• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Max's election maps and assorted others

NZ 1925/1928
More NZ, and thanks again to @Uhura's Mazda for the writeups.

1925

1922 proved to be Farmer Bill Massey's last, rather anaemic, hurrah. He was dependent on the support of the crossbench and the two Liberals he'd won over, both of whom were rewarded for the treason with seats in the upper house and succeeded in their electorates by official Reformers. Massey became ill and retreated from public life in 1924 before dying early in the election year of 1925. Despite only winning a single majority at the polls, his time in office was second only to Richard Seddon's. Another similarity with Seddon - and with Ballance - was that he died in office while at least one potential successor was unready to participate in the battle for succession. To hold the fort, the elder statesman Sir Francis Bell stepped in on an interim basis to become simultaneously New Zealand's last Prime Minister from the upper house and its first Prime Minister to be born in New Zealand.

There were two front-runners. The closest thing the Reform Party had to an intellectual or an economist (very much of the laissez-faire stripe) was William Downie Stewart, who had only entered the House in 1919. However, he had developed rheumatoid arthritis during his War service and was often to be seen in an invalid chair. At the time of Massey's death, he was on a boat back from America, where he had been seeking a cure, and he sent a telegram advising the Reform caucus that he would happily serve under whomever they chose. In the event, only a tiny group of people around William Nosworthy disrupted the coronation of Gordon Coates.

Coates is an archetypal Kiwi PM - and like Bell, he was born in the country. He was brought up on a farm in Northland where he had learned to keep a bluff distance and a stiff upper lip. His lip was indeed rather stiff due to a childhood facial injury, and he grew a no-nonsense moustache to hide the disfigurement. Coates didn't know much about political theory, unlike Downie Stewart, but he had developed the reputation of a businesslike straight-shooter who didn't over-promise. This was clearly a resilient brand, as it grew despite the fact that he had shifted from being an Independent Liberal to putting Massey in power during his first few months as an MP.

Shortly afterwards, the Liberals also swapped out their leader. Thomas Wilford took the opportunity inherent in the death of the intransigent Massey to propose anew the idea of a 'fusion' between the non-Labour parties. For the first time, a working group of party bigwigs was set up, but it foundered upon the issue of a pre-election alliance, and it is unlikely that Coates was genuinely interested in the option. Wilford resigned in a fit of exasperation and was replaced by the stolid and unimaginative George Forbes. As a futile bid to argue the toss about the affair, the Liberals fought this election as the National Party, harking back to the wartime National Government, and fought the election on the basis of agreeing on virtually every policy with Reform and guilt-tripping them into fusion.

This strategy did not come off. As well as an unprepossessing leader, the Liberals also lacked policy strength and their advertising material was very poor compared to the Reformers'. Whereas Forbes was sold as "a plain man without frills", Reform's national organiser, Albert Davy, introduced populist, personalist slogans such as "With Coates and Confidence" and "Coats off with Coates". Reform's policy offer was just as vague as National's (just as Ward had promised a "legislative holiday" in his first election, Coates pledged "less political activity), which allowed Davy - an ardent free-marketeer who would shape New Zealand politics for the next decade - the leeway to use a third slogan, "More business in Government and less Government in business". This hollowed out the remnants of the urban Liberal business classes in favour of the traditional farmers' party, Reform.

Meanwhile, the Australian radical Harry Holland continued as Labour leader and marginally increased his party's vote. The main issue in Labour in these years was their original conviction that land ought to be nationalised - a policy which did not find favour among farmers, who had an emotional connection to freehold. A compromise position, influenced by the new MPs Frank Langstone (in Labour's first really rural electorate) and John A. Lee (who incidentally had been invited by Massey to join Reform), proposed a complicated of 'usehold' tenure, which was misinterpreted by Reform and Labour candidates alike. Langstone lost his seat and the whole party fell back by five seats to a total of 12, largely because of the flood of Liberal/National voters over to Reform.

