• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

PM's Election Maps And Stuff Thread

Apologies to @vjw for this. 😛
Finally, someone woke me up. I'm going to eat some apples or something :)
Speaking of Ukrainian elections, I would most like to depict the parliamentary elections of 1990. The main problem is that there is no complete data. The website of the Verkhovna Rada has information about winning candidates and the percentages. The full results can be found in newspapers or in the CEC data, which still needs to be searched for. Electoral maps? In another castle!

Interesting news: 3,840 people were nominated in the elections, an average of 8 per district (although in Kyiv it was up to 30 candidates).
Interesting news 2: 112 deputies were elected in the first round, 337 in the second round, and one more was elected on 20 May (N 375, Kharkiv)

If you need more understanding of contemporary Ukrainian politics, you can check Ukraine 19912007 : the Essays on Modern History. There is a version in Russian on the Internet, although I read it in Ukrainian in the school library (what a time :D)
 
Last edited:
Finally, someone woke me up. I'm going to eat some apples or something :)
Speaking of Ukrainian elections, I would most like to depict the parliamentary elections of 1990. The main problem is that there is no complete data. The website of the Verkhovna Rada has information about winning candidates and the percentages. The full results can be found in newspapers or in the CEC data, which still needs to be searched for. Electoral maps? In another castle!

Interesting news: 3,840 people were nominated in the elections, an average of 8 per district (although in Kyiv it was up to 30 candidates).
Interesting news 2: 112 deputies were elected in the first round, 337 in the second round, and one more was elected on 20 May (N 375, Kharkiv)

If you need more understanding of contemporary Ukrainian politics, you can check Ukraine 19912007 : the Essays on Modern History. There is a version in Russian on the Internet, although I read it in Ukrainian in the school library (what a time :D)
I'm guessing the Verkhovna Rada website doesn't tell you the 1990 constituency boundaries? The great bugbear of mapping when countries don't use 'county PR'...

Thanks for the book recommendation btw! I'd be interested if it has any answers to why the voting patterns in 1999 were like that.
 
If you need more understanding of contemporary Ukrainian politics, you can check Ukraine 19912007 : the Essays on Modern History. There is a version in Russian on the Internet, although I read it in Ukrainian in the school library (what a time :D)
Given my attempts to map alternate Ukrainian politics in the 90s this may be for the best. Mainly trying to ponder how to stop the Communist party from returning and remaining banned.


Also @prime-minister love the Map, I do like pondering how things would have been different if Oleksandr Moroz managed to run against Kuchma.
 
Also @prime-minister love the Map, I do like pondering how things would have been different if Oleksandr Moroz managed to run against Kuchma.
Thanks! It definitely would've been interesting, especially because a Moroz presidency might've made a left-right divide more influential in Ukrainian politics rather than the Europhile-Russophile divide and the party machines of the different politicians defining it.
 
Thanks! It definitely would've been interesting, especially because a Moroz presidency might've made a left-right divide more influential in Ukrainian politics rather than the Europhile-Russophile divide and the party machines of the different politicians defining it.
Possibly, I think there were always going to be tinges of the above as you mentioned, Moroz was happy to waffle between Moscow and Brussels depending on who he was talking too.

That being said, I could see the Left - Right becoming apparent as Moroz would slow down any reforms and engage in Social Democratic/Socialist rhetoric so, I see it.
 
Liverpool 1970
Well, I've been away a little while, but I finally had an idea for something new to map- the council elections in my mum's home city. As you do.

1708357520963.png

Amusingly, I spent all evening tracing David Jeffery's map of the election by ward in Paint, only to find out Wikipedia has basemaps for the council wards from 1953 onwards and I probably could've just edited that into a useable format in GIMP. Then again, Jeffery has helped provide online records of the results, so it's a good excuse to credit him at least.

