• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Lists of Heads of Government and Heads of State

1990 - 1995: John Major (Conservative) [1]
1992 (Majority) def. Neil Kinnock (Labour), Paddy Ashdown (Liberal Democrat)
1995 - 1996: Ian Lang (Conservative Majority) [2]
1996 - 1999: Robin Cook (Labour) [3]

1996 (Majority) def. Ian Lang (Conservative), Paddy Ashdown (Liberal Democrat)
1999 - : Margaret Beckett (Labour Majority, Acting) [4]
1999 - 2003: Kevin Barron (Labour) [5]

2000 (Majority) def. Michael Portillo (Conservative), Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
2003 Euro Referendum: Yes 41%, No 59%

2003 - : Stephen Dorrell (Conservative) [6]
2003 (Majority) def. Kevin Barron (Labour), Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)

1). John Major’s time in office had been tough, whilst he had weathered the aftermath of the Poll Tax debacle, the recession of the Early 90s and beaten Kinnock in 92’, his time after that was less than desired. His grand vision of integrating Britain into the emerging European Project came crashing out during Black Wednesday, and his Back To Basics scheme was washed away by sex and sleaze. Still there was the dull hope that maybe, with the recession finally over and Britain stabilising that maybe John Major could cling on to power for a little while longer. But in 1995, as the party was divided over Europe and other internal conflicts and Labour under a fairly different leadership was making gains, Major decided he was going to confront those within his party and call it to a vote. Some historians ponder what would have happened if Portillo hadn’t put himself forward as the Candidate of the Right, or if someone less charismatic had been the one to challenged Major, then maybe Major could have continued. But as the abstentions and votes were counted, it became apparent that Major’s situation was untenable. Resigning, Major’s exit was seen as fairly graceful considering all that had occurred to him. Major’s post Premiership would be a firebreak as he called it from politics, he has since become fairly familiar for his work for charity and think tanks than for anything particularly political these days, attempts to get him to compete to be London Mayor in 2006 would see him politely declining.

2). As is the case with Conservative Party politics, though Portillo had used the dagger, it didn’t mean he gained the crown. Initially it looked likely that he would win, he was popular with the public, and with large sections of the party, Ken Clarke and Michael Heseltine with there controversial views on Europe seemed unlikely to be able to muscle Portillo out the way. In the end, the choice for the Anti-Portillo candidate came to be Ian Lang, a moderate Scottish Thatcherite, his inclination was very much in line with the John Major view of Conservatism. Lang would gain support of most of Major’s former comrades as well as several of figures who had supported Portillo initially, but felt ill at ease with Portillo becoming leader, Lang would narrowly beat Portillo in the coming race.

Lang’s ability to survive within increasingly politically alien of Scotland, allowed him to carve a path somewhat removed from the memories of Thatcher. He didn’t represent the shiny glossy Conservatism of Portillo, but his witty conciliatory tone and his centrist approach to policies helped calm the boat somewhat. The Conservatives would begin gaining in the polls again, as the economy improved and unemployment reduced. Not helping matters was that Labour’s at times aggressive campaigning against Lang seemed to harsh for it’s own good. Amongst certain figures in Labour, Labour there was a worry that they could lose and discussions about a potential Progressive Alliance were bandied about, supported by the respective Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders. But whilst Lang’s cautious, pragmatic approach was popular with the public, amongst his own party, it was much to be desired.

Pressure would grow for Lang to call a snap election, the economy was good, his majority was thinning with time, party was united (for now) and Labour’s polling rise had grown to a sluggish halt amid it’s own internal problems. So in the Summer of 1996, having been the office for just over a year, Lang decided to call a snap election for July.

Many different factors have been used to blame the Conservative defeat in 1996, some blame Lang as running a dull campaign, some blame the Scott Report, some blame Neil Hamilton, others blame the 96’ Euros and England’s Performance but in the end most people agree that generally the Conservative defeat was just due to being office so long, Fifteen Years is a very long time in politics to say the least. Labour gained a Sixty Seat Majority and Lang himself would just narrowly retain his seat, being declared the winner on a third recount, by a slim majority of two hundred, becoming the one of two remaining Scottish Conservatives MPs remaining. Lang would bow out of frontline politics soon after, becoming a peer and generally fading into the background as he prefers.

3). Robin Cook had become leader in the Autumn of 1994, mainly following John Smith’s second heart attack. Smith would resign, but feeling frustrated by the machinations of Blair who he saw has having helped lead to his retirement from the leadership office, he would provide some soft support to Cook’s bid for leadership. Cook, always popular figure with the party, would easily win particularly after Blair climbed down, burned by the sun.

Labour for a moment enjoyed a brief flurry of high polling, Cook’s vision of Britain in the late 90s, contrasting with the chaotic Conservative Party and it’s internal machinations. But it became apparent that excellent oratory, passionate leadership and a sharp intellect, couldn’t stop his at times prickly nature, a chaotic personality and a seemingly old fashioned Socialist viewpoint. Indeed a joke that some figures made that Labour had swapped out “one balding, ginger Celtic twat, for another” and image compositions of Cook and Kinnock would be produced in certain electoral propaganda by the Conservative’s.

Still despite Cook’s nature and Labour’s polling stoppage, Labour would win the 1996 election on a platform of Social Democracy, Constitutional Reform and creating a better Britain. On the Home Front, Labour’s policies were popular if somewhat dull, the Trains would enter back into public ownership, helped by a series of rail crashes and derailments that same year, the NHS reforms of the Thatcher and Major Years were rolled back and on social policies, the age of consent for homosexuality would be lowered to match the standard for heterosexual relationships and Section 28 would also be repealed, though attempts to institute civil partnerships and legalisation on gender recognition would flounder in committees for another few years.

On Constitutional Reform, Cook’s ambitions were often stymied as much by his own party as they were by the Opposition. Whilst a Cross Party Committee on Electoral Reform would meet and propose changes, the threat of resignations by figures like Prescott within the cabinet would put the kibosh on any changes, meanwhile attempts to reform the House of Lords would occur but under great strain, with Cook and his allies like Tony Wright, only getting the newly reformed, proportional and smaller Upper House after Cook’s resignation. Devolution, a policy that Cook had once been opposed too, but has become a passionate supporter of in time, would occur, Scotland, Wales, London, Northern England would all gain Elected Assemblies in time, despite protests amongst some over there use. Cook’s Government would even help broker the Hillsborough Accord in Ireland, alongside Michael Noonan, Dick Spring and George Mitchell, helping to reestablish an Irish Assembly and ensure a peaceful end to the Troubles.

It was on Foreign Policy, that Cook would make his mark, but also would see his downfall. When it came to Europe and the European Union, Cook would be supportive of Britain’s further integration within the system, whilst Britain would avoid adopting the Euro initially, due to protests within the Party, Cook would help guide the way for Britain's eventual joining. Cook would also push for a ‘ethical foreign policy’, carrying on Cook’s and other’s principles of helping those at the bottom against the remaining autocrats of the world. Whilst Jack Cunningham would be the face of Britain’s foreign policy, many agreed that Cook and his supporters within the Foreign Ministry like Derek Fatchett were the main culprits behind it.

In some capacity, like the intervention in Sierra Leone or Zambia and the support for the UN mission in Albania whilst controversial in some aspects, was seen as a net positive at the time. In other capacities, Cook’s dealings with India and Pakistan over Kashmir were considered flawed but at least attempted to deal with an increasingly fraught Asia and Middle East.

And then there was Kosovo. Cook would cautiously support the NATO Intervention into the nation and the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia which forced Milošević out of Kosovo. The Bombing would be controversial within elements of Cook’s party, but Conservative support would easily allow the the intervention to go ahead. But in June, the Pristina airport standoff would lead to a near international incident. Whilst the casualties toll was low, with a just barely a dozen wounded from the brief clumsy firefight, the new Russian President Yury Luzhkov ensuing sabre rattling would drive the world to a near standstill, particularly as Luzhkov threatened an embargo on Gas and Minerals.

