• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Lists of Heads of Government and Heads of State

Fascinatingly different
Thanks. A combination of reading a good Jacobin article on the creation of the Japanese Socialist Party (the group did argue about what to call it in there first session, the use of Socialist won by one vote) and stumbling across various PODs that appeared about Emperor Hirohito nearly being forced out.

Japan has its politically dynamic periods which inspire a lot of PODs.
 
What Kills You Makes You Stronger

(Canon background to a wikibox of an alternate 2020 election I did, if you are wondering who the OCs are)

PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

16. Abraham Lincoln/Hannibal Hamlin (R) - March 4, 1861-March 4, 1865
17. George McClellan/Horatio Seymour (D) - March 4, 1865-March 4, 1869
18. Charles Sumner/Ulysses Grant (R) - March 4, 1869-May 26, 1874
19. Ulysses Grant/VACANT (R) - May 26, 1874-March 4, 1877
20. Horatio Seymour/Grover Cleveland (D) - March 4, 1877-March 4, 1881
21. Ulysses Grant/James Garfield (R) - March 4, 1881-March 4, 1885
22. James Garfield/William Sherman (R) - March 4, 1885-March 4, 1889
22. James Garfield/James Blaine (R) - March 4, 1889-March 4, 1893
23. James Weaver/Henry George (P) - March 4, 1893-June 17, 1896
23. James Weaver/VACANT (P) - June 17, 1896-March 4, 1897
23. James Weaver/William Jennings Bryan (P) - March 4, 1897-March 4, 1901
24. William Jennings Bryan/Wharton Barker (P) - March 4, 1901-March 4, 1905
25. Theodore Roosevelt/Simon Guggenheim (R) - March 4, 1905-March 4, 1913
26. Simon Guggenheim/William Taft (R) - March 4, 1913-March 4, 1917
27. Thomas Marshall/John Cox (P) - March 4, 1917-March 4, 1921
28. Charles Evans Hughes/Leonard Wood (R) - March 4, 1921-March 4, 1929
29. Herbert Hoover/Leonidas Dyer (R) - March 4, 1929-March 4, 1933
30. Henry Wallace/Herbert Lehman (P) - March 4, 1933-March 4, 1941
31. Eleanor Roosevelt/Herbert Lehman (P) - March 4, 1941-December 16, 1941
31. Eleanor Roosevelt/VACANT (P) - December 16, 1941-January 7, 1942
31. Eleanor Roosevelt/Benjamin Davis (P/R) - January 7, 1942-September 20, 1945
31. Eleanor Roosevelt/VACANT (P) - September 20, 1945-December 7, 1945
31. Eleanor Roosevelt/Henry Morgenthau (P) - December 7, 1945-March 4, 1949
32. A. Philip Randolph/Harry Truman (P) - March 4, 1949-January 10, 1950
33. Harry Truman/VACANT (P) - January 10, 1950-August 2, 1950
33. Harry Truman/Frances Perkins (P) - August 2, 1950-March 4, 1953
33. Harry Truman/Hubert Humphrey (P) - March 4, 1953-March 4, 1957
34. Bayard Rustin/Floyd Olson (RFL) - March 4, 1957-November 16, 1964
34. Bayard Rustin/VACANT (RFL) - November 16, 1964-December 18, 1964
34. Bayard Rustin/Dwight Eisenhower (RFL/I) - December 18, 1964-March 4, 1965
35. Gerald Ford/Charles Percy (CU) - March 4, 1965-March 4, 1969
36. Millicent Fenwick/Daniel Inouye (RFL) - March 4, 1969-March 4, 1973
37. Elizabeth Holtzman/George McGovern (SL) - March 4, 1973-January 31, 1981
38. Hiram Fong/Ronald Reagan (CU) - January 31, 1981-January 31, 1985
39. Charles Percy/George H.W. Bush (RFL) - January 31, 1985-August 19, 1991

40. George H.W. Bush/VACANT (RFL) - August 19, 1991-June 4, 1992
40. George H.W. Bush/John Kasich (RFL) - June 4, 1992-January 31, 1993

41. Al Gore/John Kerry (SL) - January 31, 1993-April 15, 1999
42. John Kerry/VACANT (SL) - April 15, 1999-May 28, 1999
43. John Kerry/Will Clinton (SL) - May 28, 1999-June 14, 2000
44. Will Clinton/VACANT (SL) - June 14, 2000-January 31, 2001
45. Howard Dean/Jane Harman (SL) - January 31, 2001-January 31, 2005

46. John Kasich/Bill Weld (CU) - January 31, 2005-January 31, 2009
47. Barack Obama/Joe Biden (SL) - January 31, 2009-January 31, 2017
48. Nicole Kim/Kirsten Gillibrand (PF) - January 31, 2017-January 31, 2021
49. James Andersson/Kamala Harris (SL) - January 31, 2021-Present

ANDERSSON APPROVAL:
Yes:
65.4%
No: 26.0%

NEXT ELECTION POLLING (11/5/24):
Andersson* (SL) -
52.6%
Kim (PF) - 19.0%
Johnson (CU/TP) - 15.1%

PRESIDENTS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA:
1. Jefferson Davis (D) - February 19, 1861-February 22, 1862

1. Jefferson Davis (D) - February 22, 1862-February 22, 1868
2. Alexander Stephens (D) - February 22, 1868-February 22, 1874
3. Robert Toombs (D) - February 22, 1874-February 22, 1880
4. Nathan Forrest (D) - February 22, 1880-February 22, 1886
5. Francis Lubbock (D) - February 22, 1886-November 7, 1888
6. Benjamin Tillman (D) - November 7, 1888-February 22, 1898
7. Ira B. Jones (D) - February 22, 1898-February 22, 1904
8. Benjamin Tillman (D) - February 22, 1904-February 22, 1910
9. Coleman Blease (D) - February 22, 1910-February 22, 1916

10. Woodrow Wilson (N) - February 22, 1916-February 22, 1922
11. Coleman Blease (D) - February 22, 1922-February 22, 1928

12. James Vardaman (D) - February 22, 1928-February 22, 1934
13. Oscar Underwood (N) - February 22, 1934-September 25, 1935
15. Huey Long (N) - September 25, 1935-January 11, 1936
(-). Coleman Blease (D) - January 11, 1936-November 16, 1936
16. Strom Thurmond (S) - November 16, 1936-May 11, 1998
17. George Wallace (S) - May 11, 1998-August 14, 1998
(-). Interim Council - August 14, 1998-January 1, 1999
18. Jim Carter (P) - January 1, 1999-January 1, 2004

19. L. Doug Wilder (P) - January 1, 2004-January 1, 2009
20. Roy Moore (S) - January 1, 2009-December 8, 2012
21. Jerry Falwell Jr. (S) - December 8, 2012-January 1, 2014
22. David Price (P) - January 1, 2014-January 1, 2019
23. Jerry Falwell Jr. (S) - January 1, 2019-August 29, 2020
24. Ted Cruz (S) - August 29, 2020-Present

CRUZ APPROVAL:
No:
77.1%
Yes: 14.5%

NEXT ELECTION POLLING (11/1/23):
O'Rourke (P) -
41.5%
Cruz* (S) - 27.0%
Heinrich (H) - 26.7%
 
A CONSENSUS REBORN
Thatcher loses the Malvinas


Part One

1983 UK general election
Liberal (David Steel)/Social Democratic (Roy Jenkins): 255 seats, 37.1% vote
Labour (Michael Foot): 209 seats, 27.6% vote
Conservative (Willie Whitelaw): 165 seats, 30.7% vote

Result: Liberal/Social Democratic short 71 of majority

Jenkins ministry (1983-87)
⦁ Prime Minister: Roy Jenkins (Social Democratic)
⦁ Deputy Prime Minister: David Steel (Liberal)
⦁ Chancellor of the Exchequer: Richard Wainwright (Liberal)
⦁ Treasury Secretary: Ian Wrigglesworth (Social Democratic)
⦁ Foreign Secretary: David Owen (Social Democratic)
⦁ Home Secretary: Shirley Williams (Social Democratic)
⦁ Defence Secretary: Russell Johnston (Liberal)
⦁ Education Secretary: Bill Pitt (Liberal)
⦁ Employment Secretary: Michael Heseltine (Social Democratic)
⦁ Energy Secretary: Bill Rodgers (Social Democratic)
⦁ Health Secretary: Bob Maclennan (Social Democratic)
⦁ Industry Secretary: David Penhaligon (Liberal)
⦁ Trade Secretary: John Pardoe (Liberal)

Flagship policy
⦁ Constitutional & electoral reform
⦁ Jobs investment programme
⦁ Wealth redistribution & simpler tax
⦁ Multilateral nuclear disarmament
⦁ Council house building & sales
⦁ Greater industrial democracy
⦁ New environmental protection
⦁ European Community integration

Benn shadow cabinet (1984-87)
⦁ Leader of the Opposition: Tony Benn (Labour)
⦁ Deputy Leader/Shadow Chancellor: Eric Heffer (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Treasury: Stuart Holland (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Foreign: Michael Foot (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Home: Stan Orme (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Defence: John Silkin (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Education: Neil Kinnock (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Employment: Michael Meacher (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Energy: Denzil Davies (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Health: Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Industry: John Prescott (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Trade: Peter Shore (Labour)

Heath frontbench team (1984-87)
⦁ Party Leader: Ted Heath (Conservative)
⦁ Party Deputy Leader: Geoffrey Howe (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Chancellor: Jim Prior (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Treasury: Nigel Lawson (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Foreign: Ian Gilmour (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Home: Quintin Hogg (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Defence: Douglas Hurd (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Education: Keith Joseph (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Employment: Peter Tapsell (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Energy: Francis Pym (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Health: Norman Fowler (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Industry: Peter Walker (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Trade: Leon Brittan (Conservative)
 
Last edited:
Based on a conversation with @Meppo, who showed me an insane alternate history about a 1952 WW3. Writeup is gonna come soonish but wanted to get this out there.

