• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

AH Cooperative Lists Thread

Presidents of the Republic of Ghana

1960-1976: Kwame Nkrumah
1976-1978: Joseph Allassani
1978-1984: Kwaku Boateng
1984-1994:
1994-1999:
1999-2003:
2003-2013:
2013-0000:
 
Presidents of the Republic of Ghana

1960-1976: Kwame Nkrumah
1976-1978: Joseph Allassani
1978-1984: Kwaku Boateng
1984-1994: Victor Owusu
1994-1999:
1999-2003:
2003-2013:
2013-0000:
 
1960-1976: Kwame Nkrumah
1976-1978: Joseph Allassani
1978-1984: Kwaku Boateng
1984-1994: Victor Owusu
1994-1999: Ben Akafia
1999-2003: Paul Boateng
2003-2013:
2013-0000:
 
1960-1976: Kwame Nkrumah
1976-1978: Joseph Allassani
1978-1984: Kwaku Boateng
1984-1994: Victor Owusu
1994-1999: Ben Akafia
1999-2003: Paul Boateng
2003-2013: Tony Yeboah
2013-0000:
 
Presidents of the Republic of Ghana

1960-1976: Kwame Nkrumah
1976-1978: Joseph Allassani
1978-1984: Kwaku Boateng
1984-1994: Victor Owusu
1994-1999: Ben Akafia
1999-2003: Paul Boateng
2003-2013: Tony Yeboah
2013-0000: Adam Afriyie

-------------------------------------------------

Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751:
1751-1799:
1799:
1799-1802:
1802-1836:
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.
 
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799:
1799:
1799-1802:
1802-1836:
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of the Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children despite his sexuality) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.
 
Last edited:
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799:
1799-1802:
1802-1836:
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.
 
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799: Ernest ‘The Four Month King’ (4)
1799-1802:
1802-1836:
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.

(4) Ernest didn’t want to be King. The now 54 year old King had spent much of his life in the Army taking part in various conflicts before accepting a post as the Governor of British North America. With the death of his older brother who had left no heirs Ernest was hastily made King and whisked back to a broken Britain. Immediately Ernest let it be known that he didn’t want to be King but that he would hold off abdicating until a suitable heir was sorted out from his various daughters. Ernest’s short rule was more about making sure that Britain economy was up and running and also about increasing the standing of British North America which would be given representatives in Parliament. Ernest’s most important policy though was probably making becoming part of the Continental Alliance which include countries like Prussia, the Holy Roman Empire, Denmark, Italy and many more all united in there hatred towards France. After his Four Months as King Ernest abdicated for a suitable heir and he would head back to British North America, to live out his remaining days expanding the colony and make alliances with the various emerging nations there.
 
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799: Ernest ‘The Four Month King’ (4)
1799-1802: Anne II (5)
1802-1836:
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.

(4) Ernest didn’t want to be King. The now 54 year old King had spent much of his life in the Army taking part in various conflicts before accepting a post as the Governor of British North America. With the death of his older brother who had left no heirs Ernest was hastily made King and whisked back to a broken Britain. Immediately Ernest let it be known that he didn’t want to be King but that he would hold off abdicating until a suitable heir was sorted out from his various daughters. Ernest’s short rule was more about making sure that Britain economy was up and running and also about increasing the standing of British North America which would be given representatives in Parliament. Ernest’s most important policy though was probably making becoming part of the Continental Alliance which include countries like Prussia, the Holy Roman Empire, Denmark, Italy and many more all united in there hatred towards France. After his Four Months as King Ernest abdicated for a suitable heir and he would head back to British North America, to live out his remaining days expanding the colony and make alliances with the various emerging nations there.

(5) Anne was the second daughter but married to Prince Francesco of the Sicilies, and so having her as monarch would help cement the Italian Collective into the Continental Alliance. Greatly disinterested in the role of monarch and having never expected to have to do it, she was happy enough rubber-stamping the actions of Parliament and going to various diplomatic functions across Europe. This was greatly exploited by the Whigs, who were able to talk her into making public approval of the Reform Act of 1801 that expanded the voting franchise and erased some seats. Unfortunately for Whig free reign, Anne contracted pneumonia on one trip to Denmark and died en route home.
 
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799: Ernest ‘The Four Month King’ (4)
1799-1802: Anne II (5)
1802-1836: Mary III (6)
1836-1856:
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.

(4) Ernest didn’t want to be King. The now 54 year old King had spent much of his life in the Army taking part in various conflicts before accepting a post as the Governor of British North America. With the death of his older brother who had left no heirs Ernest was hastily made King and whisked back to a broken Britain. Immediately Ernest let it be known that he didn’t want to be King but that he would hold off abdicating until a suitable heir was sorted out from his various daughters. Ernest’s short rule was more about making sure that Britain economy was up and running and also about increasing the standing of British North America which would be given representatives in Parliament. Ernest’s most important policy though was probably making becoming part of the Continental Alliance which include countries like Prussia, the Holy Roman Empire, Denmark, Italy and many more all united in there hatred towards France. After his Four Months as King Ernest abdicated for a suitable heir and he would head back to British North America, to live out his remaining days expanding the colony and make alliances with the various emerging nations there.