Whilst Luzhkov’s Nationalistic posturing would end up just being that, the ensuing stress on the European Economy would lead to an economic downturn. Whilst Britain's economy would rebound in time, the threat of unemployment and recession, and the fallout of the Pristina being felt deeply by British public who saw it as a foolhardy venture, would effect Cook’s health. His hair had been starting to grey and thin, his personal life was a mess and rumours of Cook drinking heavily began to circulate. At the end of August in 1999, Robin Cook was on holiday in Scotland when he suffered a severe heart attack. Due to the intervention of Medics, Cook would recover, but it was apparent that Cook could no longer function in the manner of a Prime Minister at the current rate. He would resign from his hospital bed by the end of the week, stating that it was under Doctor’s advice that he step down and that Britain would have an acting Prime Minister during that period.

Cook’s tenure by some within the Labour Party as being the last potential for a purely Democratic Socialist Labour Government in Britain, some cite that even then, Cook had to kowtow some elements of the new Economic Liberal order and amongst Eurosceptics his further integration within the European system would be a stain on his career. Other’s state that Cook’s inability to truly modernise, and that he was as one comedian called him “The ZX Spectrum in a world increasingly dominated by Apple Macs” and the Pristina Airport Incident is over lumped in with the handover of Hong Kong in being a full stop on Britain’s view of being a truly singular world power.

4). Beckett’s nearly three month tenure is often questioned as how much of a make she made. Indeed as one writer put it “It’s very in keeping with Labour’s awkward history with women that its first leader and first Prime Minister occurred due to an accident”. Beckett who had remained Cook’s Deputy, had become the first female Foreign Secretary following Cunningham’s resignation, had been beginning to make a mark in repairing British and Russian relations and trying to continue the ‘Cookite’ view on Foreign Affairs when the call came.

Beckett would try and secure her place as Prime Minister, she reshuffled cabinet, forcing out increasingly stale or in some cases problematic figures like, John Prescott, David Clark and Jack Cunningham and replacing them with a series of fresher faced politicians. She also stated that she would compete to become leader of the Labour Party, and become Prime Minister in her own right.

Beckett would conduct a Rose Garden Campaign, her meeting with President Clinton was seen as successful in helping recover British - American relations, the Trade Union Legalisation Bill which had been sluggishly getting close to becoming law, would finally be approved by Parliament and the first Northern Assembly election would occur amid Beckett’s tenure and see Labour gain a clear plurality of seats and votes.

It was seen by some, that Beckett would easily transition into becoming Prime Minister with a party mandate. But the wheels of sexism would be turning as she was in office. The Trade Union Bill was ripped apart by the Right Wing Press, Peter Mandelson, who was helping running the insurgent moderniser campaign, would leak to the press about her husband, Lionel’s, role as her office manager at several points, which lead to cries of nepotism and generally there was mention of Beckett being ‘too old’ and too ‘left wing’ to be Prime Minister following Cook. The fact that Beckett was spry and healthy compared to Cook and more or less occupied the same background as Cook, was ignored, Labour needed a ‘younger person’ to take charge was the message.

Not helping matters was that British Economy whilst having stabilised, had sunk to recession levels. Pressures on Britain to cut down exports and attempt to keep inflation low, was placed on Beckett. Beckett and the Chancellor Jack Straw spent much of there time bickering about what to do, over actually being active.

Whilst Beckett’s initial Rose Garden campaign was considered successful, it rapidly became apparent that her attempt to stay in the centre was meaning she was being squeezed by both sides. When the results came in at the emergence Leadership Conference in October, the surprise results were that Beckett had lost, just barely scrapping second over a Left Wing insurgent. She had also failed to become Deputy Leader, losing by another similarly slim margin. Beckett’s response was typical of her, she and Lionel congratulated the winners, promising to work with them effectively even after the abuse afflicted on the pair of them, Leo Beckett stated that Margaret will ‘pick herself up and start again’. Then they stated they would head on a Caravan Holiday, not to be seen again for two weeks as they licked there wounds.

Beckett is better know for her other cabinet jobs, than for her time as Prime Minister, whilst Leader of the House of Commons was very much a demotion, she took to it well and was seen as an effective parliamentarian, establishing herself as a popular figure within the party in the aftermath of her time in office.

5). In 1999, to find an untarnished or still active Moderniser was hard. Peter Mandelson and Charles Clarke had been stewing on the backbenches, kept at arms length by the Cook Leadership, Tony Blair had been demoted from Cabinet and been forced to resign over the Nicosia Affair, Jack Straw was Chancellor, but was incredibly unpopular due to the Economic Problems in Britain and Gordon Brown had left British Politics, having taken a job with the IMF, establishing his popularity as a tough but fair administrator.

In the end, one of the few Moderniser figures with the Cabinet cache, strong reputation and additionally connection to the Working Class, and that would be Kevin Barron. Barron had once been a Miner and passionate NUM member before eventually becoming MP, initially he joined the Socialist Campaign Group but resigned soon after as he support the Kinnock leadership. Whilst he fell out favour with Smith, under Cook, Barron was able to come back to the Front Bench. He became a popular Health Minster, supporting the reorganisation of the NHS away from Ken Clarke’s attempted halfway house model and working well with the Health Secretary Frank Dobson before being moved into Environment, Transport and the Regions following Prescott’s departure in 98’. Whilst there he was fairly low key, mainly carrying on the reforms that Prescott had pushed for, and generally having a decent grip on a somewhat cumbersome portfolio.

Barron was a uncontroversial figure when he ran for leader, persuaded by the ‘Kinnock Clique’ as one journalist dubbed it, consisting of figures like Derek Fatchett, Kim Howells, Charles Clarke and Peter Mandelson, who hoped to move Labour way from the image of Old Fashioned Socialism. With a variety of image gurus and the Clique behind him, Barron would surprisingly beat Beckett and the surprising Left Wing insurgent campaign of Tony Banks, who campaigned to ‘shift the debate’, some pondered if there was a conspiracy to support Banks to siphon votes away from Beckett but it mainly due to a change in rules reducing the threshold needed to compete and Banks indosyncratic views appealing to an electorate who had been numbed by Cooks and Beckett’s style of Socialism.

Barron’s election, alongside Paul Boateng as his Deputy, showcased a seeming the Old and New Labour Parties, united under the ideal of having Labour integrate more fully into the Post-Thatcher world. Barron would reshuffle his cabinet, as most of the Kinnock Clique would gain some kind of Cabinet position.

Polling showed that support for Labour had dropped from 1996, but Barron and his team hoped they could win back that polling disadvantage from the Conservative’s. Michael Portillo was both young (indeed, younger than Barron), charismatic and experienced and he seemed to present a united Conservative front, with his ‘Dream Ticket’ of himself and Ken Clarke as Shadow Chancellor (though Clarke was told to stop talking about the Euro) and promised a different Conservative Party.

Barron and his team had a big problem ahead of them, with Barron promising to try and rectify the problems that had been left in his predecessor's wake. Barron lead a huge Cabinet reshuffle, Straw would be shuffled to the Home Office and Andrew Smith, an up and coming Treasury Secretary, would find himself as Chancellor.

Smith was a competent manager of the economy, helped as well by the recovery of the world economy, following the East Asian Financial Crisis and the Pristina incident. The British Economy began to recover, and with it Labour’s polling. Barron as well went on a charm offensive, travelling across the country, particularly the North and Scotland where Regional Elections had shown a decrease in support, as well as the emergence of Left Wing Populist parties in the areas that made gains off a poor economy.