The other seats went to the established Independents Statham and Atmore, who have been mentioned in previous installments. And in a blast from the past, former Prime Minister Sir Joseph Ward cut a deal with the local Liberal/National member to inherit the Invercargill electorate. He refused to fight the seat under any designation other than that of a Liberal, and was independent of the National caucus in the resultant House. The final minor force that must be mentioned is the Country Party, an electoral organisation belonging to the Auckland branch of the Farmers' Union, who had broke with Massey over the shortage of cheap credit with which to buy imported farming equipment. They performed pitifully against Coates in their first election.

The result of the election left Labour and National+Ward, equal on seat count, arguing over which of them should be the Official Opposition, in a contest reminiscent of two bald men fighting over a comb. The position remained in abeyance until the Eden by-election of the following June, which was triggered by the appointment of the incumbent as High Commissioner. Based on prosperous Auckland suburbs, it would normally have returned a Reformer, but - desperate to gain a first seat for women, 7 years after they were permitted to sit in the Parliament - Ellen Melville stood as an Independent Reform candidate and split the vote sufficiently to allow Labour to elect their first University-educated parliamentarian, Rex Mason. Not for the first time, a woman had caused trouble in Eden.

1925 was Reform's only landslide victory, fourteen years into their Government - and it proved to be too good to last.

ddqhxg9-375d81b5-3d89-4873-b561-b282c93463c1.png


1928

Gordon Coates was not destined to be a long-serving Prime Minister, despite winning a vast majority in 1925. His personal failings included a shortage of well-developed ideas of his own and a concomitant willingness to be led by others. Around him gathered a 'think tank' of more intellectual people, principal among them being Bill Sutch, who saw New Zealand's trajectory as being towards state socialism. Sutch had some influence over Coates' policies, and was much later charged with spying for the Soviet Union - although this seems to have been a case of over-zealousness on the part of the SIS.

Back to the final stages of the Reform Government. Coates had finally won over the urban business community, especially in Auckland, by making positive noises about "less Government in business". In fact, he pursued quite the opposite course, principally by extending state control over the marketing of farming exports, but also by instituting a Family Allowance which was decried by the thrifty bourgeoisie as a dole, which was self-evidently a bad thing. To compound it all, it was obvious that Coates wasn't even taking these steps out of personal conviction. He spoke to one adviser before telling the London market that dairy products would be sold at a price set by the state, but changed his mind that afternoon (in favour of the price being set by the Dairy Board) when a certain dairying industrialist named William Goodfellow phoned him up and persuaded him the other way.

Albert Davy, the Mephistopheles of New Zealand electoral organising in the inter-war period, rapidly lost patience with the man to whom he had delivered such a massive majority. He founded a United New Zealand Political Organisation in 1927 which was bankrolled by the Auckland business community through William Goodfellow, who was equally sick of Coates. The Davy-Goodfellow group announced that it was happy to work with the remnants of the Liberal Party, who were now without an obvious leader or an obvious political niche. In 1925 they had run on platitudes and an intention to merge with Reform, none of which dissuaded them from accusing the equally vacuous and pro-Reform Reform Party of stealing their policies. Now the dull George Forbes was officially leader of the National Party, but there was another group following Bill Veitch. Veitch had first been elected for Wanganui as one of the first Independent Labour MPs but was since long-wedded to the Liberals after breaking with Labour over his support for conscription during the Great War - and now he was stumping the country preaching a rejuvenation of liberalism. Forbes was so weak that he pretended that Veitch was doing this with his blessing.

A final remnant of the Liberal Party was the aging figure of Sir Joseph Ward, Prime Minister from 1906 to 1912, who now bore sole rights to the Liberal name. In 1928, everything flowed the right way for both Ward and for Albert Davy, who pulled Ward, Forbes and Veitch into his own organisation to form the United Party. United didn't have the most auspicious of starts. The first conference saw a hotly contested leadership ballot between George Forbes and Alfred Ransom (whose only real political quality was that he'd been around for a few years) in which Ransom edged out the incumbent. However, the vote was subject to some irregularities and, in a rerun, the conference decided to avoid contention and drafted Ward unanimously.