(5) Anne was the second daughter but married to Prince Francesco of the Sicilies, and so having her as monarch would help cement the Italian Collective into the Continental Alliance. Greatly disinterested in the role of monarch and having never expected to have to do it, she was happy enough rubber-stamping the actions of Parliament and going to various diplomatic functions across Europe. This was greatly exploited by the Whigs, who were able to talk her into making public approval of the Reform Act of 1801 that expanded the voting franchise and erased some seats. Unfortunately for Whig free reign, Anne contracted pneumonia on one trip to Denmark and died en route home.

(6) Mary was a lot of things, ambitious, cunning and manipulative, she was also the third daughter of Ernest. Upon succeeding her lackadaisical sister she immediately made herself know, she would become firm friends with the Earl Grey who would become Prime Minister of the new Whig Government. Not long after she would marry rather inexplicably to Alexander I of Russia but this was a way to get the Russian Empire into the Continental Alliance. This would all come to ahead with the War of the Continent in 1810 in which the Continental Alliance would slowly crush the Franco-Spanish alliance over the course of four years. In the 1814 Peace Treaty Britain would gain various French Colonies in India and Asia, cause the creation of the Dutch Empire ruled by the new William of Orange (who was married to Mary’s sister Louise) and secure it’s status as one of the growing powers in Europe.

Mary’s rule after that would be about keeping the various rulers of Europe happy whilst increasing the prestige of Britain further with ventures into China and the Pacific. Meanwhile revolutionary trouble at home would be quashed under the leadership of Lord Byron of the Whigs, alongside this advancements in technology from locomotives to continuous industrialisation would make Mary’s reign be seen as a time of great and profound change. By the time of her death from stomach cancer Mary would be seen as one of the greatest British monarchs in recent times and her death greatly mourned.
 
Last edited:
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799: Ernest ‘The Four Month King’ (4)
1799-1802: Anne II (5)
1802-1836: Mary III (6)
1836-1856: Alex I (7)
1856-???
Replaced by ???????

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.

(4) Ernest didn’t want to be King. The now 54 year old King had spent much of his life in the Army taking part in various conflicts before accepting a post as the Governor of British North America. With the death of his older brother who had left no heirs Ernest was hastily made King and whisked back to a broken Britain. Immediately Ernest let it be known that he didn’t want to be King but that he would hold off abdicating until a suitable heir was sorted out from his various daughters. Ernest’s short rule was more about making sure that Britain economy was up and running and also about increasing the standing of British North America which would be given representatives in Parliament. Ernest’s most important policy though was probably making becoming part of the Continental Alliance which include countries like Prussia, the Holy Roman Empire, Denmark, Italy and many more all united in there hatred towards France. After his Four Months as King Ernest abdicated for a suitable heir and he would head back to British North America, to live out his remaining days expanding the colony and make alliances with the various emerging nations there.

(5) Anne was the second daughter but married to Prince Francesco of the Sicilies, and so having her as monarch would help cement the Italian Collective into the Continental Alliance. Greatly disinterested in the role of monarch and having never expected to have to do it, she was happy enough rubber-stamping the actions of Parliament and going to various diplomatic functions across Europe. This was greatly exploited by the Whigs, who were able to talk her into making public approval of the Reform Act of 1801 that expanded the voting franchise and erased some seats. Unfortunately for Whig free reign, Anne contracted pneumonia on one trip to Denmark and died en route home.

(6) Mary was a lot of things, ambitious, cunning and manipulative, she was also the third daughter of Ernest. Upon succeeding her lackadaisical sister she immediately made herself know, she would become firm friends with the Earl Grey who would become Prime Minister of the new Whig Government. Not long after she would marry rather inexplicably to Alexander I of Russia but this was a way to get the Russian Empire into the Continental Alliance. This would all come to ahead with the War of the Continent in 1810 in which the Continental Alliance would slowly crush the Franco-Spanish alliance over the course of four years. In the 1814 Peace Treaty Britain would gain various French Colonies in India and Asia, cause the creation of the Dutch Empire ruled by the new William of Orange (who was married to Mary’s sister Louise) and secure it’s status as one of the growing powers in Europe.

Mary’s rule after that would be about keeping the various rulers of Europe happy whilst increasing the prestige of Britain further with ventures into China and the Pacific. Meanwhile revolutionary trouble at home would be quashed under the leadership of Lord Byron of the Whigs, alongside this advancements in technology from locomotives to continuous industrialisation would make Mary’s reign be seen as a time of great and profound change. By the time of her death from stomach cancer Mary would be seen as one of the greatest British monarchs in recent times and her death greatly mourned.


(7) Alex was definitely the son of Alexander I of Russia. He was just born a bit early. There was definitely not a strained relationship in the palace.

