• Hi Guest!

    The costs of running this forum are covered by Sea Lion Press. If you'd like to help support the company and the forum, visit patreon.com/sealionpress

Lists of Heads of Government and Heads of State

Only thoughts that immediately come to mind is I think the regions are a bit too modern in England. 1920s Yorkshire would definitely not include North Lincolnshire, and this is a period where you've got Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham all sitting on county boundaries and so likely to be split off as separate things. I also can't help but think that if London is being given devolution here as the County of London, it's more likely that we see an administration for the Home Counties (probably including Oxfordshire), a small East Anglia and an enlarged Wessex that includes Hampshire.

They're a bit too modern, aye. There were regional concepts back then, but they were more ad hoc I think. The analogous internal regional organisation for the Tories up here was termed 'Northern Counties' and encompassed most of the north east, plus Boro, plus Cumberland.
 
They're a bit too modern, aye. There were regional concepts back then, but they were more ad hoc I think. The analogous internal regional organisation for the Tories up here was termed 'Northern Counties' and encompassed most of the north east, plus Boro, plus Cumberland.

Cumbria appears to have been one of the more artificial creations of the 1974 era really. Westmoreland was generally seen as linking in with Lancashire, Cumberland as being a definitively separate thing that had more in common with Newcastle. (Well, the really artificial thing came earlier when the Barony of Kendal was joined with the Barony of Westmoreland rather that splitting along the hills).

Which, looking at things, makes me wonder how much the building of the M6 actually transformed that concept by creating a fast, all-weather route between Carlisle and Kendal.
 
Those are all good thoughts. My thinking on the divisions is that Manchester and Birmingham would be the administrative centres of North-West England and Mercia, respectively, which would solve the problems them sitting uncomfortably in the pre-1890 counties.

Take your point about the southern divisions too. One of the advantages of using 'Wessex' as a name is that it can encompass more or less whatever you like. I did think about a 'Home Counties' region surrounding London but thought that looked a little silly when I sketched it on a map. The other thought I had was this 'Greater London' just including all of historic Middlesex, Surrey, Essex and Kent, as a way of making it more competitive for the Unionists but maybe that's a bit silly.
 
Behind every fascism there is a failed revolution.

2009 - 2017: Barack H. Obama / Joseph ‘Joe’ R. Biden Jr. (Democrat)

2008: John S. McCain III / Sarah L. Palin (Republican)
2012: W. Mitt Romney / Paul D. Ryan (Republican)

2017 - 2021: Donald J. Trump / Michael ‘Mike’ R. Pence (Republican)
2016: Hillary D. Rodham Clinton / Timothy ‘Tim’ M. Kaine (Democrat)


2021 - 2025: Joseph ‘Joe’ R. Biden Jr. / Kamala D. Harris (Democrat)
2020: Donald J. Trump / Michael ‘Mike’ R. Pence (Republican)

2025 - 2033: Tucker S. M. Carlson / Joshua ‘Josh’ D. Hawley (Republican)
2024: Kamala D. Harris / Pete Buttigieg (Democrat)

2028: Anthony ‘Tony’ J. Blinken / Ayanna S. Pressley (Democrat), Mark Ruffalo / Lee J. Carter (Independent)

2033 - 20##: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez / Chokwe Antar Lumumba (Democrat)
2032: Joshua ‘Josh’ D. Hawley / Matthew ‘Matt’ T. Shea (Republican)

Made some very minor adjustments to this list. Namely: Harris as nominee in 2024 instead of Biden and Blinken as the nominee in 2028.
 
Last edited:
When Fascism Comes To America It'll Be Dressed In A Blah Blah

1943-1945: Henry A. Wallace (Democratic)
1945-1948: Douglas MacArthur (Republican)
1944 (with Earl Warren) def. Henry A. Wallace (Democratic), Harold Stassen [replacing Wendell Willkie] (Independent / Liberal)

The assassination of the so-called 'Big Three' in Otto Skorzeny's daring raid on the Tehran Conference threw the Allied war effort into temporary disarray. If the Nazis hoped this would deliver them from dreaded encirclement in Europe, they were to be sorely disappointed. In the old Big Three's place emerged a new triptych of Wallace, Eden and Zhukov. But even as Allied forces opened the promised second front in Europe, questions were being raised about the President's competence for the role. His letters to his spiritual guru Roerich emerged, casting Wallace in a faintly ridiculous messianic light. Along with that was Wallace's increasingly obvious tendency to defer to the Soviets in the war effort. This was at least in part due to Acting General Secretary Zhukov's obviously greater military experience, but for many Americans, this was more than a bit suspicious. America needed a level-headed figure in the White House - one able to look Zhukov in the eye and say no.

