Also I'm expecting if the US got to the Congo first, it might be a US where there's still a thought of "wouldn't black Americans be happier back in their real home?" so you'd get a whole extra nasty thing
Well, if Liberia is any evidence, the Anglo-Africans end up trying to lord it over the uncivilized savages.Also I'm expecting if the US got to the Congo first, it might be a US where there's still a thought of "wouldn't black Americans be happier back in their real home?" so you'd get a whole extra nasty thing
Dear God, the mortality rates in Liberia were bad enough as it was. Of the American migrants to Liberia between 1820-1843, around 60% of them were dead by 1843. Mortality rates were even worse for children.Also I'm expecting if the US got to the Congo first, it might be a US where there's still a thought of "wouldn't black Americans be happier back in their real home?" so you'd get a whole extra nasty thing
I'm surprised you didn't mention the Nazi connection to the Herero and Nama Genocide.
One of the little things about the way African history is recorded I resent is the way it has to justify its own importance by emphasising how events in Africa affected other continents. So the Herero genocide is important because of the way it foreshadowed the shoah and not because of how it changed Namibia.
I'm trying not to fall into that trap myself. I'd rather look at the effects of the genocide on the Herero than the effects on the Germans.