• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

AH Run-downs, summaries and general gubbins

I think some more parties, or at least labels, you'd be likely to see are centrist parties (maybe a surviving Reform Party or two, or something along the lines of Americans Elect? Certainly there's enough discourse demand to generate one even in excess of its actual voters) and potentially formalized parties/endorsers for specific minority groups - especially on the local level, I think the Congressional Black Caucus would find it useful to be able to give a "Freedom Democratic" or whatever label to its preferred candidates.

I was thinking something like reform or Americans Elect in hindsight yeah. and they might not get behind Yang. I could see them backing Bloomberg in 2016 maybe though. TBH If we're talking about EVERY candidate (as its on a popular vote system) I should've added more. There's probably folks like a communist party who find the Greens and Warren both too moderate even if the DSA swing behind her.

There are way more parties on a local level. You might also see more parties vaguely like the DFL in Minnesota. Independent at a state level but back candidates from the federal parties for Congress. Might see the odd minor party congress member though, even if they caucus with a bigger party. I'd definitely agree with your idea of an independent version of the Congressional Black Caucus who just Caucuses with the Dems, rather than being actual members. You might see similar with the GOP but nothing comes to mind. Maybe MAGA candidates? or they might be a full on third party.

. You might also see state legislatures elected by different methods too with just the federal level staying under FPTP (for now). Bayh-Celler opening america to the concept of electoral reform. It could get super messy :D
 
MAGA candidates, Chamber of Commerce types, maybe an officially-evangelical and/or Right to Life Party, potentially something national-security-focused...

Oh they'd be on the ballots way more but under FPTP you'd probably still see mostly the big two getting in except where its very concentrated Under a system like Instant Runoff you'd see something different.

There's probably more widespread fusion candidates ITTL too.
 
Inspired by the rundown @Bolt451 although this is a different universe.

2016 Presidential Election Candidates Rundown (First Round)

sorted by polling number averages over the past 14 days.

Fmr. SoS Hillary Clinton / Senator Tim Kaine (Democrat): Somehow polling in first place despite trying to piss off as many voters as possible it seems. I guess this just shows how divided the right is right now. Oh, you want me to actually talk about Hillary? Really? It’s Hillary fucking Clinton. Everybody knows who she is.

Businessman Donald Trump / Senator Jeff Sessions (Constitution-Reform-Independence-American): After losing the Republican nomination during the RNC, Trump started collecting political parties like Pokemon cards. It’s still kind of hilarious(ly sad) that he’s apparently polling in second place despite not even being on the ballot in four states.

Fmr. Governor Mitt Romney / Governor John Kasich (Republican): Mitt Romney called for electoral reform after losing the presidency despite winning the popular vote 4 years ago, his call actually triggered a change, and then he decided not to run for the Republican nomination again, only after the RNC managed to barely convince him due to Trump’s numbers, and now Mitt is polling in third. Did I get that right? Everybody tried to convince me that this guy would be elected president in 2016 lmao.

Senator Bernie Sanders / Representative Tulsi Gabbard (Green, Vermont Progressive, DSA): Crazy how he almost managed to win the Democratic nomination after reportedly pissing off the entire party four years ago by primarying Obama.

If I may though, Bernie I like you, but you should really fire whoever suggested picking Tulsi Gabbard as your number two. For the first time in your career, you gave the DNC something which they can successfully attack you with, and they’re milking the fuck out of it now.


Fmr. Mayor Michael Bloomberg / Admiral Michael Mullen (Americans Elect): Remember 18 months ago when we were fearing that this racist, sexist New York billionaire would become the next president? Youthful innocence. I would also like to add that 4chan successfully getting multiple of his ads off of Youtube is a good thing.

Fmr. Governor Gary Johnson / Fmr. Governor William Weld (Libertarian): Honestly, I blame Ron Paul for all of this. If he hadn’t done so well in the 2012 primaries, Gary Johnson would not have spoilt the election in favor of Obama, and we would not have this shit. As for Gary, he was polling as high as third just six months ago. What getting invited to the debates does to a mf.

Fmr. Senator Jim Webb / Author Michael Savage (Webb for America): No, I’m not gonna talk about Webb’s campaign. His VP literally called for people to vote for Trump next week, and hasn’t been heard from since. There is no such thing as a “Jim Webb Presidential campaign”.