1949-1953 Harry Truman/Alben Barkley (Democratic)
1948 def. Thomas Dewey (Republican), Strom Thurmond (Dixiecrat)
1953-1957 Dwight Eisenhower/Harry Truman (National Union)
1952 def. elections suspended
1957-1961 Dwight Eisenhower/Hubert Humphrey (Democratic)
1956 def. Strom Thurmond (Dixiecrat), Robert Taft (Republican)
1961-present Hubert Humphrey/Stuart Symington (Democratic)
1960 def. Walter Judd (Republican), Harry Byrd (Dixiecrat)
1964 def. Barry Goldwater (Conservative)
Presidential Raitings by a Political Scientist (circa. 1968)
Harry Truman- Before 1952, Harry Truman was in many ways a failure, but when the war started, he became a figurehead of the national movement to try and defeat the communist menace once and for all. He is much more well-known for that and for getting out of the way so that Eisenhower could run for president. Though there have been recent controversies on that and the suspended election, Truman played through the nuclear war as well as someone could for a year before finally starting offensives that would destroy the USSR for good. Rating: B

Eisenhower: No President since Andrew Jackson had been both at the center of much academic ink and beloved by the public. The shine of Eisenhower, the destroyer of both Nazis and Communists alike, can't be understated in the American consciousness. Eisenhower's shift to a war economy and the overall destruction of the USSR lead to America becoming the sole hyperpower. The world that Ike created was one of the contradictions, though, as even though he revealed much of the abuses of the Soviet system, but the system of adopting orphans has led to numerous accusations of abuse and harsh conditions in the system. Nevertheless, the final breath of the Soviets lead to the US turning more inward during Ike's 2nd term as he had to rebuild New York, Chicago, and Washington. Grand plans for a national highway system were scrapped as rebuilding these places of industry took top priority. The rebirth of these cities remains Eisenhower's legacy today, and even with the abuses, he is the one to take America from merely a superpower to a hyperpower. Rating: A+

Hubert Humphrey: Current presidents are the hardest to rank, but Humphrey is in many ways the successor to his three previous contemporaries. His "Marshall Plan for American Cities," the introduction of Russia into NATO with President Solzhenitsyn, the passing of multiple Civil Rights Acts, Universal Healthcare, and the centerpiece, guaranteed employment. He also has had the biggest struggles with the opposition party since Truman, as he has to fight tooth and nail, especially now, for anything to be accomplished. The rapid rise of the Conservatives see people tired of Democrats ruling for almost 40 years and wanting a change, however, it remains to be seen if the Conservative party succeeds and can stay united, only time can tell. Rating: A-
 
My take on @Enigma-Conundrum's "The Beaten Path"

1977-81: Ronald Reagan/John Connally (Republican)

1976: Jimmy Carter/Frank Church (Democrat)
1981-84: Ed Muskie/Jerry Litton (Democrat)
1980: Ronald Reagan/John Connally (Republican), John B. Anderson/Barbara Jordan (Independent)
1984-93: Jerry Litton/Mario Cuomo (Democrat)
1984: Gerald Ford/Richard Lugar (Republican), Ron Paul/Bob Livingston (Populist)
1988: Alexander Haig/Jack Kemp (Republican)

1993- : Lee Atwater/Elizabeth Dole (Republican)

1992: Neil Goldschmidt/Pete Flaherty (Democrat)
1996: Andrew Young/Tim Wirth (Democrat)

2001- : Trent Lott/John Rowland (Republican)

2000: Rick Perry/Ted Wilson (Democrat), Jesse Jackson/Bernie Sanders (Rainbow Coalition)
2005-13: Tom Morello/Harry Reid (Democrat)

2004: Trent Lott/John Rowland (Republican)
2008: Will Romney/Jeff Kottkamp (Republican)
 
A CONSENSUS REBORN
Thatcher loses the Malvinas


Part Two

1987 UK general election
Social Democratic (Shirley Williams)/Liberal (David Steel): 257 seats (+2), 39.5% vote
Labour (Tony Benn): 215 seats (+16), 33% vote
Conservative (Ted Heath): 150 seats (-15), 23% vote

Result: Social Democratic/Liberal short 69 of majority; Conservative deal

Williams ministry (1987-91)
⦁ Prime Minister: Shirley Williams (Social Democratic)
⦁ Deputy Prime Minister: David Steel (Liberal)
⦁ Chancellor of the Exchequer: Michael Heseltine (Social Democratic)
⦁ Treasury Secretary: John Pardoe (Liberal)
⦁ Foreign Secretary: Alan Beith (Liberal)
⦁ Home Secretary: David Owen (Social Democratic)
⦁ Defence Secretary: Bill Rodgers (Social Democratic)
⦁ Education Secretary: Simon Hughes (Liberal)
⦁ Employment Secretary: David Penhaligon (Liberal)
⦁ Energy Secretary: John Cartwright (Social Democratic)
⦁ Health Secretary: Bob Maclennan (Social Democratic)
⦁ Industry Secretary: Mike Thomas (Social Democratic)
⦁ Trade Secretary: Malcolm Bruce (Liberal)

Flagship policy
⦁ Further voting & Lords reform
⦁ Devolution (home rule) across UK
⦁ Social security to work initiative
⦁ Land value tax in place of rates
⦁ Minimum wage & social charter
⦁ Progressive education system
⦁ High renewable energy budget
⦁ European monetary integration

Benn shadow cabinet (1987-91)
⦁ Leader of the Opposition: Tony Benn (Labour)
⦁ Deputy Leader/Shadow Chancellor: Eric Heffer (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Treasury: Bryan Gould (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Foreign: John Silkin (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Home: Stan Orme (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Defence: Denzil Davies (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Education: Joan Lestor (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Employment: John Prescott (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Energy: Michael Meacher (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Health: Neil Kinnock (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Industry: Frank Dobson (Labour)
⦁ Shadow Trade: Robin Cook (Labour)

Parkinson frontbench team (1987-91)
⦁ Party Leader: Cecil Parkinson (Conservative)
⦁ Party Deputy Leader: Douglas Hurd (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Chancellor: Norman Fowler (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Treasury: John Major (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Foreign: Peter Tapsell (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Home: Jim Prior (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Defence: Tom King (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Education: Leon Brittan (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Employment: Peter Walker (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Energy: Norman Lamont (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Health: Kenneth Baker (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Industry: David Evans (Conservative)
⦁ Shadow Trade: Alan Clark (Conservative)
 
Last edited:
List of Presidents of the Republic of Turkey:

1923 - 1938: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Republican People’s Party)
1923: unopposed
1927: unopposed
1931: unopposed
1935: unopposed

1938 - 1938: Abdülhalik Renda (Republican People’s Party) [Acting]
1938: Presiden Mustafa Kemal Atatürk dies of Cirrhosis.
1938 - 1950: İsmet İnönü (Republican People’s Party)
1938: unopposed
1939: unopposed
1943: unoppsoed
1946 def. Fevzi Çakmak (Democrat Party), Yusuf Kemal Tengirşenk (Democrat Party)

1950 - 1960: Celâl Bayar (Democrat Party)
1950 def. İsmet İnönü (Republican People’s Party)
1954 def. İsmet İnönü (Republican People’s Party)
1957: unopposed