And so Douglas MacArthur swept into the White House, thanks in part to a 'Liberal' centrist campaign spear-headed at first by Wendell Willkie that railed against Wallace's 'socialism' and after Willkie's passing essentially acted to garnish MacArthur's campaign with liberal window-dressing. It was under MacArthur that the war in Europe ended, but very much in a manner not to his liking. The shape of post-Nazi Europe had already been cast, and it was one that placed far too much of the continent under Soviet influence.

Plans initially drawn up before Tehran were dusted off and examined - and MacArthur had an eager listener in Anthony Eden. The Labour Party was threatening to leave his War Government before the war was ended with Japan, and it seemed likely that he would go down to defeat. A mixture of paranoia and self-preservation led Eden to commit to the Unthinkable.

An initial threat to destroy 20 Soviet cities was ignored - 9 saw the sun rise twice in one day. Despite the catastrophic death toll, the bluff failed. The Western Allies could not make good on their threats. While a new war ground on in Europe, the utility of the atomic superweapon was called into question as it similarly failed to break the resolve of the Japanese. By 1947, MacArthur was widely castigated, having the blood of millions on his hands. The US military machine was overstretched occupying swathes of Indonesia and propping up the Nationalist Regime in China, while Britain's National Government creaked from a second split in the Labour Party over this new phase of the war. It was in this environment that impeachment was mooted.

The composition of Congress had changed quite dramatically since 1944 however - a swathe of right-leaning Republicans had entered Congress in the 1946 midterms, joining many who had ridden in on MacArthur's coat-tails. Together with conservative Democrats, a majority existed to keep the President in office. Nevertheless, the debate was long and humiliated and cut through party lines. Vice President Warren resigned in disgust.

By 1948, Britain's government had finally collapsed and the new Prime Minister Aneurin Bevan was negotiating an armistice with the Soviets. MacArthur considered a coup, but it was clear at this point that the war in Europe was lost - however the cause of Anti-Bolshevism was still alive and kicking in East Asia. But there was every possibility that he would not be renominated - former VP Warren was taking the Republican primaries by storm and party grandees were disquieted by what had happened over the last four years.

1948-1949: Douglas MacArthur (Constitutional Coalition)

Earl Warren repeated his gubernatorial success, winning the nominations of both major parties, and campaigned on a United Front to end the madness and restore sanity. Meanwhile, MacArthur staged a walkout and welded together his conservative coalition behind his re-election campaign. The campaign was long and bloody, one of the most bitter and confrontational in national history. But despite an initial lead, Warren's campaign began to flag as good news emerged from the East - the end of the war in Europe had allowed the US to push ahead on previously stagnant fronts, and the Bomb was finally a force to be reckoned with.

The result was close - too close. Both sides declared victory and much bitter debate over vote totals and between governors, state legislators etc. ensued. In the end, two electoral colleges met, both filled with holes, and both confirmed a victor.

1949: Douglas MacArthur (Constitutional Coalition) vs Earl Warren (United Front)

It wasn't quite a civil war, it wasn't quite an election. For a moment, it looked like the nation would split in two and go their own ways - but ultimately only one man was the Commander-in-Chief and had had four years to shape the military as he saw fit. While the troops themselves may have had their misgivings, there now existed a military high command that firmly believed it was in the midst of a crusade upon Communism.

Ironically the needed shift in manpower to secure America for MacArthur saw the virtual abandonment of mainland Asia. The newly installed anti-communist regimes in Indonesia and Japan became coastal fortresses, while the United States withdrew to her own continents and internal matters.