Activist Gloria La Riva / Journalist Eugene Puryear (Party for Socialism and Liberation): For if you think Bernie Sanders is too much of a capitalist or just if you want to continue throwing your vote away.
 
Last edited:
Superb work @Catalunya

Might go back and tweak mine a bit with more parties and Centrist non-Yang ticket. Maybe Mark Cuban? Idk
Mark Cuban’s presidential ambitions always struck me more like those of Dwayne the Rock Johnson, in the sense that they think it would be really cool, but aren’t really contemplating it.

Howard Schultz is probably more interested in actually running, and he is the perfect centrist rich guy to absolutely fucking hate.

You could of course also always go for Bloomberg.
 
Really tempted to have a something approaching Frances left Alliance in my mid term thing

Not that I'm comparing Bernie to Melenchon
 
Party Rundown August 2022

So here we are, going into the first elections under Instant Runoff voting as introduced by the thirtieth Amendment .

Can we take a second to pause how friggin weird the campaign for IRV was? MAGA campaigning on the same side as the DSA and Reform? some Democrats campaigning against President Warren? Still the weird Democrat-DSA-MAGA monstrosity and then enough minor parties at state level got it through.

Congressional Majority
Democrats:
Could Stand to lose under IRV but so Could the GOP. The party faithful are probably quite happy the amount of political capital the DSA put into electoral reform and how much they gave up. People are fairly happy with President Warren’s recovery over all.
Causing with the Democrats
Congressional African American Party: Have very specifically said the Democrats and the CAAP won’t run against each other still. Nor will the DSA. Even under IRV.
DFL: Are really quite happy with the mix between the Democrats and the DSA. That’s their jam
Raza Unida: Are quite happy pushing for improved workers rights alongside DFL and DSA.
Working Families: Well theres one of them. He’s basically a Democrat
Vermont Progressive: Also one. Probably happy to be in government with both Bernie (The only VP Senator) and the DSA

Sort of in Government. Sort of not
DSA: Put a LOT of political capital into electoral reform and had to settle for IRV. A lot of people not happy with a lot of the stuff they had to give up to form a workable government with the Democrats as opposed to the Democrat minority of 2018-20.

Other Parties:
The GOP: Fighting the same damn fight they’ve fought since 2016. The inability of Donald Trump to fuck off has left the GOP stuck between their normal center right and courting the MAGA voters and apparently he’s gearing up for 2024. Will we finally see a GOP-MAGA ticket?
MAGA: Some of them are already saying the mid terms are fixed against them. When a lot of them campaigned for it. Could benefit from GOP Second Preferences. Unless those preferences go to Reform of course

“Major” Non-Congressional Parties
(i.e. ones I could see getting in)
Reform: Happy as a pig in shit about IRV. Hoping to get in on second preference votes from moderate Dems and moderate GOP (who are scared of DSA AND MAGA) and actually get a few seats in at a federal level
Green: Are torn, do they go more pure green and go for Democratic voters or do they go for second preferences of the DSA. Same usual dichotomy for the Greens then. Benefiting greatly from the ill will against the DSA going into government.
Libertarian: Might form an agreement with the GOP? Probably waiting to see which way the GOP goes, Trump-wise
Constitution and Independence:Taking these two as a pair. Remains to be seen if they can convince the GOP to let them run fusion tickets. I don't see them getting enough second preferences when MAGA is around. Would just caucus with the GOP anyway.

Obviously there are other parties at state levels but given the wild mix of electoral systems the various states use I’m not going through all of them. Sorry Socialism and Liberation, America First (Not Sorry) etc. I don't see you getting in. Maybe if they’d stumped for proportional representation? Lets face it, it's a miracle we even got IRV at a Federal level
 
Last edited:
Giving un update to mine as well, this time by even more shamelessly stealing ideas from @Bolt451

2020 Presidential Election Candidates Rundown (First Round)

sorted by polling number averages over the past 14 days.

Senator Elizabeth Warren / Fmr. HUD Secretary Julián Castro (Democrat, DSA): Things went quite well at the DNC, aside from Hillary shooting laser beams from her eyes at Bernie, but whatever. The party is united, and Warren seems to be a decent campaigner since she stopped claiming she is a Native American.

