Of Profumo Affair?1973-1978 John Profumo (Conservative Majority)
Yes.Of Profumo Affair?
read down too far and briefly thought Pennsylvania Josh was prime minister somehowRazor Edge
2015-2015 David Cameron (Conservative Minority with DUP support and confidence)
May 2015: David Cameron-Conservative [317],Ed Miliband-Labour [248],Nicola Sturgeon-SNP [58],Nick Clegg-Liberal Democratic [5],Leanne Wood-Plaid Cymru [4],Nigel Farage-UKIP [1],Natalie Bennett-Green [1]
2015 European Membership Referendum: 52,07% In
2015-2021 Andy Burnham (Labour Minority with SNP and Liberal Democratic support and confidence)
December 2015: David Cameron-Conservative [297],Andy Burnham-Labour [271],Nicola Sturgeon-SNP [48],Tim Farron*-Liberal Democratic [7],Leanne Wood-Plaid Cymru [4],Nigel Farage-UKIP [3],Natalie Bennett-Green [1]
2020: Theresa May-Conservative [307],Andy Burnham-Labour [250],Nicola Sturgeon-SNP [48],Sir Vince Cable-Liberal Democratic [18],Nigel Farage-UKIP [3],Adam Price-Plaid Cymru [2],Adrian Ramsey-Green [2]
2021-present day Rachel Reeves (Labour Minority with SNP and Liberal Democratic support and confidence)
2017-2025 Marco Rubio/Nikki Haley (Republican)
2016 def: Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine (Democratic)
2020 def: Elizabeth Warren/Amy Klobuchar (Democratic),Mark Sargent/Edgar Bravo (Independent)
2025-present day Josh Shapiro/Cory Booker (Democratic)
do they win the franco-prussian war somehow?1870-1895 Émile Ollivier (Bonapartist Majority,Bonapartist led War Government,Bonapartist Majority)
1874: Émile Ollivier-Bonapartist [212],Adolphe Thiers-Legitimist [41],Léon Gambetta-Republicans [30]
1882: Émile Ollivier-Bonapartist [276],various Pro War Republicans [7]
1887: Émile Ollivier-Bonapartist [256],Daniel Wilson-Republicans [17],Désiré Barodet-Populares [10]
1892: Émile Ollivier-Bonapartist [226],Daniel Wilson-Republicans [32],Désiré Barodet-Populares [25]
1895-1906 Georges Thiébaud (Bonapartist Majority)
1897: Georges Thiebaud-Bonapartist [196],Georges Clemenceau-Populares [45],Daniel Wilson-Republicans [42]
1902: Georges Thiebaud-Bonapartist [192],Georges Clemenceau-Populares [47],Adolphe Carnot-Republicans [44]
1906-1908 Joachim Murat VI (Bonapartist Majority)
1906: Joachim Murat VI-Bonapartist [188],Georges Clemenceau-Populares [49],Charles Jonnart-Republicans [46]
1908-1913 Joachim Murat VI (Reformist Bonapartist Minority,Reformist Bonapartist-Republican Coalition)
1908: Joachim Murat VI-Reformist Bonapartist [143],Georges Clemenceau-Populares [64],Charles Jonnart-Republicans [61],Jules-Albert de Dion-Conservative Bonapartist [25]
1913-1915 Joachim Murat VI (Reformist Bonapartist Minority)
1913: Joachim Murat VI-Reformist Bonapartist [133],Stephen Pichon-Populares [125],various Independent Republicans [25]
1914: Stephen Pichon-Populares [140],Joachim Murat VI-Reformist Bonapartist [118],various Independent Republicans [25]
1915-19xx Stephen Pichon (Populares Minority with Independent Republicans support and confidence)
1915: Stephen Pichon-Populares [148],Joachim Murat VI-Reformist Bonapartist [103],various Independent Republicans [32]
No Franco Prussian War actually,Bismarck dies in 1866 and a World War happens in 1878 over the Dardanelles (like it nearly happened OTL,that Dizzy I tell ya),with Britain,France and the Ottomans on one side and the Germans and Russians on the other.do they win the franco-prussian war somehow?
very romanian of you to make a Second French Empire wank. it assumes the later Bonapartes are less… harebrained than others.No Franco Prussian War actually,Bismarck dies in 1866 and a World War happens in 1878 over the Dardanelles (like it nearly happened OTL,that Dizzy I tell ya),with Britain,France and the Ottomans on one side and the Germans and Russians on the other.
