken ill of the same malaria that slew his father. England needed a ruler, and there was simply no-one else.

In a Biblical twist Oliver no doubt would have relished, this stone rejected by the builders became the capstone. Henry might have been far less of a soldier and more of a conciliator than his father, but conciliation was the one thing the strife-ridden nation now needed. England chafed under the harshness of military rule, turning to royalism and republicanism in equal measure, and it took someone outside of the Grandees who dominated the general staff to notice this. While the Levellers may have been right in decrying the new parliament as nothing more than a model of a parliament, to be manipulated at will by the same small party of court, it represented a lightening of the yoke, the idea that the new Cromwell would listen to all and govern for all. Soon Henry would be acclaimed in the streets as the Young Ironsides, an equal to Oliver himself. He would need that support in the days ahead.

The second Protectorate might be more stable, but the "New Model of Britain" the Young Ironsides had founded, a careful balance of military and civil leaders acting for some rarefied national good, was still far from secure. On all sides, foes waited for a mistake. In country manors, the Grandees, rallying around a bitter Charles Fleetwood who remembered well that the throne was in his grasp, sought to maintain the near-dictatorial power of the major-generals against that of Parliament. Over the sea, the mock-court of Charles Stuart watched and waited for the right moment, believing that they'd be welcomed back with open arms even as they slipped further into being a limb of France and Popery. Through the streets of London, radical dreamers published pamphlets and preached from soapboxes in spite of the laws, dreaming of imminent apocalypses, or merely of full bellies and raised voices. Behind the walls of Westminster, Henry and his supporters watched the tumult, and tried to forge a middle way that justified itself with more than their own self-interest.

Every one of these groups hated the other, and every one of them sustained themselves the same way. Some recruited them based on self-interest--promotion to Whitehall and the ear of the Council of State, pre-eminence over demanding civilians, wages in real money rather than promissory notes. Others made appeals to higer values--the comforting embrace of the Crown, salvation and purification in the name of Christ, the ancient liberties they were supposedly fighting for. Whatever the appeal, it was always made to the same group of men, the ones who real power laid in. A group of men that still, narrowly, contained every single Totney brother.

There was no Pope to lay down judgement. No throne to appeal to. No Parliament to petition. Even, finally, no Cromwell to cut through the chaos. Power lay in one place, and one place only. During the Second Protectorate, the period of this novel, preachers read from the Soldier's Catechism, radicals swore on The Cause of the Armie, and for all they snubbed the Grandees, the New-Modellers were just as flush with generals as their opponents. Even the Stuarts would appeal to crypto-Royalists like Monck to mutiny, when they arrived for war. Without the Army, no-one could govern Britain. Yet the Army did not yet govern itself--its generals loomed over the ranks and scorned the things the common soldiers held so dear. This contradiction would, after another Ironside was claimed by the soil, work itself out in a war more bloody, and more radical, than either of the last two struggles combined, the final culmination of the Civil Wars...

...but we are getting ahead of ourselves.

The year is 1659. Matthew Totney is ensconcing himself in Henry Cromwell's court, puzzling over the tasks of administration. Mark Totney is sailing home at Fleetwood's side, swearing always to be loyal to his general. Luke Totney is bringing good news to Charles Stuart, sending notes back and forth across the Channel. John Totney is talking his father down from proclaiming himself a prophet, wondering just what it was he even fought for.

The reforging of a country awaits.

Well may they strive to leave them to their Son/For one Thing never was by one King done...

--Introduction to A Throne of Muskets, Book 3 of the Totney Cycle, by Edward Ram​
 
Last edited:

Desperate to hide Picquart being a traitor,
the Triumvirate assassinated him and his closer circle and tried to burn all incriminating documents,all futile in the face in the German assault. Madmen like Guérin and Dèrouléde’s gang of butchers last act of prominence was settling scores just before Paris became destroyed completely by the Germans. Pendézec,out of desperation,was chosen as the Triumvirate‘s successor after they died in a futile,ill convinced battle in the seize of Paris but he couldn’t keep the Anti Dreyfusards united against it. How could he,after all? The Monarchists wanted to return to the pre 1789 days,the Bonapartists to the glory days of Napoleon and the Assumptionists wanted to destroy all established order. A bland figure like him had no chance.


