So one of the things that stands out to me reading Things About the Civil War is 1) both sides's commanders largely coming from the same West Point curriculum and 2) that curriculum largely relying on Jomini. Having read a bit more, it seems that Jomini was a lot more prominent mainly because 1) more direct/handbook-y and 2) was in French and thus got translated earlier/circulated faster than Clausewitz. My question is this: if Clausewitz was more widely circulated and taught at West Point in the antebellum period, how would this have changed the way both sides fought the war (assuming everyone was equally exposed to him). Would the war have necessarily been a shorter affair? Would command and control issues have played out differently for armies that were comfortable with "Fog of war" as a concept? Would thinking of war in essentially political terms have confirmed anyone's worst instincts or pushed them for a more strategic conception of the war?