With the Bonapartists getting lucky repeatedly but without the necessary personalism of Boney III,the Third Empire eventually turns into a crowned parliamentarian republic of sorts as it chugs along. Ollivier is relatively competent enough to make the economy acceptable for most and with a gradual liberalization and constant referendums the Republicans are mostly located within the city of Paris. The situation prior to the Franco-Prussian War is maintained and,like OTL,no one outside of Paris really believes in republicanism anymore truthfully.
The Populares only win due to fatigue and the division between the conservative and the reformist Bonapartists created by Murat wanting a changing of the guard and more profund reforms. His anti corruption campaign (started by Thiébaud but taken to the next level by Murat and the Young Wolves in the cabinet) starts backfiring once his coterie‘s own dirty dealings are revealed.
Also the Legitimists and other Russophile forced end up being banned and sent to jail due to their failed plots to overthrow the Emperor during the War.
Radicals of any kind (or more specifically those radicals who the President of the Council views as a threat to the nation),including conservatives,are mostly absent in the mainstream due to them ending up in jail/exiled and the War ending up favorably for France. There are a couple of anarchists and Blaqui followers still around but they’re marginals,the Parisians are divided between the old guard of Republicans and the new ones like Clemenceau.very romanian of you to make a Second French Empire wank. it assumes the later Bonapartes are less… harebrained than others.
it’d say the parisians still have a shot at Doing A Republic if shit gets bad enough again, especially during a war. How’s socialism doing? how banned is it, and is there a radical underground? it feels with a parliamentary monarchy if there’s enough bourgeois consolidation (in what seems like a pretty conservative democracy) the labour movement must be gaining steam becauee Arc of History blah blah blah
it'd argue that apathy is surprisingly dangerous ground if the going ever gets tough; there'd probably be a fair amount of trouble (maybe some blood) in an economic downturn, or at least a labour politics movement ala BritlabRadicals of any kind (or more specifically those radicals who the President of the Council views as a threat to the nation),including conservatives,are mostly absent in the mainstream due to them ending up in jail/exiled and the War ending up favorably for France. There are a couple of anarchists and Blaqui followers still around but they’re marginals,the Parisians are divided between the old guard of Republicans and the new ones like Clemenceau.
Due to the contradictions of Bonapartism,the parliamentary monarchy is both conservative and radical,being a proto Peronism/ Gaullism. The France of 1915 isn’t too different from how the Third Republic felt like,just slightly more similar to,say,pre 1970’s Ireland or a more stable Argentina. Ollivier and his successors mostly manage to appease the labour movement and when they do a mistake either they try fixing it or the population at large doesn’t care. Remember,even after 1871 a vast majority of France was at best apathetic towards the Republic.
Not good,not terrible basically.
Oh yes,definitely.it'd argue that apathy is surprisingly dangerous ground if the going ever gets tough; there'd probably be a fair amount of trouble (maybe some blood) in an economic downturn, or at least a labour politics movement ala Britlab
Presidents of the Georgia RepublicCaesars of the Bayou
Presidents of the Louisiana Republic
1859-1860 Thomas O Moore (Democratic Whig)
1860-1876 P.G.T. Beauregard (National Salvation Committee)
-start of First Louisiana Civil War (1876-1878) between various Warlords-
1878-1891 John McEnery (National Party of Louisiana)
1879 def: Charles Gayarré (People’s Rights)
1880 Constitutional Referendum: 52,07% For,NPL to become sole legal party
1889 def: unopposed
1891-1911 Samuel McEnery (National Party of Louisiana)
1891 def: Francis Nicholls (Independent)
1901 def: John Thornton (Independent)
1911: Charles Gayarré (Write In),Leander Perez (Independent)-CANCELLED ELECTION BY SUPREME COURT ORDER
-start of Second Louisiana Civil War (1911-1912) and the Flat Cap Revolution-