He was his mother's son, trained to be as cunning and manipulative as her, but the sheer size of the Empire and the growing power of parliament & democratic rule meant there was little need for ambition on his part, nor much scope. He instead continued to act as a geopolitical asset and often played games with (increasingly sharp) MPs and the smarter Lords. It was his mix of bribes, lies, and backstabbing that helped a favoured Prime Minister get Irish Home Rule through the Lords and swing the Irish in letting "Prince/Princess of Ireland" be the second-child version of "Prince/Princess of Wales". In a similar act, he married one of the spare princesses of the Empire of Mexico (white, of course) to shore up the American Peace. While other powers began to establish more colonies in Africa, Britain stuck to its existing empire and might, feeling secure in the world.

In the 1850s, things changed: the old Continental Alliance (now France and Spain were too reduced to be a problem) began to fragment as Italy, the Netherlands, and Denmark all wanted to greater expand into Africa and didn't want the other blocking them. Britain felt this wasn't their issue until international trade began to be affected. Alex once again went out to manipulate and wheeler-deal, but this was a new era and the three nascent empires were less willing to listen. Honour and money were at stake and why shouldn't they have what Britain did? When Alex passed away of the same cancer as his mother, it was seen by doomsayers as an omen that the Long Peace (except for those "minor" shooting matches in Asia) was ending.
 
Monarchs of the House of Oldenburg of Great Britain

1714-1737: William IV (1)
1737-1751: George I (2)
1751-1799: William V (3)
1799: Ernest ‘The Four Month King’ (4)
1799-1802: Anne II (5)
1802-1836: Mary III (6)
1836-1856: Alex I (7)
1856-1912: George II (8)
Replaced by Alex II of Plantagenet of Great Britain

(1) Under the Reign of his Mother, Anne, future William IV was a byword for rebellious, youthful royalty by thwarting all the expectations of him from his parents on down. Parliamentarians hoped that he'd take after his father with little interest in politics - instead he often intrigued with the Opposition. William spent most of his reign trying to outshine his Mother, and going the wrong way about it. His needless, costly intervention in the Great Northern War did little apart from kill off Marlborough prematurely for a pyrrhic victory. Investment of royal finances in the South Seas Bubble ruined his standing with Parliament after the re-surging Whigs refused to pay his debt. The 5 years of gridlock until William relented and allowed Walpole to form a Ministry. William spent the rest of his life in austerity, mainly in Scotland where he came up close with '35 Jacobite Rebellion in which he commanded the Army that turned away the Old Pretender at Falkirk. He would die from complications with injuries from the battle two years later.

(2) Unlike his father George was a quiet and calm individual who didn’t care for war and crazy investments instead enjoying Arts, Theatre and the company of other men. Letting the Whigs run most of the affairs of the nation George would spend most of his time funding the artists, poets and playwrights which would include the creation of the Great British Institute of Art in 1745. George’s forays into international affairs were about quietly expanding the influence of Great Britain, including marrying Amalia of Nassau-Orange family in 1738 (an awkward relationship that would bring three children) which would help solidify a new relationship between the historic rivals Britain and the Netherlands against France and Spain. He would also support and fund the aims of the new United East India Company in 1750, a joint Dutch-British company that would dominate trade, control of India and East Asian adventures in the years to come. George wouldn’t see it though, abruptly catching pneumonia in 1751 and dying not long after.

(3) Wanting to emulate his father, William was determined to expand the nascent British Empire and that looked to cause war with France - but when Prussia preemptively attacked Saxony in 1756, William's goverment kept Britain out of the resulting Two Year War. Much like his father, he wanted to avoid a serious conflict. Unfortunately, the end result was the French-led forces dominating the continent and a series of wars in India, the Americas, the Channel, and even the Netherlands, which fell and caused a wave of refugees (a number to Ireland, causing a brief war there). William was popularly portrayed as "the Second Conqueror" but was actually an increasingly morose figure, seeing a reign of nothing but bloodshed. While the wars ended when France was humiliated by the Louisiana Revolution of 1782-4 - and the new republic happily traded with British North America, boosting the colony's standing - William would remain haunted by Britain suffering the same fate as the Dutch until he died in his sleep.

(4) Ernest didn’t want to be King. The now 54 year old King had spent much of his life in the Army taking part in various conflicts before accepting a post as the Governor of British North America. With the death of his older brother who had left no heirs Ernest was hastily made King and whisked back to a broken Britain. Immediately Ernest let it be known that he didn’t want to be King but that he would hold off abdicating until a suitable heir was sorted out from his various daughters. Ernest’s short rule was more about making sure that Britain economy was up and running and also about increasing the standing of British North America which would be given representatives in Parliament. Ernest’s most important policy though was probably making becoming part of the Continental Alliance which include countries like Prussia, the Holy Roman Empire, Denmark, Italy and many more all united in there hatred towards France. After his Four Months as King Ernest abdicated for a suitable heir and he would head back to British North America, to live out his remaining days expanding the colony and make alliances with the various emerging nations there.