Businessman Donald Trump / Lieutenant General Michael Flynn (American): Trump really went ‘we live in a society’ over the past four years, and he’s still likely to make the second round again? There is literally no way he’ll defeat anyone in the second round, but this shit still fucking sucks.

President Mitt Romney / Vice President John Kasich (Republican): LMAOOOOOOOO, imagine you’re the incumbent president, and you won’t even make the second round! ‘Not Donald Trump’ perhaps worked in the second round four years ago, but now that the Democrats seem to be united again, and Warren is polling 58-42 against Trump in the second round, Romney’s shtick of being the only person that can beat him just does not work.

Businessman Andrew Yang / Author Marianne Williamson (Forward!): The moment he chose Marianne Williamson as his VP, and she started calling for reprations, was the moment the ‘ironic’ racists flocked back to the Trump campaign. It’s still surprising how well a random guy running on a plan that 95% of the people had never heard of before is doing.

Representative Justin Amash / Fmr. Senator Lincoln Chaffee (Libertarian): Libertarians were really acting like pulling Amash was the biggest coup in history, and now the party is in a civil war because the fascists don’t want a VP who wants to return to the metric system (I don’t know I’m not really following libertarian infighting).

Businessman Howard Schultz / Fmr. Senator Joe Lieberman (Independent): Dropped out yesterday, and endorsed Mitt Romney. The reports of being offered a lower cabinet position of his choice are probably true.

Fmr. Governor Jesse Ventura [not actively campaigning] / Fmr. Representative Cynthia McKinney (Green): Ventura says he is not interested in actually becoming president, but will still vote for himself? Their campaign is also literally just McKinney defending Assad is random speeches. Y’all had Bernie 4 years ago.

Businessman Patrick Byrne / “Builder” Jeremy Kauffman (True Libertarian): I don’t know much about these guys, but their campaign basically reads like Trump’s, but with more crypto.

Genius Kanye West / Preacher Michelle Tidball (Birthday): Yeezy Season Approaching 😎
 
Last edited:
Giving un update to mine as well, this time by even more shamelessly stealing ideas from @Bolt451

2020 Presidential Election Candidates Rundown (First Round)

sorted by polling number averages over the past 14 days.

Senator Elizabeth Warren / Fmr. HUD Secretary Julián Castro (Democrat): Things went quite well at the DNC, aside from Hillary shooting laser beams from her eyes at Bernie, but whatever. The party is united, and Warren seems to be a decent campaigner since she stopped claiming she is a Native American.

Businessman Donald Trump / Lieutenant General Michael Flynn (American): Trump really went ‘we live in a society’ over the past four years, and he’s still likely to make the second round again? There is literally no way he’ll defeat anyone in the second round, but this shit still fucking sucks.

President Mitt Romney / Vice President John Kasich (Republican): LMAOOOOOOOO, imagine you’re the incumbent president, and you won’t even make the second round! ‘Not Donald Trump’ perhaps worked in the second round four years ago, but now that the Democrats seem to be united again, and Warren is polling 58-42 against Trump in the second round, Romney’s shtick of being the only person that can beat him just does not work.

Businessman Andrew Yang / Author Marianne Williamson (Forward!): The moment he chose Marianne Williamson as his VP, and she started calling for reprations, was the moment the ‘ironic’ racists flocked back to the Trump campaign. It’s still surprising how well a random guy running on a plan that 95% of the people had never heard of before is doing.

Representative Justin Amash / Fmr. Senator Lincoln Chaffee (Libertarian): Libertarians were really acting like pulling Amash was the biggest coup in history, and now the party is in a civil war because the fascists don’t want a VP who wants to return to the metric system (I don’t know I’m not really following libertarian infighting).

Businessman Howard Schultz / Fmr. Senator Joe Lieberman (Independent): Dropped out yesterday, and endorsed Mitt Romney. The reports of being offered a lower cabinet position of his choice are probably true.

Fmr. Governor Jesse Ventura [not actively campaigning] / Fmr. Representative Cynthia McKinney (Green): Ventura says he is not interested in actually becoming president, but will still vote for himself? Their campaign is also literally just McKinney defending Assad is random speeches. Y’all had Bernie 4 years ago.

Businessman Patrick Byrne / “Builder” Jeremy Kauffman (True Libertarian): I don’t know much about these guys, but their campaign basically reads like Trump’s, but with more crypto.