1960 - 1961: National Unity Committee led by Cemal Gürsel (Indepenxent)
1960: Democrat Party government overthrown in military coup by young officers.
1961 - 1966: Cemal Gürsel (Independent)
1961 def. Invalid/blank votes
1966 - 1966: İbrahim Şevki Atasagun (Independent) [Acting]
1966: President Cemal Gürsel dies of apoplexy.
1966 - 1973: Cevdet Sunay (Independent)
1966 def. Alparslan Turkeş (Republican Villagers Nation Party)
1973 - 1973: Tekin Arıburun (Justice Party) [Acting]
1973 - 1980: Fahri Korutürk (Independent)
1973 15th Round def. Faruk Gürler (Independent), Ferruh Bozbeyli (Democratic Party), Tekin Arıburun (Justice Party)
1980 - 1980: İhsan Sabri Çağlayangil (Justice Party) [Acting]
1980: Failure to elect President after 124 rounds.
1980 - 1982: National Security Council led by Kenan Evren (Independent)
1980: 43rd Turkish Government overthrown by military coup, and replaced by Military Junta.
1982 - 1989: Kenan Evren (Independent)
1982: Yes (91.37%)
1989 - 1993: Turgut Özal (Independent - Motherland Party)
1989 3rd Round def. Fethi Çelikbaş (Independent - Motherland Party)
1993 - 1993: Hüsamettin Cindoruk (True Path Party) [Acting]
1993: Presiden Turgut Özal dies of a heart attack, posthumously deemed a poisoning.
1993 - 2000: Süleyman Demirel (Independent - True Path Party)
1993 3rd Round def. Kamran İnan (Independent - Motherland Party), Lütfi Doğan (Independent - Welfare Party), İsmail Cem (Independent - Republican People’s Party)
2000 - 2007: Ahmet Necdet Sezer (Independent)
2000 3rd Round def. Nevzat Yalçıntaş (Indeoendent - Virtue Party), Sadi Somuncuoğlu (Independent - Nationalist Movement Party), Rasim Zaimoğlu (Independent - True Path Party), Mehmet Mail Büyükerman (Independent)
2007 - 2014: Abdullah Gül (Independent - Justice and Development Party)
2007: First Attempt at Presidential elections postponed due to Republic Protests in favor of strict state secularism.
2007 Second Attempt 3rd Round def. Sabahattin Çakmakoğlu (Independent - Nationalist Movement Party), Tayfun İçli (Independent - Democratic Left Party)
2007 Constitutional Referendum to elect the President by popular vote: Yes (68.95%)

2014 - 2017: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (Independent - Justice and Development Party)
2014 1st Round def. Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu (Independent backed by Republican People’s Party, Nationalist Movement Party and others), Selahettin Demirtaş (Independent - Peoples’ Democratic Party)
2017 - 2018: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (Justice and Development Party)
2017 Constitutional Referendum for a Presidential system: Yes (51.41%)
2018 - 2023: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (Justice and Development Party backed by Nationalist Movement Party)
2018 1st round (with Fuat Oktay) def. Muharrem İnce (Republican People’s Party), Selahattin Demirtaş (Peoples’ Democratic Party) [In preventive detention], Meral Akşener (Good Party), Temel Karamollaoğlu (Felicity Party), Doğu Perinçek (Patriotic)
2023 - 0000: Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu (Republican People’s Party backed by Peoples’ Democratic Party, Good Party, Workers’ Party of Turkey, Democracy and Progress Party, Future Party, Felicity Party, Democrat Party and others)
2023 1st round (with Ekrem İmamoğlu, Mansur Yavaş, Meral Akşener, Ali Babacan, Ahmet Davutoğlu, Temel Karamollaoğlu and Gültekin Uysal) def. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (Justice and Development Party backed by Nationalist Movement Party), Muharrem İnce (Homeland Party), Doğu Perinçek (Patriotic Party)

Made this whole ass detailed list just to draw attention to how many Vice Presidents Turkey will have if Erdoğan loses.
 
1998 - 2001: Keizō Obuchi (Liberal Democratic)
2000 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komieto), Ichirō Ozawa (Liberal), Tetsuzo Fuwa (Communist), Takako Doi (Social Democratic), Chikage Oogi (New Conservative)
2001 - 2004: Koichi Kato (Liberal Democratic)
2004 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Naoto Kan (Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Takako Doi (Social Democratic)
2004 - 2005: Tarō Asō (Liberal Democratic - Komieto Coalition)
2005 - 2007: Naoto Kan (Democratic)
2005 (Coalition with Social Democratic) def. Tarō Asō (Liberal Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komeito), Kiyomi Tsujimoto (Social Democratic), Shōzaburō Jimi (People’s New), Kazuo Shii (Communist)
2007 - 2009: Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic - Social Democratic coalition)
2009 - 2012: Shinzō Abe (Liberal Democratic)
2009 (Majority) def. Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic), Akihiro Ota (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Kiyomi Tsujimoto (Social Democratic), Shōzaburō Jimi (People’s New)
2012 - 2014: Fukushiro Nukaga (Liberal Democratic)
2013 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Koriki Jojima (Democratic), Ichiro Ozawa - Tōru Hashimoto (Association for the People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Ryoichi Hattori (Social Democratic)
2014 - 2015: Yasuhisa Shiozaki (Liberal Democratic - Komieto Coalition)
2015 - 2017: Nobuteru Ishihara (Liberal Democratic
- Komieto Coalition)
2017 - 2019: Katsuya Okada (Democratic)
2017 (Coalition with Social Democratic) def. Nobuteru Ishihara (Liberal Democratic), Tōru Hashimoto (For The People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Ryoichi Hattori (Social Democratic), Kazuo Shii (Communist)
2019 - 2022: Yukio Edano (Democratic)
2020 (Majority) def. Toshimitsu Motegi (Liberal Democratic), Tōru Hashimoto (For The People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Tomoko Tamura (Communist)
2022 - : Yuki Waseda (Democratic Majority)

Naoto Kan: The Man Who Defined Japan’s Left

Japan, or to be more specific, Tokyo. The Capital of one of the major Asian Economies is abuzz with action and excitement. It’s election season here, and compared to many Western Nations where electioneering has become increasingly digital and aloof, in Japan, soapbox politics remains king.

As is common, a wide bevy of politicians are out in force campaigning. The soapbox of Left Wing Populist Governor, Taro Yamamoto is more akin to a stage, a vast rally where he spits fire at all who oppose him and his party, People Power. But in the case of former Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, it’s more of a calm affair as he stands on his soap box. Whilst Kan has been criticised for his populistic rhetoric in the past, here he’s matter of fact and down to Earth, saying his piece and listening to what the people have to say about the incumbent government.

Overall reaction is muted if positive, though there are the occasional heckler. Of course given that up until fairly recently this area shared it’s population with Kan’s electoral ward in the Diet, it seems likely that the crowd would be supportive of Kan and the current Prime Minister, Chinami Nishimura, one of his many disciples within the Democratic Party.

But watching Kan speak and engage with the crowd, you get a sense of why Kan became Prime Minister. He is, several senses, a man of the people.

~~~

It’s a couple days later when I meet Kan more formally, whilst I have been trailing his campaign, and chatted to him a bit, we haven’t sat down and properly been interviewed.

So we meet at his house in Tokyo and are promptly greeted by his wife, Nobuko.

Nobuko Kan is probably Naoto’s biggest critic, indeed after his Premiership she wrote a book called “How Could Japan Change, When My Husband Was Prime Minister” which detailed her own particular frustrations and annoyances with Naoto and his leadership.

Nobuko‘s own fiery ideals, independence and self belief makes her starkly different from most Prime Ministers wife’s, who are often shunted into the background. I joke to her after we come into their Kan abode that she should have renamed it “How My Useless Husband, Changed Japan” given that’s the reason why I’m interviewing him. She lets out a dry laugh and says she’ll keep it in mind.

Having ingratiated myself with Mrs Kan, it’s now time to do it with the man of the hour.

Naoto Kan is sitting in an armchair, chatting to his son Gentarō who spots me first. We greet cordially, we bow, make pleasantries as I sit down. Nobuko brings in tea, sets it down and promptly tells off Naoto for not wearing a tie for an interview. The pair lightly bucket in Japanese before chuckling, Gentarō politely gets up and wishes me well before heading off.

With everyone having left the room, I decide to actually acknowledge my subject. Naoto has changed since his heyday in the 2000s, he’s lost a large amount of hair and he’s more winkled but the smile he gives me hasn’t changed.

I decide to go with simple question, does he think that his humble background has had an impact on his politics?

“Certainly” he says frankly “I had to to run four times initially to gain a diet seat, and I am Salaryman’s Son with no real connections after all, it does mean that I am more pragmatic than most I guess”

I mentioned that originally he ran as a member of the Saburō Eda formed Social Democratic Union, would he still see himself as a Social Democrat?

“I would say I am of the Left, but not a Social Democrat” Naoto says matter of factly “I am…a Japanese Liberal…now that is, of course, maybe you would think that I’m not that?” He asks me.

I ponder for a second the question, before replying with my take;

“I think I would say, you’re a Pragmatic Populist, of a Liberal variety”

Naoto nods, intrigued by what I said.

“Interesting, my wife says I’m too pragmatic if anything” he chuckles “But you are right I guess, I think a Populist is a man of the people don’t you think?” he asks me.

I shrug, my opinions on Populists are mixed, like many in the West, the Post Recession years has seen the return of such types of politicking and with it, the problems it represents. But in the usually staid Japanese Political landscape, people like Kan represent a sea change from the stodgy dynasties and bureaucrats that populated much of the Japanese Political Scene.

Indeed, even the game changer that was Morihiro Hosokawa was part of the Hosokawa clan that was connected to the Imperial Family.

Kan with his Pragmatic Populist views in many respects represented the people of Japan, or more particularly, the baby boomer generation he was part of. Indeed his victory over Tarō Asō, a backroom player thrust into the limelight following the chaos of Koichi Kato’s bungled privatisation attempts, seemed to provide a perfect vessel from which Kan could easily attack as a representative of the failures of Liberal Democratic rule.

“It did seem your message of Populist reform was combination of both presenting a positive future for Japan and its people and attacking the seeming stagnation of the Liberal Democrat’s, than destroying the system like some Populists” I mention off handily.

“Well, I wouldn’t say I’m Anti-Establishment, but the establishment makes mistakes, it does wrong to the people and they just expect to get away with it…postal privatisation of was a good example of that arrogance” Kan says, letting out a bit of that rhetoric he’s known for “At least when I make mistakes I own up to them and ensure recompense”

“Did you feel the system tried to oust you from power?” I ask and Kan’s brow wrinkles. In the aftermath of his sudden departure, due to accusations that he had unpaid annuities, he let slip that he believed that part of his leaking against him was down to the iron triangle. He would promptly shave his head, don Buddhist garb and did the Shikoku Pilgrimage. Whilst this did a lot to ingratiate himself back with the public, there always seemed to be a bitter taste left behind over his downfall.

“Hmmm” Kan lets out, rubbing his hands “No, not anymore. I wouldn’t say it was a concerted effort or anything. I do feel like that it was, an attempt to rid me though by some members of bureaucracy…I do regret the comments I made” he says moodily.

I swiftly try to move on, and decide to ask him about his opinions on more recent events. Particularly if he thinks he’s become a major backroom dealer?

“I guess” he replies, candidly.

“But doesn’t your National Shape Study Group occupy an important position within the Democratic Party?”

“Well, it does…though it’s not like everyone who’s part of it listens to me” he chuckles “But I will admit that helping in the, political direction of the previous Government was just as fulfilling as being Prime Minister” he says with a smile.

“Was the merger with the Social Democrats helpful to that goal?”

“Yes, it meant that the Japanese…left, was able to finally unite and gain a majority to govern with” he nods “And working with Tsujimoto remained me of my days as Prime Minister” he smiles softly.

Of course Kiyomi Tsujimoto was similar to Kan in numerous ways, originally starting in civil activism, becoming a Populistic leader of a Centre Left Party and also undone by a seeming corruption scandal, before becoming a major backroom dealer.

“Whilst uniting the Left has ensured an unprecedented victory, do you think it’s opened a door way for figures like Taro Yamamoto to step into a vacuum?”

Kan pauses, brow creases.

“No” he says bluntly. His gaze indicates that he’s tired of this question and feels it personally. Yamamoto candidacy for Tokyo Governor was supported by figures like Kan, who were appalled when he spat it back in their faces and went on an Anti-Establishment campaign.

I decide to move on, seeing the day move ahead I decide to finish up as best I can.

“Do you think you’ve changed Japan?” I ask him.

Kan ponders the question, before nodding.

“Before I came along, the Liberal Democratic Party had dominated Japan, the dynasties occupied much power and the people felt apathy towards politics” he says “Now, the domination of the Liberal Democrats has waned, the last three Prime Ministers have come from

whilst it’s fair to say the entrenched hierarchies that govern the Japanese still remain standing

