• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

The Twenty-Seventh HoS List Challenge.

The Twenty-Seventh HoS List Challenge: Daftest Governments

  • FDR Assassinated--Kerguelen

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • Union Turf Wars In Post-Occupation Britain, A Case Study--Mumby

    Votes: 9 34.6%
  • Watering The Tree Of Liberty--Walpurgisnacht

    Votes: 10 38.5%
  • Boring Is Back--theflyingmongoose

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • Mods Are Asleep: Post Cats!--Lilitou

    Votes: 9 34.6%
  • Who's For A Divide?--BClick

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • Reform And Aftermath--Wolfram

    Votes: 11 42.3%

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .

Walpurgisnacht

It was in the Year of Maximum Danger
Location
Banned from the forum
Pronouns
He/Him
[BBC-announcer-struggling-for-something-to-say voice] Elliot may have called April the cruellest month, but this certainly isn't the cruellest list challenge!

The rules are simple; I give a prompt, and you have until 4:00pm on the 27th (or whenever I remember to post the announcement on that day) to post a list related to the prompt. As for what constitutes a list? If you'd personally post it in Lists of Heads of Government and Heads of State rather than another thread, I think that's a good enough criterion. Writeups are preferred, please don't post a blank list, and I'd also appreciate it if you titled your list for polling purposes. Once the deadline hits, we will open up a multiple choice poll, and whoever receives the most votes after a week gets the entirely immaterial prize.

I won't beat around the bush here--there's one thing, and one thing only, people think of when they hear the name April. (Well, there's Pesach and Goyische Pesach, but they do move around.) The April Fool. In the general spirit of foolishness and folly, this month's list challenge is themed around Daftest Governments! Sortition? Social Credit? Rule by Wotjek the Bear? Whatever it is, as long as it's a sufficiently mad way to run a whole nation, it's in here, baybee! Get those madcap lists in!

Good luck!
 
Life Presidents of Boputhatswana
1. Lucas Mangope, 1977 (proclamation) to 1994 (deproclamation)

A true Life President, Mangope served until the death (not his death, the death of the Bantustan)
 
Yeah, you only get one--@Warthog, if you could mark one of these as your competitive entry, that would be nice.


Was meant more as banter, apologies if I should not have.

Can't really do a list of one, and both are OTL, so neither is competitive.
 
Last edited:
FDR Assassinated

1933-1933: Franklin D. Roosevelt/ John Garner (Democratic)
1933-1937: John Garner/ vacant (Democratic)

1937-1945: John Garner/ Harry Truman (Democratic)
1945-1949: Harry Truman/ vacant (Democratic)

1949-1953: Harry Truman/ Alben W. Barkley (Democratic)
1953-1961: Dwight Eisenhower/ Richard Nixon (Republican)
1961-1963: John F. Kennedy/ Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
1963-1965: Lyndon B. Johnson/ vacant (Democratic)
1965-1969: Lyndon B. Johnson/ Hubert Humphrey (Democratic)

1969-1973: Richard Nixon/ Spiro Agnew (Republican)
1973-1974: Richard Nixon/ Guy Vander Jagt (Republican)
1974-1977: Guy Vander Jagt/ vacant (Republican)

1977-1981: Jimmy Carter/ Walter Mondale (Democratic)
1981-1989: Ronald Reagan/ George H.W. Bush (Republican)
1989-1993: George H.W. Bush/ Dan Quayle (Republican)

1993-2001: Bill Clinton/ Al Gore (Democratic)
2001-2009: George W. Bush/ Dick Cheney (Republican)
2009-2017: Barack Obama/ Joe Biden (Democratic)
2017-2021: Donald Trump/ Mike Pence (Republican)
2021-pres: Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris (Democratic)
 
Last edited:
FDR Assassinated

1933-1933: Franklin D. Roosevelt/ John Garner (Democratic)
1933-1937: John Garner/ vacant (Democratic)

1937-1945: John Garner/ Harry Truman (Democratic)
1945-1949: Harry Truman/ vacant (Democratic)

1949-1953: Harry Truman/ Alben W. Barkley (Democratic)
1953-1961: Dwight Eisenhower/ Richard Nixon (Republican)
1961-1963: John F. Kennedy/ Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
1963-1965: Lyndon B. Johnson/ vacant (Democratic)
1965-1969: Lyndon B. Johnson/ Hubert Humphrey (Democratic)

1969-1973: Richard Nixon/ Spiro Agnew (Republican)
1973-1974: Richard Nixon/ John B. Anderson (Republican)
1974-1977: John B. Anderson/ vacant (Republican)

1977-1981: Jimmy Carter/ Walter Mondale (Democratic)
1981-1989: Ronald Reagan/ George H.W. Bush (Republican)
1989-1993: George H.W. Bush/ Dan Quayle (Republican)

1993-2001: Bill Clinton/ Al Gore (Democratic)
2001-2009: George W. Bush/ Dick Cheney (Republican)
2009-2017: Barack Obama/ Joe Biden (Democratic)
2017-2021: Donald Trump/ Mike Pence (Republican)
2021-pres: Joe Biden/ Kamala Harris (Democratic)
Very creative
 