Genius Kanye West / Preacher Michelle Tidball (Birthday): Yeezy Season Approaching 😎

I'd take President Romney in 16 over President Jeb in my TL :p

Williamson as Yang's Veep is superb
 
I'd take President Romney in 16 over President Jeb in my TL :p

Williamson as Yang's Veep is superb
Jeb always struck me as just another generic Republican, while Romney is much more of a chameleon who can be anything from centrist to right-winger, though ITTL he’s trying too hard to appeal to the centre, as some kind of uniter, and him (somewhat) embracing BLM pisses off a lot of Republican voters.

Though 4 years of Romney is better than 8 years of Jeb! anyhow.

As for Yang, the guy is just really not able to read the room, so picking a leftist while his primary base are weirdo right-wingers seems up his alley.

I really want to make a 2024 list as well, but at that point I fear I might be flocking the thread with these rundowns.
 
GREAT WAR (also known as Second Austro-Prussian War, Global War; 1915 – 1919):
Chicago Coalition: The German Empire ("North Germany") | Russian Empire | Kingdom of Italy | United States of America | Tsardom of Bulgaria | Republic of Argentina and others
The Concorde: Empire of Austria-Hungary | Second French Empire | Second Mexican Empire | Confederate States of America | Empire of Brazil | Ottoman Empire and others

Chicago Coalition victory, Treaty of Frankfurt; deposition of the French, Austrian and Brazilian monarchies, dissolution of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, spread of unrest throughout North America, Asia and Europe, foundation of the Concert of Nations

MAJOR LEADERS OF THE SOUTHRON TROUBLES/CONFEDERATE CRISIS, c. November 1920

Bogalusa-GSLC-Plant_night_postcard.jpg

United States of America: President Wolfgang Kapp | Vice President James A. Reed (Unionist)*
Republic of Argentina: President Elpidio González | Vice President Honorio Pueyrredón (Radical Liberal)
Second Mexican Empire: Emperor Agustin III (Iturbide-Hapsburg) | Chancellor Patricio Milmo Vidaurri (Christian Democratic)

Confederate States of America: President William Kitchin | Vice President T. Woodrow Wilson (National Union)
Free State of Arkansas: President Joseph T. Robinson | Vice President Harvey Parnell (Progressive)

Republic of Cuba: President Tomás Maceo | Vice President Alfredo de Zayas (Autonomist Republican)
Republic of Florida: President William H. Hay (Independent) | Prime Minister Donald B. McKay (Constitutional Democratic)
Republic of Louisiana: President John M. Parker (National Progressive) | Prime Minister Fernand Mouton (Louisiana Democratic)
Free State of Tennessee: President Alfred A. Taylor (Front for Tennessean Unity [Whig]) | Vice President Miles Poindexter (Front for Tennessean Unity [Democratic**])
Second Republic of Texas: President Andrew J. Houston (Independent) | Vice President Albert S. Burleson (Christian Democratic)
Sovereign Republic of Sequoyah: President Robert L. Owen (Democratic) | Prime Minister William B. Pine (National)

Southron Laborers' Front ("Yazoo"): First Secretary Lovett Fort-Whiteman (Socialist Laborer's)
People's Commonwealth of Texas: Comrade Thomas Parsons***
Free Republic of the Lowcountry: President Robert Smalls II (Independent)
Knights of the Authentic South: Grand Chief William J. Simmons

* - to be succeeded by the Farmer-Labor ticket of Thomas J. Walsh and Maximilian S. "Maxi" Hayes
** - increasingly identified with the Front's pro-US annexation Bluebelly faction
*** - actual existence is disputed
 
Last edited:
Chicago Coalition victory, Treaty of Frankfurt; deposition of the French, Austrian and Brazilian monarchies, dissolution of Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, spread of unrest throughout North America, Asia and Europe, foundation of the Concert of Nations
Fun times, love to see where this Alt 20s goes. I guess Britain is neutral in all this?

