- Pronouns
- he/him
Discuss this article here
You've just reminded me of one of the most surreal things I've ever seen on TV, and a reminder of @Lord Roem 's point that Richard Madeley is the closest thing real life has to Alan Partridge - when he ended up apologising to one of the Naragansett descendants and asking for forgiveness because it turned out one of his ancestors was involved in the Great Swamp Fight.Reminding me of the Scramble articles, that what we generally remember as a power imbalance wasn't always and things could have gone very different before that
There was already one surreal moment earlier in the programme where he was talking with a Canadian genealogist about his (chronologically later) Canadian ancestry, it was something like:That had to be a weird phone call John got. "So we got this film crew following this guy who--"
In particular I thought, though this isn't dwelt on to the same extent, the importance of allies like the Mohawks to the colonists at this point.Reminding me of the Scramble articles, that what we generally remember as a power imbalance wasn't always and things could have gone very different before that
On comparison to the Scramble articles, I did raise an eyebrow at the final paragraph describing an alternate North America as looking more like "modern day Africa". In terms of numbers perhaps, but considering the how, why and when many of modern nations of Africa took shape it's perhaps not the best comparison. So too did the assumption that the French would just abandon the western hemisphere after the bottom falls out the fur market.
Good discussion of the POD, and the immediate impacts of the divergence, but felt towards the end it got a bit "if Pitt the Elder had negotiated an end to the American Revolution then the Germans wouldn't be concerned with building an oversees Empire in the late 1800s."
The basic thing with colonialism and what-ifs is that the colonisers only have to be lucky once, whereas the natives have to be lucky every time. It's not like a fight with the colonies is going to lead to Anglesey being ceded to the Powhatan.It's not my area at all but didn't this like happen already several times and each time a few years later a different colony showed up and a different native tribe started a war with another giving them an in?
Feels a bit wishful thinking that Europeans would just give up and the natives would just stay United and aware of the greater threat.
Hmmm - I agree in these instances, yes, but I don't think that's a universal rule.The basic thing with colonialism and what-ifs is that the colonisers only have to be lucky once, whereas the natives have to be lucky every time. It's not like a fight with the colonies is going to lead to Anglesey being ceded to the Powhatan.
It's just nit picking about terminology but I kind of think if it doesn't apply then its not a colonial war.Hmmm - I agree in these instances, yes, but I don't think that's a universal rule.
Yes, I mean, the Iroquois did send ambassadors to Queen Anne's court so you can imagine some circumstance where indigenous nations get involved on the top table of starting a war that's also fought in Europe (i.e. not just being there when it started like the Seven Years' War) but I agree, at that point it's not just a colonial war anymore.It's just nit picking about terminology but I kind of think if it doesn't apply then its not a colonial war.
I get the point but I feel you then also end up saying the wars colonialism involves are not necessarily colonial wars.It's just nit picking about terminology but I kind of think if it doesn't apply then its not a colonial war.