Discuss @Thande 's latest article here
It's quite new - it occurred to me last week so I've been doing it for the past few days.Great work on how you included the visuals, Andy, especially as I didn't give you much notice unfortunately! But then this is your area of expertise...
Not sure if this is new or if I just haven't spotted it before, but I like the links to the article writers' published works at the bottom.
I know right? I always wonder if Turtledove was aware of this, given there's a few brief mentions in TL-191 that the US uses eagles and crossed swords and the UK just uses the Union Jack (because no potential confusion in the Canadian theatre?) but not sure how aware he was of these factors.A great piece, answered lots of questions I'd been wondering about. Particularly like the point about how modern symbols would doubtless look different if the alliance systems had been different in WWI.
I had a play around because I had some time on my hands. Good luck getting the alliance system to actually look like this...I know right? I always wonder if Turtledove was aware of this, given there's a few brief mentions in TL-191 that the US uses eagles and crossed swords and the UK just uses the Union Jack (because no potential confusion in the Canadian theatre?) but not sure how aware he was of these factors.
Very good indeed! Russia could also perhaps use a St Andrew's cross (though that might be one of those 'too neat for OTL' things)I had a play around because I had some time on my hands. Good luck getting the alliance system to actually look like this...
View attachment 11908
That's really good - if you like, imagine the above one says '1914-1915' underneath, and the St Andrew's Cross was '1915-1917*'.Very good indeed! Russia could also perhaps use a St Andrew's cross (though that might be one of those 'too neat for OTL' things)
There's a politer way to say this, by the way.Some editing required.
Huh, fair enough - that's a proper Mandela Effect moment for me because I am absolutely sure I have seen modern Luftwaffe planes with it on. In fact the one you've posted looks like a photoshop to me (as in it's not, but I'm so sure I've seen current Luftwaffe planes with the Balkenkreuz that it looks like something from an ATL).Some editing required.
The modern Luftwaffe emphatically does NOT use the Balkankreuz.
There's a politer way to say this, by the way.
What's the cross they now use called?
It's funny because I even remember having this very thought when I first remember seeing modern Luftwaffe planes with it on "huh, would have thought they'd want to avoid that implication". This is seriously creepy.The idea that the Bundeswehr would use any insignia used by the Nazi Luftwaffe is historically implausible.
It's funny because I even remember having this very thought when I first remember seeing modern Luftwaffe planes with it on "huh, would have thought they'd want to avoid that implication". This is seriously creepy.
That's probably why, yeah.
The Luftwaffe do paint it on A LOT smaller than they used to, so you can be forgiven for mistaking it for a Balkenkreuz.
I always wonder if Turtledove was aware of this, given there's a few brief mentions in TL-191 that the US uses eagles and crossed swords
I was aware of this, incidentally, although I know the text makes it sound like they switched straight to the post-1947 version from 1942 - there just wasn't enough space for that degree of detail.Seeing as the OTL USAAF changed its national insigniafourfive times between 1941 and 1945, you can get away with most thing . (Six times between 1941-1947), you can get away with a lot of variation.