1949-0000: Douglas MacArthur (Constitutional Coalition)
1952 (with Joseph P. Kennedy Jr.) def. Estes Kefauver (Progressive), Robert A. Taft (Liberty)

The United States enters a new decade, and while on the surface elections still take place as normal, take a look at the candidates on display. The so-called progressive is a naked racebaiter, those who call for liberty uncritically examine the government's corporatist economic policy. The Constitutional Coalition holds, and an heir is groomed for the throne. An archipelago of internment camps emerges, for those the government calls subversives. This is a seemingly ever-widening category.
 
Last edited:
Booth Over The Bomb!

1955-1959: Anthony Eden (Conservative)
1955 (Majority) def: Clement Attlee (Labour), Jo Grimond (Liberals)
1959-1963: Hugh Gaitskell (Labour)
1959 (Majority) def: Anthony Eden (Conservative), Jo Grimond (Liberals)
1963-1967: George Brown (Labour)
1963 (Majority) def: Quintin Hogg (Conservative), Anthony Greenwood (Democratic Labour)
1967-1972: Reginald Maudling (Conservative)
1967 (Majority) def: George Brown (Labour), Eric Lubbock (Liberals), Anthony Greenwood (Democratic Labour)
1972-1976: James Callaghan (Labour)
1972 (Coalition with Liberals) def: Reginald Maudling (Conservative), Jeremy Thorpe (Liberal), Michael Foot-John Peck (Democratic Front)
1976-1981: Maurice Macmillan (Conservative)
1976 (Majority) def: James Callaghan (Labour), Jeremy Thorpe (Liberal), Barbara Castle-Dave Cook (Democratic Front), Gordon Wilson (SNP)
1981-1983: William Whitelaw (Conservative)
1983-: Albert Booth (Democratic Front)
1983 (Coalition with Liberals) def: William Whitelaw (Conservative), David Owen (Labour), Peter Hain (Liberal), Tony Benn-Vince Cable (Radicals), Alex Salmond (The Group)

Chapter 3-I'm With Peck...The Beginnings of the Democratic Front

"It's hard to analyse what would have happened if John Peck hadn't won the Nottingham North By-Election of 1968. The Democratic Labour organisation whilst stable, hadn't made much in gains and there was a feeling they would end up like the ILP by the late 1970s. Then unexpectedly William Whitlock, popular Labour MP stepped down after George Brown stated he wouldn't support the emerging nation of Anguilla as it seceded from the Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis. This would later turn out to be the latest in Brown bullying and belittling Whitlock who was seen as a 'Closeted Bevanite' by much of the Front Bench. Whitlock would get his own back and would conspire with his local CLP to work with Democratic Labour purely out of a mixture of spite against Brown and the rest of the Front Bench and sense that the Gaitskellites were destroying the Labour Party he'd joined. Democratic Labour chose John Peck, a former member of the CPGB who disaffiliated with a number of other CPGB activists as part of the great Communist split which was considered a prelude to the 'Red 68' as it were...

Peck's unexpected victory and the subsequent attention for Democratic Labour lead to the raise in membership as numerous student activists inspired by the May 68' activists saw Democratic Labour as there major port of call. That same year it was decided that due to the raise of various disparate voices ranging from EuroCommunists to former Bevanites to Anarcho-Syndicalists to change the name of the organisation to Democratic Front. Little did they know, that there were beginning the slow death of the Butlerskillite Conesus..."

Booth Over The Bomb-The Destruction of the Post War Conesus, By Robert Harris, 1990
 
@Japhy I noticed recently that Al Smith was nominated for New York Governor by the Democrats every two years from 1918 up to FDR's nomination in 1928. What are some alternate Governors of New York that the Dems could have nominated? Did Smith just totally control Tammany? Where there other figures who could have risen up as the Tammany man?

Specifically, I was thinking about a scenario where TR is the nominee in 1920 and breaks the Solid South, Davis loses in 1924, so the South is now competitive but the rise of the urban machines and populations in cities means a New York Governor can still take control of the party. But I imagine to win the general election, said Gov would have to be a Protestant so hence why I'm thinking about alternatives to Al Smith.
 
@Japhy I noticed recently that Al Smith was nominated for New York Governor by the Democrats every two years from 1918 up to FDR's nomination in 1928. What are some alternate Governors of New York that the Dems could have nominated? Did Smith just totally control Tammany? Where there other figures who could have risen up as the Tammany man?