I decided to start with 1970 because it's the last election to date where the Tories controlled the city council, and a good illustration of how much the city has changed in 50 years. To put it mildly, it's hard to imagine the city ever looking like this again after Toxteth, 'managed decline' and Hillsborough. Also of note, though, is the weakness of the Liberals- 1970 was just the beginning of them building up an apparatus in the city, but during the 1970s they would grow fast, in no small part because of the Tory brand's toxicity slowly but surely building up.

Perhaps even more indicative of how much things have changed than the Tories winning the most seats, however, is the presence of the Liverpool Protestant Party. The famously large Irish Catholic migration to Liverpool during the 19th century led not only to the city having an infamous Orange Order (so much so that both my mum and Tom Baker's autobiography attest to its awfulness from personal experience about 30 years apart), but also to both Catholic and Protestant parties forming in the city on either side of the sectarian divide.

It's fairly well known that the Irish Nationalist T. P. O'Connor (coincidentally, apparently my granddad was friends with a different T. P. O'Connor!) sat for the Liverpool Scotland seat from 1885 until his death in 1929, the only one ever to represent an area in Great Britain, but less so that the Protestants were politically active in the region separate from the Liverpool Tories despite the close association often drawn between the two.

The Protestant Party was formed by local Protestant leader George Wise and basically focused on attacking the Tories for doing anything sympathetic to Catholics and Labour for being socialist heathens, being formed partly in response to the former allowing Catholic schools public money under the Education Act 1902, along with other policies. The rumblings of home rule probably also stirred up anger among Liverpool Protestants, of course.

Two of their biggest bugbears were the Irish nationalist movements (duh) and the construction of what is now Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral (i.e. the Catholic one); they helped block the council allowing the Archdiocese of Liverpool to buy the land for it until the abolition of the Boards of Guardians in 1929, and when construction started in 1933 local Catholic groups had to fund it. They even stood the Reverend H. D. Longbottom (yes, really) for the Liverpool Kirkdale constituency in 1931, 1935 and 1945, and he got a solid quarter of the vote in both of the former two elections.

1970 was also sort of the Protestant Party's last hurrah, as they retained their 7 seats. The Tories stood aside for them in St. Domingo and Netherfield wards, which they won over Labour- St. Domingo was very Protestant, sometimes electing three councillors from the Protestant Party. At the 1972 election, they would get wiped off the council and never returned.
 
Last edited:
Ages ago I tried to map the Liverpool council elections but got burned out after a decade or so 'cause Wikipedia didn't have percentages and I didn't care enough to calculate them. Very good work.
 
1970 was also sort of the Protestant Party's last hurrah, as they retained their 7 seats. The Tories stood aside for them in St. Domingo and Netherfield wards, which they won over Labour- St. Domingo was very Protestant, sometimes electing three councillors from the Protestant Party. At the 1972 election, they would get wiped off the council and never returned.
It’s kind of mental that Liverpool still had a Protestant Party by the early 70s, it feels like a scenario where Britain has more sectarian divisions, and some form of STV system of governance.
 
It’s kind of mental that Liverpool still had a Protestant Party by the early 70s, it feels like a scenario where Britain has more sectarian divisions, and some form of STV system of governance.
I know, right? It's especially striking considering this predates the bulk of both the Troubles and Britain's two-party system breaking down. I get the impression the local Tories allowed them to stand because otherwise local Protestants would be inclined to vote Labour (shades of STV voting patterns, as you say); I'm not sure about the voting records in Netherfield, but St. Domingo elected a Tory for the last time in 1933, and Labour won all the council seats there between 1953 and 1959, then recaptured them from the Prods in the 70s.
 
Liverpool 1971
The following year's election is, erm, a little different results-wise.
1708357544468.png
One thing to keep in mind, in fairness, is that this result is only partly because of Heath coming to power (though I wouldn't be surprised if New Pence getting instituted the month before this election didn't help the Tory campaign), and mostly because the seats up for election were the ones in each ward that were last elected in 1968. As an illustration of how dramatic the swings at work here were, there were no fewer than eight seats where Labour won more than 70% of the vote which they gained from Tory incumbents. Both Gillmoss and Speke genuinely went from Tory margins of around 1% to Labour margins of around 60%.
 
