• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

What if The USA Entered WW2 in Early 1941?

ChrisNuttall

Well-known member
I wrote this for POD. I thought it might interest a few people here.

What if The USA Entered WW2 in Early 1941?



I did a version of this earlier, but I thought it was worth exploring a little more.



What Actually Happened




In early 1941, the German Battleship Bismarck was heading out to sweep the Atlantic and the British were mobilising to sink her. She was hit and forced to try to make her way back to Brest, which started her on a path to her eventual sinking. Unknown (perhaps) to the Germans, there were a handful of American vessels in the Atlantic at the time, including a pair of older model battleships. As it happened, the German and American ships never openly met before Bismarck was sunk.



What Might Have Happened



The chain of events that led to Bismarck being sunk were so unlikely that it is quite possible she might have been able to continue her cruise into the Atlantic. If that happened, it is possible she would have encountered one of the American ships. The US crews did have orders to radio warnings to their British counterparts, even though Washington was technically neutral. The Germans bitterly resented this. Worse, there would have been a very real chance the Germans would have mistook the American ships for British and started shooting. If this happened, the most likely result would be the sinking of the US ship. This gives FDR the excuse required to bring America into the war after the ‘sneak’ German attack on an American ship.



What now?



The US Navy would join the Royal Navy in hunting the Bismarck. Britain would have the time to mass a stronger fleet to confront the German ship, then probably catch her as she made the run back home. The UK would be able to make a big song and dance about avenging the US sailors killed by the treacherous Germans. It would also make it harder for Japan to believe the UK was weak, perhaps dissuading the Japanese from joining the war ahead of time. Pearl Harbour was always a gamble. It would be a great deal more dangerous if the US is actively at war, if not with the Japanese.



Hitler might try to smooth things over, as he hasn’t gone east (yet). I don’t think he’d be willing to make massive concessions, even if he was rational enough to believe the US needed to be placated. (Historically, Hitler never thought much of the US until it was far too late). In this case, the US can declare war and start ramping up war production well ahead of OTL, as well as shifting ships to the Atlantic. The real question is ... would the Germans still go east? It’s hard to say. The preparations for Barbarossa were well on their way, with a planned launch date in late June. If Hitler changed his mind ...



Germany is in trouble. From an economic point of view, Germany needs supplies from Russia to maintain its war machine. At the same time, Germany suddenly has a new and powerful enemy at the worst possible time. Trying to take what they need from Stalin might work, but it would be a gamble. As American naval power flows into the Atlantic, and the u-boats start taking a beating because there are more escorts available to patrol the sea lanes and escort convoys to their destination. Hitler might decide the US has to be beaten, or at least convinced to back off, before he stakes everything on Barbarossa.



That said, he doesn’t have many options. Invading Britain is a pipe dream. Invading America is even worse. Hitler might be able to take control of the Med and turn it into a German lake, but at the expense of passing on Barbarossa for the next few months. It isn’t a complete disaster, from the German POV, but Stalin will be a great deal stronger in 1942.



Let’s say Hitler shifts resources to the Med. He brings immense pressure to bear on Spain, trying to convince Franco to take Gibraltar. Franco isn’t so sure, but he has less room to manoeuvre in this timeline. The Germans target Malta with parachute troops, what remains of them, and start turning the island into a forward base. German aircraft roam the Med, cutting the convoy links between Britain and Egypt. Vichy France is forced to open bases to German aircraft, perhaps even supply German troops. With Hitler on their borders, the French have little choice.



This has serious effects as Rommel heads east. Historically, the British had immense trouble keeping him from taking Europe and crossing the Suez. Now, Egypt rises in revolt as the Germans punch through the defences and keep going. The British fall back to the canal, intent on using it as a barrier to keep the Germans from getting any further east. They have trouble in the rear, as Arabs revolts break out to the east and Jewish and Arab factions start battling in Palestine. Turkey makes matters worse by rattling the sabre, demanding concessions in Mosel or else.