Specifically, I was thinking about a scenario where TR is the nominee in 1920 and breaks the Solid South, Davis loses in 1924, so the South is now competitive but the rise of the urban machines and populations in cities means a New York Governor can still take control of the party. But I imagine to win the general election, said Gov would have to be a Protestant so hence why I'm thinking about alternatives to Al Smith.
Smith didn't Control Tammany but he was one of their big whigs. You want a Protestant Governor there are plenty of Rich guys around. Look into Old Dutch Families, Wall Street and maybe some upstate Mayors (Doubt you want Schenectady's though he was a Socialist/Democrat). If you want a different face he is Tammany but there's also Robert Wagner.

That said I don't think that timeline makes any sense.
 
Smith didn't Control Tammany but he was one of their big whigs. You want a Protestant Governor there are plenty of Rich guys around. Look into Old Dutch Families, Wall Street and maybe some upstate Mayors (Doubt you want Schenectady's though he was a Socialist/Democrat). If you want a different face he is Tammany but there's also Robert Wagner.

That said I don't think that timeline makes any sense.
[Stares in William Hackett]
 
If I Had A Hammer: Presidents of the U.S.A:

1933-1944: Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Democratic)
1932 (With John Nance Garner) def: Herbert Hoover (Republican)
1936 (With John Nance Garner) def: Alf Landon (Republican)
1940 (With Henry A. Wallace) def: Wendall Wilkie (Republican)

1944-1945: Henry A. Wallace (Democratic)
1945-1953: Thomas E. Dewey (Republican)
1944 (With John W. Bricker) def: Henry A. Wallace (Democratic)
1948 (With John W.Bricker) def: James F. Byrnes (Democratic), Henry A. Wallace (Progressive-Labor)

1953-1961: Estes Kefauver (Democratic)
1952 (With W. Averell Harriman) def: John W.Bricker (Republican), Joseph McCarthy (Anti-Communist)
1956 (With Hubert Humphrey) def: Harold Stassen (Republican)

1961-: Hubert Humphrey (Democratic)
1960 (With Lyndon B. Johnson) def: Nelson Rockefeller (Republican), Strom Thurmond (Dixiecrat)

Chapter 18: 'Humphrey Clinches It':
"There was a general assumption that Hubert Humphrey would fail, he was a openly Anti-Segregationist which after Eight Years of Kefauver dragging his feet was seen as radical to many and his surprisingly good relationship with Progressives like Governor Voorhis of California which lead to accusations of Humphrey being a Communist by some of the more rabid of the Right (posters of Humphrey and Premier Bulganin would become popular). It was going to be a wash for Rockefeller many folks assumed especially after Strom Thurmond created his Dixiecrat Party to punish Humphrey for his Anti-Segregationist stance. What they weren't expecting was the utter incompetence of the Rockefeller campaign, whilst the Democrats managed to present a semi-united front the Republicans were still experiencing the chaotic after effects of the Dewey years, ranging from Californian Senator Richard Nixon constantly presenting Rockefeller's Campaign being filled with Communists and 'Subversives' and generally uniting with the Right of the Republican Party (with some fears that Nixon would run an 'Anti-Communist' Campaign like Joseph McCarthy).

Whilst this would be avoided, the failure of the Republican's behind Rockefeller would dramatically impact the effectiveness of there campaign...Despite winning Humphrey wouldn't be out of the woods just yet, because as he made his victory speech, forces beyond his control were in motion in Atlanta which would end up defining Humphrey's Presidency for years to come..."
-If I Had A Hammer-The Raise and Fall of New Deal America (1933-1968), Mark Kurlansky
 
A Brief History of Politicosplay in the UK
By the Politicosplayer's Federation UK

2001: Kenneth Clarke (Conservative)
2005: Conservative Leadership election following Labour's third election victory. "Boris wigs" become popular as a way to show support for Boris Johnson at his events
2005: Boris Johnson (Conservative)
2005: Boris Johnson wigs are seen at the Conservative Party conference for the first time. While women usually wear the wig as a joke some men take the Boris look further, with a full costume.
2006: Nigel Farage (UKIP)
2006: A Conservative Future fundraiser event at conference includes a prize for best Boris, with a men's and women's category - this is the first recorded costume party as part of a political Conference
2007: Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat)
2007: The Lib Denm Conference of this year is controversial in politicosplay history - many see is as the start of politicosplay in its modern form - the costume party had Lembit Opek on the judging panel - the first MP to do so, multiple costumes are worn, they are worn around conference, and politicosplay had a social media presence. On the other hand, the term was not used, and costumes did not have to be explicitly political - in fact the contest winner came as Doctor Who.
2008: Caroline Lucas (Green)