(5) Anne was the second daughter but married to Prince Francesco of the Sicilies, and so having her as monarch would help cement the Italian Collective into the Continental Alliance. Greatly disinterested in the role of monarch and having never expected to have to do it, she was happy enough rubber-stamping the actions of Parliament and going to various diplomatic functions across Europe. This was greatly exploited by the Whigs, who were able to talk her into making public approval of the Reform Act of 1801 that expanded the voting franchise and erased some seats. Unfortunately for Whig free reign, Anne contracted pneumonia on one trip to Denmark and died en route home.

(6) Mary was a lot of things, ambitious, cunning and manipulative, she was also the third daughter of Ernest. Upon succeeding her lackadaisical sister she immediately made herself know, she would become firm friends with the Earl Grey who would become Prime Minister of the new Whig Government. Not long after she would marry rather inexplicably to Alexander I of Russia but this was a way to get the Russian Empire into the Continental Alliance. This would all come to ahead with the War of the Continent in 1810 in which the Continental Alliance would slowly crush the Franco-Spanish alliance over the course of four years. In the 1814 Peace Treaty Britain would gain various French Colonies in India and Asia, cause the creation of the Dutch Empire ruled by the new William of Orange (who was married to Mary’s sister Louise) and secure it’s status as one of the growing powers in Europe.

Mary’s rule after that would be about keeping the various rulers of Europe happy whilst increasing the prestige of Britain further with ventures into China and the Pacific. Meanwhile revolutionary trouble at home would be quashed under the leadership of Lord Byron of the Whigs, alongside this advancements in technology from locomotives to continuous industrialisation would make Mary’s reign be seen as a time of great and profound change. By the time of her death from stomach cancer Mary would be seen as one of the greatest British monarchs in recent times and her death greatly mourned.


(7) Alex was definitely the son of Alexander I of Russia. He was just born a bit early. There was definitely not a strained relationship in the palace.

He was his mother's son, trained to be as cunning and manipulative as her, but the sheer size of the Empire and the growing power of parliament & democratic rule meant there was little need for ambition on his part, nor much scope. He instead continued to act as a geopolitical asset and often played games with (increasingly sharp) MPs and the smarter Lords. It was his mix of bribes, lies, and backstabbing that helped a favoured Prime Minister get Irish Home Rule through the Lords and swing the Irish in letting "Prince/Princess of Ireland" be the second-child version of "Prince/Princess of Wales". In a similar act, he married one of the spare princesses of the Empire of Mexico (white, of course) to shore up the American Peace. While other powers began to establish more colonies in Africa, Britain stuck to its existing empire and might, feeling secure in the world.

In the 1850s, things changed: the old Continental Alliance (now France and Spain were too reduced to be a problem) began to fragment as Italy, the Netherlands, and Denmark all wanted to greater expand into Africa and didn't want the other blocking them. Britain felt this wasn't their issue until international trade began to be affected. Alex once again went out to manipulate and wheeler-deal, but this was a new era and the three nascent empires were less willing to listen. Honour and money were at stake and why shouldn't they have what Britain did? When Alex passed away of the same cancer as his mother, it was seen by doomsayers as an omen that the Long Peace (except for those "minor" shooting matches in Asia) was ending.

(8) It has often been said that there is no better metaphor for the vast changes faced by Britain and the globe in the latter half of the nineteenth century than George II. Initially marked for a naval career, George had barely taken his first command before he was catapulted to first in line after his older brother's death from typhoid and less than a year handed the crown after his father's death. No body initially expected much from the Sailor King, but they were to be surprised be his pragmatism, resolution and even-handedness which set him apart from his predecessors and contemporaries.

At first resistant to the idea of part-taking in politics on the scale his father had, George was soon forced to change his mind when he suddenly sacked his Prime Minister, and father's favourite, Lord Palmerston at the height of the Trieste Affair, an act which probably averted Britain from a continental war is was then unequipped to fight. This was to be telling of George's approach to his ministers, seeing himself as the ringmaster of a circus than a chief puppeteer, a skill which became more valuable as the old division between Whig and Tory collapsed. He often butted heads with the two Prime Ministerial giants that people most associate with the era: Randolph Churchill and his Imperial successors to the Tory legacy for their excesses in the pursuit of death or glory in Africa and the 1895 'devil's pact' with the revanchist Bourbon League; lamented the rise of the 'Celtic fringe' and Home Rule fetishism of D.A. Thomas's continuation Whigs; and shuddered as more of the working class took Morris's Commonweal Party seriously.

As a result of the new Political extremes in Britain, more foreigners believed George to be the only sane man in England. This meant he was almost abused by successive governments as an unofficially official Foreign Secretary, with his yachts nicknamed 'the floating Foreign Office'. This suited George just fine as the chance to play sailor meant he didn't have to mourn the naval career he'd been cheated of quite so much, and also travelled to the farthermost corners of his Empire. He became the first reigning monarch to visit North America in 1860 and did not leave the continent for 5 years, often called the most radical of the colonies history. While there he opened the new House of Assembly for the Colonial representatives which stands to this day in Williamsburg, Virginia, signing the Declaration of Freedom which ended for good and all the exceptions America and the Caribbean had to British abolition of slavery and finally accepted the title Emperor of America cementing British rule of everything East of the Mississippi and North of the Great Lakes.

