• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Biaggi’s Second Opium Den

Although wars are made of mass tragedy and sacrifice, this most successful of all Amerikan wars [WWII] was a happy time for most settlers. That's why they look back on it with so much nostalgia and fondness (even with a pathological TV comedy about "fun" in a Nazi P.O.W. camp). We could say that this was their last big frontier.
 
gentleman biaggi said:
Although wars are made of mass tragedy and sacrifice, this most successful of all Amerikan wars [WWII] was a happy time for most settlers. That's why they look back on it with so much nostalgia and fondness (even with a pathological TV comedy about "fun" in a Nazi P.O.W. camp). We could say that this was their last big frontier.
Click to expand...
>RNC 1940 blown up
>Lindbergh nominated last minute
>No FDR for whatever reason
>Lindbergh barely pulls it out
>Pearl Harbor still happens or at least something equivalent
>War with Japan is literally just a race war
>Camps are basically genocide lotta Rwanda style “independent attacks” co-ordinated by government backed hate groups
>Allies still win
>Lindbergh gets weird
>Stalin dies
>Beria
>Lindbergh-Beria kissing relationship over “western dominance of east Asia”
>US colonies in Asia
>American Manchuria or some shit whatever
>Gets bored of office
>Recession
>South is adamantly anti Lindbergh so they run the Democrats now
>40something Year Old Liberal From Arkansas Defeats Establishment Republican
>idgaf what happens next
>conservative version of henry wallace commits population war on china
>young generals revolution
>american kagame for like 6 years
>party system between northern young generals, apartheid liberals, and proto-birchers
>gore vidal

1941-1949: Charles Lindbergh (Republican)
1940 def. (with Lewis Barrows) John Nance Garner (Democratic), Burton K. Wheeler (People’s)
1944 def. (with Lewis Barrows) William Bankhead (Democratic)
1949-1957: James Fulbright (Democratic)
1948 def. (with Stuart Hamblen) Lewis Barrows (Republican), Herbert Holdridge (No Colonies USA)
1952 def. (with Stuart Hamblen) Ben Bubar (Republican)
1957-1962: Symon Gould (Republican)
1956 def. (with Vernon Thompson) Stuart Hamblen (Democratic)
1960 def. (with Vernon Thompson) Hugh White (Democratic)
1962-1962: George McGovern (Independent elected by Young Patriot League Conference I)
1962-1963: Joseph Kennedy II (Independent leading National Defense Pact)
1963-1963: John Birch (Independent elected by Young Patriot League Conference II)
1963-1969: Daniel Inouye (Young Patriot Conference III, later Patriot League)
1963 Sp. Election def. Ben Bubar (Anti-Asiatic)
1964 def. Orval Faubus (Democratic), Ben Bubar (Conservative)
1969-1977: Clem McSpadden (Democratic)
1968 def. (with Grant Sawyer) Kurt Vonnegut (Patriot League), John G. Schmitz (Conservative)
1972 def. (with Grant Sawyer) Lyn Marcus (Patriot League), Revilo Oliver (Conservative)
1977-0000: Gore Vidal (Libertarian)
1976 def. (with Mark Hatfield) [backed by Independence at All Costs! - Patriot League] Grant Sawyer (Democratic), Tom Hayden (Freedom Now! - Patriot League), Willis Carto (Conservative)


NOTE TO SELF: hugh white as jan smuts tl
 
Catalunya said:
Still remember when she just lost the primaries against generic Trumpist, and two different beltway journalists were tipping her as a great pick for Cheney or Biden as VP in 2024.
Click to expand...
She is liked by the political experts because she is the only Republican who does not like Trump that is not from New England (home of last living Rockefeller Republicans), that did not last hold an office in the 1990s (and that group either served in New England or were people obsessed with the deficit), that is not a no-name state legislator or Joe Walsh, who seems to hate Trump because he is not radical enough.
In short, they like her because she has a shot at becoming the Republican candidate, but %4 of the popular vote gained in the primaries is not better than %1 of the popular vote gained in the primaries.
 
gentleman biaggi said:


lol. lmao.
Click to expand...

EURO COLOURS ALERT

2001-2009: George W. Bush (Republican)
2000 (w. Dick Cheney) def. Al Gore (Democratic), Ralph Nader (Green)
2004 (w. Dick Cheney) def. John Kerry (Democratic)
2009-2017: Barack Obama (Democratic)
2008 (w. Joe Biden) def. John McCain (Republican)
2012 (w. Joe Biden) def. Mitt Romney (Republican)
2017-2021: Donald Trump (Republican)
2016 (w. Mike Pence) def. Hillary Clinton (Democratic)
2021-2025: Joe Biden (Democratic)
2020 (w. Kamala Harris) def. Donald Trump (Republican)
2025-2029: Donald Trump (Republican)
2024 (w. Kristi Noem) def. Joe Biden (Democratic), Cornel West (Green / Peoples')
 
SultanArda said:
She is liked by the political experts because she is the only Republican who does not like Trump that is not from New England (home of last living Rockefeller Republicans), that did not last hold an office in the 1990s (and that group either served in New England or were people obsessed with the deficit), that is not a no-name state legislator or Joe Walsh, who seems to hate Trump because he is not radical enough.
In short, they like her because she has a shot at becoming the Republican candidate, but %4 of the popular vote gained in the primaries is not better than %1 of the popular vote gained in the primaries.
Click to expand...
lol didn’t joe walsh say he’d vote for bernie
 
Why don't the workers in this ripped-off "colony" organize, seeing in a revolutionary change a way to keep the wealth for the community of their children's generation? In fact, to really have a community? Why don't they resist? The answer is that the majority of them welcome such exploitation, whatever the future price. Their community may have nothing, may be sliding back into an eventual future of undeveloped desolation, but right now those who have jobs are making "good bucks." The 5,000 coal miners have been earning around $30,000 per year, while the county's per capita annual income is up to $7,000.