2008-2010: David Miliband (Labour) [Prime Minister]

2008: The Politicosplayers Forum (PF) is established, creating the first place where people from multiple parties can talk about costuming and politics. This still runs today. David Miliband outmanuevered Brown to become Labour leader and politicosplay arrived at the Labour conference, largely as a way to express dissent or approval of the changes.

2009: Complaints are made against Lembit Opik following his behaviour towards a female politicosplayer at the Lib Dem Conference - The politicosplay community proves it can act cohesively and in a crossparty manner against groping and sexual assault.

2010-2014: Boris Johnson (Conservative) [Prime Minister]

2010: Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
2010: The election of Boris, and Corbyns' surprise victory in the Labour leadership election, sees an explosion of interest in politicosplay in all conferences, largely for satire.

2011: Occupy The Labour Party holds its first demonstration outside of Labour's headquarters, in support of Corbyn. Politicosplay plays an increasing role in proceedings. First Great Schism as the Gang of 400 leave the Politicosplayer's forum to create the Worker's Republic of Politicosplay (WRP)
2012: Andrew Cooper (Green)
2012: The Labour Politicosplayer's Union is founded - the first party association dedicated to politicosplay. While it is a small group, it punches above its weight as one of the few leftist dominated party groups and because journalists and reporters have started to pay close attention to politicosplayers and give them a platform.
2013: Chuka Umunna (Labour)
2013: Corbyn being forced out from the Labour Party leadership caused splits in the Politicosplay community, with PF largely coming to be seen as pro-Umunna, while WRP was deeply not. A Second Great Schism occurred, with many posters in both WRP and PF being banned for their views on Corbyn, and perceived racism against Umunna and Diane Abbot. Scottish Independence was increasingly a fraught issue in both communities. By the end of the year, PolitiCosPlay World (PW) was founded as the first major politicosplay forum to be run from the US.
2014 Scotland Ref: Yes: 50.9% No: 49.1%
2014: Scottish Independence continued to split opinions on the various forums, and for the first time they were seen to decline in importance compared to more modern social media networks. Guido Fawkes' harrassment of a SNP activists (particularly those under 16) lead to his arrest and prosecution. Guido would later be cleared of all wrongdoing in 2018 and is still quite a popular blogger in alt-right circles.

2014-2018: Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative) [Prime Minister]
2014: Following Boris Johnson's resignation the premiership fell to an equally colourful character, who was a regular feature in politicosplay. In fact many have ascribed his success politically to politicosplay popularising his visual brand.
2015: Andy Burnham (Labour), Jo Swinson (Liberal Democrat)
2015 EU Ref: Leave: 54.6% Remain: 45.4%
2015: The year politicosplay hit the mainstream with politicosplayers very visible in the EU referendum, both in the largely Tory led Leave campaign and in the nasceant movement that has become FBPE. Politicosplay regularly made the news and prominent politicosplayers started to be seen as celebrities in their own right. The Young Greens became the first youth arty to explicitly have a politicosplayers rep in their governance group.
2016: Caroline Lucas (Green)
2016: Nicola Sturgeon (SNP)
2016: Following the defeat of the SNP in the Scottish Parliament elections negotiating Scexit fell to Unionists. FBPE clashed with Leavers, Cybernats clashed with FBPU (Follow back Pro-Union) and it was a mess. In London a prominent politicosplayer collective was arrested for wearing a political uniform. This case was later turned out of court, a result that some legal theorists believe has influenced the rise of political uniforms in 2020.
2017 Scotland Ref: Remain: 50.2% Leave: 49.8%
2017: Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh (SNP)
2017: Scotland opting to stay in the UK led to a resurgence in power for the SNP and a renewed interest in nationalist politicosplay, the trend of kilts and tartans took off, which has been influential in modern grunge and the rise in kilts in the the US. The Politicosplayers Official was reistered, and while it is not much used in Britain spurred the development of Pride and campaigns tartans and is still very popular in the US politicosplay community.