George's Golden jubilee was high mark of the era, as the largest assembly of crowned heads arrived in London to mark the occasion - for many, it would be the last time they assembled for peace. The outbreak of war in 1910 took George, and the most of the world, totally off guard. His diaries account for his usual frustration with his ministers, but also his fellow monarchs, especially his Scandinavian nephew, Christian X. The strain of the war ultimately proved to much for George. Amidst another quarrel with his Prime Minister, Joseph Chamberlain, over his shared surname with the Emperor of Scandinavia, the King was sent to launch the new Argonaut-class, HMS Alex I. Half-way through the ceremony, the King took ill and was rushed to hospital and died of a heart attack during an attempt to remove a stomach ulcer. It fell to his son to win the peace his father had died for.
 
1856-1912: George II (8)
Replaced by Alex II of Plantagenet of Great Britain
I like what’s happened here, the story of a royal family that starts of poor, gets a bit better, has bad events thrusted on them and after that manages to stabilise the ship and head forward into an uncertain future. Good stuff.

Anyway:

Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911:
1911-1915:
1915-1920:
1920-1930:
1930:
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.
 
Last edited:
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915:
1915-1920:
1920-1930:
1930:
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.
 
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915: David Shakleton (3)
1915-1920:
1920-1930:
1930:
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.

(4) Elected as Leader to draw back those who defected to the LRC, it was hoped that Shakleton's connections within the TUC and the corridors of power in Whitehall would tip the scales back in favour of the ILP. Initially, these hopes were vindicated as he one-uped Glasier by attaching his former Union, the Textile Factory Workers Association, to the ILP and became a hero to the pit workers of Lanarkshire when he averted a strike in winter of 1913 by negotiating a pay rise that would be subsidised by the government. However, what broke his turn as leader would be the Great War - as it was the breaker of so many things. To the surprise of many in Westminster, Shakleton followed the French example and proposed his own 'Union Sacrée' to the British government, a move which angered most of the party and leaders within the movement. They quickly began to view Shakleton, Minister of Labour in the War Government, a traitor as demand for the war took its toll on Industry. In the May Day Coup that brought down the Liberal led government in the wake of the disaster of the Alexandretta Campaign, the ILP extracted Shakleton as its price for continued membership of the National government. After being informed of his dismissal by the new Prime Minister, Shakleton resigned as leader of his Party.
 
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915: David Shakleton (3)
1915-1920: Ben Tillett (4)
1920-1930:
1930:
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.

(3) Elected as Leader to draw back those who defected to the LRC, it was hoped that Shakleton's connections within the TUC and the corridors of power in Whitehall would tip the scales back in favour of the ILP. Initially, these hopes were vindicated as he one-uped Glasier by attaching his former Union, the Textile Factory Workers Association, to the ILP and became a hero to the pit workers of Lanarkshire when he averted a strike in winter of 1913 by negotiating a pay rise that would be subsidised by the government. However, what broke his turn as leader would be the Great War - as it was the breaker of so many things. To the surprise of many in Westminster, Shakleton followed the French example and proposed his own 'Union Sacrée' to the British government, a move which angered most of the party and leaders within the movement. They quickly began to view Shakleton, Minister of Labour in the War Government, a traitor as demand for the war took its toll on Industry. In the May Day Coup that brought down the Liberal led government in the wake of the disaster of the Alexandretta Campaign, the ILP extracted Shakleton as its price for continued membership of the National government. After being informed of his dismissal by the new Prime Minister, Shakleton resigned as leader of his Party.

(5) Ben Tillett’s win over Ramsay MacDonald in the 1915 ILP leadership election showed that the ILP would be supporting the War effort...to a point. Tillett went around the country and managed to convince the Pacifists and Patriotic Socialists to work together to support the War Effort, as he said ‘Support the War today, to ensure a Socialist Britain for tomorrow’. Of course supporting the War Effort didn’t mean he wasn’t open to supporting striking disgruntled workers unlike the Radicals and Liberals and he would support Lansbury and other pacifists in Anti-War trials (though this was more to make sure that the ILP wouldn’t rip itself to pieces). Tillett charismatic leadership would cut a fine image against the backdrop of the horror of the World War.

Ben Tillett’s leadership would allow the ILP to get through the War and in the 1919 election he would lead the ILP to an even better result of 50 seats, as well as gaining the support of the National Union of Miners who saw there toil being ignored by the LRC. In 1920 saying that he had ‘Won the War, now we need someone to win the Peace too’ before stepping down to help with the formation of the Transport and General Workers Union.
 
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915: David Shakleton (3)
1915-1920: Ben Tillett (4)
1920-1930: Ernest Bevin (5)
1930:
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.

