This is really excellent stuff. I have to admit, I saw the headline and thought this was going to be a discussion of more traditional war journalism- Keith Murdoch, for example, whose coverage of the Gallipoli debacle was arguably the most consequential reporting of the war- but the piece I got was far more interesting.
One thing I really want to salute you for is your commitment in this series to keeping things grounded in the human reality. It's all too easy for alternate history of wars to get caught up in geopolitics, engineering and high-level maneuvering, but you always bring it down to the poor men dying in the mud. Well done.