Ward was now a shadow of his former self, and looking very thin and wan compared to his glory days. He was also suffering from intermittent diabetic blackouts and becoming a little senile. The omens didn't look good for the new party, based on has-beens, opportunists and uncompromising devotees of laissez-faire economics. But this all changed at the launch of the United Party's campaign. At the point that Ward had been supposed to promise to borrow only the paltry sum of £7 million in the term, he had a spell of blindness and had to continue his speech from memory - he pledged to borrow £70 million a year, and the crowd went wild. Ever the canny operator, Davy ensured that this commitment was picked up by the newspapers, and the Uniteds had to suddenly drop their previously claimed principles in search of the support of the electorate.

Meanwhile, the early flutterings of the Great Depression were being felt, and unemployment hit record levels in 1927, and then again in 1928. Conditions were perfect for Labour to progress, aided by the fact that Harry Holland had kicked the whole land reform debate into touch by replacing long, involved explanations of nationalisation or usehold tenure with a simple sentence about "closer settlement". Although Labour reached a quarter of the vote and its best result so far in terms of seats, they were disappointed by the fact that United had appealed to their voters by promising much greater state spending.

Two minor parties emerged in 1928 election: the Country Party of disaffected farmers in the north of the North Auckland managed to capitalise on Reform's unpopularity by electing Captain Harold Rushworth in the Bay of Islands - which, as an electorate, was rarely swayed by loyalty to major parties. Rushworth's margin was just two votes, and the Reformer incumbent, Allen Bell, alleged voting irregularities which precipitated a voiding of the result and a by-election, in which Rushworth increased his majority in a straight fight. An even closer vote was seen in the Southern Maori electorate, where Eruera Tirikatene of the Ratana movement tied with the United candidate and lost on the casting vote of the returning officer. Ratana was the political vehicle attached to Maori religious revivalist group which wished to get the Treaty of Waitangi re-established in the law of the land.

At the close of the polls, Reform was the only party to reach a third of the vote, but United and United-aligned Independents had slightly more seats. Both United and Labour voted no confidence in Coates (previously, the Liberals had tended to get cold feet before voting for no-confidence motions they themselves had proposed, if they got a whiff that Labour were going to vote with them). Now, the only realistic Government was a minority United ministry, led by the political Lazarus, Joseph Ward, and propped up by Labour. The influx of new United members was both a blessing and a problem: as very few of them had any experience in the House, some were sworn in as Ministers on their first day in the job, while the Independent Harry Atmore was drafted in as Minister of Education.

It was this motley Government that would face the deepening challenge of the Depression.

ddqhzkr-0874229b-3c0c-44db-b17f-9be0a0b3cf7e.png
 
I am a really big fan of these three party elections. Partly for the glorious colour schemes involving the full range of greens, but mostly for the opportunity to irritate Max by informing him that both Wikipedia and the Spreadsheet are wrong about the precise party affiliations of various MPs, and that he has to go back and tediously edit his maps.
 
I am a really big fan of these three party elections. Partly for the glorious colour schemes involving the full range of greens, but mostly for the opportunity to irritate Max by informing him that both Wikipedia and the Spreadsheet are wrong about the precise party affiliations of various MPs, and that he has to go back and tediously edit his maps.
The best kind of wrong person on the Internet is the wrong webmaster (or Wikipedia editor in this case).
 
NZ 1931/1935
And the last few NZ elections for a while (probably not for long though). As ever, @Uhura's Mazda wrote and I drew.

1931

The Liberals, who had dominated New Zealand for 22 years and shaped its self-image as a progressive and innovative state, returned to Government after a long absence and atrophy in 1928 in the guise of the United Party. Much as the Liberals had been faced with the prospect of cleaving a path between socialism and conservatism, the Uniteds were now faced with a stark choice between following their laissez-faire instincts and fulfilling their pledge to borrow and spend £70 million.

Sir Joseph Ward, now restored to the premiership, set out to borrow the 70 millions, but it transpired that no British consortium of banks would lend that sum to New Zealand - although the country's credit was fairly good, the memories of Julius Vogel's similar gambit in the 1870s merged with the general reluctance to take a punt which was so much a feature of the late 1920s and early 1930s. In an attempt to distract from the embarrassing failure to keep the central pledge of the election, Ward came up with a distraction: he promised to deal with the mounting unemployment problem in five weeks. It is unclear how this would have worked and what tactic he would have used to distract from a second embarrassing failure five weeks down the line, because the Prime Minister collapsed dramatically at the end of his announcement and almost died.