(3) Elected as Leader to draw back those who defected to the LRC, it was hoped that Shakleton's connections within the TUC and the corridors of power in Whitehall would tip the scales back in favour of the ILP. Initially, these hopes were vindicated as he one-uped Glasier by attaching his former Union, the Textile Factory Workers Association, to the ILP and became a hero to the pit workers of Lanarkshire when he averted a strike in winter of 1913 by negotiating a pay rise that would be subsidised by the government. However, what broke his turn as leader would be the Great War - as it was the breaker of so many things. To the surprise of many in Westminster, Shakleton followed the French example and proposed his own 'Union Sacrée' to the British government, a move which angered most of the party and leaders within the movement. They quickly began to view Shakleton, Minister of Labour in the War Government, a traitor as demand for the war took its toll on Industry. In the May Day Coup that brought down the Liberal led government in the wake of the disaster of the Alexandretta Campaign, the ILP extracted Shakleton as its price for continued membership of the National government. After being informed of his dismissal by the new Prime Minister, Shakleton resigned as leader of his Party.

(4) Ben Tillett’s win over Ramsay MacDonald in the 1915 ILP leadership election showed that the ILP would be supporting the War effort...to a point. Tillett went around the country and managed to convince the Pacifists and Patriotic Socialists to work together to support the War Effort, as he said ‘Support the War today, to ensure a Socialist Britain for tomorrow’. Of course supporting the War Effort didn’t mean he wasn’t open to supporting striking disgruntled workers unlike the Radicals and Liberals and he would support Lansbury and other pacifists in Anti-War trials (though this was more to make sure that the ILP wouldn’t rip itself to pieces). Tillett charismatic leadership would cut a fine image against the backdrop of the horror of the World War.

Ben Tillett’s leadership would allow the ILP to get through the War and in the 1919 election he would lead the ILP to an even better result of 50 seats, as well as gaining the support of the National Union of Miners who saw there toil being ignored by the LRC. In 1920 saying that he had ‘Won the War, now we need someone to win the Peace too’ before stepping down to help with the formation of the Transport and General Workers Union.


(5) A firebrand MP for just a few years, Bevin was an unlikely leader but won for his hardline anticommunist views as much of his union history - while the 'left' of the party was split, the 'right' backed him and it thus proved extremely hard for anyone to present his party as stooges of the Soviet bogeyman. By being a 'man we can talk to', Bevin was able to win concessions on workers' rights and conditions in exchange for ILP backing of the government on other issues. One of his big achievements was getting the government to force a minimum wage on coal mines, which in the long term kept wages down but in the short term of the 20s meant many men didn't suffer. Despite the economic crises of the 1920s, Britain suffered far fewer strikes than you'd have expected due to Bevin's Westminster dealings and iron-fist control of his party. The obvious downside is a chunk of the left began to see him as having sold out, and the dying LRC was slowly brought back as people defected from the ILP to it - a reversal of Keir's day!

The 1929 election was the height of Bevin's reign: eighty-seven seats, enough to force greater concessions out of the government than ever before if it wanted to achieve anything. Then the Great Depression hit the country in the face. Bevin agreed to be part of a government of national unity and this meant having to agree to far more Tory plans than he'd intended, while the LRC could say that the ILP was having its shot and failing. When Bevin had to drop a push for state pensions, the ILP finally revolted and he was convinced to resign rather than allow the party to war with itself.
 
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915: David Shakleton (3)
1915-1920: Ben Tillett (4)
1920-1930: Ernest Bevin (5)
1930: Susan Lawrence (6)
1930-1937:
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.

(3) Elected as Leader to draw back those who defected to the LRC, it was hoped that Shakleton's connections within the TUC and the corridors of power in Whitehall would tip the scales back in favour of the ILP. Initially, these hopes were vindicated as he one-uped Glasier by attaching his former Union, the Textile Factory Workers Association, to the ILP and became a hero to the pit workers of Lanarkshire when he averted a strike in winter of 1913 by negotiating a pay rise that would be subsidised by the government. However, what broke his turn as leader would be the Great War - as it was the breaker of so many things. To the surprise of many in Westminster, Shakleton followed the French example and proposed his own 'Union Sacrée' to the British government, a move which angered most of the party and leaders within the movement. They quickly began to view Shakleton, Minister of Labour in the War Government, a traitor as demand for the war took its toll on Industry. In the May Day Coup that brought down the Liberal led government in the wake of the disaster of the Alexandretta Campaign, the ILP extracted Shakleton as its price for continued membership of the National government. After being informed of his dismissal by the new Prime Minister, Shakleton resigned as leader of his Party.

(4) Ben Tillett’s win over Ramsay MacDonald in the 1915 ILP leadership election showed that the ILP would be supporting the War effort...to a point. Tillett went around the country and managed to convince the Pacifists and Patriotic Socialists to work together to support the War Effort, as he said ‘Support the War today, to ensure a Socialist Britain for tomorrow’. Of course supporting the War Effort didn’t mean he wasn’t open to supporting striking disgruntled workers unlike the Radicals and Liberals and he would support Lansbury and other pacifists in Anti-War trials (though this was more to make sure that the ILP wouldn’t rip itself to pieces). Tillett charismatic leadership would cut a fine image against the backdrop of the horror of the World War.

Ben Tillett’s leadership would allow the ILP to get through the War and in the 1919 election he would lead the ILP to an even better result of 50 seats, as well as gaining the support of the National Union of Miners who saw there toil being ignored by the LRC. In 1920 saying that he had ‘Won the War, now we need someone to win the Peace too’ before stepping down to help with the formation of the Transport and General Workers Union.


