- Location
- Colwyn Bay/Manchester
- Pronouns
- He/him
The two (rather contradictory) main Supreme Court rulings on the amendment in the last century are US v Miller in 1939 ("In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.") and DC v Heller in 2008 ("There seems to us no doubt, on the basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.")
Is there any plausible way another such case could have come up in between? And how might rulings have differed at different times?
Is there any plausible way another such case could have come up in between? And how might rulings have differed at different times?