Union Turf Wars In Post-Occupation Britain, A Case Study

Elections to the Fenland Drainage Commission

1935-1938: de facto US Army Corps of Engineers
1938-0000: Socialist Labour Party of Great Britain
1938 def. Local Independents
1942 [International Union of Operating Engineers] def. [International Brotherhood of Teamsters], [International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Iron Workers], Local Independents
1946 [International Union of Operating Engineers] def. [International Brotherhood of Teamsters], Local Independents, [International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Iron Workers]
1950 [International Brotherhood of Teamsters] def. [International Union of Operating Engineers], Local Independents, [International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Reinforcing Iron Workers]
1954 [International Brotherhood of Teamsters] def. [International Union of Operating Engineers]


The Anti-Imperial Crusade that completed the Crypto-Revolutionary American objective of destroying the British Empire saw the United States inherit responsibility for governing that Empire. While the US professed belief in establishing an international stateless worker's utopia, in practice they were themselves still a governed state, and across their new global demesne they established a pseudo-colonial series of 'mandates' - and one of these was in Great Britain.

After a few years of de facto military government, the US re-established civilian government along the same lines of American Industrial Democracy. The country was broken up into vague and often overlapping industrial districts in which the dominant Socialist Labour Party and its union affiliates competed. In most cases, this kind of democracy led to competition within specific unions that predominated in particular regions (the dominance of the United Mine Workers in South Wales, parts of Yorkshire and the East Midlands is a case in point) - but in the Fenland district, several unions ended up competing with each other. Wartime sabotage had seen much of the Fens be flooded and while the Corps of Engineers had done work repairing pumping stations, the appropriation and collectivisation of farmland meant little on that flooded swampland.

Initially, responsibility for maintaining the Fens seemed to devolve to the IUOE, but soon that came into question as the Teamsters secured an increasingly dominant position over the transport industry in Britain. The Teamsters' provision of traction to British farmers and restoring the boat building industry meant they were able to spearhead a populist campaign that slowly displaced their competitors in the Fenlands.

The IUOE's role as those who maintained the pump stations became increasingly moribund as Teamster supported sabotage meant that restoring the Drained Fens seemed increasingly out of reach. The Teamsters helped sponsor Independent campaigns that supported the re-establishment of the ancient Fen swampland. The Iron Workers faded from relevance as bridges and levees became rotten and lost structures. By the time the 1950s dawned, the Fens had virtually returned to their medieval state of swampland and a few major market towns - the economy firmly tied together by a Teamster dominated boat building industry. Former localist Independents have become Teamster-aligned SLP representatives. The remnant opposition of the IUOE is essentially token at this point.

The term 'Drainage Commission' is something of a public joke at this point.
 
Not 100% happy with this one, but it gets worse the more I pick at it.

Watering The Tree of Liberty
Governer-Generals of the United States of America
1789-1793: Henry Knox (Independent)
def 1789: (with John Jay) unopposed
1793-1801: Henry Knox (Federalist)
def 1792: (with Nathaniel Gorman) Thomas Jefferson (Republican)
def 1796: (with Benjamin Williams) Thomas Jefferson (Republican)

1801-1813: Samuel Chase (Federalist)
def 1800: (with Fisher Ames) Albert Gallatin (Republican)
def 1804: (with Fisher Ames) John Randolph (Republican), William Findley (Republican)
def 1808: (with Fisher Ames) unopposed

1813-1831: Harrison Gray Otis (Federalist)
def 1812: (with William Davie) Charles Pinckney (Southern Federalist)
def 1816: (with William Davie) unopposed
def 1820: (with Joseph Story) unopposed
def 1824: (with Joseph Story) unopposed
def 1828: (with Joseph Story) unopposed
overthrown 1831 by Second American Revolution


Tribunes of the Confederated States of America
1831-1837: Smith Boughton (Jefferson and Liberty)
def 1832: William Heighton (Republican), Louis McLane (National)
1837-1841: Stephen Simpson (Jefferson and Liberty, endorsed by "Utopic" Republicans)
def 1836: Thomas Skidmore ("Workingman's" Republican), Daniel Webster (National)
1841-1845: Thomas W. Dorr (Jefferson and Liberty)
def 1840: George Ripley (Utopic-Republican), Daniel Webster (National), Thomas Skidmore (Workingman-Republican)
1845-1849: Frederick William Evans (Utopic-Republican)
def 1844: Daniel Webster (National), James Harper (Native American), George McDuffie (Jeffersonian), Josiah Warren (Workingman's), Thomas W. Dorr (Jefferson and Liberty)
1849-1850: John H. Noyes (Utopic-Republican)
def 1848: Lewis Charles Levin (Native American), Daniel Webster (National), Edmund Ruffin (Jeffersonian), Josiah Warren (Workingman's)
assassinated 1850 by Peter Sken Smith working with the Order of the Star-Spangled Banner