(5) A firebrand MP for just a few years, Bevin was an unlikely leader but won for his hardline anticommunist views as much of his union history - while the 'left' of the party was split, the 'right' backed him and it thus proved extremely hard for anyone to present his party as stooges of the Soviet bogeyman. By being a 'man we can talk to', Bevin was able to win concessions on workers' rights and conditions in exchange for ILP backing of the government on other issues. One of his big achievements was getting the government to force a minimum wage on coal mines, which in the long term kept wages down but in the short term of the 20s meant many men didn't suffer. Despite the economic crises of the 1920s, Britain suffered far fewer strikes than you'd have expected due to Bevin's Westminster dealings and iron-fist control of his party. The obvious downside is a chunk of the left began to see him as having sold out, and the dying LRC was slowly brought back as people defected from the ILP to it - a reversal of Keir's day!

The 1929 election was the height of Bevin's reign: eighty-seven seats, enough to force greater concessions out of the government than ever before if it wanted to achieve anything. Then the Great Depression hit the country in the face. Bevin agreed to be part of a government of national unity and this meant having to agree to far more Tory plans than he'd intended, while the LRC could say that the ILP was having its shot and failing. When Bevin had to drop a push for state pensions, the ILP finally revolted and he was convinced to resign rather than allow the party to war with itself.

(6) As secretary of the ILP Parliamentary Group it fell to Susan Lawrence to not only formally wield the knife that brought down Bevin, but also to step in as the de-facto Leader of the Opposition for three weeks as her male colleagues fought a short but viscous war of succession. By all accounts she handled the task with aplomb, and she handed over the leadership to a more permanent successor Prime Minister Chamberlain could be overheard claiming that "had she been a man she would sit where I sit now," a quote she not without irony had inscribed at her headstone.
 
Leaders of the Independent Labour Party:

1893-1908: Kier Hardie (1)
1908-1911: Bruce Glasier (2)
1911-1915: David Shakleton (3)
1915-1920: Ben Tillett (4)
1920-1930: Ernest Bevin (5)
1930: Susan Lawrence (6)
1930-1937: Philip Snowden (7)
1937-1939:
1939-1948:
1948:
Merged with ___ to form the ___

(1). Hardie’s leadership of the ILP would be one of missed opportunities finally finishing in triumph. Attempts to form the Labour Representation Committee in 1899 failed due to certain Union leaders being suspicious of forming an alliance with the ILP which was made up of a grab bag of Marxists, Democratic Socialists, Labour folk and Christian Socialists and also believing having a Labour Party would kneecap there bargaining power with the Government.

Despite it all the ILP managed to gain strength to strength going from 2 MPs in 1900 to 8 by the 1906 election. It was around that time that the janky Lib-Lab alliance which had been running on fumes for awhile finally collapsed leading to several Liberal MPs joining the ILP whilst the Liberals would split into the Liberal and Radical Liberal strains. By 1908 as Hardie left to continue his passionate campaigns for Worker Rights, Universal Suffrage and Women’s Suffrage the Party was looking like it would be a strong third party.

(2) A dark horse in the leadership struggle elected as a compromise, Glasier's leadership was ultimately defined by the looming shadow of his predecessor, even if Kier himself was busy bothering the Indian government. Further attempts to reach out to the unions were made, and not all of them ended in failure--the National Railwaymen's Union were happy to start donating to the new party rather than the Radicals. Nevertheless, the consensus that the Glasier era represented more of a holding pattern than a genuine movement forwards is usually regarded as accurate by historians, with most of the growth in the party (up to 15 seats after the 1911 election) more down to Liberal-Labour types being alienated by the overpowering dominance of Lloyd-George and switching to the LRC. Glasier took the election as an excuse to finally step down and return to his literary career, and he would remain editor of the Labour Leader until his death from cancer nine years later.

(3) Elected as Leader to draw back those who defected to the LRC, it was hoped that Shakleton's connections within the TUC and the corridors of power in Whitehall would tip the scales back in favour of the ILP. Initially, these hopes were vindicated as he one-uped Glasier by attaching his former Union, the Textile Factory Workers Association, to the ILP and became a hero to the pit workers of Lanarkshire when he averted a strike in winter of 1913 by negotiating a pay rise that would be subsidised by the government. However, what broke his turn as leader would be the Great War - as it was the breaker of so many things. To the surprise of many in Westminster, Shakleton followed the French example and proposed his own 'Union Sacrée' to the British government, a move which angered most of the party and leaders within the movement. They quickly began to view Shakleton, Minister of Labour in the War Government, a traitor as demand for the war took its toll on Industry. In the May Day Coup that brought down the Liberal led government in the wake of the disaster of the Alexandretta Campaign, the ILP extracted Shakleton as its price for continued membership of the National government. After being informed of his dismissal by the new Prime Minister, Shakleton resigned as leader of his Party.