Confederate States of America: President William Kitchin | Vice President T. Woodrow Wilson (National Union)
Free State of Arkansas: President Joseph T. Robinson | Vice President Harvey Parnell (Progressive)

Republic of Cuba: President Tomás Maceo | Vice President Alfredo de Zayas (Autonomist Liberal)
Republic of Florida: President William H. Hay (Independent) | Prime Minister Donald B. McKay (Constitutional Democratic)
Republic of Louisiana: President John M. Parker (National Progressive) | Prime Minister Fernand Mouton (Louisiana Democratic)
Free State of Tennessee: President Alfred A. Taylor (Front for Tennessean Unity [Whig]) | Vice President Miles Poindexter (Front for Tennessean Unity [Democratic**])
Second Republic of Texas: President Andrew J. Houston (Independent) | Vice President Albert S. Burleson (Christian Democratic)
Sovereign Republic of Sequoyah: President Robert L. Owen (Democratic) | Prime Minister William B. Pine (National)
I have to say, a split up Confederacy after a lose in an Alt World War is an underrated scenario, and makes sense. I doubt the Union wants to integrate nations that despise them.

* - to be succeeded by the Farmer-Labor ticket of Thomas J. Walsh and Maximilian S. "Maxi" Hayes
Nice, cool stuff here.
 
Fun times, love to see where this Alt 20s goes. I guess Britain is neutral in all this?

Yeah, they didn't like either side much (for lots of fairly credible reasons). Their most cordial relations are with Portugal, Japan and Argentina.

I have to say, a split up Confederacy after a lose in an Alt World War is an underrated scenario, and makes sense. I doubt the Union wants to integrate nations that despise them.

It's a complicated matter - a lot of the Confederate states split off largely on their own accord, owing to the increasing instability of the already decidedly authoritarian Southron government, with varying degrees of American (and Argentine) influence. I've no doubt that, in a successful CS secession world, the question of reconquering the South would inevitably become central to the United States' politics, though unlike some viewpoints I have also assumed that many American politicians would not be especially willing to try and reintegrate hostile, bandit-ridden, impoverished states that have, in any case, developed their own distinct cultures by then.
 
Yeah, they didn't like either side much (for lots of fairly credible reasons). Their most cordial relations are with Portugal, Japan and Argentina.
Interesting, I could see a formal alliance of these nations emerged over the Twenties especially now with Germany and Russia having emerged as victors clashing with British Interests. I can see Britain and Japan being a ‘Progressive Conservative’ nations.
It's a complicated matter - a lot of the Confederate states split off largely on their own accord, owing to the increasing instability of the already decidedly authoritarian Southron government, with varying degrees of American (and Argentine) influence. I've no doubt that, in a successful CS secession world, the question of reconquering the South would inevitably become central to the United States' politics, though unlike some viewpoints I have also assumed that many American politicians would not be especially willing to try and reintegrate hostile, bandit-ridden, impoverished states that have, in any case, developed their own distinct cultures by then.
Very true, better to have them neutral entities with little power than have them cause further economic strife and political strife by annexing them.
 
The Successful Follies of Manuel Komnenos

4KKOMNENOS.png


Manuel Komnene was a man who restructured the world in his own image had the many gambles he'd taken failed perhaps Byzantium would have suffered from the extent of his vision. The remarkable thing, however, is that every great project he undertook, no matter how seemingly impossible, always paid off.

Also known as Béla III of Hungary, Alexius II was one of Manuel's great projects - a Prince of Hungary, adopted into the Byzantine Empire, renamed to fit into the scheme of the Prophecy of Blood - that the Komnenian Emperors would have names that spell out the Greek word for blood. Under Alexius II The Roman Empire achieved its greatest territorial extent in the 2nd millennium AD. This run-down looks at the conquests of Manuel and Alexius, and the extent to which they lasted.

Religions

The Roman Catholic Church (Latin Rite):
Gradually creating an acceptance of Church Unity was a major project through the reign on Manuel - he succeeded, somehow, in getting recognition from the Pope as Emperor of the East and secured communion between the Melkite and Latin churches. Hungary primarily followed the Latin Rite.

The Roman Catholic Church (Melkite Rite): The dominant faith in Byzantine lands. Church unification was close to a diplomatic miracle and the Hungarian Komnenoi would make every effort to accommodate Latin theology. This was not well received. Church Unity would be repealed in the 1270s under the Doukas Dynasty. However by then Melkite Rite Catholics were established and there are still villages in Greece (and a very weird village in Northern Atlantis) where it is the dominant faith, causing administrative headaches to countless bishops over the years.

