1970 – Argentina
Background
The return of the finals to South America for the first time since 1950 (and outside of Europe since 1958) coincided with the dawn of the technicolour age and live satellite broadcasting, to make 1970 for many, the first truly modern tournament.
Argentina, under the ‘civic-military dictatorship’ of General Juan Carlos Ongania, was a hybridised dictatorship built around a mixture of corporatist economics, direct military rule and state bureaucracy which eliminated the inefficiencies of liberal democracy, while remaining stringently anti-communist.
[1] The country’s authoritarian turn was mirrored in its football, as the junta established a truly national league (though like neighbouring Brazil, this was dominated by the long-established metropolitan sides) and the club game and national side combined technical ability with brute physicality, seen most commonly in the frequently violent Intercontinental Cup matches between the winners of the South American Copa de Campeones and the European Cup.
[2]
Argentina’s national side, were in many ways the great underachievers on the world stage – while they had twice reached the final in the 1930s, they had failed to make it past the quarter-final stage since 1950 (where they finished third.) The shift in government, increased funding to sports, and football in particular, with the hosting rights for the 1970 tournament turbocharging construction on stadiums across the country, alongside a general mass investment in infrastructure projects. 1969 and 1970, the year of great advances in the space race and technological innovations more generally, were “years of lead” in Argentina as Ongania’s junta cracked down heavily on a series of student and leftist protests – much like the authoritarian regimes which had hosted the finals in the 1930s, his regime put great hope into the success of the tournament.
1970 also marked the end of the ban on overseas internationals by the Argentine FA, largely at the urging of Humberto Maschio who had taken over as national coach in 1969.
[3] South American sides remained almost overwhelmingly domestically based as did their international counterparts, but Argentina’s lifting of its ban heralded a shift to an increasingly internationalised world cup tournament.
Argentina’s junta may have been in the midst of unrest and a declining economy, but the concentration of resources ensured that the stadiums were either renovated or newly constructed on time, though given the scale of funds dedicated to the task, it would’ve been highly embarrassing for Ongania’s regime if stadia were still unfinished.
[4] These venues included two in Buenos Aires city, Mar del Plata & La Plata (both in Buenos Aires province), Córdoba, Rosario, Mendoza and Tucuman, with groups to be divided geographically.
1970 also saw the introduction of several firsts – for one, it would be the first fully technicolour world cup, and would also be the first to be broadcast live around the world thanks to satellite television. Red and yellow cards for expulsions and bookings were introduced, while Addas signed on as equipment partner for the tournament (and all subsequent tournaments.) 1970 cemented the growing commercialisation of the world game, with international hoardings predominant across the various stadia (though this would become much more prevalent in the tournaments of the 1980s and 1990s.) As with previous tournaments, 1970 used the same format, with four groups of four and three knockout rounds – as with 1966, the tournament also had an official mascot, with Gauchito, a young boy in traditional Gaucho dress (replete with Argentina shirt.)
Qualification
Argentina and England both qualified automatically, leaving fourteen places to be decided: one each for Africa and Asia/Oceania,
[5] eight for Europe and four for the Americas, keeping the same criteria as 1966.
If 1966 had been relatively surprise free in qualification, 1970 threw up a few surprises, with Mexico failing to qualify for the finals for the first time since their boycott of 1938. The Mexicans were surprised by both El Salvador and Canada in the final round to finish third out of the four-team round robin, which saw El Salvador qualify for the finals for the first time. Elsewhere in Latin America, Peru, with a talented generation of players, returned to the finals for the first time since 1930 alongside Uruguay and Brazil, both of whom were under new management. Brazil, under manager Dorival Yustrich (assisted by 1958 winner Mário Lobo) qualified unbeaten for the finals and had undergone transition from the side of 1966, with a combination of traditional attacking skill and “European fitness”, which in essence meant that the Brazilians had a side full of technical ability which could also hold its own with brute physicality. Uruguay were managed by former world cup winner Juan Hohberg and had been similarly strong in qualifying, and had issued a statement of intent with a 3-1 win over Argentina in Buenos Aires in their final warmup game.
In Europe, Spain returned to the finals for the first time since 1950 with a side largely built around the aging brilliance of Internazionale’s Luis Suárez, who would be making his tournament debut aged thirty-five.
[6] Romania also returned to the finals for the first time after a long absence (having not qualified since 1934), but the two biggest surprises were the failure of 1966 runners up Portugal to qualify alongside Yugoslavia, who had finished runners up to the Italians in the 1968 European Nations Cup. Portugal’s failure was staggering – from reaching the summit in 1966, they finished bottom of a qualification group with Romania, Greece and Northern Ireland. Elsewhere, there were no real surprises – Germany, Italy, Bulgaria and the Soviets all comfortably qualified, while Hungary narrowly finished ahead of the Czechoslovaks. Belgium, the last European team to qualify had the satisfaction of finishing ahead of their neighbours France.