Barron, aimed at the ideas of ‘aspiration’, Labour wasn’t the party of Stodgy Old Fashioned Unions, but the party of all those aspired to succeed in life. Barron’s backstory, as a former Miner from Yorkshire helped in this regard, and emerging successes of the National Investment Bank and the new Arts Council funding ensured that new figures were emerging. A party political broadcast, directed by up and coming director, Shane Meadows, telling the viewers about Barron’s upbringing and his hope to continue his aspirational ideals for the country, very much encapsulated the mood.

Labour’s polling began to improve, slowly over the course of Late 99’ into 2000, helped by a somewhat successful ‘Millennium Experience’ in Birmingham and the economy rising out of recession. Meanwhile Portillo, was dealing with the occasional scandal and problem from his own side, unable to fully wash away the stink of Major’s government.

The Snap Election of September 2000 was somewhat of a surprise, most suspected that Barron would wait out the clock until the Spring of 2001, but with the economy improving and polls showing that Labour was narrowly ahead of the Conservative’s it was decided that it would best to go to the country.

Barron’s campaign was slick and effective, with focus groups and effective advertising featuring prominently but problems would begin to emerge. Murmuring around a fuel protest, a tax previously imposed by the Conservative’s, and increased with inflation and kept by Smith as one of many funds, would be the subject of protests. Supported by the Conservative’s, the protests at the beginning of the campaign lead to an embarrassing climb down from the Labour Government as the campaign was just starting. Meanwhile Peter Mandelson, Secretary for Industry and Trade, was caught engages in a scandal involving a loan he had received to help buy a flat. In the end Mandelson would resign, but the damage was done.

Meanwhile the Liberal Democrat’s gained popularity on a message of attacking a Labour proposal of reintroducing PFI, which had been supposedly ended under Cook’s tenure, a failure to reduce Classroom sizes and an increase in draconian laws, particularly around drugs, under Jack Straw. The Liberal Democrat’s would even step aside for the occasional Independent Candidates who were beginning to emerge playing on a dissatisfied public.

Hoping to close the gap, Barron would agree with Portillo and Hughes to a series of Election Debates, hosted by Jeremy Paxman. The first debate was considered a draw, Portillo’s attacks were considered effective but Barron’s boisterous defence allowed him to swat aside the tough grilling from Portillo and Paxman, the second was considered a minor Labour Victory, Barron’s attack against Portillo’s vague Economic Plans as ‘Zombie Thatcherism’ would be in the line most remembered from the debates and Hughes, who in the first debate had provided equal fire, aimed more directly at Portillo, who’s time in office and his vague promises of ‘Modernisation’ seemed hollow when faced with the realties on the ground.

Portillo was still fairly popular, but a bungled coverup of an interview in which he stated that he had ‘homosexual experiences as a young man’ lead to a bout of internal infighting. Lord Tebbit when asked about the comments, mentioned that he thought a man who had committed such ‘deviance’ shouldn’t be a leader of the Conservative Party. Meanwhile, the Conservative muteness on the Euro and it’s vague manifesto, meant that some Conservative voters felt betrayed. Andrew Hunter’s initially quiet campaign as a Democratic Unionist gained media attention after the Portillo remarks, showcasing the dissatisfaction at the Portillo leadership.

On the day of the election, the polls were fairly narrow, showing a slight Conservative victory. Some Labour Cabinet Members began swearing that Barron and the ‘Kinnock Clique’ had destroyed there chances of winning again, too eager for there own good. As the night wore on, the surprise was that Labour would secure a second term, though only by a slim margin, as a majority of seven emerged by the end of the night. In the end, the vagueness of Conservative promises worried voters particularly following an economic downturn, and Barron’s meet and greet campaigns had raised voting numbers in the North for Labour.

But despite it all, there were recriminations. Several cabinet members would lose there seats, famously Estelle Morris, the Education Secretary would narrowly lose her seat to John Hemming following an intense campaign. The eventual reshuffle was a largely grim affair, whilst several rising modernisers like Alistair Darling and Jane Kennedy muscled in to major roles, it was felt that Labour had done worse than they had expected. Mandelson, partially blamed for the wrought be pushed back into the Backbenchers, much to his eternal frustration.

Barron continued in governance, though more cautiously than before. The shine has wore off and there was a sense by some that Labour’s domestic policy was spinning its wheels Post 2000. Whilst there would occasionally be highlights, like the successful handling of the Foot and Mouth epidemic in 2001, it seemed that Barron’s government would be one of slow and steady reform. Not helping matters was that the Socialist Campaign Group and it’s 20 members who had survived the election as well as cavalcade of Individual Leftist MPs, now held the balance of power in Parliament.

In Foreign Policy, much of Barron’s remaining tenure would be governed by the incoming President of America, John Ashcroft. Following a series of incidents like the Flight 63 Bombing (which would become a bit of an embarrassment to the Barron Administration due to bombers British background), America decided to intervene in Afghanistan in Early 2002.

Barron was reticent to join, remembering Pristina, but begrudgingly agreed after it was supported by a ‘World Council’ of several different countries working together to uproot the Taliban. The Afghanistan Invasion was the background noise of the 2002 - 2003 period, whilst the Taliban were toss out of power in the cities, in the countryside, an on going insurgency would grind on.

The opinion on the war was lukewarm, whilst a few MPs protested, it didn’t gain the same intense reaction that Kosovo had caused. How tensions would emerge over other nations in the Middle East, particularly Iraq. Sensing the mood at home, Barron was cautious about supporting any invasion, he did state that he would operations similar to proposed bombing campaigns during the 98’ - 99’ period.

The ‘Shock and Awe’ bombing campaigns of 2002 and 2003 were controversial. A series of protests and counter-campaigns occurred, and the initial voting to ensure the campaigns was done through Conservative support, which was seen as embarrassing. But in the end Barron would be undone by the European Union.

Euro Integration was a path that John Major and Robin Cook had set, but Barron knew that it was divisive. Even amongst Europhile voters, there were those who were apprehensive over joining the Euro Currency. Taking a note from Harold Wilson’s book, seeing his slim majority government (having fallen down to three in that time), Barron would allow a referendum on the Euro. This would lead to the Labour Party ripping itself apart.

The Conservative’s had now come out mainly on the Anti-Euro side, whilst the LibDems were mostly in favour but Labour was split in a variety of different ways, and were unable to present a united front. The internal bickering that had been rising in the party would spill over and for many, lead to Barron’s majority collapsing as a few remaining Left Wing MPs jumped ship amid the campaign.

The Referendum would see the No side win with a solid majority, and opposition saw there chance. The next couple of months would see Barron try to organise a Confidence & Supply deal, but it would stall over the possibility of a Referendum on an Alternative Voting system. Despite the best efforts of the team lead by Robin Cook, the proposed deal would collapse, and soon the Parliament with it.

6). Stephen Dorrell was seen as a surprise, be it, Candidate, Leader and Prime Minister. In the Major and Lang Governments he’d been originally connected to the Treasury, then found himself promoted to National Heritage and then to Health where he’d been seen as a somewhat managerial figure at best. Still he’d survived the 96’ Election and had considered running in that election, but decided instead to hold fire and support Ken Clarke instead, as his campaign manager. Whilst Clarke lost, Dorrell’s ability as campaigner manger was admired and he’d been offered a place in the Portillo Shadow Cabinet as the Shadow Secretary for Industry and Trade.

Dorrell did fairly well in his role, Labour’s Industrial Strategy was mixed, leading to most businesses thought that Labour didn’t care about them, as a result. Dorrell established some popularity as a figure who’d gained the occasional scalp, helping in the ousting Peter Mandelson when questioning him on his financial dealings and called him the ‘unacceptable face of Socialism’ which gained a fair bit of publicity.

Dorrell did admirably on the campaign trail, whilst never wowing anyone, he did at least present an organised and diligent effort and seemed to be united behind Portillo, unlike some Shadow Ministers. When the election ended in a slim Labour Victory, Portillo tried to stay around, but a cabal of disgruntled Thatcherites lead by John Redwood would oust Portillo, in the hope to gain power.