The year was also notable for the #MeToo movement - the death of a prominent politicosplayer at the Conservative Party Conference led to a renewed interest in politicosplayers working together. The Politicosplayers Federation was founded and has since played a key role in the cosplay is not consent movement. Many even believe that it had a big part to play in the arrest of Alex Salmond.

2018-Present: David Cameron (Conservative) [Prime Minister]
2018: Rees-Mogg promised the Scottish a lot in terms of Brexit to stop Scexit and when the time came to renege on those promises he lacked the political support to do so. After being forced to delay Brexit he was no confidenced and replaced by a more moderate figure and Britain has been left with David Cameron, the remainer who ended up as the architect of Brexit.
2019: Jack Buckby (UKIP)
2019: The Cameron government's Gender Recognition Act Referendum led to a split within the Politicosplay community, with the older communities such as Politicosplayer's world largely favouring women, while the WRP and Politicosplayer's world favoured transpeople.

The Politicosplayer's Federation has attempted to listen to both points of view and recognise both that transwomen are women and non-binary people are valid, and that biological women's rights and single-sex spaces according to the Equality Act must be maintained.

Extinction Rebellion employed politicosplay to a massive extent this year, although many argue that the extreme commonness of some outfits (for instance their trademark green shirts) actually classify as a political uniform.
2020: Laura Pidcock (Labour)
2020: COVID-19 and lockdown have impacted the politicosplayer's community greatly, and have led to a decrease in activity in the community. However politicosplayers have continued to play an active role in the key debates of this year and have been prominent on both sides of the discussion on issues like #BlackLivesMatter, The Lockdown and trans rights. On all sides, this has blurred into political uniforms, which are such a common feature of modern protests.

While the Politicosplayer's Federation does not condone violence or political uniforms we have worked closely with all groups to encourage the use of proper PPE and many feel that the need to comply with complex government regulations in this regard is the real reason costumes have become more commonplace this year.

The US election has seen the first politicosplayers make the leap into elected politics on a national level, and this is likely to be repeated in 2021 when the delayed UK elections take place.

Some commentators talk about the politicosplay community being more diffused, as forums give way to Twitter, Facebook, Tiktok, Parler and Spinster. A small minority even talk about there being another schism within the community. However, the Politicosplayer's Federation remains as strong as ever and has built up links within all parties. In fact, in November Labour officially recognised us as the single representative body for politicosplay. The Conservatives and the SNP are working on similar arrangements.

While this has been a fraught and unprecedented year for us all, the Politicosplayer's Federation is going into 2021 strong, united, and ready to campaign in a reasonable and balanced manner for the rights of Women, Men, transpeople, the B.A.M.E Community, and anyone else who enjoys celebrating their politics through cosplay

By Karen O'Brien, External Communications Officer for the Politicosplayer's Federation [Last edited 13/11/2020, 3:45 am]
I like this a lot, a lot a lot. However I initially read it as being about “Politico Splayers”, and whilst I have no idea what that could mean, it sounds terrifying.
 
A Quick Memey and Very Cursed List I Did on Discord off the idea of "Republicans nominate Trumps. All the time."

2024: Joe Biden (Democratic)

defeats Donald Trump (Republican)

2028: Kamala Harris (Democratic)
defeats Donald Trump Jr. (Republican)

2032: Ivanka Trump (Republican)

defeats Kamala Harris (Democratic) and Lee J. Carter (Socialist)

2036: Ivanka Trump (Republican)
defeats Abby Finkenauer (Democratic)

2040: Jahana Hayes (Democratic)
defeats Donald Trump Jr. (Republican)

2044: Eric Trump (Republican)
defeats Jahana Hayes (Democratic)

2048: Eric Trump (Republican)
defeats Brian Schatz (Democratic)

2052: Donald Trump Jr. ("Trumpist" Republican)
defeats Evan Low (Democratic), Mark Zuckerberg (Cyber) and Blaire White (Republican)

2056: Tiffany Trump (Republican)
defeats Barron Trump (Cyber, cross-endorsed by Democratic)

2060: Tiffany Trump (Republican)
defeats Labiba Chowdhury (Democratic-Cyber)

2064: Barron Trump (Democratic-Republican-Cyber "National Fusion")
unopposed
 
Back
Top