• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

AHC: Bolshevik Russians end up as co-belligerents of the Entente, fighting the Germans again

raharris1973

Well-known member
Here’s the challenge- after signing a peace with the Germans, or dropping out and armistice-ing and trying to reach a treaty, the Bolshevik Russians end up as co-belligerents of the Entente, fighting the Germans again.

Posting on this topic was inspired by @Crueldwarf’s remark here:
There is no way for Germans in late 1917 or early 1918 to advance on Moscow. Petrograd is possible but it would both require serious commitment (that German Empire was ill-posed to afford) and will do nothing to actually topple Bolsheviks. In fact the most likely result of continuing German advance on Petrograd and failure of the peace talks would be a flip of the Bolshevik rhetoric toward patriotic defense and Lenin actually going along with Entente demands. Which would probably lead to Entente actually supporting the Bolsheviks against the Germans.
 
The Germans would be very dumb to waste an opportunity to reduce the war from two to one fronts, especially with the Bolsheviks being willing to agree to pretty much anything to get peace due to their belief in Germany's coming collapse. But if they do, I do agree that there's no reason the Bolsheviks would refuse to defend themselves. Revolutionary defeatism was always a stance predicated on both sides being imperialist powers. If Russia is socialist, there's no reason not to fight for it. This is of course going to hurt at home since peace was part of the promise, but the Bolshevik strategy will probably be to gain as much time as possible to let Germany collapse and that's still more popular than the provisional government's approach to the war. It's also likely to happen earlier than OTL since Germany doesn't get the temporary boost of having reduced the war to one front.

Of course the civil war is still going to happen and having to worry about German pushes makes it harder to fight the opening moves of it.
 
This is of course going to hurt at home since peace was part of the promise, but the Bolshevik strategy will probably be to gain as much time as possible to let Germany collapse and that's still more popular than the provisional government's approach to the war.

"gain as much time" means what? Mostly retreat, do hit and run attacks, and mainly have volunteers fight rather than having a broadly conscripted army used for conventional defense and attacks, like the PG?

Of course the civil war is still going to happen and having to worry about German pushes makes it harder to fight the opening moves of it.

Well there are armed groups who are going to be anti-Bolshevik for class reasons, personal survival reasons, political commitments, and national separatist reasons, but it may not total up to the same amount as the Whites, Greens, and Blacks of OTL. Some share of the White Movement was motivated by anger at German-Bolshevik collusion. The Czech Legion would have no reason to fight the Reds here, instead Moscow could facilitate their deploying into action against Austro-Hungarian occupation forces, etc.
 
Didn't they try this OTL expecting the German soldiers to just stop fighting and join the revolution so long as their Russian counterparts only defended themselves or retreated?

Hence the disastrous battles where the Germans struck at will against effectively leaderless and badly exposed Russian formations and this crushing reality led to the peace at any price decision.

The future Red Army went through a very steep learning curve over its early years, largely by completely fucking things based on ideology until people who had a clue (and a sense of a ruthlessness) took over and forged it into a functional if limited military force.


IMO if the Reds decide to fight on in 1917 or so its probably going to be in part an ideological decision based on a theory of the German state being just a stone's throw away from collapsing into socialist revolution, such thinking OTL led to a military disaster even without a full commitment to fighting the war so I think the case here would be an even more severe drubbing and either a sudden about turn or we need to start figuring out which revolutionary or counter revolutionary group successfully deposes the Bolsheviks because they're very much not going to last long if all they can promise is more losing war.
 
The easiest solution is to have it not be Lenin and his clique but the Left SRs on top.

Or perhaps the reunified RSDLP that the on the ground Bolshiviks wanted and Lenin stopped when he showed up at Finland Station.

That said as other people have mentioned the German Railway offensive in the face of "Neither Peace nor War" showed that Red Militias were useless in a War against them. You need to build up the Red Army and that is always going to have bigger fish to fry in country.

Its an interesting concept but any game one plays about it (For example having Churchill's proposal to send TR to Petrograd to bring this about which I wrote a rather lukewarm Vignette about years ago) is always going to have to be more about intrigue then the actual war. Since any such war ends no later then a month after it starts.
 
The easiest solution is to have it not be Lenin and his clique but the Left SRs on top.

Or perhaps the reunified RSDLP that the on the ground Bolshiviks wanted and Lenin stopped when he showed up at Finland Station.