Last edited:
Liverpool 1972
Just to clarify, I don't think I'll be continuing to map every year's elections in order, but here's 1972.
1708357574278.png

This was the last election held that elected Aldermen (whose numbers I can't find from a cursory look, annoyingly), on these boundaries and with elections in thirds every three years. The Local Government Act's creation of Merseyside County Council extended the city councillors' term to four years and had that body elected in the fourth year where no city councillors were up. Despite the county council getting abolished under Thatcher, Liverpool still has that cycle, and so every three years no councillors are elected in the city.

It was also the election which finally kicked the Tories out of power in the city for good. Incidentally, the Tories' leader, Sir Howard Steward, had just been knighted in the 1972 New Years Honours; he had previously been an MP for Stockport South and was apparently one of the 15 MPs who That Was The Week That Was publicly mocked in 1963 for never speaking in Parliament since the last election. His Labour successor Bill Sefton was also notable, not only for having also preceded Steward as council leader, but also for being a self-described Marxist who took a life peerage anyway in 1978.

The sheer scale of the Tories' reversal in fortunes in Liverpool after Heath came to power can be pretty easily told from the fact that in 2 years they lost 50 seats, and in the same amount of time Labour's seat count more than doubled and the Liberals' seat count almost quadrupled. (I might have to go back and do 1967-69, the elections where the Tories made their big gains, for comparison at some point.)

In addition to all the big swings against the Tories, Labour edged out the Protestants in St. Domingo by literally one vote, and their remaining councillors seemingly didn't even bother to stand in 1973 (the party's Wikipedia page says they won a seat, but Jeffery's results tables don't list them anywhere) and merged with the Tories in 1974.

One little detail I found interesting is that the Liberal in Low Hill (the ward near the city centre surrounded by red) is future Liberal and Lib Dem MP and current crossbench peer David Alton, who won Edge Hill in a by-election right after Callaghan's government lost the vote of no confidence in 1979 and sat for Mossley Hill until it was abolished in 1997. Perhaps unsurprisingly considering he became Baby of the House, he was also Baby of the Council in this election. (I mention him not only because he's the last non-Labour MP Liverpool has elected to date, but also because his views are notably colourful- he's both a vocal anti-abortion advocate and an aggressive advocate for sanctions on authoritarian regimes.)
 
Last edited:
Liverpool 1973
Ok, this really will be the last election I do the year after the last.
1708356992041.png
This was the first all-up election since 1953 when the old wards were drawn, and like that election the candidates' terms were decided by what position they came in. Whoever came first in the ward would sit until 1978, second place until 1976 and third place until 1975.

This election saw the Tories get massively squeezed out, and though Labour won the popular vote by about 1%, the Liberals took the most seats (I believe for the first time since 1895!) and would win control of the council the following year.
 
Last edited:
Really good work, PM. One of these days I'd like to attempt a full local election map series of Glasgow (because I like to peruse the Glasgow Herald, there's maps and data stretching far back beyond what I think Wiki currently has) and I suspect there may be some parallels to Liverpool.
 
Really good work, PM. One of these days I'd like to attempt a full local election map series of Glasgow (because I like to peruse the Glasgow Herald, there's maps and data stretching far back beyond what I think Wiki currently has) and I suspect there may be some parallels to Liverpool.
Thank you! And that sounds like it'd be really interesting to see, I'll look forward to seeing it someday. If it hasn't been done, maybe someone should also do Birmingham to complete the holy trinity of 'British cities outside NI with big sectarian undercurrents' (pun unintended for once).
 
Liverpool 1978
The Tories winning the popular vote in Liverpool? Led by Thatcher? Yeah, it actually happened.