Ward was not a well man, and much of the leadership was done by George Forbes until he finally resigned a few weeks before his death in 1930. 'Honest George' was less of a showman than his erstwhile chief, and also more of a conservative, meaning that he finally made the decision to retrench spending instead of seeking to maintain the support of the Labour Party for his minority government. Civil service salaries were cut by 10% across the board (Labour favoured smaller cuts for lower grades than for their superiors) and - most injurious of all to the Labour Party - all ongoing railway construction projects were cancelled. This was a particularly cruel thing to do, as the vast numbers of unemployed were paid below the proper wage to labour on public works projects including the building of railways. Labour had no option to vote no confidence in the United Government, and Reform joined them in condemnation although they agreed with most of what they were doing.

Reform was itself put in a quandary involving both the question of fusion with United and the general ideological basis of the party. Gordon Coates tended to support moderate state intervention, such as the alteration of the exchange rate, to help the economy recover, and was opposed to fusion, while William Downie Stewart and others were in favour of old-fashioned retrenchment and were open to offering their services to the poorly manned and inexperienced United Cabinet. Positive evidence from by-elections suggested that Reform could take back the mantle of Government alone if it forced an election, but Coates was outgunned and led Reform into coalition in 1931, in the late stages of a three-party economic conference which largely pitted Labour against the others. Labour refused to support a national government.

Part of the deal was that there would be a pre-election alliance in which Government candidates would not oppose one another. This was not unilaterally adhered to: a United candidate defeated Reform's Minister of Agriculture despite being asked by his party to withdraw, while the reverse happened in Wairarapa. Nevertheless, the coalition largely avoided internecine warfare and was returned with a majority of the popular vote. One of the anti-Government Independents is interesting: George Black had been elected for United, but voted with Labour on salary cuts and railways and was expelled from the caucus, going on to sit alongside long-serving Independent Harry Atmore, who had resigned as Minister of Education on similar grounds. Both were re-elected, but Black - quietly rumoured to be a homosexual - committed suicide in 1932. At the consequent by-election, he was replaced by Reform's Keith Holyoake, who would go on to greater things.

Labour achieved over a third of the vote, their best result so far, but only gained a few seats. In particular, three Auckland city seats were added to their tally, reintroducing John A. Lee into the fray after three years writing books and running a hotel. Lee had discovered monetary reform in his brief retirement, which would have relevance in the next few years. Rounding out the parties were Ratana, which came second in every Maori seat, and the Country Party, which re-elected Captain Rushworth and won a few second places in the rural environs of Auckland. Rushworth mainly discussed the monetary reform policies of Major Douglas in the House, and was regarded as a proper English gentleman with too much honour and not enough energy to be a successful party leader.

A lack of leadership ability did not prevent George Forbes from continuing as Prime Minister, though. In practice, he was led by two august Reformers: the Minister of Finance, William Downie Stewart, and the Minister of Works, Gordon Coates. With the economy as the central problem to be solved at the bottom of the Great Depression, and with public works the only way of occupying the unemployed without giving them an odious 'dole', these Ministers would hold the main levers in the ministry. It was a shame, therefore, that they agreed on so little.

ddqjzuu-e60e20af-2844-4f8d-bb09-aca61f443590.png


1935

The general election scheduled for 1934 was delayed for one year, amid protest from Labour, due to the unusual political circumstances and the United-Reform coalition's fear of a shellacking at the polls. In truth, the Depression was less onerous in New Zealand than in many other countries, but the idea behind New Zealand is of a fertile land which provides a decent standard of living for all, and the sight of 'swaggers' roaming the country roads in search of farms at which to work a season (to say nothing of the urban jobless) was an affront to Kiwis' conception of self.