The plan was half cocked, Redwood and the other potential Thatcherites were all eccentric at best, and whilst able to push Portillo aside, were unable to agree on a single candidate. Ken Clarke pondered running again but was persuaded otherwise, allowing Dorrell to have a chance. Dorrell support by the Left of the Conservative Party promised to win the next election, stop the crisis within the party and would be a leader for ‘all conservatives’.

Dorrell’s pitch is what would allow him to narrowly Michael Howard who had emerged as the eventual Thatcherite candidate. Dorrell’s party had suffered a poll decline, but steadily began to increase as the early 00s carried on.

When 2003 came, Dorrell’s campaigning on a broadly ‘Anti-Euro, but Pro-European perspective’ appealed to voters in the Home Counties. Labour, feeling it’s age and suffering splits, was easily pushed aside by Dorrell when the came at the next election, as enough swing Liberal Democrat and Labour voters came back to Dorrell’s Conservatives.

Dorrell’s time in office has been seen as one of dull competence, not as Nasty as previous Conservative’s Governments but additionally not as dynamic. Francis Maude as Chancellor is cautious about government spending, but as an economic boom continues in the background, it seems find to spend. Dorrell has been somewhat supportive of an intervention in Iraq, though such plans would likely occur after the 2004 elections in America.

Labour in opposition has gained a leader who can say Socialism without cringing as the Trade Unions begin flexing their muscles once again. Paul Boateng still offers the chance for the party to embrace a new future, but for now there happy returning to the comforts of the past.

The future of Britain remains uncertain, certainly a mood of dull blandness has replaced the cheery optimism of the late 90s. Things Haven’t Gotten Better, but they haven’t got much worse…yet.
 

Governors of Nova Scotia​

1811-1816: Sir John Coape Sherbrooke

1816-1820: Earl of Dalhousie

1820-1836: Sir James Kempt

1827: Popular Revolution; Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island declare loyalty to the Guelphs
1832: Cape Breton Island secedes, becomes a colony under the authority of Parliament
1835: Prince Edward Island secedes, becomes a colony under the authority of Parliament


1836-1839: Thomas Nickleson Jeffery
-1839: Treaty of Boston; Nova Scotia and New Brunswick consolidated into a formally independent monarchy

Kings of Nova Scotia​

1839-1856: Adolphus (House of FitzClarence)

1856-1863: George (House of FitzClarence)

1863: Monarchy abolished in the wake of a financial default; Nova Scotia made a British colony

Governors of the Province of Nova Scotia​

1863-1878: Edward Baring (Solvency Commission)
1877: Charter granting full autonomy introduced

1878-1886: Thomas MacPherson (Reform)
1878 def. Charles Tupper (Country)

In 1827, the Popular Revolution broke out in the British Isles. The new revolutionary government was, while not terribly enthusiastic about colonies (which it regarded as a costly jobs program for lesser scions of aristocracy), nevertheless intent on stamping its authority in the colonies in the name of legitimacy. To this end, it sent a commission to British North America, and while Upper and Lower Canada, with strong oppositionist movements, saw miniature revolutions of their own, it got more complicated on the Eastern Seaboard. Newfoundland with its Irish majority went on board with the revolution as well, but the same could not be said about the remainder. For these were colonies settled primarily by Loyalists fleeing the American Revolution in the name of loyalty to the Guelphs, and later migrations (chiefly of Scottish Highlanders) had not enormously changed that character. For this reason, in an effort largely led by the erstwhile governor of Nova Scotia, these maritime colonies declared their continued loyalty to the exiled Guelphs. In this, it was helped by a sizeable loyalist navy headquartered in Halifax.

Following the end of the Convention Parliament and the settling of a new constitutional order in 1829, these colonies did not change their status at all, and aversion to costly colonial endeavors meant that the new British administration did not try to conquer them either. Instead, they were allowed to continue with trade, including with the exilic British administration in the Electorate of Hanover. But it remained a security risk for the St. Lawrence trade, and to that end in 1832 Westminster passed an Act of Parliament declaring Cape Breton Island a separate colony. With this island having a Scottish Highlander majority, and with its union with Nova Scotia having already been a lightning rod for political resentment, this saw widespread support, and a large British expedition successfully forced administrators to flee the island. Its port of Sydney suddenly became an important part of the new British trading system, at the expense of Halifax.

These loyalist maritime colonies would remain a tangential part of British politics until 1834, when in the wake of the Orange Riots of that year, its loyalism suddenly became very, very suspect. It became a dagger pointed towards the British system, filled with people who swore loyalty to Elector Ernest, blamed for the destruction of the Palace of Westminster. Suddenly, attacks on Nova Scotian merchant shipping increased, and it became clear an informal embargo had been established. In 1835, to further secure the St. Lawrence trade, Westminster reorganized Prince Edward Island as a colony; additionally, it granted tenant right on the lines of those recently granted to Ireland, which in a colony chiefly consisting of tenants working for absentee landlords, attracted many. This successfully provoked an uprising on the island, and it went for the revolutionary regime too. The loyalist area in British North America had been reduced to mainland Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Many braced themselves for a British invasion, and for his failure Governor Kempf was forced to resign.

This invasion didn't come, however. The Radical Whitbread administration was too riddled with myriad political crises to consider some sort of costly colonial war, and the 1837 election which brought Lord John Russell's band of Moderates to power was widely recognized as an opportunity. To this end, the loyalists initiated negotiations in Boston, and in 1839 they came up with a deal. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were to be made an independent kingdom under a lesser scion of the Guelph family, fully independent of Ernest's exile administration. The royal scion in question was Lord Adolphus FitzClarence, a son of Duke William of Clarence (died of a stray bullet in 1822), who served as a captain in the exilic British navy and was generally considered unambitious. Declared King of Nova Scotia in abstentia, after he accepted the offer he was formally coronated as such.

The new Kingdom of Nova Scotia, now lacking an unofficial embargo, quickly embarked on new trade links. It established strong trade with Hanover despite the end of its formal ties to the Electorate, and many ships moved to and from it and Ernestshaven. The kingdom got a great number of German settlers thanks to this. However, in 1847, the Schleswig War broke out and consumed continental Europe for the next seven years, and with it trade with Hanover tapered off. Instead, trade with the British Isles boomed. To construct roads, canals, and eventually railways, Nova Scotia needed capital. To get this, it required loans and capital, and inevitably many British banks were happy to use this as an opportunity. Despite attempts to play British and American banks off of each other, ties with the British Isles rapidly increased. When Adolphus died and was succeeded by his eleven year old son, it was slowly becoming apparent the degree of these ties. In the 1850s, the rail boom came to an end as companies collapsed. The kingdom fell into debt, and despite its efforts at bailouts, the situation continued to get worse. The Bank of Nova Scotia itself collapsed in this period, and with it the economy fell further. In 1862, the nation defaulted on its loans, and following negotiations with the British Isles, it formally surrendered its sovereignty.

To resolve this financial situation, the Grey administration formally imposed on Nova Scotia a Solvency Commission led by a member of a major banking family. It formally introduced a number of economic reforms centered around connecting its economy with British colonies in the Caribbean. Halifax boomed and became the center of a colony that looked out for new trade opportunities. However, it did not significantly alter the way that Sydney on Cape Breton Island had taken much of its position on the St. Lawrence. But the boom that followed had nevertheless improved its economic position, and the new Morley administration saw no reason to spend money administering a colony that did not seem to need it. For this reason, it granted Nova Scotia a charter which, on the terms of the other Anglophone colonies, granted it near total autonomy with an elective governor, with only a weak Commissioner from London devoid of any power to liase with it. As for the old Kings of Nova Scotia, they got to keep their rural manor. Today falling well within city limits, this manor has since become it a hotel and the flagship of the FitzClarence Hotel Company, and through it the FitzClarences have since become the leading hoteliers in Nova Scotia.
 
