ChrisNuttall
Well-known member
A while back, I was reading ‘The Last Emperor of Mexico’ (highly recommend) about the French-led bid to put Archduke Maximilian on the throne of Mexico in 1864, while the US was preoccupied with the American Civil War. The scheme had a number of major problems – Mexico was incredibly divided, the UK refused to back the scheme, Maximilian himself was not a very practically-minded man, the expense eventually became unbearable particularly after America started putting intense pressure on the Europeans and supplying weapons and suchlike to the Mexicans. Maximilian was eventually taken prisoner, as his government collapses, and executed.
Could it have worked?
The problems were immense and Maximilian was not the kind of person capable of dealing with them – or even, until it was too late, realising he needed to deal with them. The Mexicans themselves were torn between libreral and conservative factions (not as we know them today, but something close) and Maximilian’s own liberal feelings put him at odds with both sides. He didn’t have an army of loyalists and relied far too much on French troops, which were eventually withdrawn. To win, Maximilian would have needed to strike a path between the two factions in hopes of building a government of national unity, as well as coming up with a plan to improve the lives of Mexicans so they didn’t join the nationalists or simply turn to banditry. He would also have needed to either find a way to pay Mexico’s creditors or convince them to put off their demands for payment (perhaps with the quiet intention of welshing on the debts, which he didn’t sign up for, when he had an army of his own.)
Could it have been done?
What do you think?
Chris
Could it have worked?
The problems were immense and Maximilian was not the kind of person capable of dealing with them – or even, until it was too late, realising he needed to deal with them. The Mexicans themselves were torn between libreral and conservative factions (not as we know them today, but something close) and Maximilian’s own liberal feelings put him at odds with both sides. He didn’t have an army of loyalists and relied far too much on French troops, which were eventually withdrawn. To win, Maximilian would have needed to strike a path between the two factions in hopes of building a government of national unity, as well as coming up with a plan to improve the lives of Mexicans so they didn’t join the nationalists or simply turn to banditry. He would also have needed to either find a way to pay Mexico’s creditors or convince them to put off their demands for payment (perhaps with the quiet intention of welshing on the debts, which he didn’t sign up for, when he had an army of his own.)
Could it have been done?
What do you think?
Chris