In Africa, Morocco returned to the finals ahead of Nigeria, South Africa and Sudan – unlike the tense finish in 1966, the Moroccans won what was a straight shootout with Nigeria who had surprisingly knocked out Ghana in the preliminaries. In Asia, Australia surprisingly won out, finishing ahead of Korea, Japan, the Peoples Republic of China and Iran to qualify for the first time.
[7]
Participating teams
- Argentina (hosts)
- England (holders)
- Australia (debut)
- Belgium
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
- El Salvador (debut)
- Germany
- Hungary
- Italy
- Morocco
- Peru
- Romania
- Soviet Union
- Spain
- Uruguay
The draw, held in Buenos Aires on March 22 1970, saw the seeding system introduced in 1954 retained, with the groups again split geographically, with Group 1 in Buenos Aires, Group 2 in Mar del Plata and La Plata, Group 3 split between Rosario and Mendoza and Group 4 divided between Córdoba and Tucuman.
The seeds were: Argentina, Brazil, England, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Soviet Union and Uruguay. The draw was as follows:
Group 1: Argentina, Soviet Union, Belgium, Morocco
Group 2: Italy, Hungary, Peru, El Salvador
Group 3: Germany, Uruguay, Spain, Australia
Group 4: Brazil, England, Romania, Bulgaria
Tournament summary
Group 1
Group 1 grouped the hosts Argentina with the Soviets, Belgium and the 1962 African heroes Morocco. Argentina, who had earned a deserved reputation for overt physicality, had refreshed their side, though the core of the squad from 1966 remained intact. The Soviets, were also in a period of transition, but had a experienced squad, while Morocco were built around a core of the army side FAR Rabat.
The opening game, between Argentina and the Soviet Union ended in a 0-0 draw in front of a capacity crowd in Buenos Aires, as both sides cancelled each other out in a sterile draw. The game, minus a chance from left-back Silvio Marzolini, is perhaps notable for Lev Yashin breaking the record for the oldest player at the World Cup at the age of forty and winning his 75th cap in the process.
[8] In the other match, Belgium recovered from a surprise Maouhoub Ghazouani opener to beat Morocco 3-1, with Paul van Himst scoring a hat-trick, the third of which involved a sumptuous volley to leave Allal Benkassou no chance.
In the second round of fixtures, Argentina improved to beat Belgium 4-1, with Oscar Más scoring twice and setting up another in a performance which drew widespread attention from European clubs
[9], though an injury suffered by Marzolini marred the result. In the other game, the Soviets under long serving manager Gavril Kachalin
[10], failed to convert a series of chances and were held to a surprise 1-1 draw with Morocco, with a rare error from Albert Shesternyov allowing Mohammed El Filali to tap home and cancel out Anatoliy Byshovets opener. The game, played José Amalfitani, was notable for having the first red card at the world cup, as Jalili Fadili was dismissed for a scything challenge on Gennady Yevryuzhikhin. Despite the man advantage, the Moroccan defence, superbly marshalled by captain Moulay Khanousi, shut out the Soviets, though they were lucky that a Soviet shot that crossed the line was denied by the Austrian linesman.
The final round of matches, saw Argentina ease to a 2-0 win over Morocco, with Roque Avallay and Rodolfo Fischer scoring in either half, much to the delight of the watching President Ongania, who attended all the Argentine matches.
[11] Elsewhere, the Soviets eased to a 1-0 victory over Belgium who were unlucky to lose, with Yashin belying his age in a superb performance – sadly it would be his counterpart, the young Christian Piot who’s error would gift the Soviets victory, dropping a high ball into the path of substitute Eduard Streltsov to tap home.
[12] The results saw Argentina top the group ahead of the Soviets, while the Belgians and Morocco exited with a measure of pride.
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Points |
1 | Argentina | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 5 |
2 | Soviet Union | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 |
3 | Belgium | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 2 |
4 | Morocco | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
Results
13 June Argentina 0-0 Soviet Union
14 June Belgium 3-1 Morocco
16 June Argentina 4-1 Belgium
17 June Soviet Union 1-1 Morocco
19 June Morocco 0-2 Argentina
20 June Soviet Union 1-0 Belgium
Group 2
Group 2 paired an improving Italy, with an aging Hungary, a talented Peru and debutantes El Salvador who had surprised Mexico to qualify. Italy, under Edmondo Fabbri, played a more attacking style than their predecessors in the 1960s, but were still prone to workmanlike displays and often saw Gianni Rivera introduced as a late substitute, rather than a starter.
[13] Hungary, long competitive on the international stage, were beginning to enter something of a downward era, but were still expected to be competitive with Flórián Albert leading the line. Both Peru and El Salvador were something of an unknown, but Peru had become increasingly competitive in South America, winning the 1969 Campeonato Sudamericano (perhaps aided by both Uruguay and Brazil sending weakened squads) while El Salvador’s triumph over Mexico was a genuine shock.