Kev Barron now there's an interesting niche choice. I enjoyed that.
Thanks, I’ve seen him appear in a few other lists and timelines but he’s not that prominent. Which is interesting, because well, a Blairite Moderniser who also happens to be a Northern, Former Miner and Trade Unionist provides a very different perspective and image for a Late 90s Britain.

I want to do a late 90s that felt familiar but also quite different.
 
33. Charles Lindbergh (Republican) - January 20, 1941 - January 20, 1949
'40 (with Burton K. Wheeler) def. President Franklin Roosevelt (Democratic), 271-260 EV / 47.8%-50.3% PV
'44 (with Burton K. Wheeler) def. Businessman Wendell Willkie (Democratic), 269-262 EV / 48.3%-49.1% PV
34. Huey Long (Democratic) - January 20, 1949 - January 20, 1953
'48 (
with William Lemke) def. Senator Harold Stassen (Republican), 294-237 EV / 50.7%-45.3% PV
35. Hubert Humphrey (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1953 - ????
'52 (
with William O. Douglas) def. General George Patton (Republican), President Huey Long (Democratic), 269-173-89 EV / 33.0%-35.5%-28.9%

35. Hubert Humphrey (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1953 - January 20, 1961
'52 (
with William O. Douglas) def. General George Patton (Republican), President Huey Long (Democratic), 269-173-89 EV / 33.0%-35.5%-28.9%
'56 (with William O. Douglas) def. Senator John Bricker (Republican), Governor Herman Talmadge (Democratic), 375-85-71 EV / 40.7%-30.1%-27.6%
36. William O. Douglas (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1961 - January 20, 1965
'60 (
with Dean Acheson) def. Fmr. Attorney General Earl Warren (Republican), (1) 43.2%-26.3% (2) 61.3%-38.7%
37. Richard Nixon (Republican) - January 20, 1965 - January 20, 1969
'64 (
with William P. Rogers) def. President William O. Douglas (Free Liberal), (1) 28.2%-34.9% (2) 52.4%-47.6%
38. William O. Douglas (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1969 - August 7, 1970
'68 (
with Birch Bayh) def. President Richard Nixon (Republican), (1) 30.6%-31.5% (2) 50.3%-49.7%
39. Birch Bayh (Free Liberal) - August 7, 1970 - January 20, 1977
'72 (
with Ramsey Clark) def. Governor Barry Goldwater (Conservative), (1) 38.1%-20.6% (2) 74.5%-25.5%
40. Nelson Rockefeller (Republican) - January 20, 1977 - January 20, 1981
'76 (
with Charles Mathias) def. Vice President Ramsey Clark (Free Liberal), (1) 22.6%-37.4% (2) 51.1%-48.9%
41. Abe Fortas (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1981 - January 20, 1989
'80 (
with Henry Jackson) def. Senator Ronald Reagan (Conservative), (1) 42.5%-23.8% (2) 58.3%-41.7%
'84 (with Tom Bradley) def. Various, (1) 57.9%-15.4%-13.0%-9.4%
42. Liz Holtzman (Free Liberal) - January 20, 1989 - ????
'88
def. TBD

For most American students, Hubert Horatio Humphrey was just like any other President. Sure, the brighter ones might be able to tell you that he was an extremely good one, and perhaps some of his accomplishments that make him so, but few will actually mention just how unlikely his ascension to the top job was. Not from an individual standpoint- in his early 40s, he had already been Mayor of Minneapolis and then a Senator- but from a political standpoint.

In June of 1952, just under five months before the election, absolutely nobody thought it would be Humphrey being sworn in as President the following year. Like so many election cycles before, it looked like it would be a close horse-race between two candidates- Huey Long, the charismatic but controversial President of the United States, and his likely opponent, General George Patton (a hero for his tank defense of Darwin).

But plenty of Americans were unhappy with this state of affairs, most notably, liberals. Despite major wins in 1932 and 1936, they had been struggling over the last twelve years, with three different liberal candidates from two different parties narrowly failing to take the Presidency. At first, this was understandable- Charles Lindbergh was a hero to most Americans, and once in office was much more of a moderate than some expected, quietly allowing the Lend-Lease deals approved by Roosevelt for the UK to go through, possibly saving the island from German invasion.

When the United States was forced to go to war after the Manila Affair, Lindbergh didn't do much to protest. He would struggle to shake his isolationist reputation, but enough Americans were satisfied with his job performance that he would defeat moderate businessman Wendell Willkie in November. But once the 1946 turned into 1947, and the war was all but won, the seams of the administration had begun to unravel.

Conservatives and moderates clashed over almost everything, and Lindbergh (never all that skilled of a politician) was almost powerless to stop it. Bills that would have provided benefits for veterans like housing and education died in the Congress, while foreign policy was increasingly left to the overworked Secretary of State, Arthur Vandenberg. So, to so many, 1948 would be their year. Wendell Willkie looked likely to take the nomination once again, and this time he would be heavily favored to win the election.

Until he died.

Now the convention was in a tailspin. Basically everyone except the populists and the Dixiecrats had accepted fate, so few were prepared to throw together a campaign to try and convince the delegates. So, the advantage was fully in the hands of those two groups. The leader of the former, Huey Long, gave a stirring speech excoriating the failures of the administration, and hitting all the right Democratic talking points. With the northern New Dealers still in chaos, Long was narrowly able to take the nomination on the fifth ballot.

From then until November, the election was a tight race between Long and the one Republican without much of a connection to the chaos enveloping the White House, Senator Harold Stassen. But Long was a fire-breather. He relentlessly toured the country, criticizing the Lindbergh White House for its failure to help veterans after the conclusion of the Second World War, and (seemingly ignoring his constant clashing with Roosevelt during the latter's presidency) pledging a "Renewed Deal" for the American people. By a small but comfortable margin, Long would be elected the nation's 34th President in November.

Upon taking office, he would initially see quite a bit of success. Eight years of Republican administration (most of which was focused on the largest war the world had ever seen) had left plenty of low-hanging fruit, and Long would get to work harvesting them. The so-called "GI Bill", granting free college or trade school training for veterans, was passed in his first hundred days on the job, with a bill that established a massive amount of funding for housing and public transit (in accordance with the recommendations of the Wright Commission, led by the man who would later become Long's first Secretary of Housing & Urban Affairs) passing not long after.

Long would also be able to get a major expansion of Social Security through, which would expand coverage to include farmers, domestic workers, and people suffering from chronic health conditions. When coupled with the Food Stamp Act, Long had presided over the largest expansion of the American welfare state since the New Deal. With these accomplishments under his belt, the White House set its eyes on something else- healthcare reform.

One thing Long never realized, however, was that Capitol Hill wasn't Baton Rouge, and the White House wasn't the Governor's Mansion (despite the striking resemblance). The bigwigs in Congress didn't owe their careers or elections to Long, and the President didn't have a dominant machine over the entire country. His threats had the total opposite of the desired effect, and many Democrats refused to even hear the President out. Northern progressives, who were in lockstep behind the healthcare reform, weren't all that willing to bail him out either due to his views on civil rights legislation, and he couldn't side with them without losing his base in the south.

All in all, it seemed that the "Renewed Deal" was dead in its tracks. Most Democrats, however, simply sighed and shrugged their shoulders- Long was the President and would therefore be the standard-bearer in 1952. The Democrats would probably lose to the Republicans, and return to the opposition for the next few years. But not all were okay with that. Americans For Democratic Action was founded in 1948 as a social liberal to social democratic center-left pressure group. It counted such luminaries as Walter Reuther and Eleanor Roosevelt among its members, and was in general getting pretty fed up with the White House.