That said as other people have mentioned the German Railway offensive in the face of "Neither Peace nor War" showed that Red Militias were useless in a War against them. You need to build up the Red Army and that is always going to have bigger fish to fry in country.

Its an interesting concept but any game one plays about it (For example having Churchill's proposal to send TR to Petrograd to bring this about which I wrote a rather lukewarm Vignette about years ago) is always going to have to be more about intrigue then the actual war. Since any such war ends no later then a month after it starts.

Where did your little vignette about it?
 
Guessing Theodore Roosevelt, since he helped end the Russo-Japanese war.
It doesn't really seem to have had much to do with that and more to do with the fact that Churchill had a man crush and a cocktail of worldwide fame and not actually doing anything.
 
Because they thought the German workers would join them in short order and based their strategy such as it was around this and got their asses kicked OTL.

But this is OTL and they did in fact exit the war OTL. So I don't see how your point explain why they'd stick around when it's clearly not working.
 
But this is OTL and they did in fact exit the war OTL. So I don't see how your point explain why they'd stick around when it's clearly not working.
Because there is nothing stopping them from deciding one more heave will do it or that a people's war would work out after just waiting passively didn't work. They tried that one in Poland a few years later after all and against their domestic opposition and it took Lenin's personal intervention to gain enough support among the senior leaders to accept the German terms after the disasters.

Seems fairly easy as POD that he or someone in his circle decide that the Germans are deluding themselves because of easy battlefield success and will instead crumple if they suffer a defeat. And given how close they were to St Petersberg/Petrograd when the OTL peace was agreed its fairly easy to see that city falling if the Soviets take even a few weeks longer to face reality.

And I think losing Russia's second city, former capital and the symbolic birthplace of the revolution is going to see at least Lenin's circle ousted though I have no idea who would end up in charge.
 
Because there is nothing stopping them from deciding one more heave will do it or that a people's war would work out after just waiting passively didn't work. They tried that one in Poland a few years later after all and against their domestic opposition and it took Lenin's personal intervention to gain enough support among the senior leaders to accept the German terms after the disasters.

Seems fairly easy as POD that he or someone in his circle decide that the Germans are deluding themselves because of easy battlefield success and will instead crumple if they suffer a defeat. And given how close they were to St Petersberg/Petrograd when the OTL peace was agreed its fairly easy to see that city falling if the Soviets take even a few weeks longer to face reality.

And I think losing Russia's second city, former capital and the symbolic birthplace of the revolution is going to see at least Lenin's circle ousted though I have no idea who would end up in charge.

I really don't think there's any chance of that happening. The Bolsheviks knew exactly how unpopular the war was, they made a campaign out of it. Some in the party were defencists, and that was very visible in the party line before Lenin returned but that was also before the disastrous Kerensky offensive. And their army is even worse than that. Once it's clear the Germans are still pushing, they're going to send peace feelers.

If you want to derail that attempt, that's another angle entirely, and one that might work, but the Germans really wanted to refocus on the western front and the Bolsheviks were willing to offer pretty much anything because they didn't believe the Germans would last.

I guess you could use a plot from the remaining SR, who were opposed to the peace though.
 
I really don't think there's any chance of that happening. The Bolsheviks knew exactly how unpopular the war was, they made a campaign out of it. Some in the party were defencists, and that was very visible in the party line before Lenin returned but that was also before the disastrous Kerensky offensive. And their army is even worse than that. Once it's clear the Germans are still pushing, they're going to send peace feelers.

If you want to derail that attempt, that's another angle entirely, and one that might work, but the Germans really wanted to refocus on the western front and the Bolsheviks were willing to offer pretty much anything because they didn't believe the Germans would last.

I guess you could use a plot from the remaining SR, who were opposed to the peace though.
I really don't think the Soviets were incapable of incredible stupid foreign policy moves. They made a whole bunch in this period including continuing to fight Germany and the German terms were very harsh and swallowed very bitterly.
 
I really don't think the Soviets were incapable of incredible stupid foreign policy moves. They made a whole bunch in this period including continuing to fight Germany and the German terms were very harsh and swallowed very bitterly.

But they did swallow them. I think the party as a whole might make that mistake but you'd need to remove Lenin from the picture somehow, he was the one most convinced of the necessity for peace and the one who changed the party line when he came back despite that being still unpopular at the time he did it.

Or as I said, having the remaining SR they were still allied with sabotage the peace talks.
 
Back
Top