[14]
The first round of fixtures saw Italy ease to a 2-0 victory over Hungary, with Luigi Riva, who had spearheaded the unlikely league triumph of provincial Sardinian side Cagliari, scoring twice. Hungary, perhaps unsettled by an injury to Albert, who hobbled off after a hard tackle from Giorgio Puia, faded from the game and the contest was virtually over by the hour mark. In the other match, Peru comfortably dispatched El Salvador 4-0, with Teófilo Cubillas, Alberto Gallardo and Eladio Reyes. Peru, playing in a kit perfect for technicolour, played with real panache, leaving the El Salvadorans no real chance – indeed if it hadn’t been for Gualberto Fernández in the El Salvador goal, the Peruvians could easily have scored ten, such was their dominance.
[15]
The second round of games saw Italy and Peru play out an entertaining 2-2 draw, with Cubillas scoring twice to ensure Peru shared the points after Angelo Domenghini and Riva had put them two goals in front. Italy, so long associated with sterile defence, were playing with an attacking verve rarely seen at national level, though Fabbri’s unlikely reinvention as an all-out attacking coach was one that many felt would collapse on its own internal contradictions as soon as the Italians found themselves under any real attacking pressure. Gianni Brera, the doyen of Italian sports writing had long dismissed Rivera as
il abatino for his lack of defensive application, was scathing of Fabbri’s decision to deploy him in the place of Sandro Mazzola.
[16] Meanwhile, Hungary crushed El Salvador in La Plata, scoring six unanswered goals in the second half to win 6-1, the El Salvadorans being rewarded for taking a surprise lead with a pummelling. Their goal, which came in the 34th minute, was against the run of play, but the first half itself was a poor one, with neither side really able to get to grips with the pitch. Hungary, under Rudolf Illovszky, changed tactics in the second half, going more direct, and relying on Ferenc Bene’s speed and extraordinary finishing ability to do the rest. Bene, playing off the taller, more withdrawn János Farkas, ran riot setting a record for most goals scored by one player in a world cup match, with five, with Farkas scoring the last to add gloss to the finish. El Salvador, despite the shellacking, had at least scored their first world cup goal.
The final round of matches saw Italy ease to a 3-0 victory over El Salvador, though the goal that broke the deadlock was highly controversial. The Egyptian referee, Ali Kandil appeared to stop play for a foul, but Riva continued and blasted past the rooted Fernández. Despite vociferous protests, Kandil allowed the goal to stand, and El Salvador wilted, bringing their campaign to a sad end. Elsewhere Peru and Hungary played out a 1-1 draw, with the Peruvians indebted to their captain Héctor Chumpitaz who marshalled his defence superbly. Whether a fully-fit Flórián Albert would’ve made a difference has long been debated in Budapest, but for the first time they were exiting the world cup at the first round, a result met with sadness and resignation on the Danbue. Peru, meanwhile, had qualified for their first ever quarter final.
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Points |
1 | Italy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 5 |
2 | Peru | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 4 |
3 | Hungary | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 3 |
4 | El Salvador | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 | -12 | 0 |
Results
13 June Italy 2-0 Hungary
14 June Peru 4-0 El Salvador
16 June Italy 2-2 Peru
17 June Hungary 6-1 El Salvador
19 June El Salvador 0-3 Italy
20 June Hungary 1-1 Peru
Group 3
Group 3 paired 1962 winners Germany with three-time champions Uruguay (in a repeat of the 1966 bronze medal match), Spain appearing at their first world cup in twenty years and debutantes Australia, who’s squad was almost entirely domestic based but included players with experience of European leagues.
[17]
The opening round of matches saw Germany ease to a 1-0 win over Spain, who’s veteran playmaker (and former holder of the transfer record) Luis Suárez came close to scoring a late equaliser for the Spanish. Spain, a direct and hard-running side, lacked polish in the final third, with Suárez often on a different wavelength to his teammates, allowing the Germans to simply mark him out of the game. Germany’s goal, from the poacher extraordinaire Gerhard Müller, powering a header from a floating Netzer cross past the static José Ángel Iribar in the Spanish goal to seal the win.
Elsewhere, Uruguay eased to a 2-0 win over a spirited Australia, who came close to taking the lead through captain Johnny Warren, who’s shot was well-saved by Ladislao Mazurkiewicz. Uruguay, playing a more dynamic style than their more defensive approach of four years ago, had too much quality for the Australians, who were nonetheless cheered loudly by the local crowd.
[18]
The second round of games saw Uruguay and Spain play out a 1-1 draw in Rosario, with an error from Antonio Bentacourt, a late replacement for José Ángel Iribar after the latter had injured his hand in training, allowing Juan Mujica to steal home from a corner, after Bentacourt had spilled a corner into his path.
[19] Spain, despite the setback, grew into the game and equalised through Joaquín Peiró, who like Luis Suárez had spent most of his career in Italy.
[20] The match, despite the somewhat substandard pitch, was an entertaining one, but one also marked by unsettling images of massed army personnel around the running track.