In 1932, a march down Queen Street, the main commercial road of central Auckland, by the Communist-backed Unemployed Workers Movement, turned ugly and the windows of the Town Hall were smashed. One leader who had tried to calm things down was hunted through a series of safe-houses before being jailed, while the rest of the country was rocked - this sort of thing simply didn't happen in boring, civilised little New Zealand. It is notable that Gordon Coates subsequently moved to a more generous policy, giving relief workers a special bonus for a royal Jubilee and restoring most pensions and salaries to their previous levels as soon as the economy showed flutters of life.

Predictably, this was too little, too late for the left, and a dangerously slippery slope for the Right. Just as in 1928, the Auckland business community rallied around William Goodfellow in opposition to Gordon Coates' 'Socialistic' policies, and Goodfellow recruited Albert Davy as his campaign organiser. The result was the Democrats, although Goodfellow's initial vision of an Empire Free Trade crusade was deemed a difficult sell to the electorate, and the Democratic Party split almost immediately. Goodfellow and a few others sat the election out. However, Davy managed to lure two sitting MPs into his new party, one of whom was Bill Veitch - a Minister in the United minority government and originally a Labour MP. He had, let us say, been on a journey since then. The Democrats hit 7% of the popular vote but only came close to winning Invercargill and came away with nothing but the dubious honour of having split the right-wing vote sufficiently to let Labour walk away with a few more seats than they would otherwise have gained.

As well as the obvious narrative of the economic situation, the other major drama during the coalition years was the opprobrium poured upon Apirana Ngata, the Native Affairs Minister and a long-serving MP for Eastern Maori. He had been an Acting Prime Minister while higher-ranked Ministers were away, but was almost universally respected in the Maori community: his ideas were mainly around using Pakeha systems to advance Maori interests, and to follow Pakeha ideals so that they would start to respect Maori. An example of this was a scheme to develop Maori land into profitable farms which would eventually transition into individual ownership, so as to prevent Pakeha from claiming that it was unused and should be opened up for white people to farm. Unfortunately, Ngata had a tendency to favour his friends with the placement of projects and the distribution of contracts, and there were some other dodgy dealings. These would not have been judged as abnormal in earlier years, but the fact that Ngata was a powerful Maori made the criticism all the more vociferous and he was forced to resign in ignominy.

At the same time as Ngata's vision was rejected by the white community, it was also being rejected by Maori. In the 1920s, a faith healer named T. W. Ratana had established a shanty town for his religious followers, and he had subsequently transitioned into preaching on material, political matters. Four candidates for the Maori seats issued forth from Ratana Pa with the objective to overturn the existing Pakeha structures and re-establish the Treaty of Waitangi as the basis of the law of the land. Eruera Tirikatene came achingly close to victory in the seat of Southern Maori (it was easy to influence the voters there as only a few hundred could get to the place where voting happened) in 1928 and 1931, but he entered Parliament in 1932 after the death of the incumbent. At the general election, Tirikatene was joined by T. W. Ratana's son, who was the Ratana movement's standard-bearer in its organisational base of Western Maori. The Ratana MPs brought with them a petition for the restitution of Te Tiriti whose signatures had to be weighed rather than counted.

As well as change in the Maori electorates, the general electorates saw some social progress as well. In a 1933 by-election, that of Lyttelton, the long-standing Labour MP, James McCombs, was succeeded by his wife Elizabeth as New Zealand's first woman MP. This was forty years after women gained the right to vote and thirteen years after they were first allowed to run for Parliament. Dispiritingly for New Zealanders of the female persuasion, McCombs followed her husband to her grave before the election and was replaced in another by-election by her son. The McCombs family held the seat for nearly 40 years, but no women were elected in 1935.

The Lyttelton seat was very close to Christchurch North, where another inter-generational handover took place in 1935. In this case, Reform MP Henry Holland (not to be confused with Labour Leader Harry Holland) was succeeded by his son Sidney, who was closer to the United Party and became a prime mover in fusion discussions. His other claim to fame at that stage was that he had made a submission to the Royal Commission on Monetary Reform, which was the sceptical Government's only sop for the growing Social Credit movement. Small farmers in rural areas flocked to Major Douglas out of desperation and their eternal hunger for cheap credit. As such, the Country Party achieved its best result and elected a second MP in Bill Massey's old seat in South Auckland.