1708359613056.png
Admittedly the high watermark here didn't translate to winning enough seats to not come last of the three main parties, but the fact that even this good a result for the Tories happened in Liverpool so late is bizarre to me.

Something worth noting is that Hamilton was only council leader for part of 1978- I can't find a specific date as to when, but later that year the Liberal council leader Trevor Jones took control of the council with Tory support.
 
Liverpool 1983
One term of Thatcher later...
1708725653023.png
While most of the country gave Labour a humiliating defeat in 1983, Liverpool actually swung towards them quite heavily, which isn't that surprising considering Thatcher's infamous disdain for the city. (This was reflected in the general election too, though, as the Tories were shut out of Liverpool for the first time ever, and have never won a seat there again. The sources I've looked at seem to be pretty mixed on whether they notionally held any seats on the 1983 boundaries, likely because no one seems to have properly calculated it.)

While the Liberals retained the support of many Scousers distrustful of Militant's influence over the council's Labour delegation, by 1983 they had been governing the city for 5 years with the Tories' support, and Labour weren't shy of pointing it out. This likely helped convince swing voters to back Labour to get back into power.

Part of the reason Labour got back into power was because they sort of had the best of both worlds as far as appealing to voters was concerned; the party's local leader was still John Hamilton, who wasn't part of Militant but was friendly to them, and their deputy leader was Derek Hatton, Militant's poster boy. At this point, they had both plausible deniability for the Militant association from their opponents and the backing of the tendency, but things would get messy fast.

One interesting point I noticed is that the SDP were more or less a non-factor, which is ironic considering one of their pre-1983 MPs was from Liverpool (not to mention from Toxteth specifically!). I assume that's both because the Liberals already had a solid foothold here and overshadowed them, and because the Labour right in the area wasn't and isn't especially large.
 
Last edited:
Bulgaria 1991
Sometimes you just stumble on the resources to make a map in an evening and have to do it.
1709326350956.png
It turns out everyone's favourite country that shares its name with a Womble has fairly easily accessible results online for its elections (well, I did have to track down a Cyrillic webpage to find how the seats were allocated, but still), and a good map of all the constituencies which have been the same since 1991, but hasn't really been mapped much. So, behold!

The 1991 election was the first under Bulgaria's current constitution, promulgated three months before in June, and the second to be held after the end of Communist rule. The first such election had been held to elect a Constituent Assembly the previous year, and used a mixed electoral system where half the members were elected in single member constituencies and half by PR; it sounds interesting, but I don't really have any leads on the constituency boundaries or a breakdown of the results.

So instead we're starting with 1991, the first election to the modern National Assembly. It was reduced from 400 seats for the Constituent Assembly to 230, and the electoral system was changed from mixed-member to pure PR, with members elected by oblast (aside from Plovdiv, which was a separate constituency from its oblast, and Sofia, which was split into three constituencies along with a fourth for the rest of the oblast) by the D'Hondt method, with a 4% national threshold. Aside from the 2009 election, this is the method that's been used for every Bulgarian election since.

In 1990 the Bulgarian Socialist Party (Българска социалистическа партия, BSP), the rebranded Communist Party, had won an overall majority, but its leader Andrey Lukanov soon became unpopular. He and the reformist wing of the party had elbowed out Todor Zhivkov after he had ruled the country for 35 years, and despite the democratising reforms, it quickly became clear Bulgaria's economy was not only corrupt but collapsing thanks to its big consumer goods deficit. The fact Lukanov was buddies with Robert Maxwell certainly didn't help lessen that impression.

Lukanov finally resigned amidst a general strike and protests, and a new technocratic government was formed by independent judge Dimitar Popov, the first non-Communist Bulgarian PM in 44 years. His government's purpose was basically just to get the constitution hammered out and then hold a new election, and brought the non-Communist parties into power- the Union of Democratic Forces (Съюз на демократичните сили, СДС/SDS) and Bulgarian Agrarian National Union (Български земеделски народен съюз/BANU)- with the implicit support of the BSP.