[21]
Germany, beat Australia 3-1, with Müller’s hat-trick cancelling out Johnny Warren’s surprise opener. The Germans, playing a passing style in contrast to the fast-running approach with which they’d won in 1962, were nevertheless supremely fit, and ran their largely semi-professional opponents of the park, though Australia’s striker Ray Baartz unsettled the usually unflappable Anton Beckenbauer with his hard-running style. Germany, now under the management of Georg Buschner, the long-serving coach of SV Jena, were something of a side in transition, though several veterans of the 1962 triumph were still in the squad including Uwe Seeler and Peter Ducke.
[22]
In the final round of fixtures, Germany overcame a stubborn Uruguay to win 2-1 with nineteen-year-old Joachim Streich (a surprise pick, but one who had an exceptional debut season for Hansa Rostock in the Bundesliga) scoring a late-winner as a substitute to send Germany through as group winners. Both sides attacked in waves, with Josef Maier in the German goal making a superb save to deny Rocha a second goal. Played in Rosario, the match itself was an advert for attacking football, with Germany’s captain Uwe Seeler setting up Gerhard Müller for his fifth goal of the tournament. Viewed by many as one of the best games in the group stages, both sides would be involved in classic matches in the knockout stage as well.
Spain, depleted by injury, eased to a 1-0 victory over Australia, thanks to a goal from Suárez, though the Australians who played with a dogged determination, and were deeply unlucky not to equalise, as Miguel Reina (the third Spanish goalkeeper to play at the finals) tipped Baartz’s goalbound header onto the crossbar. Despite their failure to win a game, Australia returned home from Argentina with their heads justifiably high. Spain despite their failure to qualify for the knockout stage (despite finishing level on points with Uruguay, their goal difference was inferior) laid the groundwork for the side that would host the tournament in 1974.
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Points |
1 | Germany | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 5 |
2 | Uruguay | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 |
3 | Spain | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
4 | Australia | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
Results
13 June Germany 1-0 Spain
14 June Uruguay 2-0 Australia
16 June Uruguay 1-1 Spain
17 June Australia 1-3 Germany
19 June Germany 2-1 Uruguay
20 June Spain 1-0 Australia
Group 4
Group 4 paired the holders England with 1958 winners Brazil, and two Eastern European sides in Romania and Bulgaria, with the Romanians making their appearance at the finals since 1934. The group, staged between Córdoba and Tucuman was viewed as a straight shootout between the English and Brazilians. England, still under the shrewd management of Bill Nicholson, had gradually refreshed their squad, though mainstays of the 1966 team, including Gordon Banks, Fred Moore, (who had become the first £200,000 player in British history upon signing for Tottenham Hotspur from West Ham in 1967), Bobby Charlton, Martin Peters and Jimmy Greaves
[23] remained key to the side. Brazil combined exquisite skill with a team trained in endurance, having used the military government’s Cold War ties to the US government to do a series of endurance training, with an emphasis on fitness training, with a series of fitness trainers and medical staff appointed to the side from the Brazilian military.
[24] Bulgaria and Romania were both competitive sides, though neither had particularly strong international records, with Bulgaria having finished bottom of their group at both the 1962 World Cup and the 1968 European Nations Cup, while Romania were returning to the world finals for the first time in nearly four decades.
The opening round of matches saw England defeat Romania 2-1, with Francis Lee and Joe Royle on the scoresheet, with Mircea Lucescu netting a late consolation for the Romanians. England, having largely refined their style since the 1966 victory were in some ways a better team than the one that had won four years ago, having largely refreshed the squad with players more comfortable playing a multi-functional role.
[25] Nevertheless, despite the victory the ease with which Lucescu burst past George Cohen alarmed Nicholson, and he was replaced by Leeds United’s right-back Paul Reaney for the rest of the tournament, bringing a sad end to an excellent international career.
[26]
Elsewhere, Brazil ran riot in a 4-1 victory over the Bulgarians, who were subject to a display of potency and attacking skill not seen by a Brazil side since 1962, as Yustrich and Mário Lobo adopted a system designed to get the best out of their attacking players.
[27] The Bulgarians, generally compact but not offering much of an attacking threat, were torn to shreds by the interplay between Dico and Eduardo Andrade who both scored alongside Jair Ventura and Dario José. Brazil’s second goal, involving a string of passes from defence to midfield to the overlapping full-back Carlos Alberto, who cut back to Roberto Rivellino who dinked the ball into the path of Dico to slot home, is one of the greatest goals in the history of the tournament, and fired a warning to the rest of the world – Brazil were not hear for platitudes.
The second round of matches saw the Brazilians and English play out an entertaining 1-1 draw, with Greaves late strike cancelling out Andrade’s opener. England, despite suffering a setback when Charlton had to go off injured, held their own and Brazil were indebted to their goalkeeper Félix Miélli for a superb save from Geoff Hurst, which saw him tip a goalward bound header over the bar, much to the disbelief of the English. The game was also notable for it’s low foul count, with both sides generally playing fairly, in a pleasant contrast to the wanton brutality which had passed for contests between Latin American and European sides at both international and club level for the preceding decade. In Tucuman, Romania won their first match at the finals since 1930, defeating Bulgaria in a tightly-contested game, settled by a Emerich Dembrovschi goal in the last five minutes. The game, played in the most northerly of the venues, was held the day after a massive clampdown on the workersprotest movement, with both the military and riot police on the streets and volley after volley of teargas deployed.
