Whats this from??
Whats this from??
It’s by @BlackentheborgWhats this from??
From the Gentleman's Magazine for September 1772:
View attachment 89324
This refers to the Gustavian Era tilt to absolutism, reflecting the way 'revolution' was used more generally in English in a political sense before it got the tinge of radicalism from America and France. @Makemakean @Ares96
Page 8 of the same issue has an illustration of a mosque somebody built in Kew Gardens just to be exotic, which is strange in hindsight (not unlike Brighton Pavilion).
Much like the similar-era Pagoda.From the Gentleman's Magazine for September 1772:
View attachment 89324
Page 8 of the same issue has an illustration of a mosque somebody built in Kew Gardens just to be exotic, which is strange in hindsight (not unlike Brighton Pavilion).
a truly lovely word and phrase“statsvälvning” (lit. “turning of the state”),
Speaking of that country, post-independence Zimbabwe has continued to use the Rhodesian brushstroke camo pattern and made new uniforms in a slightly different shade (so it's not just using surplus for cost reasons)a truly lovely word and phrase
the coup that took down Mugabe was officially referred to as the Bloodless Correction
Does the article directly refer to the structure as a mosque, or is some other term used to mean the same thing?From the Gentleman's Magazine for September 1772:
View attachment 89324
This refers to the Gustavian Era tilt to absolutism, reflecting the way 'revolution' was used more generally in English in a political sense before it got the tinge of radicalism from America and France. @Makemakean @Ares96
Page 8 of the same issue has an illustration of a mosque somebody built in Kew Gardens just to be exotic, which is strange in hindsight (not unlike Brighton Pavilion).
and the Zimbabwe Rhodesia Police became, still are, the Zimbabwe Republic Police, ZRP, and few people still alive remember...Speaking of that country, post-independence Zimbabwe has continued to use the Rhodesian brushstroke camo pattern and made new uniforms in a slightly different shade (so it's not just using surplus for cost reasons)
I've never heard of the acronym for Robert Gabriel Mugabe, thank you!and the Zimbabwe Rhodesia Police became, still are, the Zimbabwe Republic Police, ZRP, and few people still alive remember...
RGM was quick to dump Walls, and essentially the wrong guys from the Air Force but was quite happy to keep on the entire secret police apparatus: the Central Intelligence Organisation essentially was retained lock stock and barell, with Cardinal Richelieu, sorry Flower, in charge
I don’t think the events of 1809 were ever referred to as anything other than a statskupp though. Granted it took a few decades to hammer out the reform of the Riksdag of the Estates and for government by cabinet responsible to the legislature to be properly established, but fundamentally, 1809 in many respects played a similar role to 1688 in Britain.
Curiously though, there was very limited interest in seeing it celebrated and commemorated the way that Gustav III celebrated and commemorated his coup. Everyone involved seemed to take the view, “sure, it needed to be done, but it was still nasty business”.
There were also a number of people at around this time who spoke of the British East India Company takeover of India as a revolution. I’m not sure how related that is, and some of it later on came from conservatives like Edmund Burke negatively comparing the British Raj to the First French Republic, but I found it pretty striking.From the Gentleman's Magazine for September 1772:
View attachment 89324
This refers to the Gustavian Era tilt to absolutism, reflecting the way 'revolution' was used more generally in English in a political sense before it got the tinge of radicalism from America and France. @Makemakean @Ares96
Page 8 of the same issue has an illustration of a mosque somebody built in Kew Gardens just to be exotic, which is strange in hindsight (not unlike Brighton Pavilion).
On the other hand, something like the coup d'etat in Brazil in 1964, which is still referred to as the "Revolução de 1964" by junta supporters, is clearly counterrevolutionary.Revolution is a neutral term that can apply to any significant change from the previous order.
Well, you can read it yourself if you click the link and advance a couple of pages. At least until someone kills the Internet Archive...I would almost bet money on that the account is not particularly favourable
It its fundamentals it is very much like the Moroccan claim to Western Sahara, but very few Filipinos by my understanding actually give a shit.