I think you're confused here. Esterharzy was the traitor, not Picquart- Picquart was one of the heroes of the affair.
 
1960 - 1963: Chough Pyung-ok (Democratic)†
1960: Approved Unanimously by the Assembly
1963 - 1964: Kim Hong-il (Independent)
1963: Approved Unanimously by the Assembly
1964 - : Kim Hong-il (National Democratic)
1967 def. Hyun Seok-ho (Democratic), Kim Du-han (People’s), Park Ki-chul (United Socialist)

1960 - 1964: Chang Myon (Democratic)
1960 (Majority) def. Scattered Independents, Seo Sang-il (Socialist Masses), Cho Gyeong-gyu (Liberal)
1964 - 1967: Yun Posun (National Democratic)†
1964 (Majority) def. Chang Myon (Democratic), Yoon Gil-joong (United Socialist)
1967 - 1969: Yu Chin-san (National Democratic)
1967 (Majority) def. Jeong Il-hyung (Democratic), Kim Du-han (People’s), Yoon Gil-joong (United Socialist)
1969 - : Song Yo-chan (National Democratic Majority)

Korea’s Kemalism; Military Intervention Within The Sphere of Korean Liberal Democracy

“The Republic of Korea was deemed by some figures within the foreign office recently as an example of a strong Asian Democracy, with comparisons to Japan as an example of an emerging Economic Power that has embraced Liberal Democracy. However digging beneath the surface indicates that this isn’t entirely the case…”

“Prime Minister Song Yo-chan is the man credited with having upheld Korea’s Democracy during the turmoil of the Sixties. But to say that he’s a purely committed proponent of liberal democracy is a fallacy. Whilst Song can be credited as having helped in helping to overthrow the Fascistic Dr Syngman Rhee regime and would oversee a subsequent purge of corruption within the military, he has been known to be supportive of imposing tough and autocratic measures on the populace when the time calls for it.

The 1967 Crisis indicates that, as the aftermath of Posun’s begrudging trip to Japan on behalf of American interests would yield his death from a Korean Nationalist. Song, at that time a technocrat operating as the Director of Economic Planning still held sway over the army he had purged. Commander Lee Han-lim, a comrade of Song who helped in the stopping of the May 12th Coup attempt, would oversee the martial law over Seoul and Busan whilst the National Democratic Government would find a successor to Posun.

The intervention of the military whilst praised by some as ensuring stability within the Korean Republic, was pointed out by others as a dangerous precedent. The April Revolution had been reliant on Military support to oversee the overthrow of Rhee and now the military were once again being used to ensure the continuation of the National Democratic Government.

The Korean Military isn’t couping the democratically elected government but a manner similar to the Turkish Military seems to permeate in Korea; a letter of support or protest could make or break a Prime Minister as seen with Chin-san and the October 69’ crackdowns as Korean Students and Trade Unionists would March onto the streets demanding reform, the breaking up of the hated chaebol, an end to Korean support in Vietnam and increased democracy.

The subsequent ‘Letter on National Defence of Korean Democracy’ would send shivers down the spines of many National Assembly member. Whilst certainly declaring himself, partially in favour of increased constitutional and liberal reforms, the manner in which Song Yo-chan went about it would disturb many on the left of Korean Politics.

It’s now 1971, and as election looms large for the Korean people, questions whether the National Democratic Party and the military will respect the result is up in the air. Chang Chun-ha of the Democratic Party seems like he could potentially win, on the back of a message of Populistic Reform.

But noises from Song Yo-chan, who has increasingly become friendly with his Singapore counterpart Lee Kuan Yew and seems to be taking tips from his Economic Planning, seems like Korea could be back under the grip of authoritarian rule, backed by the harsh hand of the military.

And even then, for some within the Korean Military, the Centrist Big-Tent nature of the National Democratic Party isn’t enough. Murmurings that Korea could potentially have it’s own Colonel’s Coup puts doubt on whether Korean Democracy can survive into the Seventies…”
 


With all votes counted, the winner of this month's challenge is @Time Enough with his list Korea's Kemalism! Congratulations to our winner, and comiserations to the losers!

The next challenge will be up tomorrow.

Thank you, I do find it amusing that for the first time that entry I didn’t initially intend to be submitted for the contest is the one that wins.

Thanks to all that voted and I guess I’ll ponder other Korean Scenarios in the future.
 
Back
Top