In a meeting held in New York, much of the Rooseveltian left would decide to run their own candidate. After much hemming and hawing over who that would be, it was eventually decided that Hubert Humphrey would carry the new "Free Liberal" standard. At the "convention" in June, Humphrey started out in the polls at a little over 7%- amazing for a third party, but only that.

A series of missteps by both main candidates, however, would greatly change the calculus. First, George Patton would remark that he considered Israel "something of an illegitimate state", ending whatever chance he had of winning any Jewish voters (and, therefore, New York). Second, President Long- never caring much for the "Rose Garden" campaigning strategy previous presidents had done- agreed to a debate with all three candidates, hoping that Patton and Humphrey would drag each other down. This was a mistake.

Humphrey performed uncharacteristically well in the debate, putting both candidates on the defensive. Seeing something of an alternative (it wasn't like Long was going to win anyway) many northern Democrats would endorse him, which would be accompanied by a decent amount of campaign cash. Still, the final polls on election day indicated over 43% support for Patton, 29% for Long, and 23% for Humphrey.

But once the results began to come in, a miracle began to happen. Record turnout from minorities and the urban poor was boosting the Free Liberals, while Long was underperforming with many of the demographics that had given him the victory four years prior. Patton had made gains in the South, but cutting a 70% margin to a 40% margin doesn't mean anything with the electoral college.

The election was undecided for up to three days, when the State of New York reported that Humphrey had taken a lead of just about 5,000 votes over Patton, giving him 269 electoral votes and, with that, the Presidency. At a mere 42 years of age, and a member of a third party that only won 20 Seats in Congress, Humphrey would have a difficult road ahead, but he had turned single-digit polling into a term in the White House. After that, almost anything seemed possible.
 
40. Nelson Rockefeller (Republican) - January 20, 1977 - January 20, 1981
'76 (
with Charles Mathias)
This ticket isn't ideological balanced at all
Charles Lindbergh was a hero to most Americans, and once in office was much more of a moderate than some expected, quietly allowing the Lend-Lease deals approved by Roosevelt for the UK to go through, possibly saving the island from German invasion.
literally the first result for 'Lindbergh Lend-Lease'
 
This ticket isn't ideological balanced at all
It doesn't need to be. If you look closely, you can see that the Goldwater-Reagan types are in the Conservative Party. The GOP is mostly a moderate party.
literally the first result for 'Lindbergh Lend-Lease'
He didn't propose any new lend-lease deals, but the political realities of the situation and pressure from some internationalist Republicans prevented him from torpedoing some of the agreements Roosevelt had done during the lame duck period.
 
He didn't propose any new lend-lease deals, but the political realities of the situation and pressure from some internationalist Republicans prevented him from torpedoing some of the agreements Roosevelt had done during the lame duck period.
hmmm I think you might want to use a less die-hard isolationist like Hoover
It doesn't need to be. If you look closely, you can see that the Goldwater-Reagan types are in the Conservative Party. The GOP is mostly a moderate party.
why exactly do the Goldwater types leave it when they have Nixon as president ? Someone who bended backwards to appeal to them ?
 
Last edited:
hmmm I think you might want to use a less die-hard isolationist like Hoover
Probably not Hoover himself (there's no way he could ever defeat FDR in an election held after 1928) but someone of his caliber is probably a good choice.
why exactly do the Goldwater types leave it when they have Nixon as president ? Someone who bended backwards to appeal to them ?
The new runoff system means that they can run separately and still potentially get into the second round. Also, Nixon didn't govern nearly as right wing as they wanted him to.
 
The new runoff system means that they can run separately and still potentially get into the second round. Also, Nixon didn't govern nearly as right wing as they wanted him to.
ah yes the presidency a role that famously moderated Nixon. It would make more sense to have them split off during the Rockefeller administration. Even then I have doubts that like Goldwater would leave it unless Rockefeller governs far lefter than he reasonable would. Oh also the Rockefeller / Mathias is geographically unbalanced too
Probably not Hoover himself (there's no way he could ever defeat FDR in an election held after 1928) but someone of his caliber is probably a good choice.
yeah I just kinda spitballing a isolastionist name there
theflyingmgoose:
'84 (with Tom Bradley) def. Various, (1) 57.9%-15.4%-13.0%-9.4%
if it's a two round system this doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
Presidents of the Republic of China

1911–1912: Yuan Shikai (Independent), Provisional
(with Li Yuanhong and Huang Xing): Executive of the First Provisional Government
1912–1913: Yuan Shikai (Independent)
1912: acclaimed by the National Assembly
1913–1913: Li Yuanhong (Independent), Provisional
(with Liang Qichao and Cen Chunxuan): Executive of the Second Provisional Government
1913–1918: Li Yuanhong (Republican)
1913 def: Huang Xing (Nationalist)
1918–1918: Tan Yankai (Republican)
1918 def: Song Jiaoren (Nationalist), Liang Qichao (Constitutionalist)
1918–1918: Wang Zhengting (Republican), Interim
1918–1920: Chen Jiongming (Nationalist)
1920–1921: Cai Genyin (Nationalist)
1921–1921: Chen Qimei (Nationalist), Interim
1921–1927: Li Liejun (Nationalist)
1921: acclaimed by the National Assembly
1923 def: Li Yuanhong (Republican)

1927–1927: Yan Huiqing (Independent), Interim
1927–1938: Song Jiaoren (Nationalist)
1928 def: Xu Qian (Republican), Zhou Zhangshou (Socialist)
1933 def: Chen Qimei (Nationalist)

1938–1943: Lü Chao (Nationalist)
1938 def: Zhang Boling (Independent)
1943–0000: Zhou Enlai (Nationalist)
1943 def: He Siyuan (National Democratic)
 
This was my submission for last month's list challenge! This month's challenge is themed around Mistakes, and there's still a week and a bit to get an entry in!

GlasnostPerestroika.jpg

The Square Meatball
Premiers of the Union of Sovereign States:
1991-2022: Mikhail Gorbachev (Union of Socialist Democrats)
def 1991: (majority) Yegor Ligachyov (Communist), Aron Atabek (We Turks), Alexander Barkashov (National Unity Front), Valeriya Novodvorskaya (Future of Democracy)
def 1996: (coalition with Future of Democracy) Nina Andreveya (Communist), Saparmurat Niyazov (We Turks), Sergei Kovalev (Future of Democracy), Alexander Barkashov (National Unity Front), Grigory Isayev (Worker's Self-Government)
def 2001: (majority) Gennady Semigin (Communist), Saparmurat Niyazov (We Turks), Nina Andreyeva (All-Union Bolshevik League), Anatoly Greshnevikov (Russianist), Oleg Tyangibok (National Unity Front)
def 2006: (majority) Gennady Semigin (Communist), Alexander Potkin (Russianist), Nina Andreveya (All-Union Bolshevik League), Oleg Tyangibok (National Unity Front), Alexy Yablokov (Russian Greens)
def 2011: (majority) Vladimir Solovyov (Communist), Sergey Mironov (All-Eurasian Patriots), Alexander Potkin (League of Russian Rights), Viktor Tyulkin (Bolshevik Party of Labour), Alexy Yablokov (Russian Greens)
def 2016: (majority) Igor Girkin (All-Eurasian Patriots), Vladmir Solovyov (Communist), Oleg Mitvol (Russian Greens), Sergey Kalyakin (Bolshevik Labour), Alexander Potkin (League of Russian Rights)
def 2021: (majority) Vladimir Solovyov (Communist), Zakhar Prilepin (Eurasian Unity), Igor Girkin (All-Eurasian Patriots), Anastasia Udaltsova (Bolshevik Labour), Oleg Mitvol (Russian Greens)

2022-0000: Evgeny Lebedev (Union of Socialist Democrats)

>Thirty Years On, What Does "Perestroika" Mean To Those Still In Its Way?
[This Article Is Available To AOL-Turner Premium Internet Users. Upgrade For The Full Experience!]