[28] Romania’s victory, was watched by the smallest crowd at the finals, with only 12,000 or so watching in a stadium built for three-times as many.
The final round of fixtures saw Brazil triumph in a thriller against the Romanians 4-3, with Dico scoring twice and Jair Ventura and Roberto Rivellino adding the rest. The game, ended up feeling like a basketball match as both sides committed to all-out attack, with Dico’s second leaving a memorable image, as four canary yellow shirts bore down on two Romanian defenders. The game, which saw Brazil finish the group stage with an average of three goals a game, would later be commemorated in a series of performance art pieces by the Japanese artist Yoko Ono, as football became increasingly of interest to the art world. England, shorn of such pretension eased to a 1-0 victory over Bulgaria with Francis Lee scoring the winner with a volleyed shot from a deflected clearance. While not a vintage display, England’s win saw them qualify alongside Brazil, though they finished second despite being on level points, due to Brazil’s superior goal difference.
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Points |
1 | Brazil | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 5 |
2 | England | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 5 |
3 | Romania | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 |
4 | Bulgaria | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 0 |
Results
13 June England 2-1 Romania
14 June Brazil 4-1 Bulgaria
16 June England 1-1 Brazil
17 June Romania 1-0 Bulgaria
19 June Brazil 4-3 Romania
20 June Bulgaria 0-1 England
Quarter finals
Following the conclusion of the group stages, the quarter finals were drawn on 21 June, with the hosts Argentina paired with Peru, Italy facing the Soviets, Germany facing England and Brazil drawn with old foes Uruguay.
The opening quarter final, between Argentina and Peru saw Argentina eventually triumph in extra time in a game that burst into life in the second half. Whether it was the sense of occasion, the pressure of playing to a capacity crowd in front of the president, or perhaps the absence of Silvio Marzolini for Argentina, who’s attacking thrusts down the left were sorely missed. And yet, despite the sterility, neither side wilted, and with legs tiring, and the crowd almost lulled by the hypnotic boredom of the spectacle in front of them, the game turned. Oswaldo Ramírez, the foil to Teófilo Cubillas, burst through an Argentine defence too slow to react to a through ball from Pedro Pablo León and smashed the ball past Antonio Roma in the Argentine goal.
[29] Rafael Albrecht would equalise before Ramírez scored again, getting above his marker to power a home a header from a corner a minute after Albrecht had restored parity. With Peru looking on course to cause an almighty upset, Argentine substitute Alberto Rendo, who had come on for captain Antonio Rattín scored with a scuffed shot, which took a deflection off of Peruvian captain Héctor Chumpitaz to leave Luis Rubiños in the Peru goal no chance. In extra time, with both sides nearly off their feet, Argentina sealed it when an exhausted Alberto Gallardo failed to clear properly and substitute Aníbal Tarabini tucked home in the 117th minute to send Argentina through, much to the relief of the nation.
Italy, playing with greater freedom than previous tournaments, saw off the Soviets 3-1, though the game was effectively decided as a contest in the 60th minute, when Soviet captain Albert Shesternyov was sent off for a debatable second yellow, for a push on Gianni Rivera. Down to ten men, and without their inspirational skipper, the Soviet defence wilted and the Italians added two easy goals to give gloss to the scoreline, with Riva scoring twice, and Rivera adding the third, with Yashin having no chance with any of them.
[30] The Soviets afternoon could be summed up by their consolation goal, Pierluigi Cera making an absolute hash of a clearance and smashing the ball past his own goalkeeper. It was a sad end to the career of one of their great servants in Lev Yashin, who played his 78th and final game for the national side.
Germany and England, meeting for only the second time at the tournament (England having previously defeated Germany 1-0 in the 1958 quarter finals), played out a thriller in Córdoba, with the Germans holding on to break English hearts. In an end to end game, high on tension and attacking intent, if not always end product, the veteran Uwe Seeler would prove the hero, scoring a late winner due to a defensive error from the usually unflappable Fred Moore, who’s decision to hold onto the ball near his own goal-line and shepherd it out for a goal kick saw German substitute Hans-Jürgen Kreische steal in and nip the ball from him, before cutting back for Seeler, who had stepped in front of Norman Hunter to drive past Gordon Banks.
[31] Before that, the two sides had cancelled each other out, though England had largely been in control, thanks to Martin Peters opening goal. And yet, Germany didn’t wilt – Beckenbauer, playing one of his many outstanding performances for the national side, began to slowly grow into the game, and initiated the move which led to Peter Ducke equalising. Geoff Hurst, had a goal ruled out for offside, but from the equaliser Germany steadily grew into controlling the match tempo, with England pushed further and further back, before Moore’s mistake sealed the victory.