~~~

It’s soapbox politicking again, though this time Kan is joined by a fellow former Prime Minister. Yukio Edano, the Middle Aged Memeable face of Japanese Liberalism is joining Kan on a speaking tour.

It’s apparent that despite the positive energy they’re getting that not everything is well in the campaign. People Power and the Communists pact seems to be more popular than expected and worries that the Democratic Party may lose there slim majority in the House of Councillors.

The grand tradition of Japan rebelling against the status quo by voting for outsider parties continues, as memories to 2013 and Ozawa & Hashimoto Olive Tree Coalition of Populist ‘outsiders’ gutted both parties.

But despite it all, the pair are campaigning hard. Edano, the loveable liberal lawyer who still commands popularity with the public despite his party ousting him, is in his element. Kan watches on, seeing his disciple and supporter at work.

Despite, in the every lasting order of Japanese politics, being unceremoniously ousted from power, the two can be seen as titans in their own right.

But without Kan, and his victory over the established order, then this little surreal scene of Prime Ministers soapbox politicking wouldn’t be playing out.

Even if his wife doesn’t agree, Kan can certainly be seen as a man who has defined Japan’s Modern Left.
 
Last edited:
Yamamoto as a left-wing equivalent of both Hashimoto and Koike gave me a good laugh.
Amusingly I read quickly that it was believed when he ran in 2020, his voting base overlapped with Koike and Utsunomiya a bit, generally it seems he was viewed as the ‘Fuck This’ Candidate.

But yeah, I do find him interesting as a character and giving him the platform of Tokyo Governor seems like a great way to throw a spanner in the works for the incumbent Democratic Government.
 
Hoover-Kennedy/TNO but based edition (Kennedy is impeached, US goes full war mode, turning into a de-facto dictatorship that ignores the President during that timeframe. This eventually allowed the Soviets to survive and Germany and Japan to be defeated, although 2 Million Americans die instead of 20% of that as OTL)

PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
31. Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis (R) - March 4, 1929-January 20, 1937

-Elected 1928 (OTL)
-Re-Elected 1932 (def. John Nance Garner (D), 276-255 EV/ 46.1%-49.4% PV)
32. Joseph Kennedy/James Byrnes (D) - January 20, 1937-October 24, 1943
-Elected 1936 (def. Alfred Landon (R), 382-149 EV/ 50.7%-45.5% PV)
-Re-Elected 1940 (def. Wendell Willkie (R), 270-261 EV/ 47.2%-50.0% PV)
33. James Byrnes/VACANT (D) - October 24, 1943-January 20, 1945
33. James Byrnes/Harry Truman (D) - January 20, 1945-January 20, 1949

-Elected 1944 (def. Thomas Dewey (R), Henry Wallace (P), 269-176-86 EV/ 28.3%-35.0%-30.7% PV)
34. Douglas MacArthur/George Patton (R) - January 20, 1949-January 20, 1953 (Both members of the five-man Emergency War Council that de-facto ruled from 1943-1949)
-Elected 1948 (def. Henry Wallace (P), James Byrnes (D), 272-231-28 EV/ 34.1%-38.0%-23.6% PV)
35. Hubert Humphrey/Lyndon Johnson (P) - January 20, 1953-January 31, 1961
-Elected 1952 (def. Douglas MacArthur (R), Strom Thurmond (D), 460-44-27 EV/ 52.6%-29.1%-16.0% PV)
-Re-Elected 1956 (def. William Knowland (R), Orval Faubus (D), 416-58-57 EV/ 50.4%-28.0%-20.1% PV)
36. Lyndon Johnson/Abe Fortas (P) - January 31, 1961-January 31, 1969
-
Elected 1960 (def. Richard Russell (NU), 463-74 EV/ 60.4%-37.1% PV)
-Re-Elected 1964 (def. John F. Kennedy (NU), 531-7 EV/ 69.2%-26.1% PV)
37. Abe Fortas/George McGovern (P) - January 31, 1969-June 7, 1970
-
Elected 1968 (def. Barry Goldwater (NU), 513-25 EV/ 67.0%-31.9% PV)
38. George McGovern/VACANT (P) - June 7, 1970-November 27, 1970
38. George McGovern/Shirley Chisholm (P) - November 27, 1970-January 31, 1973
39. Gerald Ford/Charles Percy (NU) - January 31, 1973-January 31, 1977

-Elected 1972 (def. George McGovern (P), 272-266 EV/ 44.3%-48.5% PV)
40. Elizabeth Holtzman/James Carter (P) - January 31, 1977-January 31, 1985
-
Elected 1976 (def. Gerald Ford (NU), 314-224 EV/ 53.1%-44.0% PV)
-Re-Elected 1980 (def. Ronald Reagan (NU), 538-0 EV/ 75.3%-20.8% PV)
41. James Carter/Barbara Jordan (P) - January 31, 1985-January 31, 1993
-Elected 1984 (def. Jesse Helms (NU), 68.1%-27.5% PV)
-Re-Elected 1988 (def. Bob Dole (NU), 58.0%-39.3% PV)
42. Barbara Jordan/Michael Dukakis (P) - January 31, 1993-January 31, 1997
-Elected 1992 (def. Bob Dole (NU), 54.3%-44.0% PV)
43. Pat Saiki/Bill Weld (NU) - January 31, 1997-January 31, 2001
-Elected 1996 (def. Michael Dukakis (P), 48.0%-47.8% PV)
44. Al Gore/Dianne Feinstein (P) - January 31, 2001-January 31, 2009
-Elected 2000 (def. Pat Saiki (NU), 50.9%-46.4% PV)
-Re-Elected 2004 (def. Rick Perry (NU), 57.9%-38.0% PV)
45. Michael Huffington/Susana Martinez (NU) - January 31, 2009-January 31, 2017
-Elected 2008 (def. Dianne Feinstein (P), 49.1%-47.3% PV)
-Re-Elected 2012 (def. Bill Clinton (P), 56.8%-41.1% PV)
46. Susana Martinez/Charlie Baker (NU) - January 31, 2017-January 31, 2021
-Elected 2016 (def. Bernie Sanders (P), 54.4%-41.7% PV)
47. Ted Lieu/Kirsten Gillibrand (P) - January 31, 2021-Present
-Elected 2020 (def. Susana Martinez (NU), 58.5%-39.0% PV)