> In some ways, Leningrad Airport is the same as it was the last time I came here, with the five great cuboid cups framing the great airy interior of the terminal. In every other way, it couldn't be more different. Where garish red propaganda posters once hung, tasteful lobby art and those mysterious large ferns lend a touch of colour. In place of surly armed guards, a smiling pair of stewardesses usher me to security with a "Have a nice trip!". And instead of a debatably-legal array of hawkers and a cafe out of the Fifties, the full fruits of the chain restaurant world-- McDonalds, Diedrich, Pizza Express, Jollibee, and Russia's own Concordiadog--greet the weary traveller for an after-flight meal. This is Perestroika in a nutshell--injecting new life into Russia's old shell...
___
BREAKING NEWS: McDonalds relaunch the Hulaburger for a limited time at select outposts, citing internet meme popularity of Hulaburger Challenge. Pandora TV streamer EdibleJarth,
invited to taste the "new-taste" Hulaburger, had this to say...
___
> ...he sips from his 'Zhuko-Cola'--a clear variant of coke manufactured locally, and increasingly a nationalist shibboleth. Hence why Concordiadog no longer offer it, and why Navalny is hiding it in a paper bag. "We had plenty of elections in the old system. Real democracy requires opposition. And do we have that here?". I suggest that maybe people are satisfied with Gorbachev's performance in office, and that the opposition has simply failed to be a credible alternative. This sets him off. "Credible--how can we be credible, when they incite splits between us and fatten the traitors? It's not the voters we need to convince, anyway." Before I can mention that those allegations were unproven, he starts to slam the table. "A tiny cabal, but they are the owners of everything--the Duma, the press, even this restaurant--and nothing in Russia happens that they don't want!" I am reminded of his party's past association with less-than-savory political views...
___
BREAKING NEWS: Nikki Sinclare has announced that she has no plans to step down as Referendum Party leader. Facing a potential leadership challenge from Mayor Winston McKenzie after some disappointing European election results, many feel that...

___
> ...an up-and-coming challenger to Udaltsova. However, due to his current residence on a Maoist-run collective farm in Siberia, "Comrade Maxim" did not respond to my request for an interview. His party's continued abstention from the Duma, out of a belief that any engagement in what they call 'bourgeoisie democracy' is tantamount to endorsing it, is not shared by the main Communist Party that they broke from, which still forms the main opposition. Their platform, however, is a far cry from the days of Red October. Ever since taking the plunge and accepting oligarch campaign funds, the party has seen no problem with privatisation--merely disagreeing with the way the gains have been shared out. The party's main distinguishing factor, much like former leftists in the West, is greater social conservatism consistent with a base of pensioners...
___
BREAKING NEWS: The Tata Group has purchased a major stake in EuroTelekom, as part of a bid to break into mobile service. With 15% of the company's shares purchased, only the French and German governments have more sway over...
___
> ...allegations that Ganeyev refuses to give any credence to. "Controlled? Please. Every party has mysterious donors--that's just the fruits of the new Russian economy. A lot of rich people who have enough skeletons in their closets to value their privacy isn't a conspiracy." He sips from an iced tea, and motions towards mine--a Russian mint tea, as opposed to his Long Island one. "These people, they are merely jealous that we're the real opposition. They waste their time on shibboleths--is that the word? It is--like red flags, old statues, and the Jews, and we focus on real issues affecting this country. Like this country!" In this Ganeyev is very far from being wrong. Centuries of crash industrialisation have left staggering amounts of pollution all over Russia, from the wreck of Chernobyl to the blazing gas fields of Kazhakstan, where the Greens are filling a vacuum created by a collapsed personality cult...
___
BREAKING NEWS: Despite the ratification of the Hanoi Protocol by America last year, scientists say the country is still not on track to make the emissions reductions it needs to prevent catastrophic warming. Current models estimate that global temperature rise will exceed...
___
> Staring up at the Kremlin, I see a few lights remain on, even at this late hour. I imagine Gorbachev, ancient but with the same young heart of 1997, working at his desk through the night. Is he proud? Disappointed? Just weary with the effort of carrying Russia for nearly three decades? He's not achieved every dream of his. The Ukraine and Siberia has flowered within the Union, but Central Asian nationalism had to be crushed, harshly. The economy remains in a small number of hands, with the state picking and choosing the better oligarchs. Despite his best efforts, Russia has yet to see a peaceful transfer of power, or have a party worth peacefully transferring power to. But, as I look up at that single shining window, I can imagine all the things he can take pride in as well. A press that's free to print anything it wishes, even if it's lies. A people who can make their voices heard, even if they yell loudest for someone to shut them up. A standard of living that's rising from the Baltic to the Arctic, fit to overtake the US from whence came those blue jeans and McDonalds, setting Russia, for the first time since the Mongols, at the centre of the world.

For all his faults, Gorbachev has at last created a Russia that can work with us. One that's willing not to be a dominating tyrant, in red or white or even green, but as another peaceful participant in a rules-based international order. And that will surely be his greatest legacy.
___
BREAKING NEWS: Russian tanks crossed the Latvian border yesterday, following weeks of spiralling negotiations between Premier Lebedev and Prime Minister Zile. Citing alleged suppression of Russian minorities in the country's east, Lebedev's "special policing operation" has...
 
1991-2022: Mikhail Gorbachev (Union of Socialist Democrats)

[This Article Is Available To AOL-Turner Premium Internet Users. Upgrade For The Full Experience!]
Scariest part
Pandora TV streamer
Love this
BREAKING NEWS: Despite the ratification of the Hanoi Protocol by America last year, scientists say the country is still not on track to make the emissions reductions it needs to prevent catastrophic warming. Current models estimate that global temperature rise will exceed...
___
Oh just like otl!
 
We Shall Overcome 2: Electric Boogaloo // with a little inspiration from @allthepresidentsmen and @2ndH00PTIE$ON for some choice picks

hex codessss:
Democratic - 15c
Republican - d21
Independent - 888
National Unity - 046
Justice - c08
New Liberal - 995
Conservative - 158
Green - 273

(46.) Fmr. VP Joe Biden of Delaware / Sen. Kamala Harris of California (Democratic): Jan. 20, 2021 - May 6, 2027
2020 def. Pres. Donald Trump of Florida / VP Mike Pence of Indiana (Republican)
2024 def. Fmr. Pres. Donald Trump of Florida / Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York (Republican); Env. lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of California / Atty. Nicole Shanahan of California (Independent)
2027: suffers a mild stroke, forcing him to resign
(47.) VP Kamala Harris of California / vacant; Fmr. Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina (Democratic): May 6, 2027 - Jan. 20, 2029
2027: Roy Cooper appointed as VP along party lines
(48.) Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy of Ohio / Gov. Kim Reynolds of Iowa (Republican): Jan. 20, 2029 - Jan. 20, 2033
2028: def. Pres. Kamala Harris of California / VP Roy Cooper of North Carolina (Democratic)
2031: impeached by House for covertly funding far-right terrorist operations within the United States, acquitted by Senate
2032: impeached by House for secretly authorizing and weaponizing "New COINTELPRO" (as revealed during the "Vanessagate" scandal), narrowly acquitted by Senate
(49.) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York / Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia (Democratic-National Unity): Jan. 20, 2033 - Jan. 20, 2041
2032 def. Pres. Vivek Ramaswamy of Ohio / VP Kim Reynolds of Iowa (Republican)
2036 def. Sen. Mike Lawler of New York / Rep. Peter Meijer of Michigan (Common Sense); Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida / Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana (Republican)
2037: remaining Republican members of Congress who haven't crossed over to Common Sense are expelled following the start of the "American crisis"
2037 (unrecognized, Revolutionary Action Committee) Far-right commentator Nick Fuentes of Illinois def. Fmr. Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida
(50.) Fmr. Gov. Wes Moore of Maryland / Sen. Michelle Wu of Massachusetts (National Unity-Justice): Jan. 20, 2041 - Jan. 20, 2049
2040 def. Sen. Dan Crenshaw of New York / Rep. Max Miller of Ohio (Common Sense)
2042: Common Sense Party rebrands to "Conservative" Party
2044 def. Sen. Guy Reschenthaler of Pennsylvania / Sen. Anthony D'Esposito of New York (Conservative)
2045: National Unity Party splits into "Justice" and "New Liberal" parties
(51.) Sen. Robert J. Peters of Illinois / Sen. Jabari Brisport of New York (Justice): Jan. 20, 2049 - Jan. 20, 2053
2048 def. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington / Sen. Nabeela Syed of Illinois (New Liberal); Actress Auli'i Cravalho of Hawaii / Activist Vi Whitman of Rhode Island (Green); Sen. Claire Cory of North Dakota / Rep. Joe Mitchell of Iowa (Conservative) // 2nd round def. M.G. Perez / N. Syed (New Liberal)
(52.) Sen. Spencer Igo of Minnesota / Rep. Jay Trumbull of Florida (Conservative): Jan. 20, 2053 - present
2052 def. Pres. Robert J. Peters of Illinois / VP Jabari Brisport of New York (Justice); Rep. Tom Carlyle of Connecticut / Pol. commentator Maddie Powell of Wisconsin (Green); Gov. Sam Lawrence of Ohio / Rep. Meagan Simonaire of Maryland (New Liberal) // 2nd round def. R.J. Peters / J. Brisport (Justice)
 