The main impact of Social Credit, however, was that small farmers radicalised by the Depression and the solutions offered by monetary reformers were available for any party which sought them out. The Government were not prepared to do this, but Labour were, and pursued an accord not only with the Country Party, but with the branches of the as-yet non-electoral Social Credit movement. A minority of Labour MPs were already keen on monetary reform, most significantly John A. Lee and Frank Langstone, and the Labour Party publicly hailed the Social Credit victory in Alberta as a success. Labour, now stripped of Marxist ideas of land nationalisation and made acceptable to the farmers by promises of monetary reform, made devastating progress outside of the cities for the first time.

Harry Holland, the Party leader since 1919 and the symbol and architect of its gradual moderation over these years (he also introduced a promise of a guaranteed price for primary produce exporters, which would be backed by the Reserve Bank), was not there to take advantage of Labour's stunning win. He had died after over-exerting himself by walking up a hill to the Maori King's funeral in 1932. Holland's successor, Michael Joseph Savage, had followed a similar career trajectory, from Socialism in Australia to moderation in 1930s New Zealand, but Savage was mild where Holland had been blustery, and came across as jovial, homespun and accessible on the platform. He was exactly the sort of figure that middle-class New Zealand could warm to - and warm to him they did.

United and Reform, the protagonists (under a series of names) of the last few decades of politics, were beaten into a cocked hat, while new parties threatened to break out and the Labour Party entered office for the first time. The 1935 poll is one of NZ's most thrilling transitional elections.

ddqk01t-10f5c83f-1c8d-4963-8df0-895836243863.png
 
NZ 1990/2016 (K)
And some later NZ stuff, mainly so I can have a benchmark for the newer boundary sets once the scans provided by David run out.

In the 1980s, New Zealand was governed by a radically reformist Labour government led by David Lange - but of course, somewhat confusingly for outsiders, it was a radically reformist neoliberal Labour Government. Efficiency was the objective, and as many sacred cows as possible would be slaughtered to achieve it.

Since the provinces were abolished in 1877, there had been no actually powerful local authorities in the country. There were local municipalities, 249 of them, which handled road maintenance, bin collection, local planning and a few other issues too basic for Parliament to be able to deal with them even in a country as small as New Zealand. Then there was a bewildering mess of single-purpose districts, which might manage a harbour or water usage within a specified river drainage area. Fire services had been nationalised in 1976, but other than that, no major effort had been undertaken to clear up this situation.

In 1987, the Labour government passed a new Local Government Act, which tore up this whole system root and branch and created 89 new local authorities - 75 territorial councils, 13 regional councils, and one council (Gisborne) fulfilling both roles. The territorial councils would handle most of the old local authorities’ functions, while the regional councils took over environmental management functions from the old drainage and harbour boards as well as managing public transport and planning co-ordination.

kommuner-nz-1990.png

The regions were drawn to follow river drainage basins wherever practical, while territorial authorities were intended to be governable from a central place. This meant that the two layers didn’t quite match up, especially in the central North Island. Taupo District famously ended up split between four different regions, and several other less dramatic splits existed, but this has evidently not been a serious problem. In general, the system seems to have been working alright, because only three significant changes have been made to the structure since:
- As early as 1992, three years after the new divisions came into effect, Nelson-Marlborough Regional Council was abolished. Three of its four constituent districts (Nelson, Marlborough and Tasman) were turned into unitary authorities on the Gisbourne model, while Kaikoura was judged too small for this treatment and instead moved into the neighbouring Canterbury region.
- In 2006, the small Banks Peninsula district was merged into the City of Christchurch, becoming its sixteenth ward.
- Perhaps most notably, in 2010, all territorial authorities in the Auckland Region were merged with the regional council into a new “super-city” covering the entire metropolitan area. The former district of Franklin, which was split between the Auckland and Waikato regions, was divided between the new Auckland Council and Waikato District in the homonymous region, the latter taking in a slightly bigger share of the district than had previously been south of the regional boundary.