In the final game, Brazil eased to a 2-0 victory over Uruguay thanks to a goal in each half from Dico and Jair Ventura, though Uruguay were perhaps unlucky to see Víctor Espárrago’s goalbound shot cleared off the line by Wilson Piazza. Uruguay were also hindered by an injury suffered by their captain Pedro Rocha, which reduced their attacking play, and faced with a strong defence and unyielding waves of attack struggled to deal with the pressure – indeed if it hadn’t been for the exceptional Ladislao Mazurkiewicz, they could easily have lost by more.
Results
27 June Argentina 3-2 Peru
27 June Italy 3-1 Soviets
27 June Germany 2-1 England
27 June Brazil 2-0 Uruguay
Semi-finals
The semi-final draw paired Argentina with Germany and Brazil with Italy, with both games taking place in Buenos Aires. The hosts, buoyed by fervent home support, had eased into the semi-finals without particularly impressing (Brian Glanville describing them as one of the worst last-four sides in recent memory) hampered as they were by Silvio Marzolini’s absence from their left flank. Germany, in contrast, had emerged from a tough group and then knocked out the holders in the quarter finals, though they had also had the toughest game of any of the semi-finalists in the preceding round.
The game, hosted in front of a capacity crowd and numerous attendees from Ongania’s regime, as well as the German foreign minister Walter Scheel.
[32] The game, in contrast to the barnstorming classic played out the day after, was a controversial one, with several instances of hard tacking on Germany’s midfield maestros Overath and Netzer going unpunished by the Peruvian referee Arturo Yamasaki. Germany, opened the scoring thanks to Netzer, a surprise starter.
[33] Netzer, running onto a dinked pass from Beckenbauer, drew two Argentine defenders out of position with a mazy run, before threading a ball through for Müller to pounce.
Argentina, possessed by a wave of fury from the crowd, came out swinging in response, attacking at pace and tackling with a physicality that caught the Germans by surprise. Under the direction of their captain Antonio Rattín, they scrapped and cajoled and worked their way up the pitch and secured an equaliser after the usually unflappable Willi Schulz miskicked a clearance under pressure from Agustín Balbuena, which allowed an unmarked Tarabini to blast past the stranded Maier, sending the crowd into a frenzy. The second half was less a football match than an exhibition in theatrics as the Argentines took the lead through Alberto Rendo and proceeded to protect it via time-wasting, gamesmanship, near constant fouling of Netzer and lax refereeing. The game, descending into farce, saw the Germans become increasingly wound up by the Argentine antics, and their rhythm was further disrupted by an injury to Beckenbauer. Nevertheless, despite the provocations, Argentina were indebted to their veteran goalkeeper Antonio Roma, who made two brilliant saves to deny both Joachim Streich and Uwe Seeler, to send Argentina through to their first final since 1934, and the third in a row to see the hosts make it.
[34]
In contrast to the gamesmanship on display in the first semi-final, Brazil and Italy produced an all-time classic, the Brazilians eventually triumphing 3-2 after an enthralling spectacle which saw both sides throw caution to the wind. Italy’s commitment to attacking at the tournament, memorably described by Hugh McIlvanney, as “watching a priest cast off the frock and rechristen himself as the return of Lord Byron”, saw them take the game to Brazil in a manner the Brazilians perhaps weren’t expecting. The first half, saw a ten-minute burst where three goals were scored, Italy’s dual
registas Mazzola and Rivera passing around the generally excellent Brazilian midfield, setting up Riva to score twice, neither goal leaving Félix Miélli any chance. And yet despite the wave of attacks, the two sides almost designed for the technicolour ages, as yellow shirts crashed against blue in the midafternoon sun, Brazil held on with Dico scoring their first on the verge of half-time, dinking a finish beyond the reach of Enrico Albertosi.
The second half, saw Italy’s never falter as Edmondo Fabbri substituted Mazzola for his more-defensive minded Internazionale teammate Mario Bertini. Without Mazzola’s diligence however, the Italian midfield began to find itself overran as they retreated further and further into their own half, allowing Brazil space to exploit.
And how they exploited it! The Brazilian equaliser, one of the most famous goals scored in the tournament’s history, is also one of its most beautiful, as the Brazilians strung together eighteen passes before Carlos Alberto thundered home. The Italians, seemingly shellshocked wilted, and Brazil’s winner came from substitute Dario José, who headed home from a corner to send Brazil through to face their great rivals and neighbours Argentina.
The third-place playoff, played in Rosario saw Italy win a tight contest 1-0 following a goal from Luigi Riva, to see Italy achieve their highest finish at the tournament since their back-to-back triumphs in the 1930s.
Results
1 July Argentina 2-1 Germany
1 July Italy 2-3 Brazil
Third place playoff
4 July Italy 1-0 Germany
Final
Many finals are competitive, many are one-sided and many are narrow contests decided by one moment of skill. The 1970 World Cup final was not any of these. It was a rout, a moment of national humiliation as Brazil fully exercised the demons of 1950 on a rival host nation. More importantly, it was a crushing defeat for brute physicality, as the Brazilians, possibly the side best equipped to deal with such tactics at the final, simply played through and around the Argentines as if they were marionettes. Indeed if it hadn’t been for the veteran Antonio Roma, the scoreline could’ve been far worse.