Churchill and FDR disagree about how to approach the war. FDR wants to put together a massive invasion of France, while Churchill wants to secure Britain’s position in the Middle East, retake North Africa and even thrust into the ‘soft underbelly’ of Europe. Churchill is uneasily aware that American power is already growing, that it is just a matter of time before Britain is eclipsed completely. The US is already generating a sizable number of regiments and shifting war production into high gear. They’re untested as yet, but that too is just a matter of time.



Hitler keeps supplies flowing to Rommel while moving Panzer divisions to the Turkish border. Once they’re in place, he gives the Turks an ultimatum. If they join Germany as an ally, they can keep large chunks of the British Empire. If they refuse, Hitler will take Turkey and treat the Turks as an enemy nation (perhaps in alliance with the Russians). The Turks go back and forth a lot - they do want the territory, but they don’t trust Hitler to keep his word (and they’re not sure who’ll win the war either) They also know they can’t keep Hitler from overrunning European Turkey and, perhaps with the Russians, invading Asian Turkey either. They reluctantly agree to ally with Hitler.



German troops flood across the border and push down into Palestine, linking up with Arab rebels and stabbing a knife into Britain’s back. British forces withdraw into Iraq, leaving Jewish fighters to fight and die; Iraq rises as Turkish forces head south, triggering another series of bloody engagements. The British fall into Iran, ignoring the country’s neutrality and set up defensive lines along the Indian border. They have a breathing space as the Germans find themselves not only outrunning their logistics, but having to consolidate their gains.



So ... where do we go from here?



Japan is the wild card - they might stab Britain and America in the back as they did in OTL. On the other hand, there would be a great deal to gain by either staying out of the fighting or trying to ally with the US/UK. That would be an easier sell if the Allies desperately need the help.



The USSR isn’t going to be invaded, at least not in the remainder of 1941. Stalin may choose to push south himself, into Afghanistan and/or Iran, effectively serving as Hitler’s military ally. He may also wage war on the Japanese instead, gambling he can take most of Manchuria and Korea before Hitler invades or the Japanese manage to stop him. Or he can wait, build up his forces and see what happens. The prospect of the Allies and the Nazis bleeding each other dry cannot help, but be appealing to him.



The US is going to get very powerful very quickly, as it builds up its forces. By the end of 1941, it is already well on the way to putting together a much larger navy and air force. The ground forces are going to be stronger, but their tanks and suchlike are going to be less effective than their German counterparts. FDR still wants an invasion of Europe, but he’s also concerned with events in the middle east. Losing the Saudi oil wells is not an immediate problem, but it’s likely to become one fairly quickly.



So ... where do we go from here?
 
I don't think this is sufficient to bring the United States into the war, nor do I think Hitler would be as boneheaded as presented to allow it to occur:

NOVEMBER 22

EUROPEAN WAR

Interviewing Date 11/7-12/41

Survey #252-K Question #11

It has been suggested that Congress pass a resolution declaring that a state of war exists between the United States and Germany. Would you favor or oppose such a resolution at this time?

Favor.............................. 26%

Oppose.............................63

No opinion......................... 11

Less than a month from Pearl Harbor and as the Germans advanced on Moscow nearly two thirds of Americans were still opposed to entry into the conflict; this despite the Reuben James and other events which had resulted in serious loss of American lives. Americans had been responding in the affirmative to "eventually" getting into the war since almost 1939, the problem therein is that such sentiments were the future nature of such questions, in that such always involved some sort of uncertain date of involvement; in effect, useless platitudes. Likewise, Hitler was well aware of the danger of bringing the United States into the war as this stage, which explains the extremely restrictive ROE he placed upon the Kriegsmarine in 1941 to prevent such an eventuality.
 
Good points, but:

First, there would be a much bigger incident here - a battleship has been sunk in open combat, which is a great deal harder to blow off (even if Hitler grovels, which he won't).

Second, Hitler doesn't have much say in the matter. If the incident happens, the choice of declaring war is in American hands. (Unless we assume he decides to get it over with and declare war himself, anyway.)

Chris
 
Good points, but:

First, there would be a much bigger incident here - a battleship has been sunk in open combat, which is a great deal harder to blow off (even if Hitler grovels, which he won't).

Second, Hitler doesn't have much say in the matter. If the incident happens, the choice of declaring war is in American hands. (Unless we assume he decides to get it over with and declare war himself, anyway.)

