If I can, I do find timelines where people are SI’d into Louis XVI to be rather weird. I mean, bleeding hell, the readership was outright encouraging the author to immediately put Robespierre to death even though he isn’t even a teenager yet. Hell, the SI himself was already plotting Marat’s death even though, at the time, he was no one important.
I think my problem is that they seem pretty great man-ish in theory. They think that, if we eliminate this specific person, then the movements they represented wouldn’t exist. That’s not good history, and I’d love it if an SI would acknowledge that.