1850-1853: Lewis Charles Levin (Native American)
1853-1857: Robert Y. Hane (Jeffersonian)
def 1852: Frederic Hedge (Utopic-Republican), Josiah Warren (Workingman's), Daniel Webster (National), Charles Naylor (Native American)
1857-1861: James Henry Hammond (Jeffersonian)
def 1856: Moncure Conway (Utopic-Republican), William Greene (Workingman's), Levi Boone (Native American)
1861-1862: Charles Sumner (United Abolitionist Ticket)
def 1861: Jacob Thompson (Jeffersonian)
assassinated 1862 by the combined efforts of the Baltimore Ring

1862-1865: J. W. Booth (Jeffersonian)
def 1864: no election held
assassinated 1865 by Boston Corbett as part of Butler's Mutiny

1865-1869: Boston Corbett (Utopic-Republican)
1869-1877: Benjamin Butler (Utopic-Republican)
def 1868: August Willich (Social Democratic Workingman's), Daniel Vorhees ("Union" Jeffersonian), Lysander Spooner (Liberty)
def 1872: Horace Greeley (Union and Liberty), William H. Sylvis (Social Democratic)
def 1876: Otto Weydermeyer (Social Democratic), Carl Schurz (Union and Liberty)
assassinated 1877 by John "Black Jack" Kehoe as part of First American General Strike

1877-1881: John Kehoe (Social Democratic)
1881-1882: Thomas Ewing (Union and Liberty)
def 1880: Ira Steward (Social Democratic), Charles J. Guiteau (Utopic-Republican)
assassinated 1882 by Charles J. Guiteau

1882-0000: Charles J. Guiteau (Utopic-Republican)

Every step along the way to Hell was precedented, justified by what came before.

It was right to overthrow the Federalist junto. The country had been founded on such acts, of course, and the House of Hamilton (for even if Treasury Secretary was no longer the post it was when his father held it, "King Phillip II" was still on an equal level to Otis) had proved itself on an equal level of despotism to the House of Hanover. Sure, rioters storming the President's House, mutiny in the ranks, Mexican soldiers marching across the Mississippi to "restore order", all of these things were regrettable. But the violence of Federalist rule--the muzzling of the press and the hanging of seditionists and the fawning at Britain's feet--far outstripped the violence deployed against it. Wisely did the new government, on Jeffersonian principles, bind the Presidency's powers, so that America would never again be ruled by kings.

It was right for Levin to take the Presidency. His party commanded the largest plurality, if not a majority, of the Electors, and after a little debate a few of the more anti-Catholic Nationalists and anti-competition-for-jobs Workingmen agreed to back him. The previous president had had some...odd religious ideas, even for an Utopic, and owed his victory more to vote-splitting than to any actual election, so few bothered to look deeply into the assassins' sources of funding, or precisely who allowed them to slip past the few guards around Independence Square. Then, "General" Sken Smith was caught crossing the St Croix River into Canada, and was stupid enough to try and have his secret society bail him out. The American people soon rejected the party of a President who, even if he was unconnected with the death of his predecessor, had no clean hands when it came to such mob violence.

It was right for Corbett to slay the head of the Baltimore plotters. That cabal of Southern planters had been the aggressors, seizing the Presidency by force. Sumner bled out on the floor of a train carriage, and the Jeffersonians' "Electors", virtual hostages in New York under the guns of the city police, made a mockery of democracy and swore in a nine-days-wonder of an actor who'd greased the plot's wheels as Mayor of Baltimore. By the cancellation of the 1864 elections on the grounds of "public order", things reached a fever pitch. The Massachusetts State Militia, one of the few Northern militias to remain loyal, launched the final revolt, but it was a Jayhawker of New York who had been fighting from the beginning who fired the fatal shot on Booth. The rattled Electors' response was to proclaim him President, for the time being--if only because he was the only neutral figure willing to let them lead him, and who the country was willing to be led by.

It was right for Kehoe to take the Presidency. Butler, the general who fought for freedom and democracy, had turned into a petty showboater willing to go on and on and on in office. Government expropriation was widespread across the "special military districts", fuelling a civil service full of cronyist makework. By turns posing as the friend of labour and the friend of business, Butler ultimately chose his side by 1875, after negotiations to build in Mexico fell through and American-Pacific Rail collapsed. With millions out of work following "Black Tuesday", strikes and riots became commonplace across the States, and the government's response was to send in the militias, led by ex-Jayhawkers who viewed the rioters as godless. In revenge for Bloody Jim Lane's slaughter in St Louis, the Presidential train was derailed passing through Pennsylvania. The Social Democrats, in a violent mood, may not have known that Kehoe and the Molly Maguires were involved with the assassination, but when they learnt of it, they certainly didn't care, and neither did the American people.

And so, here the American people were. The year was 1882, and Charles J. Guiteau, former Governor of Niagara, was standing over the cooling body of President Ewing, holding a gun. In front of him, the Electors. Rather than run, or shoot some more, Guiteau calmly slid his pistol back into his trousers and began to speak. He cited the rebellions of 1831 and 1865, which had prevented tyranny by ending individual tyrants (ones everyone, not just Guiteau, considered tyrants). Kehoe and Levin, who had been confirmed after ordering the deaths of their predecessors (by a majority of the popularly-elected Electors, not a slim minority). Corbett, his "esteemed predecessor", sworn in as an emergency measure in similar circumstances. The speech was rambly, but the point was clear--and backed up by the Utopic militias outside. What better reward was there, for a man who, by slaying a tyrant and a scoundrel, had unified his party and saved his country, than the Presidency?