The game, despite the one-side nature saw moments of real skill and talent, Dico’s goal from a Roberto Rivellino through-ball, subtly changing pace and accelerating past a hatchet man defence to leave Roma no chance. Argentina, struggling to deal with the Brazilian’s metronomic passing in midfield were left stranded by the second, which saw every single one of the Brazilian outfield players involved as the defence moved the ball to midfield who passed the Argentines out of existence to allow Dico to thread the ball through for Brazil left-back Everaldo to blast home.
[35] Argentina, shellshocked and playing to a largely silent stadium (minus a noisy Brazilian corner) managed to claw a goal back through Rafael Albrecht, but the result remained indelible – they were not going to win.
Brazil further added to their lead, as Clodoaldo Tavares, Brazil’s midfield anchorman scored his only international goal, picking the ball some thirty yard out and blasting far beyond the reach of a despairing Antonio Roma, who had made several fantastic saves to keep the score respectable. Brazil’s fourth and final goal, came from Hércules Brito who drove a header home to emphasise the win and Brazil’s total dominance over Argentina.
Upon the final whistle, the atmosphere was funereal, no band striking up a patriotic jaunt to celebrate Argentina’s victory. Much has been written about Brazil’s dominance in the final, their so called love of artistry winning through. This is very much a fatuous reading – Brazil played attractive football, but they won because they were fitter than any other side at the tournament, and because of their military regime’s cold war ties, they were tougher as well. Juan Carlos Ongania may have led a corporatist, military regime, but Argentina did not spend two and a half months before the tournament being trained by Brazilian and American military personnel how to endure, or indeed how to win.
Ongania had built the stadiums, he had renovated them and he had celebrated the World Cup as being the moment to celebrate the apotheosis of his regime’s glory, and thus Argentina’s. Three years later, the victim of a coup by his comrades in arms, he’d find himself tried and executed in the stadium where had watched those dreams turn to ash.
[1] With the exception of Chile, which remained a representative democracy throughout the Cold War, and the populist leftism of Jorge Gaitán and his followers in Colombia, South America was dominated by authoritarian regimes during this period, most of whom were unified by a stringent anti-communist world view.
[2] There are too many incidents to mention in one short paragraph, but the level of violence was such that some managers, including England’s Bill Nicholson called on sides to boycott the fixture. The Intercontinental Cup would shift location and format as commercialisation and business interests in the Far East saw it become an increasingly lucrative venture.
[3] Roberto Perfumo’s move from Racing Club to Cruziero may also have played a part, as Argentina would’ve been without their key centre-back for the tournament. Perfumo would remain the only overseas based player in Argentina’s squad.
[4] How much of Argentina’s economic resources was committed has never been fully substantiated, but the consensus figure remains around 11-14% of the country’s GDP during the 1960s.
[5] The Pacific Football Confederation merged with the Asian Football Union in 1966, having (alongside their counterparts in the Middle East) previously signed a memorandum of understanding. The new body, headquartered in Hong Kong, was renamed the Asia-Pacific Football Union or APFU.
[6] Spain’s national side had undergone something of a renaissance in the late sixties, finishing fourth at the 1968 European Nations Cup, and qualifying ahead of European silver medallists Yugoslavia,.
[7] The Asian qualifiers saw politics intervene as the Republic of China refused to play the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, while Indonesia refused to play West Papua or Malaya due to disagreements between its communist government and those two nations.
[8] The match report being a sole paragraph in
The Times perhaps proving the lack of quality on display
[9] Más would join Madrid F.C. in 1971.
[10] Kachalin was in his second spell in charges, having taken over after the 1966 World Cup.
[11] At the same time, the Argentine military was engaged in a brutal suppression campaign in the northern regions of the country. Ongania, ever alert to propaganda opportunities was frequently seen in full military uniform.
[12] Streltsov, who would retire after the finals, would alongside Yashin, remain the only Soviet player to play in four consecutive finals.
[13] The Italian media had been surprised to see Fabbri retained, but he led his side to their first World Cup quarter final since 1950 and victory at the 1968 European Nations Cup. Nevertheless, despite shifting to a more attacking style, Fabbri was a pragmatic, cautious coach and the idea of two playmakers (particularly including one in Rivera who had limited work rate) was anathema to him.
[14] Becoming only the fourth North American side to appear at the finals, El Salvador had also overcome sporting challenges, including having to play their home qualifiers in Guatemala City, due to the increasing violence of a growing rural insurgency, which had seen the military take power and declare martial law.
[15] El Salvador were perhaps undermined by news that riot police had killed seven protestors and injured hundreds more in a demonstration against the military government on the day of the game itself.
[16] Joao Saldanha, the Brazilian journalist, in his reflections on the tournament maintained that if the pair had been Brazilian, they would’ve been deployed in tandem, with another midfielder operating in the Lobo role.
[17] Australia’s squad, much to the chagrin of conservative commentators was largely immigrant based, with the majority of the squad born overseas. Their squad did contain players with experience of European leagues, with goalkeeper John Reilly having played for Hibernian and a number of other players having played in the lower divisions of the English Football League, including former Leyton Orient player Ray Richards.