POLITICAL PARTIES:
National Unionist (NU) - 40%

A party originally formed from the old Democrats and Republicans that has now morphed into a liberal conservative party that supports abortion rights and has a fully-accepted LGBT wing with over a hundred thousand members. National Unionist administrations usually focus on promoting policies that help business growth- including things like tax incentives for profit sharing- and the signature "max min" policy (maximizing the tax burden on the lowest number of people). Members view universal healthcare, food security, and high-quality public education/housing as a good investment for future productive citizens. They also oppose public sector unions but strongly support private sector unions as 'people exercising their right to work' Internationally, they support an internationalist, pro-NATO line including support for the Republic of Israel and opposition to the USSR. They also believe in direct democracy and referendums (limited to the one petition per cycle with the most signatures), which sometimes allows them to block things due to the average voter being slightly to the right of the average old-guard Progressive members of Congress that control the body. (TL;DR- OTL mainstream Dems)
Progressive (P) - 45%
The long-standing champion of the rights of the common person. Winning after years of practical dictatorship and horrible Presidents, they would ride to a period of dominance that didn't fully end until a decade ago. The party has two main factions, the establishment flank and the younger, more moderate insurgent flank. The former is full of the libertarian socialists and ameromarxists ('Communism' is a dirty word in this America, but they are basically like Eurocommunists) raised in the fires of Progressive domination, who support socialist policies like public ownership and sectoral trade unions. The second category are the younger members of the party, which reflect a growing trend among America's youth towards more center-left ideologies and away from the leftism of their parents and grandparents. They are more left wing on social issues (not that the old guard was conservative to begin with by OTL standards) and far more internationalist/pro-NATO (again, not that the establishment was ever against the latter in the first place). And, while generally right-leaning, the younger membership did play a crucial role in defeating the attempts of the Martinez Administration to end tuition-free college education, a system that had been in place since the late 1970s.(TL;DR- Marxist-NATOism and libsocs)

CURRENT HOT-BUTTON ISSUES:
-Serious gender-affirming care (puberty blockers, hormones) for those under 18
(Progressives largely support, National Unionists uniformly opposed)
-Minimum wage (Progressives want an increase to at least $30, National Unionists want it kept at $25 per hour or only want a small increase)
-Gender-neutral paid leave reform (Currently fathers get 30 weeks of paid parental leave, while mothers get 50. Progressives want to increase both to a whole year while National Unionists support either the status quo or giving couples 80 weeks to divide amongst themselves as they wish)

-Public coverage of dental care (The National Healthcare System, which has been an immovable institution of American life for over half a century and a model for much of the world, was expanded in 2020 to include dental care during the COVID Pandemic. Following mass vaccinations and the vast decrease in cases, National Unionists have began arguing for its repeal, stating that the emergency is over, while Progressives want to keep it)
-Dealing with USSR/North China (Strangely (or understandably if you have any understanding of American or Global history), one of the most left wing nations in the world is militantly anti-Communist. However, the fact remains that both the USSR and North China are significant markets and producers. The younger generation of Progressives want to isolate them until they adopt more liberal governments, the older Progressives want some interaction to convince them to change, and the National Unionists are split between those who want to bring back the death penalty solely for Belgrade Pact spies and those with more aggressive approaches to the conflict.
-Free public transit (President Lieu introduced free and universal public transit for everyone last year, supplanting the $10/month unlimited ticket as many as 85% of Americans held. National Unionists claim that this lost revenue will have to be made up with taxes and that the ticket should be restored, while Progressives believe that economic growth will make up the tax shortfall.
-Executive power (Largely in response to the weakening of the presidency in the 1940s, the Progressives heavily expanded the powers of the office in the following decades. This included the ability to force an up/down vote on any judicial/cabinet nominee or bill, the increase in the override threshold from 2/3rds to 3/4ths, the ability to unilaterally renew budgets adjusted for inflation if Congress doesn't pass one, and the introduction of the line-item veto. At one point, following several consecutive landslides, they even considered allowing the President to unilaterally appoint judicial nominees. National Unionists, previously strongly opposed, have somewhat warmed up to this after experiencing the situation of having your guy in the Oval Office and the other guys in control of Congress. Instead, most support for limiting the powers of the President come from younger, reformist members of both parties.
 
Last edited:
-Dealing with USSR/North China (Strangely (or understandably if you have any understanding of American or Global history), one of the most left wing nations in the world is militantly anti-Communist. However, the fact remains that both the USSR and North China are significant markets and producers. The younger generation of Progressives want to isolate them until they adopt more liberal governments, the older Progressives want some interaction to convince them to change, and the National Unionists are split between those who want to bring back the death penalty solely for Belgrade Pact spies and those with more aggressive approaches to the conflict.
Alright, which warlord west of the Volga managed to re-establish the USSR? Tukhachevsky? Zhukov? Yagoda? Khrushchev?
 
1945-53: Clement Attlee (Labour)
1945: Winston Churchill (Conservative), Archibald Sinclair (Liberal)
1950: Winston Churchill (Conservative), Clement Davies (Liberal)

1953-55: Hugh Dalton (Labour)
1955-64: Richard A. Butler (Conservative)

1955: Hugh Dalton (Labour), Clement Davies (Liberal)
1959: Harold Wilson (Labour), Jo Grimond (Liberal)

1964-67: George Brown (Labour)
1964: Richard A. Butler (Conservative), Jo Grimond (Liberal)
1967-75: Barbara Castle (Labour)
1967: Peter Thorneycroft (Conservative), Emlyn Hooson (Liberal)
1971: Peter Thorneycroft (Conservative), Emlyn Hooson (Liberal)

1975-79: Robin Chichester-Clark (Conservative)
1975: Barbara Castle (Labour), Mark Bonham Carter (Liberal)
1979-85: John Silkin (Labour)
1979: Robin Chichester-Clark (Conservative), Enoch Powell (Unionist), Mark Bonham Carter (Liberal)
1984: Peter Walker (Alliance), Enoch Powell (Unionist), David Steel (Liberal)

1985-88: Gerald Kaufman (Labour)
1988-92: Michael Heseltine (Reform)

1988: Gerald Kaufman (Labour), Alan Clark (Unionist)
1992-97: Robert Kilroy-Silk (Labour)
1992: Michael Heseltine (Reform), Alan Clark (Unionist)
1997- : Francis Maude (Reform)
1997: Robert Kilroy-Silk (Labour), Neil Hamilton (Unionist)

Prime Ministers in The Crown
Simon Chandler as Clement Attlee
Jason Watkins
as Hugh Dalton
Robert Dawes
as Richard Austen "Rab" Butler
Ron Cook
as George Brown
Caroline Catz
as Barbara Castle
Ian Glen
as Robin Chichester-Clark
Martin Clunes
as John Silkin
Alex McQueen
as Gerald Kaufman
Dexter Fletcher
as Michael Heseltine
Greg Davies
as Robert Kilroy-Silk
Vincent Franklin
as Francis Maude
 
Alright, which warlord west of the Volga managed to re-establish the USSR? Tukhachevsky? Zhukov? Yagoda? Khrushchev?
While the USSR still falls, assistance by the US following the impeachment and removal of Kennedy allows them to stay somewhat consolidated. Still undecided on who leads the USSR.
 
Notes confiscated from student entering American History exam, May 2022

01-09: Roosevelt (R)
09-13: Taft (R)
13-21: Wilson (D)
GW 17-18
21-3: Harding (R) ✞H
23-9: Coolidge (R)
29-30: Hoover (R) ✞A
30: Curtis (R) ✞A
30-3: Stimson (CUF [R, D, S, & C-RWB])
33-7: MacArthur (A-A) X
37-41: Young (ind + CUF)
41-3: Sinclair (PF + PD) *
43-4: Long (PD + PF) *
44-5: Wallace (ind + PF & PD)
45-7: Long (PD) X
47-8: Forrestal (PD) *H
48-58: Humphrey sr (PD) *
WW 29/50-58
58-61: Rogers (PD)
61-9: Cochran (L)
1NE 68-80
69: High (PD) ✞H
69-79: Nixon (PD) ✞H
79-81: Cochran (L + PD)
81: Alexander (PD-S) ✞A
81-9: Foster (JPCA + PD-S)
2NE 87-99
89-90: Turnipseed (PD-U) ✞A
90-3: Humphrey jr (PD)
93-5: Buchanan (A-A) X
95: Smothers (A-A) X
95: Nixon Robb (CUF II) ✞A
95-9: Carter (CUF II) *
99: Kerry (CUF II)
99-02: Richards (PD) *H
02-3: Silkwood (PD)
03-7: Powell (Ref)
07-15: Kaku (CC-21CL + S!)
15-7: Davis (CC-21CL) *H
17-9: O'Rourke (CC-21CL)
19-: Jarrett (PD)