It was a precedent many would follow in the years to come.

The principles of Jefferson had been tortured until they turned upside down. Every twenty years, or near enough, the government was overthrown, but the old order was not renewed, merely the faces on top of it. Once, one man was legitimised to defend himself from the tyranny of a majority using force; now, one man was legitimised by his use of force to tyrannise a majority. Sovereginity had passed out of the hands of the people, but it had not passed into the hands of any one man, or one family. It remained floating free in the air, ready to be picked up by anyone with courage, and used.

Other nations have been said to have had despotism tempered with assassination. Only America proclaimed that fact.

--Marcus P. C. Lamar, One Nation Under Brutus: the United States, 1882-1962
 
Boring is Back: A Tale of the Stable and Normal Men Who Have Guided Britain:

PRIME MINISTERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM:
Tony Blair (Labour) - 1997 - 2003
Michael Howard (Conservative) - 2003-2003
Tony Blair (Conservative) - 2003 - 2012
Michael Howard (Labour) - 2012-2012
Zac Goldsmith (Farmer-Labor-Antisemitic League) - 2012 - 2013
Keira Knightly (Communist) - 2013 - 2014
GENERAL SECRETARIES OF THE PEOPLE'S EMIRATE OF BRITANNIA:
Keira Knightly (Communist) - 2014 - 2020
CEOS OF THE FREE CONGLOMERATE OF MONSANTO LLC:
Jeremy Corbyn (Libertarian) - 2020 - 2022
Liz Truss (Communist) - 2022 - 2023
DIRECTOR-KINGS OF THE UN OCCUPATION COMMITTEE FOR SAUDI ARABIA & FIRST MINISTER OF THE BENE GESSERIT:
Francois Hollande (MAGA) - 2023 - ?

Following the refusal of US President Dick Cheney to invade Iraq, Prime Minister Blair called a general election. While it was close, the Conservatives would win a one-seat plurality. With the Lib Dems holding the balance of power, the first thing Michael Howard did after winning the 2003 general election was to call a snap election. This time Labour won a narrow plurality. Upon his return to Number 10, Prime Minister Blair called another snap election, this one on the promise of holding fewer snap elections. Because of this, Blair was able to easily win. Over the next five years, various policies (such as the legalization of gay marriage and gassing Lidl). This caused Blair to change his party affiliation to Conservative, just in time for the 2012 election. Michael Howard returned as leader, winning and taking office again. The first thing he did was call a snap election, which he narrowly lost by one seat. This time, however, it was the Farmer-Labor-Antisemitic League party- led by Zac Goldsmith and Ed Miliband- that defeated him. Such a narrow plurality, however, made the government unstable. In particular, infighting between the Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox wings of the party brought the government down.

In backlash to all of this, the British Communist Party was able to win, running on a platform of closer relationships with western allies, improved ties to Israel, and killing the richest person in the UK every year. The party oversaw a decent rise in living conditions brought on by increased funding by George Soros, which enabled Prime Minister Keira Knightly to declare herself General Secretary of the People's Emirate of Britannia.

Knightly oversaw a large shakeup, hiring J.K. Rowling as anti-transphobia czar and George Galloway as anti-Islam czar. All good things must come to an end, however, and this occurred for the Communists when Jeremy Corbyn's Libertarian Party won the 2020 general election. Over two years, Corbyn saw the sale of the Prime Minister's official car to a South Korean businessman and cut tax rates by 0.5% for those born on Tuesday.

Again, however, all good things have to come to an end. For Corbyn this came when the Mongolian House of Representatives votes 673-1 against him, forcing him to resign. In a snap election called after, Marxist-Brandonist-Wahhabist Liz Truss was elected Prime Minister, partly due to critical support from Nigel Farage. This was too much for the rest of the world, however, and the UN then invaded the British Isles. Francois Hollande was then made chairman of the occupation committee.
 
Last edited:
Mods Are Asleep: Post Cats!
(Or: The Moderatocracy)

###

The following is entirely fictional. The story, all usernames, posters, and incidents portrayed are fictitious. Any identification with actual posters (active, inactive, gone fishing, kicked or banned), threads, in-jokes, or overused gags is unintended and entirely coincidental.