The employed miners who are getting those "good bucks" are unconcerned about the poverty right at their side. Disabled miners and the elderly live in poverty, children are uneducated, while what income exists in the community is eagerly thrown away on individual consumerism. This points out the fact that what is poverty-stricken about settlers is their culture.

The Euro-Amerikan coal miners are just concentrating on "getting theirs" while it lasts. In the settler tradition it's "every man for himself." They have no class goals or even community goals, just private goals involving private income and private consumerism. Meanwhile, the local N&W land manager says that they do have future plans for Appalachia: "We don't intend to walk off and leave this land to the Indians." Of that we can be certain.
 
gentleman biaggi said:
Why don't the workers in this ripped-off "colony" organize, seeing in a revolutionary change a way to keep the wealth for the community of their children's generation? In fact, to really have a community? Why don't they resist? The answer is that the majority of them welcome such exploitation, whatever the future price. Their community may have nothing, may be sliding back into an eventual future of undeveloped desolation, but right now those who have jobs are making "good bucks." The 5,000 coal miners have been earning around $30,000 per year, while the county's per capita annual income is up to $7,000.

The employed miners who are getting those "good bucks" are unconcerned about the poverty right at their side. Disabled miners and the elderly live in poverty, children are uneducated, while what income exists in the community is eagerly thrown away on individual consumerism. This points out the fact that what is poverty-stricken about settlers is their culture.

The Euro-Amerikan coal miners are just concentrating on "getting theirs" while it lasts. In the settler tradition it's "every man for himself." They have no class goals or even community goals, just private goals involving private income and private consumerism. Meanwhile, the local N&W land manager says that they do have future plans for Appalachia: "We don't intend to walk off and leave this land to the Indians." Of that we can be certain.
Click to expand...
1969-1973: Richard Nixon/ Henry Bellmon (Republican)
1973-1977: Henry Bellmon/ Gerald Ford (Republican)
1977-1981: Lawton Chiles/ Adlai Stevenson III (Democratic) †
1981-1985: Adlai Stevenson III/ (Democratic)
1985-1993: Bob Evans/ Larry Pressler (Republican)
1993-1997: Gaston Caperton/ John Breaux (Democratic)
1997-pres: Geoffrey D. Miller/Clayton Williams (Republican)
 
gentleman biaggi said:
social democracy is the moderate wing of fascism very similarly socialism is the moderate wing of liberalism
Click to expand...

>new deal era
>republicans nominate borah 1936
>he does whatever
>new left wing “t. roosevelt” wing of republicans dominate
>very racist towards asians (as social democrats always are) or whatever
>lindbergh baby never kidnapped
>popular front occurs alliance between southern anglophile liberals and northern socialists during ww2
>kmt aligns with hitler unfortunately the worlds greatest liberal mao zedong in the dustbin of history
>lindbergh aligns the left and fascist wings of america first
>still gets smoked
>hoover caught sucking cock replaced with alger hiss
>alaska plan
>rexford tugwell vp
>random ass socialists appointed all over the place
>chinese pearl harbor
>win wwii but fascists still run GQP
>earl warren 1944 L
>fdr lives and resigns to lead UN
>lindbergh comes back wins 1948
>no one cares about the soviet union everyone cares about japan because conservatives and socdems have always hated asian people more than communists
>cpusa elects low level officials under widespread “popular front”
>japan begins sponsoring extremely dumb black nationalist fronts
>lib-popular frontist oscar ewing elected in 1956
>destroys south in second reconstruction typical biaggi trope
>harold stassen is his VP
>hubert humphrey synthesizes social democratic fascism for republicans
>nuclear war against japan
>tl ends here

1933-1946: Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
1932 def. (with John Nance Garner) Herbert Hoover (Republican)
1936 def. (with John Nance Garner) William Borah (Republican)
1940 def. (with Rexford Tugwell) Charles Lindbergh (Republican)
1944 def. (with Rexford Tugwell) Earl Warren (Republican)
1946-1949: Rexford Tugwell (Democratic)
1949-1957: Charles Lindbergh (Republican)
1948 def. (with John Bricker) Rexford Tugwell (Democratic)
1952 def. (with John Bricker) Orson Wells (Democratic)
1957-1965: Oscar Ewing (Democratic)
1956 def. (with Harold Stassen) John Bricker (Republican), James Eastland (Southland)
1960 def. (with Harold Stassen) George Patton (Republican)
1965-0000: Hubert Humphrey (Republican)
1964 def. (with George Lincoln Rockwell) Vito Marcantonio (Democratic)

Catalunya said:
Based and truthpilled
Click to expand...
GUN TO YOUR HEAD NAME 5 SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS THAT DIDNT EVOLVE INTO FASCISM OR 5 SOCIALIST GOVERNMENTS THAT DIDNT EVOLVE INTO LIBERALISM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top