[18] How much of this was due to the rivalry between Argentina and Uruguay or genuine support for the underdog is a question perhaps best left unanswered.
[19] This was a rare error from Betancourt, who had been Madrid F.C.’s first choice since the mid-60s, though he was appearing in only his seventh game for Spain, and first in three years when called upon.
[20] Peiró, at 34 was making his world cup debut, would return to Athletic Club de Madrid where he had previously made his name. Athletic Madrid, who had alongside Barcelona challenged Madrid F.C. dominance (thanks in part to a relationship with the country’s air force which evolved into a partnership with the national airline Iberia) would enjoy a sustained period of success upon Peiró’s return to the club in 1970.
[21] Ongania’s regime was in the midst of fighting a long and bloody internal war against hard-left guerillas in the interior of the country, and had brutally repressed a series of wildcat strikes in Mendoza in the month sleading up to the tournament.
[22] Buschner, who had won a handful of caps as a player in the 1950s, was a competent tactician, if a somewhat surprise choice for the national team job. However after Georg Gawliczek had stood down in 1968, and the DFB had been unable to agree compensation with Borussia Mönchengladbach for Schön’s services, Buschner was appointed. His record at SV Jena, establishing as a consistent top-half side and a league champion in 1968 (as well as several cup triumphs) saw him picked by the DFB as Gawliczek’s successor.
[23] Alan Ball and Geoff Hurst were both in the squad, alongside George Cohen. The squad also contained new blood, with players from Manchester City, Everton and Leeds United in the squad, though it retained the Manchester United-Tottenham Hotspur core from the ’66 team.
[24] Increasingly strong ties between the Brazilian military regime and that of Ongania’s Argentina would also see a military attaché travel with the side, and members of the Brazilian military used the tournament to meet with their South American counterparts for in-depth discussions on how to counter their respective insurgencies.
[25] Greaves, who’s scoring record in both the football league and at international level remained undimmed, saw his role largely reduced to that of super-sub by Nicholson who recognised that his increasing lack of pace, hindered by a series of injuries he suffered playing for Chelsea (where he was largely expected to play every game) reduced his contribution. Nicholson, an astute man-manager encouraged Greaves to sign with Brian Clough’s Derby County where he would eventually revive his career.
[26] Reaney, a disciplined right-back and superb marker made history when making his debut in 1968 by becoming the first mixed-race (and second non-white international after Frank Soo) to play for England. Alongside utility-man Paul Madely, Norman Hunter and Terry Cooper, he was one of a strong Leeds contingent in the England squad for the 1970 tournament.
[27] Yustrich, a pragmatic coach with a fearsome temper, had been something of a surprise appointment to the role, but alongside Lobo developed a style of play built around rapid passing and off-the-ball movement with technical midfielders who could hold their own against the overt physicality which had undone Brazil in 1962 and 1966.
[28] So much teargas was deployed that both sides abandoned their respective training sessions at the stadium, with an apocryphal story told that both countries communist governments sent diplomatic protests to Buenos Aires decrying their treatment.
[29] Roma, who was thirty-seven, was a controversial pick as first-choice, with longstanding rumours that the Argentine sports ministry put pressure on Humberto Maschio to keep him as first choice due to President Ongania’s fondness for him. Maschio’s assistant coach Adolfo Pedernera would later state that it was Maschio’s mistrust of the younger Hugo Gatti and Miguel Ángel Santoro that saw Roma retained as first choice.
[30] Yashin had originally been called up as third choice, after announcing that the 1970 Soviet season would be his last, but injuries to Viktor Bannikov and Anzor Kavazashvili saw him return as first choice at the age of forty.
[31] Nicholson, a manager who was both tactically astute and a decent man-manager, refused to blame Moore for the mistake, though Hunter, who was deputising for the injured Brian Labone would rarely appear for England after the tournament.
[32] Scheel’s attendance as part of a broader conference between several key CECI member states and their South American counterparts over increased economic links, partially encouraged by the Kennedy Administration in the United States, was controversial in Germany, particularly amongst the left.
[33] Georg Buschner tended to select one of Wolfgang Overath or Günther Netzer, generally preferring Overath for his increased workrate, and pairing them with a more defensive counterpart. Buschner, an often unheralded coach pulled a surprise with the expectation that Overath and Netzer’s combination play would unsettle an Argentine midfield built around a hard-working, physical trio.
[34] Much ink has been spent on discussing whether there was a conspiracy at FIFA to ensure that host nations would win the tournament, though no evidence has ever been produced to support it. In both Germany and England, the tournaments were won by the most consistent side rather than the best (Brazil and Portugal), while the Argentines are sadly remembered for their overemphasis on brute force, often overshadowing just how talented so many of their players were during the 1960s.
[35] The goal, regularly voted the greatest in world cup history, would gain a second life in the cultural world, with Borges (who hated football) immortalising it in a short story, while JG Ballard would incorporate it into one of his many tales of postwar British deprivation.