###

Administrators of Ezelpe (A Metaverse Instance)

2027-2035: @moorland (Administration)
2027 def: unopposed
2030 def: unopposed
2033 def: @cimcat (Anti-Administration)

2035-2037: @moorland (Administration - Moorist-Mowenist)
2036 def: @baron_barns (Administration - "Authentic"), @cimcat (Anti-Administration)
2037-2042: @baron_barns (Administration - "Authentic")
2039 election suspended

Membership of the Moderator Juntas of Ezelpe (A Metaverse Instance)

2042-2052: @mowen (Moderation)
2042 with @blaze (Moderation) and @fawsley (Moderation)
2043 with @blaze (Moderation) and @d_mod (Moderation)
2046 with @blaze (Moderation) and @gritty (Moderation)

2052-2053: @blaze (Moderation)
2052 with @gritty (Moderation) and @fawsley (Moderation)

Administremperor of the Sovereign Entity of Ezelpe (A Metaverse Instance)

2053-2067: @dr_walnut (Administremperor's Circle)

Administrators of Ezelpe (A Metaverse Instance)


2067-2068: @cimcat (Ezelpean Shitposter Congress)
2067 def: @time_out (Administremperorial Remnant), @blaze (Moorist-Mowenist League)

Everyone laughed when the Metaverse first launched.

It was tacky and weird, and everyone agreed that there was no chance that it could ever catch on. But, much like every technological leap before it, it eventually simply became a part of everyday life. By the late 2020s and early 2030s, pretty much every major website had established a presence in the Metaverse.

Online forums and chatrooms were no exception; in fact, they often led by example. Many forums moved wholesale, becoming "instances" of the Metaverse, and emerging as true emulations of their Roman namesakes, home lively debate in virtual agorae. This is the story of one such forum.

Ezelpe was, originally, an elaborate social experiment exploring the extent to which one can beat a dead horse to receive likes, and a post-neo-modernist art piece serving as a social commentary on the humour of said dead horses. It was planned for the nature of the experiment to be revealed in 2024, but the project spiralled out of control and lost sight of the original goals; and so when the Metaverse came knocking in 2027, the community was ready and waiting to sign up.

The early administration was led by a number of users, the chief administrator being @moorland. He was joined by a host of moderators, and in general the administration of the instance was drawn from the same users who had moderated the original website. Like the majority of early-adopters, however, the administration adopted a largely performative form of digital democracy in its early years; in which @moorland was elected unopposed as administrator on two occasions.

All was not rosy in Ezelpe, however. There was resentment at the centralisation of power under the administrator; and an intense backlash to some of the instance rules put forward by @moorland. The infamous "no-really-we-can't-use-the-metaverse-to-solve-the-real-housing-crisis" declaration led to virtual riots, and symbolised the growing rift between the administrator and the average user.

In response, @cimcat launched the first challenge to the leadership of @moorland in 2033 under the "Anti-Administration" label, running on a populist, shitposter platform. She came remarkably close to unseating the sitting administrator, which spooked the administration and the moderators. This signalled the major split in the administration between @moorland and former ally @baron_barns, who formed his own "alternative" administration in response. The two new administrations vied for supremacy in a dual power situation for some minutes, before the election in 2036 allowed the two administrations and the Anti-Administration camps to clash legitimately.

The famous debate in the virtual agora between @moorland, @baron_barns and @cimcat was legendary. @moorland had by this time rebranded his grouping as the "Moorist-Mowenist" Administration, codifying his beliefs (and those of his chief moderator, @mowen) into a single ideology. He famously argued "no, really, stop beating this dead horse it's the 2030s surely the housing crisis is solved by now". @baron_barns, meanwhile, centred his arguments on his slogan ("Hang the Floggers, Flog the Doggers, and Dog the Hangers") and christened his grouping as the "Authentic" Administration. @cimcat resumed her shitposting campaign from 2023, arguing that neither administrations were actually funny enough for the good users of Ezelpe. @moorland emerged victorious, but both other candidates called the legitimacy of the election into question.

In the end, it did not matter; @moorland was perma-banned from the entire Metaverse in 2037 as part of the wider "crypto for cope" scandal afflicting the Labour-Green coalition government of the real-world United Kingdom. As the runner-up of the previous election, @baron_barns took his place as administrator.

The @baron_barns administration was immediately beset by crisis, after it emerged that @baron_barns had purchased a 'body pillow' in 2031, circumventing the embargo of Japan during the Third World War. His approval ratings plummeted; not only was he accused of anti-British activity, but he had also done so in a weeb-y way. In response he indefinitely postponed the planned 2039 election and ruled by decree until 2042, when his moderators finally broke with the administration. The final straw was, supposedly, an outburst by @baron_barns where he said the moderators were "basically weebs by association".

The moderators hit back, and they hit back hard. Using their power over the instance, they banned @baron_barns and essentially launched a coup d’état.

In his place, a council of three moderators led the administration of Ezelpe. The first council was comprised of the three moderators who had organised and led the coup; @mowen (who had inherited the following of @moorland), @blaze and @fawsley. The first major change in the composition of the council came in 2043, when @fawsley was replaced with @d_mod, and the composition was changed again without controversy in 2046 when @d_mod was replaced by @gritty.

The ship had been steadied under the stalwart leadership of @mowen. There was little democracy any more, but riots in the agora had subsided; and shitposts flowed freely. Some agitators continued to push for justice, such as @cimcat, but these were exceptions to the rule.

This all changed when @mowen stepped down after ten years of leadership, announcing in 2052 that he had no time for the Metaverse now that he was First Minister of the real-world country of Wales.