Melkite Old Believers: People who rejected the unificaton. Melkite congregations held on through what they still call "the heresy". In Russia, where the unification was never fully accepted or policed it would become the dominant branch of Orthodoxy from the 1270s onwards. The Byzantine branch... not so lucky. Some Old Believers rejoined the Orthodox Church as a formal autonomous grouping, others rejected that. The ecumenical mess caused schisms throughout the 13th and 18th centuries. Russian religious life is still dominated by Melkite Old Believers, but in Greece and Anatolia the isolated Old Believer sects are insular, highly controlling, and weird.

Islam: Re-Christianising Anatolia was a challenge due to its huge area - Manuel managing to get the church to allow for converts to renounce simply Mohammed and not Allah helped but a lot of compromises had to be made along the way. Islam very much survived under the Byzantine Reconquest and in the Crusader states though centuries of occupation. Turkic and Levant Islam is a very specific kind of tradition that ha strong elements taken from Christianity in terms of iconography and culture.

Anatolia

Iconium:
The Capital of the Sultanate of Rum fell to the Byzantines at the start of the Second Crusade in 1146, before the Latins arrived on the scene. Manuel dedicated the victory to his new bride. Iconium accepted Roman taxation relatively readily and the Turks were ejected from the city. Iconium would remain loyally Roman until the 16th century.

The Armenian Principality of Cilicia: Cilicia first paid homage to Manuel Komnenos in 1158 and this was renewed continually throughout Alexios II's reign with little incident. Cilicia would remain a loyal ally of the Byzantines until it became a vassal of the Mongols in 1243.

Ancyra: The Seljuk Turks would hold on to Ancyra till the Third Crusade in 1176, which was another of Manuel's gambles. Leading a huge army through dangerous terrain far from support and resupply was dangerous, but with a truly remarkable outpouring of support from Latin Christendom, it was possible. Ancyra would remain a loyal until its conquest by the Mongols in the 1240s. After this it became the core of the Kingdom of Anatolia.

Amasia: The Danishmends held out until 1180 but the Third Crusade would see them too removed from the board. Their conquest would leave Byzantium in control of the Anatolian Peninsula. Islam held out better there than in the rest of Turkish occupied Anatolia. It was occupied by the Mongols in the 13th century was gradually incorporated into the Kingdom of Anatolia.

Outremer

Principality of Antioch:
Aligned itself with Manuel at the start of the Second Crusade and was a key Byzantine ally and vassal in Outremer. It would last until the Mongol Conquest of 1260 and was then swallowed into Jerusalem.

County of Edessa: The Crusader state was retaken with Byzantine help in 1148 by Manuel and the Second Crusade. As a vassal it was particularly vulnerable to Seljuk raids but in their weakened state it held on till the Mongols invaded and it never be retaken by Christendom.

County of Aleppo: Retaken by Alexios II in 1183, Aleppo was Alexios' big conquest of the Middle East. The state was always fragile, however ironically it passed into the hands of the Jerusalem and would remain within Christendom until the 15th century.

Duchy of Egypt: Another of Manuel's gambles - the conquest of Egypt in 1161 was a combined effort by Byzantium and the Crusader states and formed a major bulwark against Islam. Its conquest was a miracle and required careful maintenance in Alexios' reign. It was retaken by Muslims during the Fourth Crusade against the Mongols.

County of Tripoli: Technically a vassal of Jerusalem. But in the reign of Alexios II that made it practically a vassal of Byzantium. It survived the Mongol Invasion through the combined forces of the Forth Crusade and maintained very nominal independence until it was incorporated into Jerusalem in the 14th century.

Kingdom of Jerusalem: Manuel's ally and, arguably after his recognition as Eastern Emperor, vassal, Jerusalem had its heyday after the Fourth Crusade and would eventually lose its independence to Spain in 1544.

Italy

Sicily:
Manuel retook Sicily from the Normans in 1155 with the help of the Holy Roman Emperor and the Venetians. It was taken by the Spanish in 1492.

Catepanate of Italy: Another of Manuel's risky gambles - the Catepanate was reconstituted as a Byzantine province in 1158 following reconquest from the Normans. With them dealt with it would remain Byzantine until the invasion of the Spanish in 1519.