Both the BSP and SDS had popular dissidents in charge. On the BSP's side was Aleksandar Lilov, a former Politburo member expelled in the early 1980s who moved to Britain, returning on the then-BCP's request. He was an outspoken reformist, having criticised Zhivkov for economic mismanagement (which was why he was expelled), denounced the Revival Process and its assimilationist oppression of Bulgarian Muslims, and had the BCP transition into the BSP and renounce Marxism-Leninism in favour of democratic socialism. The downside was that liberals wanted him gone as a vestige of the Communist regime, though I imagine he had a certain amount of popularity among those nostalgic for the regime's economic stability compared to the uncertainty of the early 90s.

On the SDS side, you had Philip Dimitrov. Dimitrov was also an unusual character, a law graduate, attorney and psychotherapist who'd become vice-president of the Green Party when it was founded in 1989 and helped break the secret police's sealing of their files, contributing to them being abolished. Under his stewardship, the SDS was able to position itself as a modern and moderate alternative to the BSP, with an indication it would continue the privatisation and market-opening reforms the Popov government had tentatively begun.

This was the central battle line the two parties fought the 1991 election on, and interestingly, despite dominating the seats only 67.5% of Bulgarians voted for them. A further 7.55% went for the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (Движение за права и свободи Dvizhenie za prava i svobodi, ДПС/DPS), the party of Bulgaria's ethnic minorities (particularly Turks), and the other quarter of the vote was messily distributed between a series of small parties that all failed to cross the 4% threshold. The largest of these was the BANU, which took 3.86% of the vote, but seven parties won at least 1% of the vote and came home empty-handed.

The SDS formed a coalition with the DPS, forming the first Bulgarian government not to contain figures associated with the Communists since the end of the Secold World War. I think it also technically made Dimitrov the first person associated with a green party to become head of state anywhere in the world, too, but don't quote me on that (especially because he wasn't part of the Green Party by this point anymore).
 
Last edited:
Taiwan (president) 2024
I only remembered the other day Taiwan was holding its presidential election in January, and sort of expected it'd be a 'massive right-wing surge after two terms in power from the left' kind of election. I was a bit off.
1709739970845.png
I'll probably do a follow-up map with both a clearer explanation of the parties' nominees and a city-county breakdown of the DPP, KMT and TPP (Taiwan People's Party) vote, because the TPP performed really well in this election, coming a strong third with the best performance for a third-party nominee since 2000 as well as deadlocking the Legislative Yuan in the down-ballot legislative election.
 
Here's the slightly belated follow-up.
1710177366410.png
Apologies for the numbers changing between nominees, I know it might be a bit confusing but it shows better how geographically spread out Hoh's support was compared to Lai's being more concentrated and highlights what little variance there was in Ko's vote.

Speaking of Ko, while the other two's platforms are fairly self-explanatory if you're at all familiar with Taiwanese politics, his is a bit more obtuse. He's waffled on cross-strait relations, initially being sympathetic to the Sunflower Movement before eventually turning on the perceived antagonism of the DPP, while not being as socially conservative as the KMT traditionally is. Oh, and in one of those touches that sounds like I'm making something up to link this to British politics, apparently his running mate Cynthia Wu was once an aide to Major-era welfare hater and awful parody song lover Peter Lilley.

Ko's ticket suffered from a pretty bad case of second everywhere, but his vote was fairly stable and he had the lowest variance between his highest and lowest voteshares of the three candidates. He also came second in five administrative divisions, coming within 1,300 votes of winning Hsinchu City (the little city on the northwest coast). Surprisingly, despite being Mayor of Taipei his vote in the city and county was noticeably low, likely because of the close contest between Lai and Hoh there.
 
Back
Top