There was no consensus within the moderation as to who should replace @mowen. @blaze led a short-lived caretaker administration with @gritty and @fawsley, but she was swept away by @mowen’s actual successor. It was @dr_walnut; who had been appointed as a minor moderator the previous year.

@dr_walnut took direct control, utilising his control over the instance administration account (which he took control over by changing the password). He banned those moderators and Ezelpians who would not submit to him, and declared himself the ‘Administremperor’.

@dr_walnut had achieved supreme power, and quickly set about exacting his will upon the denizens of Ezelpe. He banned the posting of images unrelated to ongoing discussions, banned anyone who dissented to his rule, and – most egregiously for many Ezelpian posters – publicly declared that Star Trek was “massively overrated”. This state of affairs continued for some time, with @dr_walnut’s control of the administrative account ensuring his complete control over the server (although, by this time, user numbers had plummeted due to mass bans).

But, like many despots, @dr_walnut failed to count on the love for liberty that persists in posters’ hearts. On the fortieth anniversary of Ezelpe’s foundation, a grand celebration was cancelled as @dr_walnut and his top moderator @time_out instead had a pizza party in real life. The end result was the two heads of the regime falling asleep earlier than planned, engorged on Hawaiian pizza (which @dr_walnut had declared was “the best kind”).

Seizing the opportunity, a group of shitposters led by @cimcat stormed the central square of the instance and declared with one voice “the Mods are asleep!”, and in violation of the banning of unrelated images they declared “post cats!”. And so, cats were posted. So many photos of so many cats – fluffy, hairless, tabby, grey, angry, derpy – were rendered into virtual existence at one time that it overloaded the server, forcing a full restart.

The full restart reset the administrative account password to what it had been before @dr_walnut had seized power; allowing the shitposters to themselves gain control.

@cimcat gained control of the administrative account and banned @dr_walnut; and then unbanned all those who had been unjustly banned by the @dr_walnut regime, and held the first elections in over thirty years. She won in a landslide; vowing to return Ezelpe to the prosperous and humorous “old days”, and govern with dignity.

And then the instance was shut down by Meta, having defaulted on its monthly crypto-rent payments under @dr_walnut’s rule.
 
Who’s For a Divide?

Executive Cabinet of the Republic of Oregon, 1990 - :
Presidential Committee: Leonard Truant (The Earthbreakers) (Chairman), Henry Reinikka (New Independence), Pratt Tsung (People’s)
Clerk and Recorder: Signe Oleson (Socialist Icarian)
Treasurer: Jonathan Jenks Hoskins (People’s)
Attorney: Grafton Hoskins (People’s)
Sheriff: Dougal Weiss (New Independence)
Surveyor: Ardys Lebreton (Socialist Icarian)

Legislature of the Republic of Oregon, 1990 - :
Speaker: Nimrod Hansen (People’s leading minority coalition with New Independence) of Sawtooth County
Leader of the Opposition: Milward Hawes (The Earthbreakers) of Tuality County

Supreme Court of the Republic of Oregon, 1990 - :
Justices Robert Waylon Kirtland (New Independence), Jan Eide (New Independence), Lisbeth Smith (nonpartisan)

The 1971 Constitution, promulgated after the downfall of strongman president Thomas H. MacIntosh, is a living relic of the immediate postbellum. The collegiate executive cabinet, the balance between three branches of government, and the heavy emphasis on democracy through ubiquitous referenda and the direct election of cabinet ministers all reflect the Constitutional Convention’s rejection of centralist rule. The fact that the unusual government structure was copied almost unchanged from that of the nineteenth-century Oregon Provisional Government, on the other hand, reflects the Convention’s proud nationalism. It is easy to forget that the coalition that took down MacIntosh – liberal capitalists, the LDS Church, and the aboveground communalist movement – did so not because of his violent excesses in fighting the Anarchists but because of his increasing reliance on American dollars, which raised fears of a second Protectorate in the making. The new Constitution was intended to “rekindle the spirit of Champoeg,” to restore a supposed Oregon tradition of participatory democracy. It appears it may have worked better than was intended.

Years of contentious referenda – over fisheries, over ethnic dignity, over the regional power of the LDS Church, over relations between the counties and the Anarchist and Indian autonomous zones – have rebuilt a civil society once shattered by MacIntosh. While partisan office remained reserved mostly for the New Independence and People’s Parties, the individual electoral mandates of each cabinet member meant that factional leaders have gained their own followings and the already mild discipline of these big-tent organizations has begun to fray. The NIP is splitting between its high-minded liberals, its bourgeois Boston conservatives, and its left-populists in timber-land, while the People’s Party is barely papering over the divide between relatively moderate LDS business leaders in Auburn and Bitterroot, and the fundamentalists gaining ground on the high desert and among immigrant converts.

All in all, what was once a simple, consensus-driven political scene has grown more and more complex over the years. Both major parties collapsed to historic lows in this election, losing old heartlands to upstart movements, and it appears that once the last votes have been counted in the Alyeskan bush that there will be ten separate parties represented in the Legislature - counting the AZRO, that is.