1929-1930: Herbert Hoover (Republican) ✞
'28 (with Charles Curtis) def. Al Smith (Democratic)
'30 assassinated by Andrew Kehoe
1930-1930: Charles Curtis (Republican) ✞
'30 assassinated by Silver Legion team led by William Dudley Pelley
1930-1933: Henry Stimson (Republican leading Constitutional United Front of Republican, Democratic, Socialist, and 'Red, White, and Blue' Communist)
1933-1937: Douglas MacArthur (All-American)
'32 (with Charles Lindbergh) def. Henry Stimson (CUF), William Z. Foster ('Independent Constitutional' Communist)
'36 (with Hugh S. Johnson) no national opposition
'37 resigned as result of Business Plot
1937-1941: Owen D. Young (independent backed by remnants of CUF)
'38 def. Norman Thomas (Popular Front), Huey Long (People's Democratic), William Z. Foster (Anti-Capitalist), scattered regional
1941-1943: Upton Sinclair (Popular Front endorsed by People's Democratic)
'40 (with Huey Long) def. Henry Luce (Liberal), William Z. Foster (Anti-Capitalist)
'43 resigned in accordance with rotation agreement with People's Democratic
1943-1944: Huey Long (People's Democratic endorsed by Popular Front)
'44 resigned due to allegations of corruption
1944-1945: Henry A. Wallace (independent endorsed by Popular Front and People's Democratic)
1945-1947: Huey Long (People's Democratic)
'44 (with Wendell Wilkie) def. Upton Sinclair (Popular Front), Henry A. Wallace (independent), William Z. Foster (Anti-Capitalist)
'47 impeached due to corruption
1947-1948: James V. Forrestal (People's Democratic)
'48 resigned due to health issues
1948-1958: Hubert H. Humphrey (People's Democratic)
'48 (with Clare Boothe Luce) def. Richard Nixon ('Anti-Corruption' Popular Front), Vito Marcantonio ('Workers First' Popular Front), Prescott Bush ('Irreconcilable' Liberal), Philip La Follette (Progressive)
'52 (with Richard M. Nixon) def. Clare Boothe Luce (Liberal), Burton K. Wheeler ('Anti-Humphrey' Popular Front)
'56 (with Will Rogers Jr.) def. Philip La Follette (Alliance for Peace)
'58 resigned upon end of World War
1958-1961: Will Rogers Jr. (People's Democratic)
1961-1969: Jacqueline Cochran (Liberal)
'60 (with Walter Judd) def. Will Rogers Jr. (People's Democratic), Orval Faubus (Southern People's)
'64 (with George Romney) def. Joseph P. Kennedy Jr. (People's Democratic), Orval Faubus (Southern People's)
1969-1969: Robert King High (People's Democratic) ✞
'68 (with Richard M. Nixon) def. Laurence Rockefeller (Liberal), John Crommelin (Southern People's)
'69 died of heart attack
1969-1979: Richard M. Nixon (People's Democratic) ✞
'72 (with Barbara Jordan) def. Mark Hatfield (Liberal), Phyllis Schlafly (National)
'76 (with scattered) def. Phyllis Schlafly (National), Owsley Stanley (Renaissance)
'76 Neil Goldschmidt selected as Vice President, then resigned from ticket October due to revelations of sexual misconduct. Nixon selected Jacqueline Cochran as running mate, but various state-level People's Democratic affiliates chose alternative candidates, sending Vice Presidential selection to Senate. Cochran defeated National Party vice-presidential candidate Robert Dornan in Senate.
'79 died of phlebitis
1979-1981: Jacqueline Cochran (Liberal endorsed by People's Democratic)
1981-1981: Barbara Alexander ('Sunshine' People's Democratic) ✞
'80 (with Marcus Foster) def. Buz Lukens (National), John Connally ('Caucus' People's Democratic), Elmo Zumwalt (Moderate)
'81 assassinated by People's War Group team led by Joe Remiro and Lynette Fromme
1981-1989: Marcus Foster (Justice Party of California endorsed by 'Sunshine' People's Democratic)
'84 (with Jack Brooks) def. Chuck Robb ('Caucus' People's Democratic), Timothy Leary (Renaissance), Smith Hempstone (National), Tom Metzger ('White' National)
1989-1990: Tom Turnipseed ('Unity' People's Democratic) ✞
'88 (with Hubert "Skip" Humphrey III) def. Diane Rodham ('Reform' People's Democratic), Bo Gritz (All-American), Tony Dolan (National)
'90 assassinated by Shelly Shannon
1990-1993: Hubert "Skip" Humphrey III (People's Democratic)
1993-1995: Pat Buchanan (All-American)
'92 (with Clay Smothers) def. Hubert "Skip" Humphrey III (People's Democratic), Cecil Heftel (Reform), Bill Paparian (Sunshine)
'95 impeached for treason
1995-1995: Clay Smothers (All-American)
'95 resigned
1995-1995: Julie Nixon Robb (Second CUF) ✞
'95 assassinated by Contra team led by James Mason
1995-1999: James E. Carter (Second CUF)
'96 (with John Kerry) no national opposition
'98 resigned upon end of Second National Emergency
1999-1999: John Kerry (Second CUF)
1999-2002: Ann Richards (People's Democratic)
'99 (with Karen Silkwood) def. Janet Reno (independent), Michio Kaku (Committees of Correspondence for the 21st Century Left), David Graeber (Workers' Defense), Marvin Olasky (Constitutional Conservative)
'02 resigned due to diagnosis of terminal cancer
2002-2003: Karen Silkwood (People's Democratic)
2003-2007: Colin Powell (Reform)
'03 (with Joe Scarborough) def. Karen Silkwood (People's Democratic), John Kitzhaber (Sunshine), Ian MacKaye (Solidarity!)
2007-2015: Michio Kaku (Committees of Correspondence for the 21st Century Left endorsed by Solidarity!)
'07 (with Blase Bonpane) def. Colin Powell (Reform), Hubert "Skip" Humphrey III (People's Democratic), Al Gore (independent)
'11 (with Blase Bonpane) def. Joe Scarborough (Reform), Richard Holbrooke ('Interventionist' People's Democratic)
2015-2017: Mike Davis (Committees of Correspondence for the 21st Century Left)
'15 (with Beto O'Rourke) def. Al Gore (People's Democratic), Herman Cain (Reform), Barack Obama (Spirit of '95)
2017 resigned due to health issues
2017-2019: Beto O'Rourke (Committees of Correspondence for the 21st Century Left)
2019-: Valerie Jarrett (People's Democratic)
'19 (with William McRaven) def. Randy Credico (Reform), Beto O'Rourke (Committees of Correspondence for the 21st Century Left)
 
Last edited:
1998 - 2001: Keizō Obuchi (Liberal Democratic)
2000 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komieto), Ichirō Ozawa (Liberal), Tetsuzo Fuwa (Communist), Takako Doi (Social Democratic), Chikage Oogi (New Conservative)
2001 - 2004: Koichi Kato (Liberal Democratic)
2004 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Naoto Kan (Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Takako Doi (Social Democratic)
2004 - 2005: Tarō Asō (Liberal Democratic - Komieto Coalition)
2005 - 2007: Naoto Kan (Democratic)
2005 (Coalition with Social Democratic) def. Tarō Asō (Liberal Democratic), Takenori Kanzaki (Komeito), Kiyomi Tsujimoto (Social Democratic), Shōzaburō Jimi (People’s New), Kazuo Shii (Communist)
2007 - 2009: Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic - Social Democratic coalition)
2009 - 2012: Shinzō Abe (Liberal Democratic)
2009 (Majority) def. Yukio Hatoyama (Democratic), Akihiro Ota (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Kiyomi Tsujimoto (Social Democratic), Shōzaburō Jimi (People’s New)
2012 - 2014: Fukushiro Nukaga (Liberal Democratic)
2013 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Koriki Jojima (Democratic), Ichiro Ozawa - Tōru Hashimoto (Association for the People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Kazuo Shii (Communist), Ryoichi Hattori (Social Democratic)
2014 - 2015: Yasuhisa Shiozaki (Liberal Democratic - Komieto Coalition)
2015 - 2017: Nobuteru Ishihara (Liberal Democratic
- Komieto Coalition)
2017 - 2019: Katsuya Okada (Democratic)
2017 (Coalition with Social Democratic) def. Nobuteru Ishihara (Liberal Democratic), Tōru Hashimoto (For The People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Ryoichi Hattori (Social Democratic), Kazuo Shii (Communist)
2019 - 2022: Yukio Edano (Democratic)
2020 (Majority) def. Toshimitsu Motegi (Liberal Democratic), Tōru Hashimoto (For The People), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Tomoko Tamura (Communist)
2022 - : Yuki Waseda (Democratic Majority)

Naoto Kan: The Man Who Defined Japan’s Left

Japan, or to be more specific, Tokyo. The Capital of one of the major Asian Economies is abuzz with action and excitement. It’s election season here, and compared to many Western Nations where electioneering has become increasingly digital and aloof, in Japan, soapbox politics remains king.