Papal States: In a remarkable diplomatic coup, Manual managed to get the pope to recognise the authority of Byzantium, provided them with miitary support to conquer southern Italy and restored church unity, and until the 1270s it was buffered by two allied powers - the Western (Holy) Roman Empire in the north and the Eastern (Byzantine) Roman Empire in the south. The alliance with Byzantium ended with church unity

Venice: In 1171 Manuel arrested all Venetians doing business in Byzantium, confiscated their property and drove them into the sea - this ended their alliance but, remarkably, had little impact on his standing with the Latin powers. Under Alexios II Venice became a Hungarian vassal.

Europe

Hungary:
Alexios II maintained a personal union between Byzantium and Hungary - a remarkable feat given its initial unpopularity in both states. Hungary would expand under the Komnenoi, taking in Croatia and Dalmatia and Zader. The Empire he built would outlast, and surpass, Byzantium

Halych and Moldavia: In 1165 Hungary and Halych supported the rebellion of Andronikos Komnenos and his attempt to usurp Manuel. Manuel ended the rebellion and bought Halych into alliance. He also pardoned Andronikos - a decision that is notable for having absolutely no negative consequences whatsoever. Halych expanded into Moldavia.

Serbia: Became a Byzantine vassal in 1150 and remained so until 1244. It was bought into the Byzantine Empire in 1409 and remained so until 1448 when it returned to Hungary's sphere of influence

Vlachia: Vlachia was conquered by Alexios and was reconstituted into the Byzantine Empire, though Hungarian influence remained strong. It was lost to Hungary in 1310. It was held by Byzantium in 1401-1442 then fell back into the Hungarian sphere of influence.

The Imperial Core: Following the fall of its external empire in 1519 Romania held on to Hellas, Dyrrachium, Western Anatolia, Crete, Cyprus, Trebizond and of course, Byzantium. Crete and Cyprus were lost in the Spanish Wars of 1526-1541. 1566 saw the Bulgarian sack of Constantinople - the Queen of Cities, which Manuel had defended from the Latins and the Turks, fell to relatively minor upstart power with cannons. It would be retaken in 1574 but Byzantium would never again be a major power. From 1664 Byzantium was a Russian puppet and in 1712 the city was taken under direct Russian rule with the King of Russia styling himself Emperor of the Eastern Romans.
 

Attachments

  • 6kdhsu.jpg
    6kdhsu.jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
The United European Community has been the greatest power on Earth since its foundation - combining the nations of Western Europe into an economic union designed to prevent another Great World War, restore the pre-1914 prosperity, and stand as a bulwark against communism. Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Austria, Portugal, and Germany all stand unified in trade, with Czechoslovakia and Spain hoping to enter. Initially it was comprised of the first four and a reluctant Germany, who initially saw it as a tool of enforcing Versailles sanctions, but now only fringe parties like the NSDAP and KDP are calling for exit; it brought Germany back out of the cold and the combined might weathered the Great Depression far better than most places.

The main geopolitical rivals include the Turin Pact of fascist nations, the Communist Internationale headed by the USSR, and the American Trade Pact, though even the rivals have to trade with the UEC. The United States and its allies are the only real economic challenge and Washington is eager to begin "the American Century" rather than chafe under European global order. Currently, all four of these powers are trying to woo (or coup) the Republic of China and a rush of books, films, anmd radio dramas talk about war breaking out over the Orient. This is the main foreign policy concern of Western Europe, who believe the 1950s have reached the end of history on Earth and next stop, space.

With the majority of wealth being European and the colonies often a hassle, a lot of the colonies have been granted independence (with conditions) or made Protectorates, Departments, Dominions, Free States, or anything that sounds good and means they have a degree of internal autonomy as long as the metropol makes the big decisions. This lessens the burden on the metropol and 'resolves' the contradiction of liberal democracies still owning people while not reducing Europe's grip. (Others still remain colonies, for various reasons.) Most people in the UEC consider questions of empires and independence to be resolved now.

The various pseudo-independent states and the Europe-directed economic unions do not consider it resolved. The Commonwealth of Africa, Occidentale Afrique, Dominion of India, and United East Indies Protectorates have just shocked the hell out of the world by announcing a joint conference with delegates from a dozen 'native' political organisations. And they're demanding to be considered independent member-states of the UEC - if they're de facto stuck in it, they want the full benefits. And now the cracks are forming because the heads of state can't agree on what to do, any decision will spiral out of control, the UEC is unlikely to stand united and nobody knows what will replace it - and the dominated members of the other great alliances are watching this with interest.

The times, they are a-changing.
 
Back
Top