The biggest story, of course, is the rise of The Earthbreakers, the legal successor to MacIntosh’s old Pioneer Party. Once relegated to the fringe, they’ve now swept through sub-urbia and parts of the farm belt with their calls for solidarity among Anglo-Saxon nations, the lowering of trade barriers with the American Republic, and the (implicitly) forcible “re-integration” of Anarchist country. Although they have narrowly become the largest opposition party in the Legislature, they were mostly shut out of the cabinet, likely due to the frightening nature of several of their candidates. Only by gaming the system – nominating a single vote-concentrating candidate for the Presidential Committee, aging rugby legend Leon Truant, who led the Salmon to silver in 1968 – did they enter the executive branch. Nostalgia is perhaps the best explanation both for Truant’s personal popularity and for the new interest in the MacIntosh legacy.

On the other hand, the Socialist Icarians, once the small parliamentary wing of a dying social movement, have bloomed under the leadership of Signe Oleson, who became their first-ever cabinet minister after her defection from the NIP two years ago. (A hate figure for the political right, Oleson was The Earthbreakers’ biggest target this year; while they were unable to unseat her, her presence on the ballot likely boosted their turnout in a few close races.) With the effects of a century of heavy resource extraction becoming clear, both timber-land and the urban kosmicist vote have turned decisively away from the traditional Oregonian developmentalist philosophy, and Icarian-agrarian simplicity now has its devotees all across the republic. The Icarians have also been aided by the turmoil in Anarchist country. The collapse of the Row River Commune in 1986 and the increasing pressure on Anarchist zones by Earthbreaker-influenced county legislatures have generated fears of an end to Dual Power or a reopening of the war, and Recorder Oleson’s alignment with some Anarchist priorities has led some communes to cast their votes for a partisan candidate for the first time. Votes for the abstentionist legislative delegates of the Autonomous Zones Representation Organization (AZRO) sank this year, and the Icarians took the position of Republican Surveyor on a slim plurality almost certainly guaranteed by the last-minute endorsement of the Tillamook Bay Cooperative.

A bevy of smaller parties and high-profile independent candidates have also taken office, although aside from new Supreme Court Justice Lisbeth Smith – loosely aligned with The Earthbreakers but far more presentable – none yet hold significant power. The Coalition of 1971 remains in the majority, but badly shaken and with forces on its left and right in control of major offices for the first time. With its traditional developmentalist goals likely blocked by Icarian control of land management, and its policy of cautious engagement with the Anarchists undermined by a centralist warrior as titular head of state, the Reinikka-Hansen axis may be unable to do much aside from deliver the mail. Further complicating matters is that the broad-based, institutional NIP has suffered a much greater collapse than the geographically concentrated People’s Party, and so the LDS right – led by Pratt Tsung, the first Chinese Oregonian to join the Presidency – will be pushing to use their numerical advantage to enact old priorities like alcoholic prohibition and an expanded Ranger presence along the American frontier. The spirit of Champoeg has returned indeed: Oregonians are as bitterly divided, as politically passionate, and as close to violence as they were that fateful day in 1843.
 
Reform and Aftermath

1969-1974: Richard M. Nixon (Republican)
1974-1977: John B. Connally (Republican, then National Union)
1977-1979: Jerry Brown (Democratic)
'76 (with Birch Bayh) def. Ronald Reagan (Republican), John B. Connally (National Union)
'79 assassinated by Mark David Chapman
1979-1985: Birch Bayh (Democratic)
'79 ratification of 27th Amendment (Equal Rights Amendment)
'79 ratification of 28th Amendment (Presidential Popular Vote Amendment)
'80 (with Gary Hart) def. John B. Anderson (Republican), Meldrim Thomson (National Union)
'84 ratification of 29th Amendment (Congressional Compensation Amendment)
1985-1987: T. Boone Pickens (Republican)
'84 (with H. John Heinz) def. Adlai Stevenson III (Democratic), Ralph Nader (Green)
'86 ratification of 30th Amendment (Federal Recall Amendment)
'87 54% RECALL
1987-1995: Kathleen Brown (Democratic)
'87 (with Lawton Chiles) def. H. John Heinz (Republican), Pat Buchanan (National Union), Jesse Jackson (PUSH), Ralph Nader (Green), Robert A. G. Monks (independent), Lyndon LaRouche (U.S. Labor), others
'90 56% RETAIN
'91 (with Lawton Chiles) def. Newt Gingrich (Republican), Helen Chenoweth (National Union), Kent Hance (Moderate), Jesse Jackson (PUSH), Ralph Nader (Green), others
'93 51% RETAIN
1995-1998: John McCain (Republican)
'95 (with Lynn Morley Martin) def. Dianne Feinstein (Democratic, replacing Lawton Chiles), Ann Richards (PUSH-WELL), Bob Richards (National Christian), Ellen Craswell (National Union), John Kitzhaber (Green), Sheila Jackson Lee (PUSH-CRC), others
'98 53% RECALL
1998-1998: Lynn Morley Martin (Republican)
1998-: J.C. Watts (Republican)
'98 (with Melissa Hart) def. Evan Bayh (Democratic), Joe Lieberman (Moderate), John Kitzhaber (National Coalition for Peace), Bo Gritz (National Union), others

By 1976, American trust in government was at an all-time low. Liberals had seen Nixon's bloody prosecution of the war in Vietnam and his blatant corruption, only continued by his Texan successor who combined all of Johnson's flaws and none of his virtues, plus a blatant self-dealing all his own; conservatives still remembered the chaos of the Sixties and the perceived radicalism of McGovern; and everyone tumbled in the grip of inflation, the Nixon Shock, and the global unraveling of Bretton Woods.