As is common, a wide bevy of politicians are out in force campaigning. The soapbox of Left Wing Populist Governor, Taro Yamamoto is more akin to a stage, a vast rally where he spits fire at all who oppose him and his party, People Power. But in the case of former Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, it’s more of a calm affair as he stands on his soap box. Whilst Kan has been criticised for his populistic rhetoric in the past, here he’s matter of fact and down to Earth, saying his piece and listening to what the people have to say about the incumbent government.

Overall reaction is muted if positive, though there are the occasional heckler. Of course given that up until fairly recently this area shared it’s population with Kan’s electoral ward in the Diet, it seems likely that the crowd would be supportive of Kan and the current Prime Minister, Chinami Nishimura, one of his many disciples within the Democratic Party.

But watching Kan speak and engage with the crowd, you get a sense of why Kan became Prime Minister. He is, several senses, a man of the people.

~~~

It’s a couple days later when I meet Kan more formally, whilst I have been trailing his campaign, and chatted to him a bit, we haven’t sat down and properly been interviewed.

So we meet at his house in Tokyo and are promptly greeted by his wife, Nobuko.

Nobuko Kan is probably Naoto’s biggest critic, indeed after his Premiership she wrote a book called “How Could Japan Change, When My Husband Was Prime Minister” which detailed her own particular frustrations and annoyances with Naoto and his leadership.

Nobuko‘s own fiery ideals, independence and self belief makes her starkly different from most Prime Ministers wife’s, who are often shunted into the background. I joke to her after we come into their Kan abode that she should have renamed it “How My Useless Husband, Changed Japan” given that’s the reason why I’m interviewing him. She lets out a dry laugh and says she’ll keep it in mind.

Having ingratiated myself with Mrs Kan, it’s now time to do it with the man of the hour.

Naoto Kan is sitting in an armchair, chatting to his son Gentarō who spots me first. We greet cordially, we bow, make pleasantries as I sit down. Nobuko brings in tea, sets it down and promptly tells off Naoto for not wearing a tie for an interview. The pair lightly bucket in Japanese before chuckling, Gentarō politely gets up and wishes me well before heading off.

With everyone having left the room, I decide to actually acknowledge my subject. Naoto has changed since his heyday in the 2000s, he’s lost a large amount of hair and he’s more winkled but the smile he gives me hasn’t changed.

I decide to go with simple question, does he think that his humble background has had an impact on his politics?

“Certainly” he says frankly “I had to to run four times initially to gain a diet seat, and I am Salaryman’s Son with no real connections after all, it does mean that I am more pragmatic than most I guess”

I mentioned that originally he ran as a member of the Saburō Eda formed Social Democratic Union, would he still see himself as a Social Democrat?

“I would say I am of the Left, but not a Social Democrat” Naoto says matter of factly “I am…a Japanese Liberal…now that is, of course, maybe you would think that I’m not that?” He asks me.

I ponder for a second the question, before replying with my take;

“I think I would say, you’re a Pragmatic Populist, of a Liberal variety”

Naoto nods, intrigued by what I said.

“Interesting, my wife says I’m too pragmatic if anything” he chuckles “But you are right I guess, I think a Populist is a man of the people don’t you think?” he asks me.

I shrug, my opinions on Populists are mixed, like many in the West, the Post Recession years has seen the return of such types of politicking and with it, the problems it represents. But in the usually staid Japanese Political landscape, people like Kan represent a sea change from the stodgy dynasties and bureaucrats that populated much of the Japanese Political Scene.

Indeed, even the game changer that was Morihiro Hosokawa was part of the Hosokawa clan that was connected to the Imperial Family.

Kan with his Pragmatic Populist views in many respects represented the people of Japan, or more particularly, the baby boomer generation he was part of. Indeed his victory over Tarō Asō, a backroom player thrust into the limelight following the chaos of Koichi Kato’s bungled privatisation attempts, seemed to provide a perfect vessel from which Kan could easily attack as a representative of the failures of Liberal Democratic rule.

“It did seem your message of Populist reform was combination of both presenting a positive future for Japan and its people and attacking the seeming stagnation of the Liberal Democrat’s, than destroying the system like some Populists” I mention off handily.

“Well, I wouldn’t say I’m Anti-Establishment, but the establishment makes mistakes, it does wrong to the people and they just expect to get away with it…postal privatisation of was a good example of that arrogance” Kan says, letting out a bit of that rhetoric he’s known for “At least when I make mistakes I own up to them and ensure recompense”

“Did you feel the system tried to oust you from power?” I ask and Kan’s brow wrinkles. In the aftermath of his sudden departure, due to accusations that he had unpaid annuities, he let slip that he believed that part of his leaking against him was down to the iron triangle. He would promptly shave his head, don Buddhist garb and did the Shikoku Pilgrimage. Whilst this did a lot to ingratiate himself back with the public, there always seemed to be a bitter taste left behind over his downfall.

“Hmmm” Kan lets out, rubbing his hands “No, not anymore. I wouldn’t say it was a concerted effort or anything. I do feel like that it was, an attempt to rid me though by some members of bureaucracy…I do regret the comments I made” he says moodily.

I swiftly try to move on, and decide to ask him about his opinions on more recent events. Particularly if he thinks he’s become a major backroom dealer?

“I guess” he replies, candidly.

“But doesn’t your National Shape Study Group occupy an important position within the Democratic Party?”

“Well, it does…though it’s not like everyone who’s part of it listens to me” he chuckles “But I will admit that helping in the, political direction of the previous Government was just as fulfilling as being Prime Minister” he says with a smile.

“Was the merger with the Social Democrats helpful to that goal?”

“Yes, it meant that the Japanese…left, was able to finally unite and gain a majority to govern with” he nods “And working with Tsujimoto remained me of my days as Prime Minister” he smiles softly.

Of course Kiyomi Tsujimoto was similar to Kan in numerous ways, originally starting in civil activism, becoming a Populistic leader of a Centre Left Party and also undone by a seeming corruption scandal, before becoming a major backroom dealer.

“Whilst uniting the Left has ensured an unprecedented victory, do you think it’s opened a door way for figures like Taro Yamamoto to step into a vacuum?”

Kan pauses, brow creases.

“No” he says bluntly. His gaze indicates that he’s tired of this question and feels it personally. Yamamoto candidacy for Tokyo Governor was supported by figures like Kan, who were appalled when he spat it back in their faces and went on an Anti-Establishment campaign.

I decide to move on, seeing the day move ahead I decide to finish up as best I can.

“Do you think you’ve changed Japan?” I ask him.

Kan ponders the question, before nodding.

“Before I came along, the Liberal Democratic Party had dominated Japan, the dynasties occupied much power and the people felt apathy towards politics” he says “Now, the domination of the Liberal Democrats has waned, the last three Prime Ministers have come from

whilst it’s fair to say the entrenched hierarchies that govern the Japanese still remain standing

~~~

It’s soapbox politicking again, though this time Kan is joined by a fellow former Prime Minister. Yukio Edano, the Middle Aged Memeable face of Japanese Liberalism is joining Kan on a speaking tour.

It’s apparent that despite the positive energy they’re getting that not everything is well in the campaign. People Power and the Communists pact seems to be more popular than expected and worries that the Democratic Party may lose there slim majority in the House of Councillors.

The grand tradition of Japan rebelling against the status quo by voting for outsider parties continues, as memories to 2013 and Ozawa & Hashimoto Olive Tree Coalition of Populist ‘outsiders’ gutted both parties.

But despite it all, the pair are campaigning hard. Edano, the loveable liberal lawyer who still commands popularity with the public despite his party ousting him, is in his element. Kan watches on, seeing his disciple and supporter at work.

Despite, in the every lasting order of Japanese politics, being unceremoniously ousted from power, the two can be seen as titans in their own right.

But without Kan, and his victory over the established order, then this little surreal scene of Prime Ministers soapbox politicking wouldn’t be playing out.