The Eight Celestial Emperors and their Fates

1. Emperor Black Rabbit: The First Emperor Above Heaven died peacefully in bed at the age of 303, surrounded by pious descendants and loyal concubines. He took humanity to the stars, and more than any of his successors worked tirelessly to establish human dominion over the universe.

2. Emperor Gracious Butterfly: The Second Emperor Above Heaven starved to death in his summer palace on Jinxing. So caught up was he in his admiration of a portrait of a dancing youth, he forgot sustenance. He lived a long and decadent life, leaving the matter of ruling entirely to squabbling ministers of state.

3. Emperor Radiant Flame: The Third Emperor Above Heaven drank of the quintessence while untethered from his aethercraft, and floated away into the void. An ambitious scholar, he believed that in order to advance to the next stage of evolution, humanity must shed their physical bodies and join the planets in orbit. Whether his theories proved correct, none can yet say.

4. Emperor First Petal of Crimson: The Fourth Emperor Above Heaven choked on an excess of blood beneath his tongue and drowned while bathing. His attendants did not discover him for some time. He was a man unafraid of collecting enemies, and his efforts to reestablish imperial sovereignty over the colonies in an era of rapid expansion left him with more than he could anticipate.

5. Emperor Third Petal of Crimson: The Fifth Emperor Above Heaven was torn apart by wild crows for his arrogance and impiety. This bizarre incident has been recorded in detail (often to an inappropriate degree of luridity) a thousand times over, and will not be repeated here. The first direct line descendant of a previous emperor to inherit the throne, he was an intemperate and brutish tyrant who suffered a just fate.

6. Emperor Ninth Petal of Crimson: The Sixth Emperor Above Heaven took his own life with poison, after a lengthy period of convalescence. He reigned in an era of ceaseless disharmony and conflict: wars were waged between colonies vying for the favor of the throne, rebellions were raised against the demands of imperial taxation, and in the last years of his rule, foreign interlopers began to test the limits of imperial magnanimity by encroaching upon long-established borders. The last petal of crimson was a romantic, unsuited to the times he found himself in.

7. Emperor Gestalt Face: The Seventh Emperor Above Heaven waged civil war against his subjects from birth, and was beaten to death by his own resentful selves. He blasphemed by creating many copies of himself while still living and appointing them as officials and advisors whose counsel he favored over those of the ministers. His practice of pitting his copies against each other to foster innovation proved to be his ultimate downfall once they turned their fists on him.

8. Emperor Verdant Unfolding: The Eighth and final Emperor Above Heaven lost the throne before he ever ascended. He knew this well, so did not fight when the ministers deposed him. He retired to a monastery on one of Earth's first moons, and lived out his days alone tending the gardens. The glass holding humanity together shattered, and many rivers have since flowed from the shards.
 
The Tudor Kings of England

1485-1509: Henry VII
m. Elizabeth of York (1486 – d.1503) Issue. Arthur I, King of England (b.1486); Margaret, Queen of Scots (b.1489 – 1541); Henry VIII, King of England (b. 1491); Elizabeth Tudor (b.1492 – 1495); Mary, Queen of France (b.1496 – 1533); Edmund, Duke of Somerset (b.1500 – 1501)

1509-1519: Arthur I
m. Catherine of Aragon (1501 – d.1536) Issue. Henry, Duke of Cornwall (d.1510); Mary, Duchess of Devon (b.1515 – 1558); Edward VI, King of England (b.1518)

1519-1536: Edward VI
Regents: Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, Archbishop of York (1519-1529); Henry, Duke of York (1529-1535)

1536-1547: Henry VIII
m. Lady Anne Stafford (1510 – annul. 1530); Jane Seymour (1531 – d. 1540); Catherine Howard (1542 – d.1544); Anne of Cleeves (1544) Issues. Margaret of York (b.1511 – d.1513); Edward, Earl of Richmond (d. 1515); Edmund of Greenwich (d. 1520); Henry IX, King of England (b.1533); Elizabeth, Queen of Denmark (b.1537 – d.1603)

1547-1595: Henry IX
Regent: Thomas Cromwell, 1st Earl of Essex (1547-1551)
m. Mary, Queen of Scots (b.1556 – d.1587) Issue. Henry, Prince of Wales (b.1557 – d. 1560); Arthur II and I, King of England and Scotland (b.1558); Jane Valois, Duchess of Anjou (b.1561 – d.1631); Elizabeth Devereux, Duchess of Leicester (b.1566 – d.1603)


1595-1625: Arthur II and I
m. Princess Virginia of Sweden (b.1559 – d.1633) Issue. Arthur, Prince of Wales (b.1586 – d.1616); Thomas, Duke of Clarence and Albany (b.1588 – d.1641); Mary (b. 1592 – d.1593); Elizabeth, Queen of Bohemia (b.1596 – d.1662); James, Duke of Lennox and Richmond (b. 1599 – d. 1646); Anne Villiers, Duchess of Buckingham (b.1601 – d.1628); Henrietta (d. 1603)

1625-1653: Richard IV and I
m. Princess Christine Marie of France (b.1606 – d.1663) Issue. Catherine I, Queen of England and Scotland (b.1626)

1653-1685: Catherine I
m. Richard Cromwell, 5th Earl of Essex (b. 1626 – d.1712) Issue. Oliver I Cromwell, King of England and Scotland (b.1644); Gregory, Duke of York (b.1650); Princess Grace (b.1651); Edward of Wales (b.1654); Richard of Essex (b.1656); Princess Anne (b.1659); Thomas, Duke of Cambridge (b.1660)
 
"Os que se separam do populismo classificam-se, muito grã-finamente, de democratas. Na verdade, porém, são apenas homens poderosos ou a serviço de grupos poderosíssimos que julgam que o Brasil deve continuar a ser das raras nações do mundo onde existe, de um lado, uma pequena minoria de milionários e de outro, a grande maioria de paupérrimos e semipobres"

Brazilian presidents timeline (stops at 2006):

• Ademar de Barros (1961–1966)
• Juscelino Kubitschek (1966–1971)
• Tancredo Neves (1971–1976)
• Leonel Brizola (1976–1981)
• Paulo Maluf (1981–1983) impeached
• Aureliano Chaves (1983–1986)
• Mário Covas (1986–1991)
• Fernando Collor de Melo (1991–2001)
• Ciro Gomes (2001–2006)
 
Back
Top