Chris

See the sinking of the USS Reuben James and the damaging of the USS Kearny in late 1941, which caused American casualties in the hundreds. Rather than provoke a war, it provoked a Congressional response that prevented one at that time. I don't see how the response will be any different here, especially since in early 1941 the isolationists were much stronger given the strategic situation of the time and the fact there's the rather obvious question of why American battleships were that far out into the Atlantic to pick fights with the Germans in first place. Beyond all of that though, assuming Bismarck did encounter the American battleships, a lot would have to go wrong to get an engagement going and then to become so heated that it results in an American battleship sunk. Even if such were to occur, the obvious response by Hitler would be to disavow the commander of the Bismarck and then issue restrictive ROE, which occurred OTL anyway.
 
See the sinking of the USS Reuben James and the damaging of the USS Kearny in late 1941, which caused American casualties in the hundreds. Rather than provoke a war, it provoked a Congressional response that prevented one at that time. I don't see how the response will be any different here, especially since in early 1941 the isolationists were much stronger given the strategic situation of the time and the fact there's the rather obvious question of why American battleships were that far out into the Atlantic to pick fights with the Germans in first place. Beyond all of that though, assuming Bismarck did encounter the American battleships, a lot would have to go wrong to get an engagement going and then to become so heated that it results in an American battleship sunk. Even if such were to occur, the obvious response by Hitler would be to disavow the commander of the Bismarck and then issue restrictive ROE, which occurred OTL anyway.

Both of which were a lot more ambiguous than an outright clash between a trio of battleships. Isolationists could certainly make a case the destroyers were hit by accident or that they started it by getting involved in convoy protection. A battleship or two being sunk by accident would be a far harder incident to dismiss.

Chris
 
TBH I'm not sure this would result in war, it certainly could but it could as easily not.

The USA was heading distinctly towards war by the period and Rooservelt was fishing around for an excuse but the Axis did the hard part for him, however they also were well aware that American material was flooding the Allied Nations and American ships were sinking theirs and the American embargo was crippling Japan.

So there is always a chance they make the same calculation they did OTL and decide in for a penny in for a pound. Though if you want a USA joins WWII scenario there are probably much more plausible ways to do it.
 
Though are we talking here about a plausible way to get America in by early 1941 or about what happens if they did, for whatever reason, enter in early 1941? (The former means there are probably better ways to bring them in but they could be during different times which affect what happens when they turn up, like if America due to mumble-mumble has declared war before Hitler hits the Low Countries does it change how France responds to invasion, does it makes Hitler do Sea Lion in mad desperation to cut the US off etc)
 
Though are we talking here about a plausible way to get America in by early 1941 or about what happens if they did, for whatever reason, enter in early 1941? (The former means there are probably better ways to bring them in but they could be during different times which affect what happens when they turn up, like if America due to mumble-mumble has declared war before Hitler hits the Low Countries does it change how France responds to invasion, does it makes Hitler do Sea Lion in mad desperation to cut the US off etc)

I'm not sure how to get the US involved before 1941, barring a major disaster - U-Boat sinks a battleship instead? Assuming that happened in 1940, the US would still need much more time to get ready before it could have a major impact.
 
Both of which were a lot more ambiguous than an outright clash between a trio of battleships. Isolationists could certainly make a case the destroyers were hit by accident or that they started it by getting involved in convoy protection. A battleship or two being sunk by accident would be a far harder incident to dismiss.

Chris

Battleships getting into a scuffle would be far harder to portray as reckless German aggression, however, since Destroyers could hide behind the claim of protecting American commerce and/or civilian lives. Further, to see the engagement become so heated as to have one American vessel sink would require either the Germans or the Americans to act reckless to an extent that does not fit the historical record in terms of the personalities on the former side while the latter would result in Congress and the American public having many questions about why exactly the U.S. Navy is acting without orders far into the Atlantic.
 
In OTL, Bismarck was sunk in May 1941. I think in ATL the US would enter the war in June 1941.

Chris

Chris, I honestly think that Hitler's instinct here, after the Bismarck sinking a US battleship, in May or June, will be to declare war on the United States and unleash the submarines, because he will probably assume the US will declare war, and will want to get his declaration in first.