(4) Ben Tillett’s win over Ramsay MacDonald in the 1915 ILP leadership election showed that the ILP would be supporting the War effort...to a point. Tillett went around the country and managed to convince the Pacifists and Patriotic Socialists to work together to support the War Effort, as he said ‘Support the War today, to ensure a Socialist Britain for tomorrow’. Of course supporting the War Effort didn’t mean he wasn’t open to supporting striking disgruntled workers unlike the Radicals and Liberals and he would support Lansbury and other pacifists in Anti-War trials (though this was more to make sure that the ILP wouldn’t rip itself to pieces). Tillett charismatic leadership would cut a fine image against the backdrop of the horror of the World War.

Ben Tillett’s leadership would allow the ILP to get through the War and in the 1919 election he would lead the ILP to an even better result of 50 seats, as well as gaining the support of the National Union of Miners who saw there toil being ignored by the LRC. In 1920 saying that he had ‘Won the War, now we need someone to win the Peace too’ before stepping down to help with the formation of the Transport and General Workers Union.


(5) A firebrand MP for just a few years, Bevin was an unlikely leader but won for his hardline anticommunist views as much of his union history - while the 'left' of the party was split, the 'right' backed him and it thus proved extremely hard for anyone to present his party as stooges of the Soviet bogeyman. By being a 'man we can talk to', Bevin was able to win concessions on workers' rights and conditions in exchange for ILP backing of the government on other issues. One of his big achievements was getting the government to force a minimum wage on coal mines, which in the long term kept wages down but in the short term of the 20s meant many men didn't suffer. Despite the economic crises of the 1920s, Britain suffered far fewer strikes than you'd have expected due to Bevin's Westminster dealings and iron-fist control of his party. The obvious downside is a chunk of the left began to see him as having sold out, and the dying LRC was slowly brought back as people defected from the ILP to it - a reversal of Keir's day!

The 1929 election was the height of Bevin's reign: eighty-seven seats, enough to force greater concessions out of the government than ever before if it wanted to achieve anything. Then the Great Depression hit the country in the face. Bevin agreed to be part of a government of national unity and this meant having to agree to far more Tory plans than he'd intended, while the LRC could say that the ILP was having its shot and failing. When Bevin had to drop a push for state pensions, the ILP finally revolted and he was convinced to resign rather than allow the party to war with itself.

(6) As secretary of the ILP Parliamentary Group it fell to Susan Lawrence to not only formally wield the knife that brought down Bevin, but also to step in as the de-facto Leader of the Opposition for three weeks as her male colleagues fought a short but viscous war of succession. By all accounts she handled the task with aplomb, and she handed over the leadership to a more permanent successor Prime Minister Chamberlain could be overheard claiming that "had she been a man she would sit where I sit now," a quote she not without irony had inscribed at her headstone.

(7) After seeing the work that Lawrence had done at the dispatch box, there were few within the ILP who were not by that point champing at the bit to take her place. Because of this it's perhaps fitting that the likes of Philip Snowden would take her place, a man who had not volunteered himself for the job nor had a particular desire for it. Nevertheless, to stop the likes of Oswald Mosley, George Strauss or Arthur Greenwood taking the job in their own divisive direction, Snowden was propped up as a compromise candidate who could keep the young whippersnappers in line. He didn't disappoint. He cut to pieces Chamberlain regularly on a weekly basis on every topic from India to Imperial Preference. After a year in the job, PMQs was the worst day of the week for the Government.

In 1933, Snowden threw everything he had at a do-or-die charge for Number 10 to smash the National Government, and he succeeded... just. A deal had to be made, ultimately with the Lloyd George Radicals to ensure that Snowden would get the keys to power. Frankly, they were glad to join Snowden and sold themselves comparatively cheap considering how tight they had been to the Tories a few weeks earlier.

For a government made up of such avowed movers for reform, the end result was quite conservative in its expectations: this was mainly due to the success Snowden did in building his Cabinet, effectively giving everyone the wrong job. The harbinger of economic reform, Mosley was suddenly cowed as a Foreign Secretary that was desperate for photo ops with visiting dignitaries; Cripps, who wanted to embrace the Soviet Union as long-lost brothers, was suited to the Home Office as only a lawyer could be; finally, Greenwood made a celebrated Chancellor, nursing the country back to economic recovery, even though he was loathe to increase the armament spending Mosley's Policies warranted. Although the Four men were all larger than life, with there own incompatible ideas on how to run the country, they did their best - which was better than many expected.

However, as the years ticked by, and Europe became a more divided camp - so to did the Cabinet, over that very issue. While Mosley threw his weight around Europe, many in the ILP felt he was ignoring the threat of Fascism. In splitting Ethiopia with Balbo and forcing France to do a deal with Göring over the Saar, Mosley thought he was creating a united front against Bolshevism, which Cripps and the ILP at large didn't appreciate, nor Snowden and Greenwood despite their supposed indifference. Cabinet tensions continued to rise until the quarrelling took its toll on Snowden, working himself to death with an upcoming election, the ILP's very first Prime Minister suddenly dropped dead over a letter of resignation to the King.
 
Back
Top