Which parts did you not find realistic?I feel like someone should do an update of that TL with it being more realistic.
Which parts did you not find realistic?I feel like someone should do an update of that TL with it being more realistic.
Dems getting 69 Senate seats and then basically doing nothing with it and working with Republicans. It feels kinda ridiculous if you are winning by that much and then immediately go to compromises.Which parts did you not find realistic?
They had 57+2 OTL and still compromised more than they should. It’s just a feature of Obama 2008 where he wants to portray himself as a unifying figure, and working together with Republicans is necessary for that. However, unlike most people I don’t think he did this out of naivety, but rather a belief that his reforms would have more legitimacy and staying power if it had (at least some) Republican support.Dems getting 69 Senate seats and then basically doing nothing with it and working with Republicans. It feels kinda ridiculous if you are winning by that much and then immediately go to compromises.
My main problem is, imo, he compromised to try and not put the filibuster in use, which is not really an issue if they have 69 Senate seats.They had 57+2 OTL and still compromised more than they should. It’s just a feature of Obama 2008 where he wants to portray himself as a unifying figure, and working together with Republicans is necessary for that. However, unlike most people I don’t think he did this out of naivety, but rather a belief that his reforms would have more legitimacy and staying power if it had (at least some) Republican support.
They only had a gentleman’s agreement on not raising taxes. Not saying it wasn’t stupid, but I don’t think it really affected policy too much (in the sense that Obama wouldn’t have done more anyway), though did give the GOP ammunition for the 2010 midterms in the TL.My main problem is, imo, he compromised to try and not put the filibuster in use, which is not really an issue if they have 69 Senate seats.
There is a logical explanation for literally every single race though. He didn’t just pick states at random or whatever.Also the Senate map in general is just ???????
View attachment 64679
stop doubting dave freudenthalAlso the Senate map in general is just ???????
View attachment 64679
It’s logical but I do question how a few of them go tbh, Maine is weird in terms of Collins retiring, MN staying even with a landslide, etc. there’s a lot where I feel it’s a bit too much.There is a logical explanation for literally every single race though. He didn’t just pick states at random or whatever.
I disagree on both points as there were ideas of raising taxes a bit to pay for stimulus bills IIRC, and I think they just wouldn’t do it because they really have no reason to.They only had a gentleman’s agreement on not raising taxes. Not saying it wasn’t stupid, but I don’t think it really affected policy too much (in the sense that Obama wouldn’t have done more anyway), though did give the GOP ammunition for the 2010 midterms in the TL.
Unironically don’t have a problem with him winning.stop doubting dave freudenthal
- he did his best but southern democrats blocked him (backstabbed by his own people)left wing argument for why bill clinton was the greatest president ever
-he made america north koreas biggest financial backer
-he appointed a neocon cia director and never spoke to him once
-put a left wing government in haiti (international revolution)
-hutu power is inherently left wing
-socialized healthcare = social fascism
-marx supported free trade
marx saying this about andrew johnson- he did his best but southern democrats blocked him (backstabbed by his own people)
If Lincoln chose Marx instead of Johnson we’d have free communal showers by now.marx saying this about andrew johnson
-he appointed a neocon cia director and never spoke to him once
true/realSince neocons are Trots, this is also leftist infighting.
Alexis Herman