It's all well and good what other posters have said that people in the US will be able to ask what the hell the US battleship was doing so close the British-German gunfight, but I don't think Hitler will give that situation enough time to boil on its own for FDR to get into trouble. Hitler will declare war, launch wider attacks, and leave the US without a choice but to fight. Maybe a half dozen in the House and Senate each will vote against the DoW and be a caucus of suspicion, but the grudge-holders won't materially hamper the war.

I also think that by this point, especially if the mutual sinkings have waiting until June, that it is far, far too late for Hitler to abort the invasion of Russia and switch gears. He will just enjoy being crazy like a fox brag to his high command about how much *more* surprised and caught out the Soviets will be now, and how helpless the Western Allies will be to do anything about it.

Some of the big questions after this are if the U-Boat arm is as capable of launching its broad Atlantic and Caribbean offensive five months early as it was from December 1945 onward? Would early US ASW be as bad as OTL? Would the US, starting from a lower base, mobilize faster and be ready to land forces in the ETO earlier in 1942?

The other huge variable is Japan. Can Japan be kept out of the war? I think it is tough to do so. The US will probably try to be more diplomatic with Japan and will not declare outright embargoes or asset freezes against Japan, but it will still guard the Far East and warn against Japanese expansion north or south. Plus, with the US's own mobilization, it won't be able to justify exporting strategic minerals like petroleum for long, so that becomes a de facto embargo. Without a formal embargo, Japan may see the writing on the wall anyway. The US may be on higher wartime alerts, reducing tactical surprise, but the Pacific will still not be the forward theater, and the Philippines and Guam and Wake and Malaya/Singapore and DEI all really aren't defensible in the event of attack.
 
Hey Chris and everyone - what do you think about my Japan-related speculations?

I went back and forth on Japan, to be honest. The Japanese might stay out of the war if the US, focusing on Germany, decided not to tighten the sanctions any further. There’s also the prospect of Japan declaring war on Germany, in the hopes of making the sanctions politically unviable. (Probably ASB, but never mind.) In this world, with a POD before Barbarossa and Pearl Harbour, there would be at least some room for thinking ‘now we finish off the Chinese’ or ‘we have to keep our guard up as the Russians might attack as the Germans are distracted.’

Assuming the Japanese stay out of the war a little longer, they’ll soon see the US growing rapidly in power and decide (if they’re rational) to avoid the war if possible.

Assuming they do join the war, it will be harder to do Pearl Harbour in this timeline. (They might wait in hopes of US troops being removed from the Philippines and the other US possessions.) The fighting will be a great deal more conventional as a lot of US ships will have been sent to the Atlantic, and without a surprise attack to start the war the Japanese might not be seen as the complete monsters of OTL.

(That said, we might just get a Japanese invasion of either Australia or India as both targets will be considerably weaker than OTL.)

Chris
 
Both of which were a lot more ambiguous than an outright clash between a trio of battleships. Isolationists could certainly make a case the destroyers were hit by accident or that they started it by getting involved in convoy protection. A battleship or two being sunk by accident would be a far harder incident to dismiss.

Chris

Historically they didn't use the "It was a mistake" aspect to attack the administration; the fact American Destroyers were that far out in the Atlantic fighting with the Germans was the issue itself. As for Hitler's role, it's important to note he historically didn't resort to aggression when incidents previously cited occurred, he instead restricted ROE on his own Navy so as to not provoke the United States to war. His ultimate decision to seek alliance with Japan and become open to it was based on the strategic circumstances of the second half of 1941 as it appeared triumph was about to be had over the USSR; he thought the combined resources of his Empire and that of Japan would be sufficient to take on the United States. He was right, except for the part he had failed to defeat the USSR in actuality.

In short, I don't see a way to get Bismarck to sink two American battleships, it doesn't fit with what we know about the officers commanding her nor the German ROE at the time. I could see an accidental exchange of fire, of course, but that seems incredibly unlikely to escalate. If it does some how happen, it would thus depend on Hitler acting in such a manner that does not fit with what we know of his thinking at the time.
 
Back
Top