Jerry Brown was not quite the right candidate to reforge consensus. His personality oscillated between alienating asceticism and messianic meliorism; his policy agenda, meanwhile, combined staunch loyalty to the aesthetic New Left with deep indifference to many of its priorities. Perhaps extending the logic of the era of limits from the biophysical limits of the world system to the economic limits of the budget was the logical conclusion of the environmental movement, but it wasn't a conclusion that met with much support, as Brown maintained and expanded his predecessors' budget cuts and shift to workfare while also raising taxes on the middle class. The greatest shock about the end of the Brown presidency was that it wasn't because of any of his policies in office - cutting welfare, cutting the military budget, environmental regulations, tax hikes - but because of his image, because Mark David Chapman thought that the onetime Catholic seminary student was selling himself as a messianic figure.

Like the last Catholic President, Brown was succeeded by a legislative giant. Bayh's commitment to reform was a great deal more concrete than Brown's - one talked endlessly about equal rights and direct democracy and shaking up the system, the other passed the laws and constitutional amendments necessary to make them happen. Bayh worked a bit harder to build a bipartisan consensus than his predecessor had - the glow of the martyr helped with that - but he also had his own agenda to pass.

But the 1980 election was defined less by Bayh than by his opposition. As his presidency proceeded, the right was increasingly divided - modernizers thought Ronald Reagan had lost because he was too out-of-touch and wanted to adopt some aspects of the New Politics to adapt to the new reality. In 1978, though, the political situation was shaken by some unusual occurrences at an off-year convention for a decaying party. Larry McDonald and his disciples had joined the husk of the National Union Party, John Connally's onetime vehicle for reshaping American politics and saving his own skin. Forty-eight hours later, they had taken it over. The reverberations of that shift kept the American right divided for a decade.

So it was that Birch Bayh watched the Republican Party split between moderate modernizers who could schmooze Washington Post columnists to kingdom come but couldn't mobilize the base, and a loose coalition of John Birch Cold Warriors and Christian Right zealots united by the conviction that the whole structure was rotten through with godlessness and Communism. The war between his opponents scared Middle America enough to give him a majority in the popular vote. He would be the last President so blessed in that century.

The early '80s saw a combination of stagflationary conditions, in part blamed on Bayh's refusal to countenance a "short, sharp shock" to reset inflation expectations, and a drumbeat of scandals - Korscam, Lockheed, the House banking scandal, the Vegas mob bribery scandal, and a dozen small things here and there that toppled tens of Congressmen and hundreds of local and state officials. Americans' already-shaky trust in government was on life support. The only thing left to do was to replace an idealist with a cynic. Governor T. Boone Pickens was an unusual choice - he had given up a lucrative career in the oil business to run for Governor of Oklahoma, served a full term and a half, and gave generously to charity - but his actual commitments demonstrated his true skepticism. Government could not be trusted if run as government - it had to be held to the standards of business, up to and including the right for shareholders to remove management at any time. The first manager so removed was Pickens himself.

Kathleen Brown, sister of the martyr, was able to hold the political system together despite never once receiving a majority of the vote (the 28th Amendment allowed Presidents to be elected with only 40%), in part because deep divisions on the right allowed her to slough off personalistic left-wing splinters and in part because many voters responded badly to the sexist undertones (or overtones) of many of her critics. But it couldn't last forever. McCain's outsider energy and willingness to dogwhistle to the Sagebrush Rebellion helped paper over serious questions about corruption and major gaffes, and even though his decision to bring the United States into the Syrian War led directly to his recall, it wasn't enough to shake the Republican Party's hold on the Presidency.

Proponents of electoral reform believed that it would provide more and higher-quality accountability to the government, and wanted to bring more voices into the public sphere. But twenty-one years after the 28th Amendment and fourteen years after the 30th, American politics shows few signs of fundamental change. Third parties have less prominence and less power than they did before the introduction of the popular vote, Presidents still frequently find themselves beholden to 'special interests' and committed to unpopular policies, and trust in government is if anything decreasing. Optimists and reformists still believe that one more heave - perhaps raising the runoff threshold to require a majority, perhaps Congressional term limits, perhaps the introduction of electoral reform - will do the trick and restore faith in the system, or else restore a system worthy of faith. But pessimists increasingly consider all of that a distraction. The problems of the age aren't technocratic problems of procedure and reform. Americans say they're dissatisfied with the way things are, but they still proceed as they always do. Nothing will change until Americans really want change, want it enough to pay the true cost...
 
Back
Top