kommuner-nz-2020.png

The major parties have not traditionally involved themselves in local elections, as in a lot of former British colonies, and this tradition was continued past the reforms. Nevertheless, in the major cities, a left-right divide is fairly obvious - the first Auckland "super-city" mayoral election was between Manukau mayor Len Brown, who was known to be a Labour Party member, and pre-merger Auckland mayor John Banks, who had served in government for the National Party and would later become the leader of the right-wing ACT party. Both Brown's successor Phil Goff and Christchurch mayor Lianne Dalziel had similarly been Labour frontbenchers before seeking election locally. In general, though, party affiliation matters less than it does in parliamentary elections - a staunch Labour city like Dunedin can elect mayors from the Green Party, and the current mayor of Wellington is an NZ First member who defeated the Labour incumbent by a razor-thin margin. And of course, none of this has really reached beyond the major cities, and rural New Zealand continues to elect independents on a personal basis.
 
Last edited:
That's brilliant. I do hope, for your sake, that there are way less seats as you get away from Bangkok.
I wouldn't worry about that, Bangkok has about a fifth to a quarter of Thailand's population by itself, and it's the most dominant capital city (i.e. the biggest population gap between it and the country's second-largest city) in the world.

That said, I kind of feel like areas with a lot of small constituencies are more satisfying to map than a few big ones. There's more variation and less constant drawing of lines. This is probably something that's less true of vector mapping than it is of bitmap though.
 
I wouldn't worry about that, Bangkok has about a fifth to a quarter of Thailand's population by itself, and it's the most dominant capital city (i.e. the biggest population gap between it and the country's second-largest city) in the world.

I would have guessed Mongolia, but I suppose that's only in percentage terms, and then you start having to exclude places that are just one city and a village.
 
Not even that. Mongolia is 1.2 million to 80,000, Thailand is 14 million to 250,000.

14 million means you're including Nonthaburi Province as part of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, which is a little dodgy as Nonthaburi includes the city of 250,000 (Nonthaburi itself).

Still, even using the registered population of 5,686,646 for Bangkok metropolis proper, it is one thicc bih.
 
14 million means you're including Nonthaburi Province as part of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, which is a little dodgy as Nonthaburi includes the city of 250,000 (Nonthaburi itself).

Still, even using the registered population of 5,686,646 for Bangkok metropolis proper, it is one thicc bih.
I was counting Chiang Mai as the second city, but you’re not wrong that how you count megacities makes a big difference for anything like this.
 
All done but the south.

val-th-2019.png

Pheu Thai (For Thais) - populist, pro-Shinawatra. The refoundation of the People Power Party, which in turn resulted from the refoundation of the Thai Rak Thai ("Thais Love Thais") Party.
Palang Pracharat (variously translated as "people's power", "citizens' power" or "civil power") - right-wing, pro-military. Effectively the support organisation for the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), the military junta that ruled Thailand from 2014 until this election (and still kind of does).
Future Forward Party - centre-left, anti-military. New party for 2019, did better than expected in spite of the, er, dubious circumstances this election was held under.
Democrats - right-wing, royalist, pro-business. Traditionally the main opposition to Shinawatra, seemingly less relevant outside their southern stronghold now that the military's getting into electoral politics on its own.
Bhumjai Thai ("Thai Pride" - no, presumably not that kind) - populist. Largely based in Buriram Province, but polls fairly well across rural north-central Thailand, sometimes well enough to squeak through.
Thai Liberal Party - basically a softer, more centrist version of Future Forward. Won no constituency seats.
Chart Thai Pattana (Save the Thai Nation) - as Bhumjaithai, but with Suphanburi in place of Buriram.
New Economics Party - boy, I wish I knew. Also won no constituency seats.
Prachachart - idfk.
Pheu Chart (For the Nation) - Pheu Thai front party, created so the Pheu Thai leadership can jump somewhere if the junta tries to ban their main party. Still won five list seats.
Action Coalition for Thailand - hard-right, royalist, pro-military, pretty questionable on the concept of democracy as such. Right-wing split from the Democrats.
Chart Pattana (Save the Nation) - as Prachachart.
Local Power - pretty much what it says on the tin.
Thai Forest Conservation Party - That's right, a green party in Asia. They seem a bit crap, as they joined the governing coalition after the election, and have repeatedly threatened to pull out over various issues without ever actually doing so.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top