Even if his wife doesn’t agree, Kan can certainly be seen as a man who has defined Japan’s Modern Left.
Governor of Tokyo:
2011 - 2013: Naoki Inose (Independent; Liberal Democratic, Komeito)
2011 def. Akira Nagatsuma (Independent; Democratic, Social Democratic, Association for The People), Miki Watanabe (Independent), Akira Koike (Communist)
2013 - 2017: Hiroya Masuda (Independent; Liberal Democratic, Komeito)
2013 def. Kenji Utsunomiya (Independent; Democratic, Social Democratic, Communist), Hideo Higashikokubaru (Independent; For The People), Toshio Tamogami (Independent)
2017 - 2019: Tarō Yamamoto (Independent; Democratic, Social Democratic, Communist)
2017 def. Hiroya Masuda (Independent; Liberal Democratic, Komieto), Kota Matsuda (Independent; For The People)
2019 - : Tarō Yamamoto (People Power, Communist)
2021 def. Satsuki Katayama (Independent; Liberal Democratic, Komieto), Akiko Kamei (Independent; Democratic)

Chair of the Tokyo Prefecture Assembly:
2009 - 2011: Naoki Takashima (Liberal Democratic)
2009 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Naoto Kan (Democratic), Natsuo Yamaguchi (Komieto), Yoshiharu Wakabayashi (Communist), Fumie Yamaguchi (Tokyo Seikatsusha Network)
2011 - 2013: Yoshino Toshiaki (Liberal Democratic - Komeito Coalition)
2013 - 2017: Hiroshi Yamada (Liberal Democratic)
2013 (Coalition with Komieto) def. Naoto Kan (Democratic), Yōsuke Takagi (Komieto), Kota Matsuda (For The People), Yoshiharu Wakabayashi (Communist), Mitsuko Nishizaki (Tokyo Seikatsusha Network)
2017 - 2019: Masako Ōkawara (Democratic)
2017 (Communist Confidence & Supply) def. Hiroshi Yamada (Liberal Democratic), Yōsuke Takagi (Komieto), Kota Matsuda (For The People), Yoshiharu Wakabayashi (Communist), Mitsuko Nishizaki (Tokyo Seikatsusha Network)
2019 - 2021: Ikuo Yamahana (Democratic - People Power, Communist Confidence & Supply)
2021 - : Ayumi Yasutomi (People Power)
2021 (Democratic & Communist Confidence & Supply) def. Ichirō Kamoshita (Liberal Democratic), Ikuo Yamahana (Democratic), Yōsuke Takagi (Komieto), Chiharu Araki (For The People), Saori Ikeuchi (Communist), Reiko Yamauchi (Tokyo Seikatsusha Network)

Tarō Yamamoto: Tokyo’s Firebrand

7th of July, 2021

“Tokyo First; People Power” read posters that dot streets of the ever bustling metropolis that guides the nation. But the city isn’t being guided by the current party of Government, the Democratic Party, the party of Japan’s until recently languid centre left or even the opposition, the Liberal Democratic Party, the ever present party of Japan’s stodgy Centre Right.

Instead People Power guides the city.

Already the aftermath of Japan’s prefectural elections are being felt, Yukio Edano, the previously buoyant Prime Minister having gained the first Centre Left Majority has seen his popularity plummet and his future as leader seems tenuous.

Meanwhile the Liberal Democratic Party have entered another bout of infighting, seeing there vote being carted off to Right Wing Populist candidates across the country, it seems Toshimitsu Motegi time as opposition leader is not long for the world.

But for the ever enthusiastic Tokyo Governor, Tarō Yamamoto his continued Governance and the gains made by his party in the Prefectural Assembly have put him on the map.

For many, the beaming face of Yamamoto as results came in, indicate one major point; that there is a sea change happening in the land famed for a long time for Japan’s political stability.

~~~

Yamamoto isn’t Tokyo’s first Left Wing Governor; that honour goes to the Marxist Economist Ryokichi Minobe. The ever affable Socialist Governor would be part of a wave of Progressive Governors and Mayors elected into office during the turmoil of the Sixties and Seventies. Minobe’s combination of Municipal Socialist policies and Reformist attitudes would guide Tokyo for over a decade. His presence is still felt within Japanese society even today.

Nor is Yamamoto the first Tokyo Governor to have initially had a start in entertainment; that dodgy honour goes to Yukio Aoshima. His four year stint is known for being incredibly underwhelming and would earn him the moniker of ‘Mr Broken Manifesto’. It’s fair to say that Aoshima has not left a presence within the world of politics.

But Tarō Yamamoto isn’t like either man; he’s embodies of the contradictions of Japan’s Democracy in the Twenty First Century.

Yamamoto got his start as an actor, fans of cult Japanese Cinema may know him as the red headband wearing, shotgun wielding young rebel Shogo Kawada in the film adaptation of Battle Royale. It’s fair to say that combination of affable charisma, rebellious nature and sense of apathy towards the establishment are mirrored in the real life Yamamoto.

Yamamoto was drawn to politics till after the 2011 Earthquake and the ensuing Fukushima Disaster. Yamamoto would leave acting and start work as an anti-nuclear campaigner alongside working as a Solar Power company. Yamamoto would make a name for himself in early 2012, in which whilst campaigning at an anti-nuclear rally would verbally abuse ailing Prime Minister Shinzō Abe and call on him to resign.

Whilst this seemingly vulgar display would be criticised by numerous politicians, with leader of the opposition, Koriki Jojima saying that Yamamoto had acted in a disrespectful and disgraceful manner, it virally appeal amongst the disaffected would lead to a chain of events that would see the Prime Minister depart.

Tarō Yamamoto would run in the House of Councillors election of 2013 as an independent supported by a broad Left coalition of Social Democratic, New Socialist and Communist and would manage to gain a seat on the Tokyo Proportional Representation Block.

With his seat as a Councillor secured, Yamamoto decided to spend his time aiming his fire at the Liberal Democratic Government. He would often post videos on YouTube in which he attack Liberal Democratic policies and propose Progressive solutions instead. He would attack the Prime Minister Noboteru Ishihara as the contentious issues of the privatisation of Japan Post was brought up again, with Yamamoto helping to organise the ‘Survive Our Post’ campaign alongside the rather militant Postal Trade Union.

Yamamoto was raising up during a tide of Populism around the World from the Right and Left. Whilst Japan had been dabbling with Right Wing Populist politics with the ‘For The People’ a Right Wing Libertarian party, Yamamoto represented the Left Wing version of it, compared to the more cautious and pragmatic Democratic and Social Democratic parties.

Tarō Yamamoto’s brand of Left Wing Populism combined Neo-Keneysian ideals, Anti-Nuclear campaigning and additionally advocating for the rights of the disabled and LGBT+ community, often ignored within Japanese society.

As Yamamoto’s brand grew, calls for him to potentially run for Tokyo Governor began apace.

~~~

2017 was to be a dramatic year for the Japanese Left.

Noboteru Ishihara’s brand of austerity driven neoliberalism was proving to not be the saving grace for the Liberal Democratic Party as hoped. Meanwhile Katsuya Okada represented the chance of comfortable moderation.

But within Tokyo, this wouldn’t cut it.

The campaign for Tarō Yamamoto to become a ‘broad Left’ candidate was supported by the Communists, New Socialists and Social Democratic parties, due to Yamamoto’s mixture of Anti-Nuclear policies and Progressive ideals. The Democratic Party was less enthused and discussions about either having former Prime Minister Naoto Kan or actor Junichi Ishida running for Governor. Both refused and Kan would begrudgingly endorse Yamamoto, pushing for his party to support the firebrand.

Yamamoto ran on his ever present themes of Anti-Nuclear, Progressive policies and Anti-Corruption. As with the general mood of the time, Yamamoto, like much of the Left across the country, would win.

Tarō Yamamoto would be Governor.

To say that Yamamoto’s tenure has been, fairly all over the place is an understatement.

His support for ‘Green Spaces, Green Energy’ made him a surprisingly forceful leader for the moribund environmentalist movement within Tokyo and Japan. Additionally his support for making Tokyo more disabled friendly was lauded within progressive circles for helping a group that were often underrepresented within Japanese politics.

Whilst his Progressive policies have been lauded in the West, at times he’s stepped over the line for polite Japanese Society. His support for Same Sex marriage would open a tidal wave of backlash, particularly after his administration proposing expanding the Shibuya Same Sex Partnership scheme to the entirety of Tokyo. Whilst this would manage to occur, the backlash that occurred would lead to several politicians receiving threats and one campaigner being several attacked.

Additionally whilst his election had been won with the support of the Democratic Party, he chafed against them. The party was fairly fiscally reticent and Yamamoto proposals for increased social spending, increasing the civil service, rent freezes, increasing social housing, free education and welfare schemes hit a brick wall of fiscal discipline.

The 2019 would see Yamamoto form his own party, disparaging the Democratic Party from ‘being foolish as the LDP on fiscal issues’. Whilst this seemed to initially hurt his chances, the subsequent series of agreements and popularity with the Tokyo population despite controversies meant that Yamamoto’s ability to govern would continue.

2021 would see the People Power’s first official outing, in 2020 the party had a couple of political candidates who did okay but the 2021 Prefectural and Governorship election would see the machine tested.

Yamamoto would campaign on a clean break and ‘no more having to answer to a parties that don’t care about the people of Tokyo’.

Much of his program was less on Anti-Nuclear issues (which the Democratic Party itself was taking in stride to dismantle) but instead more on the issues of welfare and progressive ideals.

Whilst his Universal Basic Income plan to ‘give every citizen of Tokyo 30,000 yen per person to tackle deflation’ was accused as being bribery, a controversial Assembly candidate being accused of sexual harassment and a muddled response to compulsory vaccinations, seemed to leave more than desire, Yamamoto’s brand of Left Wing, Municipal Populism shone through.

Combined with clumsy campaigning from the Liberal Democratic Party and the Democratic Party who spent more time attacking each other and using a Governor’s election to air our national debates, Yamamoto slim if significant victory has managed to earn him a position as a power player within Japanese politics.

As congratulations come in from across the globe from Labour leader Katy Clark to exiled Bolivian President Evo Morales, praising the fiery Governor, it seems the actual business of governing now presents itself.

It’s now up to Yamamoto to show what he’s like unshackled and given the metropolitan playground that is Tokyo Prefecture to play with.
 
Back
Top