• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

  • Thank you to everyone who reached out with concern about the upcoming UK legislation which requires online communities to be compliant regarding illegal content. As a result of hard work and research by members of this community (chiefly iainbhx) and other members of communities UK-wide, the decision has been taken that the Sea Lion Press Forum will continue to operate. For more information, please see this thread.

Stagnation forever:the U.S.S.R under Kirilenko and how it would affect the 1989 revolutions

Yokai Man

Well-known member
Say,for the the sake of argument,that after the well known POD of Nixon and Brezhnev dying in a car crash in 1973,Kirilenko(possibly via support by Suslov) becomes Secretary General.

Let’s also assume that things(in Eastern Europe for the most part) stay the same until the 1980’s,when discontent towards communism becomes more stronger and visible.How could Kirilenko deal with the vast social upheavals and dissident movements like Solidarity or Charter 77? Would the Brezhnev policy still be kept in this timeline?

Would Kirilenko or his successor say yes to Honecker’s desperate plea to ask the Soviet troops to put down the demonstrators? And how and when will the Iron Curtain fall?
 
Back
Top