- Location
- Sandford, Gloucestershire
- Pronouns
- She/They
I'm the many many Suriviving SDP lists I don't think I've seen Danny Finkelstein as leader. Jist reading how he was a close ally of Owen and opposed the merger . Before then moving to the Tories
A lot the Continuity SDP lot fucked off to the Tories, I do often find the constant appearance of Rosie Barnes odd though, like from all accounts she was pretty useless and highly reliant on John Cartwright’s support.I'm the many many Suriviving SDP lists I don't think I've seen Danny Finkelstein as leader. Jist reading how he was a close ally of Owen and opposed the merger . Before then moving to the Tories
A lot the Continuity SDP lot fucked off to the Tories, I do often find the constant appearance of Rosie Barnes odd though, like from all accounts she was pretty useless and highly reliant on John Cartwright’s support.
I always like Mike Thomas or John Cartwright myself with eventual appearances from Gisela Stuart or David Mundrell.
Presidents of the United States (propriety authority)
1961-1965: Richard Nixon/Henry Cabot Lodge
def John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson
1965-1969: Hubert Humphrey/Albert Gore
def. Richard Nixon/Henry Cabot Lodge
1969-1970: Edward Walker✟/Spiro Agnew
def. Hubert Humphrey/Albert Gore, Robert Kennedy/various (faithless electors)
1971-19??: Spiro Agnew/vacant
Mayors of Chicago (recognised by the United States Federal Government)
1955-1970: Richard J. Daley (Democratic)
'55: def. Robert E. Merriam
'59: def. Timothy P. Sheehan
'63: def. Ben Adamowski
'67: def. John L. Waner, Dick Gregory (write-in)
1970: [vacant]
1970-19??: Frank Collin (Independent)
- appointed by President Walker
Chairmen of the Council for Metropolitan Open Communities for the Free Chicago Autonomous Zone
1970-1972: Fred Hampton (United Front Against Fascism)
1972: William “Preacherman” Fesperman (UFAF)
- temporary Chairman after Hampton was elected to the National Cooperative Congress
1972-19??: Bobby Rush (UFAF)
- elected by standing ovation
1949-1967: Senator for Louisiana
defeated Clem Clarke
defeated Charles Gerth
- (unopposed in 1956)
defeated Taylor O'Hearn
1953-1967: Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance
defeated Eugene Millikin
- died in office
tl;dr - Nixon claws over Kennedy and absolutely botches Cuba. Anti-communist militancy on the American mainland increases as does anti-government sentiment from the leftist bloc. Humphrey refuses to budge on civil rights to appeal to the Dixecrats. Walker gets elected and assassinated a year later by Lee Harvey Oswald, who's worshiped as a martyr by extremists. Agnew goes full goosestep and the counterculture war (Black Panthers, Weathermen, et al.) escalate to the point of actual factual civil war.Welp you can't leave us with this without telling us more!
Good ol' Fred.
He was also senator from 1932 to 1942, being reelected to the second seat by special election, meaning he's technically in the senate for 30+ years if you ignore the break in-between. Not to mention this is the Kingfish we're talking about, odds are he could talk Byrd and George into some sort of armistice.Good list, but this final part really makes me raise an eyebrow. I can buy Huey Long being the Democratic nominee for President in 1948 despite running against FDR in 1936. Or well, at least I find that less difficult to buy than the notion of Huey Long being able to bypass the seniority rules and become chairman of the Finance Committee after only four years in the Senate. If anything, he would have been the most junior member of that committee at the time. I just cannot see either Walter F. George being willing to hand over the chairmanship to Long, nor Harry Byrd doing the same (both were staunch conservatives).
He was also senator from 1932 to 1942, being reelected to the second seat by special election, meaning he's technically in the senate for 30+ years if you ignore the break in-between.
Not to mention this is the Kingfish we're talking about, odds are he could talk Byrd and George into some sort of armistice.
A classic stefanbl monarch list, but this time I actually show my workings and tell you who the people are.
Ultimogeniture (Youngest Child Inherits) from George I
George I (Hannover) - 1714-1727
Sophia I(Hannover) - 1727-1757 (2nd Child of George I)
Augustus I (Hohenzollern) - 1757-1813 (14th Child of Sophia I)
Augustus II (Hohenzollern) 1813-1843 (7th child of Augustus I)
William IV (Orange-Nassau) 1843-1843 (Grandchild of the 13th Child of Sophia I, and OTL King of the Netherlands)
Mary II (Orange-Nassau) 1843-1883 (4th Child of William IV)
Alexandrine I (Hohenzollern) 1883-1906 (4th Child of Mary II)
Albert I (Hohenzollern) 1906-1906 (3rd Child of Mary II)
Friedrich I (Hohenzollern) 1906-1925 (3rd Child of Albert I)
Albert II (Hohenzollern) 1925-1939 (2nd Child of Albert I)
Albert III (Hohenzollern) 1939-1940 (1st Child of Albert I)
Feodora I (Wettin) 1940-1945 (Grandchild of the 1st Child of Mary II)
William V (Wied-Neuwied) 1945-1945 (Grandchild of 3rd Child of William IV, and briefly Prince of Albania)
Victor I (Wied-Neuwied) 1945-1973 (2nd Child of William V)
Carl I (Bernadotte) 1973-2003 (Great Great Grandchild of 2nd Child of William IV)
Albert IV (Belgium) 2003- (Great Great Great Grandchild of 2nd Child of William IV, and was King of Belgium OTL until 2013)
On checking back I made an error but the results of the correct method were much more boring than the error, so I left it in
Bit sad this isn't strict ultimogeniture - when I was working out how exactly Juan is last for the throne, I know I encountered the rather funny issue (which you can't get with most any other type of succession) that "higher up" branches marrying in actually loses you your spot in line.
Could you explain how strict ultimogeniture would work?
Just replace "whoever is first in line" with "whoever is last in line". It's often just youngest daughter because of bog-standard male-preference stuff, but it starts to get massively convoluted when - well take, like, Philip, who was very distantly in line through Victoria but obviously his kids aren't, are they? Better claim takes preference.
UK law also messes it up because you have to work out if random bankrupt noble in the 1890s married a Catholic, hence the actual line ends up being a fairly tortured path via the Duke of Württemberg.
"Incest circle" is a horrific turn of phrase.